Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
ProgFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2006
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 338
|
Posted: April 14 2007 at 05:54 |
Mike, you did some nice work here
But which bands do you consider as "Nu" Prog??
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46828
|
Posted: April 14 2007 at 05:51 |
^ good thing I held off posting ... I figured you had it under classic prog...
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 20667
|
Posted: April 14 2007 at 05:48 |
^ yes, I mentioned in the first post that some genres are missing. Feel free to make some suggestions as to how to add them to the timeline, and I'll try to add them.
|
|
|
paolo.beenees
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 30 2007
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 1136
|
Posted: April 14 2007 at 05:39 |
I think you've totally forgotten Krautrock
|
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46828
|
Posted: April 14 2007 at 05:02 |
Mike...Cert... as you all know .. I'm not an expert on metal... just as always ..curious...
what do you say to those who call... groups like Uriah Heep and Deep
Purple proto Prog Metal. I see them called that every once in a while
Edited by micky - April 14 2007 at 05:02
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 20667
|
Posted: April 14 2007 at 04:54 |
^ Thanks! Could you name some of these early tech/shred metal bands/albums?
I agree that the "core" timelines need to be adjusted ... Neo prog begins a bit too early for example.
|
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: April 14 2007 at 04:50 |
I think "technical" and "shred" metal began in the late 1980s - and would dispute some of the "core" timelines - but great 1st attempt!
|
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 20667
|
Posted: April 14 2007 at 04:39 |
^ Not really: - Extreme Prog Metal:
Opeth, Death, Atheist, Cynic, etc - Prog Power Metal:
Symphony X (they're also rooted in classic/melodic Prog Metal), Kamelot, Rhapsody, Angra, Pagan's Mind etc - Post Metal:
Isis, Neurosis, Pelican, Cult of Luna, Red Sparowes etc - Tech/Shred Metal/Metal Fusion:
Planet X, Anomaly, Indukti, Michael Romeo, John Petrucci, Derek Sherinian, Arctopus, Electrocution 250, Mattias Eklundh etc.
|
|
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
|
Posted: April 14 2007 at 04:30 |
Very interesting MIke. Is it fair to say that some of the metal categories you have included are not considered Prog on this site?
|
|
Philéas
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
|
Posted: April 14 2007 at 04:17 |
I like it. I've wanted to do something like this myself for quie a while. I particularily like how you've also marked a core period of some styles.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 20667
|
Posted: April 14 2007 at 04:10 |
Have a look at this prog timeline I created: Some genres are still missing. I am trying to create a simple view of the "prog universe" ... I don't want to make it too detailed, but I also want to show the important differences between the styles.
Edited by MikeEnRegalia - April 14 2007 at 04:11
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.