<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Progressive Rock Music Forum : Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot;</title>
  <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; Progressive Rock Music Forum : Top 10s and lists : Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot;</description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:36:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.69</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.progarchives.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=88597</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by HorizonsAs...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4593789#4593789</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=27888" rel="nofollow">iluvmarillion</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 09 2012 at 19:36<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Horizons</strong></em><br /><br />As an avid Rush fan, i'm surprised at 2112 at #2, but that song and album are(were) honestly massive, even if the prog qualities lack in some places.<div><br></div><div>I would of enjoyed A Farewell To Kings to take it's place.</div></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>But that's the whole problem with the Rolling Stone's list. Nothing wrong with any of these albums but they don't represent the best Prog-Rock albums of all time by anyone's opinion on this site (go to the top 100 albums on the PA Archives list of top albums for that).</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4593789#4593789</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :    Originally posted by HarbouringTheSoul  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590990#4590990</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=34831" rel="nofollow">Dayvenkirq</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 06 2012 at 01:05<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by HarbouringTheSoul</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by TheLionOfPrague</strong></em><br /><br />Does anybody have the "Best prog bands" poll they mention in the article?</td></tr></table><br>http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/readers-poll-the-best-prog-rock-bands-of-all-time-20110720<br></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>OK, I HAVE to say: Yes at #6 and KC at #5? Wow. ... WOW!!!. What's the exact opposite of laughter? Is it crying or the willing to break the neck of a dead pig?</div><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Dayvenkirq - August 06 2012 at 01:06</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 01:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590990#4590990</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : As an avid Rush fan, i&amp;#039;m...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590862#4590862</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=32791" rel="nofollow">Horizons</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 21:32<br /><br />As an avid Rush fan, i'm surprised at 2112 at #2, but that song and album are(were) honestly massive, even if the prog qualities lack in some places.<div><br></div><div>I would of enjoyed A Farewell To Kings to take it's place.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590862#4590862</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :  Personally, i would have preferred...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590857#4590857</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=7680" rel="nofollow">Logan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 21:23<br /><br />Personally, i would have preferred a list something more like:<br><br><br>Amon Duul II - Tanz der Lemminge<br>Area - Caution Radiation Area<br>Art Zoyd - Generation sans Futur<br>Can - Tago Mago<br>Clivage - Mixtus Orbis<br>Comus - First Utterance<br>Davis, Miles - Get Up With It<br>Hancock, Herbie - Crossings<br>Magma - Kobaia<br>Univers Zero -&nbsp; 1313<br>Wakhevitch, Igor - Docteur Faust<br><br>But that's just me (oops, went over ten)<br><br><br><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Logan - August 05 2012 at 21:25</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590857#4590857</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : Amuch better list than the album...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590851#4590851</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=11374" rel="nofollow">Wanorak</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 21:11<br /><br />Amuch better list than the album list, but Rush as number 1??  I don't think so.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590851#4590851</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : Dream Theater was basically just...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590763#4590763</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=15380" rel="nofollow">Tapfret</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 17:38<br /><br />Dream Theater was basically just a gateway band for me. I tolerated some really drippy sweet yuck on their albums for a few nice tidbits. Now that I have heard so many other bands that do what they do so much more interestingly, I scarcely put any of their albums on.<br><br>As far as the Rolling Stone list goes, fairly close to what my list would have been 20 years ago.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 17:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590763#4590763</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :  Originally posted by Guldbamsen Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590761#4590761</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=32791" rel="nofollow">Horizons</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 17:37<br /><br /><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Guldbamsen</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Horizons</strong></em><br /><br />&nbsp;</div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Guldbamsen</strong></em><br /><br />^ You obviously haven't heard ABBA <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gif" border="0" align="middle" /></td></tr></table><br><div></div><div>I'm afraid i have.&nbsp;<img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gif" border="0" alt="T&#111;ngue" title="T&#111;ngue" /></div></td></tr></table> <br><br><br><br>So the rumors that Rush fans are prone to ABBA worship are indeed false?</td></tr></table><div><br></div><div><img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" border="0" alt="LOL" title="LOL" /><br></div><div><br></div><div>It appears so sadly.&nbsp;</div><div>I don't think i'll ever join the Dancing Side.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 17:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590761#4590761</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :  Originally posted by Horizons  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590747#4590747</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=22735" rel="nofollow">Guldbamsen</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 17:19<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Horizons</strong></em><br /><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Guldbamsen</strong></em><br /><br />^ You obviously haven't heard ABBA <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gif" border="0" align="middle" /></td></tr></table><br /><div></div><div>I'm afraid i have. <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gif" border="0" alt="T&#111;ngue" title="T&#111;ngue" /></div></td></tr></table> <br /><br /><br /><br />So the rumors that Rush fans are prone to ABBA worship are indeed false?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 17:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590747#4590747</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by Guldbamsen^...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590743#4590743</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=32791" rel="nofollow">Horizons</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 17:16<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Guldbamsen</strong></em><br /><br />^ You obviously haven't heard ABBA <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gif" border="0" align="middle" /></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>I'm afraid i have.&nbsp;<img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gif" border="0" alt="T&#111;ngue" title="T&#111;ngue" /></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 17:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590743#4590743</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : ^ You obviously haven&amp;#039;t heard...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590739#4590739</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=22735" rel="nofollow">Guldbamsen</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 17:12<br /><br />^ You obviously haven't heard ABBA <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gif" border="0" align="middle" /> ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 17:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590739#4590739</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : Because they are the best, most...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590736#4590736</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=32791" rel="nofollow">Horizons</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 17:08<br /><br />Because they are the best, most consistent band ever.<div><br></div><div>Not biased at all.&nbsp;<img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley9.gif" border="0" alt="Embarrassed" title="Embarrassed" /></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 17:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590736#4590736</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by TheLionOfPragueDoes...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590734#4590734</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=29175" rel="nofollow">HarbouringTheSoul</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 17:05<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by TheLionOfPrague</strong></em><br /><br />Does anybody have the "Best prog bands" poll they mention in the article?</td></tr></table><br>http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/readers-poll-the-best-prog-rock-bands-of-all-time-20110720<br><br>The inevitable question is: Why are there so many Rush fans?<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 17:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590734#4590734</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : Does anybody have the &amp;#034;Best...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590680#4590680</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=33570" rel="nofollow">TheLionOfPrague</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 15:14<br /><br />Does anybody have the "Best prog bands" poll they mention in the article?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 15:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590680#4590680</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by IMPF  Those...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590646#4590646</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=37972" rel="nofollow">Ytse_Jam</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 14:38<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by IMPF</strong></em><br /><br />Those are all harmless, predictable and inoffensive choices all of them. I don't see why anyone would be too&nbsp;disappointed&nbsp;with this list. I mean it's Rolling Stone magazine for f**k's sake, what were you expecting them to put? Some obscure Brazilian neo-prog group that has like only 3 ratings overall on this site?<br></td></tr></table><div>Agreed, but no TAAB in a prog chart is a shame!</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 14:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590646#4590646</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : I dont agree with the list at...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590426#4590426</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=41824" rel="nofollow">appudds</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 05 2012 at 08:44<br /><br />I dont agree with the list at all. Lot of great albums missed out.<br><div>My list would have been</div><div>10)Transatlantic- The Whirlwind</div><div>9)Pink Floyd- Dark Side of The Moon</div><div>8)ELP- Brain Salad Surgery</div><div>7)Mahavishnu Orchestra- Birds of Fire</div><div>6)King Crimson- In The Court of The Crimson King</div><div>5)Rush- Hemispheres</div><div>4)Metropolis 2: Scenes from a Memory-Dream Theater</div><div>3)Genesis-Foxtrot</div><div>2)Jethro Tull-Thick As A Brick</div><div>1)Yes- Close to the edge</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 08:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590426#4590426</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :     Originally posted by dtguitarfan  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590258#4590258</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10080" rel="nofollow">rogerthat</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 04 2012 at 23:16<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by dtguitarfan</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by The T</strong></em><br /><br />I like DT a lot (I used to be a fanboy even) but intellectual? Really? Muscular, sometimes I would rather say.&nbsp;</td></tr></table><br>I think they do more than just flex muscles.&nbsp; Dragonforce and Yngwie Malmsteen are artists that I would give as examples of muscle flexers.&nbsp; Dream Theater does flex their muscles, indeed, but they do it in an intellectual way - they throw in complicated time signatures, sometimes different members of the band are playing in different time signatures than the other members, they use unusual chord progressions, difficult techniques, and they even invent new instruments.<br></td></tr></table><br><br>What you mean is that DT are more sophisticated than Dragonforce and Malmsteen but muscle is still the standout quality in their quality.&nbsp; Very fast and breathless passages over odd time is muscular, right?&nbsp;&nbsp; I don't think muscular necessarily means "all brawn and no brain" and it is certainly very rarely the case in actually physical sports or martial arts.&nbsp; <br><br>I call that music intellectual which is organised mainly to explore new musical concepts.&nbsp;&nbsp; That way, I could not call much rock related music intellectual - and there's no reason why music HAS to be intellectual, so I don't see that as a negative quality - and DT is no exception.&nbsp; DT is at the technical, complex end of the spectrum in rock music, just like many other prog rock bands and artists.&nbsp;&nbsp; DT compositions are written around and in order to express specific lyrical themes and hand-in-hand build in passages to showcase the technical prowess of their musicians.&nbsp;&nbsp; You may or may not agree with such a categorization of intellectual music but it's also the way Greig has framed it and Theo seems to have as well, so we are all just stating the general perception of the word intellectual w.r.t music.&nbsp; <br><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by rogerthat - August 04 2012 at 23:22</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 23:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590258#4590258</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Those are all harmless, predictable...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590249#4590249</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=39123" rel="nofollow">IMPF</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 04 2012 at 22:47<br /><br />Those are all harmless, predictable and inoffensive choices all of them. I don't see why anyone would be too&nbsp;disappointed&nbsp;with this list. I mean it's Rolling Stone magazine for f**k's sake, what were you expecting them to put? Some obscure Brazilian neo-prog group that has like only 3 ratings overall on this site?<div><br></div><div>Besides, three Rush albums in the top 10 are perfectly fine with me in my opinion. Perfectly fine indeed.&nbsp;<img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley4.gif" border="0" alt="Big smile" title="Big smile" /></div><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by IMPF - August 04 2012 at 22:48</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 22:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590249#4590249</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : ^I still wouldn&amp;#039;t qualify...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590247#4590247</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10657" rel="nofollow">The T</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 04 2012 at 22:42<br /><br />^I still wouldn't qualify them as intellectual. Those you mention are of course pure muscle. Maybe DT lies somewhere in between. But what makes DT music what you call complex is technical skills, and those technical skills are in large part associated with dexterity and ability with your hands/fingers/feet/etc, obviously controlled by your brain. So I would still say that, more than intellectual, way more, they are muscular, though not shallow.&nbsp;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 22:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4590247#4590247</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by The TI...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589762#4589762</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=35257" rel="nofollow">dtguitarfan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 04 2012 at 08:00<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by The T</strong></em><br /><br />I like DT a lot (I used to be a fanboy even) but intellectual? Really? Muscular, sometimes I would rather say.&nbsp;</td></tr></table><br>I think they do more than just flex muscles.&nbsp; Dragonforce and Yngwie Malmsteen are artists that I would give as examples of muscle flexers.&nbsp; Dream Theater does flex their muscles, indeed, but they do it in an intellectual way - they throw in complicated time signatures, sometimes different members of the band are playing in different time signatures than the other members, they use unusual chord progressions, difficult techniques, and they even invent new instruments.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 08:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589762#4589762</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : ^^^ Aw, come on, we&amp;#039;ve gone...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589709#4589709</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10080" rel="nofollow">rogerthat</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 04 2012 at 04:25<br /><br />^^^ Aw, come on, we've gone round and round about this by now!<img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" border="0" alt="LOL" title="LOL" /><br><br>I agree that a top 10 simply cannot accommodate everyone's likes even if it is just restricted to one album per band.&nbsp; I am just saying the logic they offered to not include all DT albums that got voted into the top 10 sequentially sounds contradictory when they included multiple albums of other bands.&nbsp; But maybe we should just trust RS to mess up one way or the other.&nbsp; The readers did their job by voting in a good, if popular, selection of prog but RS decided to leave the mark of zorro over it. <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" border="0" alt="LOL" title="LOL" /><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 04:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589709#4589709</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   OK, how about this: if we...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589679#4589679</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=34831" rel="nofollow">Dayvenkirq</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 04 2012 at 02:58<br /><br /><div>OK, how about this: if we had to come up with a list of our own (or if you had to come up with a list of your own) using the one-per-band concept, then what bands would be on it and with what albums?</div><div><br></div><div>I got Yes, KC, PF, Rush, Genesis (the leading ones), ELP, JT, Camel, Caravan, Soft Machine, Magma, Dream Theater, ... s%^t, that's more than ten. Help me out here, guys. And keep in mind that it may be pretty difficult to pick between "The Lamb", "Foxtrot", and "Selling".</div><div><br></div><div><b>I guess what I'm trying to say is </b>that the list will blow in any case as long as it is top ten, not 15 or whatever.</div><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Dayvenkirq - August 04 2012 at 02:59</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 02:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589679#4589679</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by DayvenkirqNo,...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589654#4589654</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10080" rel="nofollow">rogerthat</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 04 2012 at 01:37<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Dayvenkirq</strong></em><br /><br /><div><br><div>No, I mean how did the RS come up with the list on their own?</div></div><div><br></div><div>"Faced with the difficult decision of scrubbing out all their votes or having six of the 10 spots taken up by Dream T, we opted to lump them all in at number one (though one particular album the group released in 1999 did get the vast majority of their votes)."</div><div><br></div><div>And then what?&nbsp;</div></td></tr></table><br><br>I guess the other albums that got the highest votes were picked.&nbsp; Except, of course, that they forgot to exclude multiple selections of KC, Rush and Genesis by the same yardstick.&nbsp; <br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589654#4589654</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :     Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha3....</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589651#4589651</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=34831" rel="nofollow">Dayvenkirq</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 04 2012 at 01:30<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha</strong></em><br /><br />&nbsp;<br>3. How did <b>Selling England By The Pound</b> and <b>2112 </b>become nominees in the first place? Last time I read the New Rolling Stone Album Guide, those works weren't viewed too favorably.&nbsp; <br></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>Weren't viewed too favorably by RS, not the readers they took part in the poll.</div><div><br></div><div><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by thellama73</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Dayvenkirq</strong></em><br /><br />^ Are we discussing Petrucci or DT, or are we talking about the RS list?</div><div><br></div><div>One more thing to say about the list on my part: I still can't put my finger on the very details of how the list came about.</div><div></td></tr></table></div><div><br></div><div>Rolling Stone decided to poll their readers, then decided that their readers' votes shouldn't count and made the rest of the list up themselves.</div><div></td></tr></table></div><div><br></div><div>No, I mean how did the RS come up with the list on their own?</div></div><div><br></div><div>"Faced with the difficult decision of scrubbing out all their votes or having six of the 10 spots taken up by Dream T, we opted to lump them all in at number one (though one particular album the group released in 1999 did get the vast majority of their votes)."</div><div><br></div><div>And then what?&nbsp;</div><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Dayvenkirq - August 04 2012 at 01:36</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589651#4589651</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by Dayvenkirq ^...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589647#4589647</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8636" rel="nofollow">thellama73</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 04 2012 at 01:22<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Dayvenkirq</strong></em><br /><br />^ Are we discussing Petrucci or DT, or are we talking about the RS list?<div><br></div><div>One more thing to say about the list on my part: I <i>still </i>can't put my finger on the <i>very </i>details of how the list came about.</div></td></tr></table><br><br>Rolling Stone decided to poll their readers, then decided that their readers' votes shouldn't count and made the rest of the list up themselves.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589647#4589647</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :  ^ Are we discussing Petrucci...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589644#4589644</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=34831" rel="nofollow">Dayvenkirq</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 04 2012 at 01:16<br /><br />^ Are we discussing Petrucci or DT, or are we talking about the RS list?<div><br></div><div>One more thing to say about the list on my part: I <i>still </i>can't put my finger on the <i>very </i>details of how the list came about.</div><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Dayvenkirq - August 04 2012 at 01:17</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589644#4589644</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : DT definitely like to flex their...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589597#4589597</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=5630" rel="nofollow">darkshade</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 23:31<br /><br />DT definitely like to flex their muscles, and John Petrucci has a lot of them these days&nbsp;<img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /><br><br>One only needs to listen to Octavarium, Metropolis, and A Change of Seasons to understand how unworthy YOU are. <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/bowdown.gif" border="0" alt="Bowdown" title="Bowdown" /><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 23:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589597#4589597</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by The TI...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589592#4589592</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10080" rel="nofollow">rogerthat</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 23:23<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by The T</strong></em><br /><br />I like DT a lot (I used to be a fanboy even) but intellectual? Really? Muscular, sometimes I would rather say.&nbsp;</td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>Muscular, dazzling, breathless and spectacular with reference to those DT moments that I like. &nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 23:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589592#4589592</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : I like DT a lot (I used to be...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589585#4589585</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10657" rel="nofollow">The T</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 23:11<br /><br />I like DT a lot (I used to be a fanboy even) but intellectual? Really? Muscular, sometimes I would rather say.&nbsp;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 23:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589585#4589585</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :  Who gives a sh*t about The Rolling...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589568#4589568</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=38061" rel="nofollow">Mirror Image</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 22:52<br /><br />Who gives a sh*t about The Rolling Stone anyway? I sure as hell don't. There isn't such a thing as a definitive progressive rock list because NOBODY will every agree on the same bands and recordings. Total waste of time and money. This is just another example of a magazine that's ran completely out of ideas.<span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Mirror Image - August 03 2012 at 22:52</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589568#4589568</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by HarbouringTheSoul  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589527#4589527</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10080" rel="nofollow">rogerthat</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 21:36<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by HarbouringTheSoul</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by dtguitarfan</strong></em><br /><br />Tell you what - why don't you tell me what YOU find intellectual and I will piss on it in turn and tell you it's not intellectual in any way.&nbsp; Let's have a pissing contest, why don't we?</td></tr></table><br>Geez, didn't I <i>explicitly </i>say that good music doesn't have to be intellectual? Most of the music I like isn't intellectual in any way.<br></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>Er, don't bother. &nbsp;The guy just needs a pretext to launch into his favourite crib. &nbsp;He initiated it, as usual, by talking more about how much PA hates DT and less about what DT sounds like or what would be a good place to start with the band...and subsequently, plays victim. &nbsp;Very convenient.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 21:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589527#4589527</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :    Originally posted by KingCrInuYashaNot...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589524#4589524</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10080" rel="nofollow">rogerthat</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 21:30<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha</strong></em><br /><br /><br><br>Not a knock against Dream Theater, since I've never heard any of their works, thus I can't make any judgment. How are they?<br></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>Straight answer to a straight question, people. &nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>If you have heard some metal before, then it's basically a blend of Rush, Metallica and Dixie Dregs. &nbsp;There are other related influences like Yes, Queensryche, Al Di Meola among many others but this is the basic idea. &nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Start with Images and Words and if you like that, maybe go for Scenes from a Memory.</div><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by rogerthat - August 03 2012 at 21:31</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 21:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589524#4589524</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589393#4589393</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=38249" rel="nofollow">Ambient Hurricanes</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 17:03<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha</strong></em><br /><br />Why am I not surprised that the album that made #1 is the only one I don't have in my collection?<br><br>Not a knock against Dream Theater, since I've never heard any of their works, thus I can't make any judgment. How are they?<br></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>They're kind of like a metal version of Kansas, if that helps. &nbsp;Their music is typically structured in a traditional way, but focuses on harmonic and melodic variations in the verses. &nbsp;There are heavy riffs, chugging chords, arpeggios, and blindingly fast solos. &nbsp;The best parts of their music are the instrumental sections where, instead of trading off solos, all of the instruments play together. &nbsp;The music is very technical and rhythmically complex. &nbsp;Labrie's voice is very unique, it's love-it-or-hate-it but I personally find his vocals excellent.</div><div><br></div><div>The band is pretty much essential listening, even if it's not to your taste, because they are so important in the development of progressive metal. &nbsp;You may not like them or the genre they spawned but you should at least hear one of their albums (if only to see what all the hype is about). &nbsp;Start with Images and Words, Metropolis Part 2, or Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence. &nbsp;Whatever you do, don't listen to Systematic Chaos first.</div></td></tr></table><br><br>Huh. It kind of sounds like what Wetton-era King Crimson would've played had Robert Fripp not closed the shop in 1974.<br></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>Not even close, I must have done a terrible job of explaining&nbsp;<img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" border="0" alt="LOL" title="LOL" />. &nbsp;You just have to listen to get the idea yourself, come back and tell us what you think when you do&nbsp;<img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley1.gif" border="0" alt="Smile" title="Smile" />.</div><div><br></div><div>On the intellectual debate: if, by "intellectual," you mean that the music and lyrics are intelligently composed and are musically and thematically thought-provoking, then yes, I would say that DT is intellectual (some might disagree). &nbsp;On the other hand, if by "intellectual" you mean that it's super artsy and high brow and, as Logan said, designed specifically to appeal to the intellect ("eye music" if you will), then DT isn't very intellectual. &nbsp;They're pretty complex as far as metal bands go, but not "intellectual" in the same way that Bach is, where the music is composed with strict rules of counterpoint, theme, and subject, full of word painting and symbolism and designed to appeal to the mind. &nbsp;That doesn't diminish the quality of DT's music; as HarboringtheSoul said, "intellectual" in this sense isn't synonymous with "good." &nbsp;It depends how you define the word; the first meaning I mentioned deals with whether the music is intelligent or not, the second deals with the more extreme connotations of the word "intellectual."&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589393#4589393</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :  To me intellectual music is...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589285#4589285</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=7680" rel="nofollow">Logan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 14:43<br /><br />To me intellectual music is designed to appeal more to the intellect than the emotions.&nbsp; It's more about thinking than feeling.&nbsp; I would say that academic music generally is more intellecual than rock/metal forms of music, but of course a lot of Western art music (classical music to use the general term) does appeal to the emotions in very direct manner.&nbsp; I love music that makes me feel emotional, but classical music can make me feel too emotional (Delibes' Lachme, Tallis, Schubert, Prokofiev, Beethoven, Rachmaninov. Miaskovsky etc. can bring tears to my eyes).<br><br>Speaking of a composer who has&nbsp; a link to a school I have worked for, I think Murray Schafer's compositional apprach to music is more intellectual than Dream Theater's.&nbsp; I think that "modern" composers such as Stockhausen, Xenakis, Penderecki, Berio and Ligeti are more intellectual in their approach (some might say that the music simply appeals more to pseudo-sophisticos than the genuinely sophisticated audience that Dream Theater has).<br><br>If talking Prog, well I just don't think Prog commonly intellectual, and I am a fairly visceral listener.&nbsp; Intellectual also equals high-brow, and what is the most sophisticated and erudite music that Dream Theater has done?<br><br>Speaking PA materials, Aranis is not that structurally, harmonically or rhythmically complex , but this still sounds more sophisticated to me (partially due to the instrumentation and that it's more like western art music) than this Dream Theater track from the same year. More intellectual; that depends.&nbsp; I don't consider either of these to be intellectual (chose an Aranis track that I would think some would find more easy-listening, though long).<br><br>&#091;tube&#093;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBM270zkWwI&#091;/tube&#093;<br><br>&#091;tube&#093;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecHv-Fee8-E&#091;/tube&#093;<br><br>Or, for fun, how about the openings of these compared since they are rather similar?<br><br>&#091;tube&#093;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgAc7ekYmVA&#091;/tube&#093;<br><br>&#091;tube&#093;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6Vth8fdzic&#091;/tube&#093;<br><br><br><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Logan - August 03 2012 at 14:47</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589285#4589285</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by dtguitarfanTell...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589241#4589241</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=29175" rel="nofollow">HarbouringTheSoul</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 13:50<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by dtguitarfan</strong></em><br /><br />Tell you what - why don't you tell me what YOU find intellectual and I will piss on it in turn and tell you it's not intellectual in any way.&nbsp; Let's have a pissing contest, why don't we?</td></tr></table><br>Geez, didn't I <i>explicitly </i>say that good music doesn't have to be intellectual? Most of the music I like isn't intellectual in any way.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589241#4589241</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by dtguitarfanHmph,...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589238#4589238</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8636" rel="nofollow">thellama73</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 13:44<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by dtguitarfan</strong></em><br /><br /><br>Hmph, Bach?&nbsp; He's not intellectual!&nbsp; Blah blah blah Mahler blah blah Shostakovich blah blah Rachmaninoff blah blah blah and therefore Bach sucks.<br></td></tr></table><br><br>Your arguments are very compelling.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589238#4589238</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by thellama73  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589227#4589227</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=35257" rel="nofollow">dtguitarfan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 13:30<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by thellama73</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by dtguitarfan</strong></em><br /><br />Tell you what - why don't you tell me what YOU find intellectual and I will piss on it in turn and tell you it's not intellectual in any way.&nbsp; Let's have a pissing contest, why don't we?<br></td></tr></table><br><br>That sounds like fun. I'll start. I find Bach intellectual (sometimes too much so.)<br></td></tr></table><br>Hmph, Bach?&nbsp; He's not intellectual!&nbsp; Blah blah blah Mahler blah blah Shostakovich blah blah Rachmaninoff blah blah blah and therefore Bach sucks.<br><br>There - wasn't that fun?&nbsp; <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /><br><br>(note: Bach is awesome, I was just doing my Prog Snob impression in a classical music context)<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589227#4589227</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by thellama73  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589222#4589222</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=5630" rel="nofollow">darkshade</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 13:27<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by thellama73</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by dtguitarfan</strong></em><br /><br />Tell you what - why don't you tell me what YOU find intellectual and I will piss on it in turn and tell you it's not intellectual in any way.&nbsp; Let's have a pissing contest, why don't we?<br></td></tr></table><br><br>That sounds like fun. I'll start. I find Bach intellectual (sometimes too much so.)<br></td></tr></table><br><br>I'm sure he was looking for a prog band as an answer <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gif" border="0" alt="T&#111;ngue" title="T&#111;ngue" /><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589222#4589222</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by dtguitarfanTell...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589217#4589217</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8636" rel="nofollow">thellama73</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 13:25<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by dtguitarfan</strong></em><br /><br />Tell you what - why don't you tell me what YOU find intellectual and I will piss on it in turn and tell you it's not intellectual in any way.&nbsp; Let's have a pissing contest, why don't we?<br></td></tr></table><br><br>That sounds like fun. I'll start. I find Bach intellectual (sometimes too much so.)<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589217#4589217</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by HarbouringTheSoul  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589212#4589212</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=35257" rel="nofollow">dtguitarfan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 13:23<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by HarbouringTheSoul</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by ExittheLemming</strong></em><br /><br />I personally loathe Dream Theater heartily, but would never castigate the band for being anything remotely approaching <i>intellectual</i>. You can count to 5, 7 and 9 in sync with yer buddies? That's counting matey, not impenetrable complexity.....</td></tr></table><br>More to the point, complexity and intellectuality have nothing to do with each other.&nbsp; Dream Theater's music is certainly complex, but it's hardly intellectual. Which is not a judgment of quality, you don't have to be intellectual or complex to be good.<br></td></tr></table><br>There are works by DT that I have listened to countless times and am still trying to figure out the structures of.&nbsp; So yes, it is a deeply intellectual experience for me.&nbsp; Tell you what - why don't you tell me what YOU find intellectual and I will piss on it in turn and tell you it's not intellectual in any way.&nbsp; Let's have a pissing contest, why don't we?<br><br>Silly prog snobs.&nbsp; <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589212#4589212</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by Ambient...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589124#4589124</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=30762" rel="nofollow">KingCrInuYasha</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 11:26<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha</strong></em><br /><br />Why am I not surprised that the album that made #1 is the only one I don't have in my collection?<br><br>Not a knock against Dream Theater, since I've never heard any of their works, thus I can't make any judgment. How are they?<br></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>They're kind of like a metal version of Kansas, if that helps. &nbsp;Their music is typically structured in a traditional way, but focuses on harmonic and melodic variations in the verses. &nbsp;There are heavy riffs, chugging chords, arpeggios, and blindingly fast solos. &nbsp;The best parts of their music are the instrumental sections where, instead of trading off solos, all of the instruments play together. &nbsp;The music is very technical and rhythmically complex. &nbsp;Labrie's voice is very unique, it's love-it-or-hate-it but I personally find his vocals excellent.</div><div><br></div><div>The band is pretty much essential listening, even if it's not to your taste, because they are so important in the development of progressive metal. &nbsp;You may not like them or the genre they spawned but you should at least hear one of their albums (if only to see what all the hype is about). &nbsp;Start with Images and Words, Metropolis Part 2, or Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence. &nbsp;Whatever you do, don't listen to Systematic Chaos first.</div></td></tr></table><br><br>Huh. It kind of sounds like what Wetton-era King Crimson would've played had Robert Fripp not closed the shop in 1974.<br><br>As for the other nine choices: It's not the worst list I've seen, but I have my disagreements with the readers who voted in that list (and the magazine for making it):<br><br>1. Ranking <b>2112</b> higher than <b>Hemispheres</b><i> </i>and <b>Moving Pictures</b><i>. </i>I think the latter two works were greater accomplishments for the band, <b>Hemispheres</b> perfecting their prog sound and <b>Moving Pictures</b> showing that it is possible for a prog band to successfully incorporate new-wave styled sounds into their music.<br><br>2. Ranking <b>In The Court Of The Crimson King </b>higher than <b>Red</b>.&nbsp; Once again, good albums, but <b>Red</b>, in my book, was the greater accomplishment. Very few groups were making music like this at the time. I've said this before, the fact that<b> Red</b> came out during the time of the Osmonds and Casey Kasem's Top 40 just boggles the mind. <br><br>3. How did <b>Selling England By The Pound</b> and <b>2112 </b>become nominees in the first place? Last time I read the New Rolling Stone Album Guide, those works weren't viewed too favorably.&nbsp; <br><br>4. No <b>Thick As A Brick</b>, <b>Godbluff</b>, <b>ELP (debut)</b>, etc.&nbsp; <br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589124#4589124</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : This is the reason I am writing...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589072#4589072</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=20315" rel="nofollow">AtomicCrimsonRush</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 10:20<br /><br />This is the reason I am writing up my own Prog list. And I hope its more reliable than that travesty.<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 10:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589072#4589072</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by KingCrInuYashaWhy...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589045#4589045</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=38249" rel="nofollow">Ambient Hurricanes</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 09:30<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha</strong></em><br /><br />Why am I not surprised that the album that made #1 is the only one I don't have in my collection?<br><br>Not a knock against Dream Theater, since I've never heard any of their works, thus I can't make any judgment. How are they?<br></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>They're kind of like a metal version of Kansas, if that helps. &nbsp;Their music is typically structured in a traditional way, but focuses on harmonic and melodic variations in the verses. &nbsp;There are heavy riffs, chugging chords, arpeggios, and blindingly fast solos. &nbsp;The best parts of their music are the instrumental sections where, instead of trading off solos, all of the instruments play together. &nbsp;The music is very technical and rhythmically complex. &nbsp;Labrie's voice is very unique, it's love-it-or-hate-it but I personally find his vocals excellent.</div><div><br></div><div>The band is pretty much essential listening, even if it's not to your taste, because they are so important in the development of progressive metal. &nbsp;You may not like them or the genre they spawned but you should at least hear one of their albums (if only to see what all the hype is about). &nbsp;Start with Images and Words, Metropolis Part 2, or Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence. &nbsp;Whatever you do, don't listen to Systematic Chaos first.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4589045#4589045</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by ExittheLemmingI...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588993#4588993</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=29175" rel="nofollow">HarbouringTheSoul</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 06:44<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by ExittheLemming</strong></em><br /><br />I personally loathe Dream Theater heartily, but would never castigate the band for being anything remotely approaching <i>intellectual</i>. You can count to 5, 7 and 9 in sync with yer buddies? That's counting matey, not impenetrable complexity.....</td></tr></table><br>More to the point, complexity and intellectuality have nothing to do with each other.&nbsp; Dream Theater's music is certainly complex, but it's hardly intellectual. Which is not a judgment of quality, you don't have to be intellectual or complex to be good.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 06:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588993#4588993</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; : To quote Ian Anderson from &amp;#034;Baker...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588987#4588987</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=30360" rel="nofollow">BarryGlibb</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 06:23<br /><br />To quote Ian Anderson from "Baker St Muse":<div><br></div><div><br><div>"I have no time for Time magazine or Rolling Stone"</div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 06:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588987#4588987</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by dtguitarfan  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588979#4588979</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16519" rel="nofollow">ExittheLemming</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 05:51<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by dtguitarfan</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha</strong></em><br /><br />Why am I not surprised that the album that made #1 is the only one I don't have in my collection?<br><br>Not a knock against Dream Theater, since I've never heard any of their works, thus I can't make any judgment. How are they?<br></td></tr></table><br>They are Prog <i>Metal</i>.&nbsp; Actually, they pretty much inspired almost everyone else in that sub genre who came after them.&nbsp; So their existence pisses PA off.&nbsp; <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /> <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" border="0" alt="LOL" title="LOL" /><br>But give them a shot, and try not to judge right away - speaking as one of the "crazy" fans who thinks they are the greatest band ever, I didn't like them right away: they had to grow on me.&nbsp; They do a lot of intellectual stuff that has to grow on you, I think, before you start to enjoy their music and see the heart in it.<br></td></tr></table><br><br>Notwithstanding the emoticon which may masquerade as irony, why would a band that many informed souls would concede initiated an entire sub genre on PA<i> piss this web site off</i>?<img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley5.gif" border="0" alt="C&#111;nfused" title="C&#111;nfused" /> I personally loathe Dream Theater heartily, but would never castigate the band for being anything remotely approaching <i>intellectual</i>. You can count to 5, 7 and 9 in sync with yer buddies? That's counting matey, not impenetrable complexity.....<br><br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588979#4588979</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by KingCrInuYashaWhy...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588974#4588974</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=35257" rel="nofollow">dtguitarfan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 03 2012 at 05:30<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha</strong></em><br /><br />Why am I not surprised that the album that made #1 is the only one I don't have in my collection?<br><br>Not a knock against Dream Theater, since I've never heard any of their works, thus I can't make any judgment. How are they?<br></td></tr></table><br>They are Prog <i>Metal</i>.&nbsp; Actually, they pretty much inspired almost everyone else in that sub genre who came after them.&nbsp; So their existence pisses PA off.&nbsp; <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /> <img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" border="0" alt="LOL" title="LOL" /><br>But give them a shot, and try not to judge right away - speaking as one of the "crazy" fans who thinks they are the greatest band ever, I didn't like them right away: they had to grow on me.&nbsp; They do a lot of intellectual stuff that has to grow on you, I think, before you start to enjoy their music and see the heart in it.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588974#4588974</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by HarbouringTheSoul Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588814#4588814</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8636" rel="nofollow">thellama73</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 02 2012 at 22:39<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by HarbouringTheSoul</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Sympathy Orchestra</strong></em><br /><br /><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-ansi-: EN" lang="EN"><o:p></o:p></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-ansi-: EN; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-: EN-US; mso-bidi-: AR-SA" lang="EN">I love how they took the subtitle of La Villa Strangiato as Rush admitting that they were too self indulgent. Funny, I always thought that was a jab at critics, such as those from Rolling Stone, who always criticized them as being such. Of course, they wouldn’t get it!</span></td></tr></table><br>Of course they were making fun of themselves. I mean, how much more self-indulgent does it get than a multi-part suite based on Alex Lifeson's dreams?<br></td></tr></table><br><br>And with a musical quote from Raymond Scott of all people (who should be on PA under prog electronic.)<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588814#4588814</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by Horizons  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588808#4588808</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=15960" rel="nofollow">CCVP</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 02 2012 at 22:32<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Horizons</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha</strong></em><br /><br /><br>Not a knock against Dream Theater, since I've never heard any of their works, thus I can't make any judgment. How are they?<br></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>This should start an interesting <strike>discussion</strike>&nbsp;drama..</div></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>Fixed.</div><div><br></div><div>As for the pool, some of it was predictable, but the amount of Rush was not. All in all, dumb top 10, PA has a <strike>fair and balanced</strike> much better selection, even though I disagree with it as well.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588808#4588808</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by thellama73While...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588798#4588798</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10657" rel="nofollow">The T</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 02 2012 at 22:20<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by thellama73</strong></em><br /><br />While I love 2112, number 2 is ridiculous. The fact that Dream Theater is there at all invalidates the list in my opinion.</td></tr></table>How is it that the selection as # 1 album of the most popular album among readers in a list made from <i>readers votes </i>invalidates it?<img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley5.gif" border="0" alt="C&#111;nfused" title="C&#111;nfused" /><div><br></div><div>Having said that, Rolling Stone is a monument of idiocy so it's rather surprising that at least they have some of the names and bands straight....</div><div><br></div><div>And, having said that, I'm so happy to see DT continuing to be popular and making so many prog purists extremely unhappy...<img src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley15.gif" border="0" alt="Evil Smile" title="Evil Smile" /></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588798#4588798</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Rolling Stone&#039;s&quot;Best Prog-Rock Albums of All Time&quot; :   Originally posted by KingCrInuYashaNot...</title>
   <link>http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588718#4588718</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=32791" rel="nofollow">Horizons</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 88597<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 02 2012 at 18:55<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by KingCrInuYasha</strong></em><br /><br /><br>Not a knock against Dream Theater, since I've never heard any of their works, thus I can't make any judgment. How are they?<br></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>This should start an interesting discussion..</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=88597&amp;PID=4588718#4588718</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>