Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Sorry but this is not Prog...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSorry but this is not Prog...

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
Cygnus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 12 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 520
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Sorry but this is not Prog...
    Posted: September 20 2005 at 09:05

I must say that this is the best organized and most complete prog rock site but I have noticed that some bands listed have nothing to do with prog. I am not talking about bands like Queen or Styx tha t are a little "lighter" but still bands with some prog elements. I am talking about bands that are playing something completely diferent than prog. I am going to give some examples becouse it will make no good to speak about any band I think it falls to it.

 

Nightwish: A great band that I enjoy to listen but it is totaly power metal. Just becouse they have keyboards doesn't mean they are prog. If we have nightwish here we sould also have Stratovarious, Thunderstone, Sonata Arctica and a hundred such bands. Well guys I thing this is just europower metal and of course most music magazines say the same.

 

Rhapsody: For God's sake. Look at them ... All their albums are the same. All of them are power metal the Helloween way plus some orchestrecal parts. They don't even make a progress from an album to another. If this is prog then Metallica live with michael Kammen are prog to and so are Rage of XIII and Lingua Mortis albums.

Whaat do you think. I am sure that some of you will agree and you may have noticed such bands yourselves.

 



Edited by Cygnus
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20615
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 09:17

Nightwish got included after much discussions and uproar! I did not vote for or against this band because Metal as a genre is not my cup of tea! Some 25 years ago , I was a ltlle into it, but I really stop at NWOBHMB appeared.

But as much as I can say , both bands are here because the site has taken an option to be inclusive rather than exclusive.

This in order not to broadbrush , but to maybe hope to entice Nightwish fans to look at "similar" albums that are proposed by the site and maybe make him/her a metal proghead and ultimately a proghead!

If I can congratulate you on your moderate tone of writing , I do! Some others would have used abusive language!

Bravo! And I hope my answer was sufficiently satisfying to you.

let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Frasse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2004
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 758
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 09:18

Someone must consider them prog if they are here..that one is not me though. The only thing original about Nightwish compared to other pwer metal bands is that Tarja sings opera but that can't qualify to them being prog. I've haerd some songs by htem that maybe can qualify but have they done a whole album?

Of Rhapsody I've only heard a "best of" made by a friend. All I can say is that they are bombastic as hell. and of course that they have made the worst music videos ever.

I do like both bands, at least a bit, and I don't see any real problem of them being here, but I can as well do without them in the archives.

Back to Top
gulliman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 02 2005
Location: Estonia
Status: Offline
Points: 126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 09:22
I absolutely agree on these two examples, Nightwish and Rhapsody. The latter is ridiculously bad despite their collective virtuosity. (Just my opinion).
Back to Top
CrazyDiamond View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 09:30
Back to Top
PeeWee View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: May 10 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 37
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 09:47
The same arguments can be made about a band like Kraftwerk. If Kraftwerk is included, why are not artists like the Human League, Japan, Gary Numan and Ultravox included?
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 09:56

Originally posted by PeeWee PeeWee wrote:

The same arguments can be made about a band like Kraftwerk. If Kraftwerk is included, why are not artists like the Human League, Japan, Gary Numan and Ultravox included?

If Talk Talk are listed in the archives and I assume they still are, then Ultravox and Japan should also be there.

BTW..I like all the aforementioned bands..

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Frasse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2004
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 758
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 10:24
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by PeeWee PeeWee wrote:

The same arguments can be made about a band like Kraftwerk. If Kraftwerk is included, why are not artists like the Human League, Japan, Gary Numan and Ultravox included?

If Talk Talk are listed in the archives and I assume they still are, then Ultravox and Japan should also be there.

BTW..I like all the aforementioned bands..

Isn't Japan there? At least David Sylvain is. 

Back to Top
Jared View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20749
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 10:28
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by PeeWee PeeWee wrote:

The same arguments can be made about a band like Kraftwerk. If Kraftwerk is included, why are not artists like the Human League, Japan, Gary Numan and Ultravox included?

If Talk Talk are listed in the archives and I assume they still are, then Ultravox and Japan should also be there.

BTW..I like all the aforementioned bands..

gosh,I'm glad I'm not the only one around here who had a soft spot for Ultravox...

Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
Back to Top
porter View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 07 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 362
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 10:32
I agree with you Cygnus...I still don't understand why some bands are added and some others are not...
"my kingdom for a horse!" (W. Shakespeare, "Richard III")
Back to Top
slipperman View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 05 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 217
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 10:32

Like Cygnus, I totally agree that the bands he pointed out do not fall within the boundaries of this site.

I'm thankful for, as Sean Trane puts it, the inclusive rather than exclusive nature of this site. A good variety of metal bands that are on the Progarchives deserve to be on and should most definitely stay on: Watchtower, Anathema, In The Woods, Atheist, Arcturus, Sieges Even, many more. 

Surely bands like Canvas Solaris and Mekong Delta deserve inclusion over the poor choices of Nightwish and Rhapsody. All due respect to the site's moderators and creators, of course. 

...it is real...it is Rael...
Back to Top
fairyliar View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 21 2005
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 107
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 10:52

 I like Rhapsody alot!!!!!!!!!!!!

I like their pompous and bombast!!! Their first album was fabulous, the last is brilliant, between them I only pocess Power Of The Dragonflame which is a bit disappointing cos repetitive but the 2 others are surely not!!! Common guys it's their style!!!

Do you say that Genesis or Yes of the 70s are repetitive? No. Indeed they are alot if you consider they play always the same manier but for me, as Rhapsody, they sound great cos it's their style which is great! When you got your style and your materials are top, you don't need to change everything everytime the next album u make.

Moreover there are very significant evolutions depending on the story of each album.

 

Back to Top
Cygnus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 12 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 520
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 10:55
Originally posted by slipperman slipperman wrote:

Like Cygnus, I totally agree that the bands he pointed out do not fall within the boundaries of this site.

I'm thankful for, as Sean Trane puts it, the inclusive rather than exclusive nature of this site. A good variety of metal bands that are on the Progarchives deserve to be on and should most definitely stay on: Watchtower, Anathema, In The Woods, Atheist, Arcturus, Sieges Even, many more. 

Surely bands like Canvas Solaris and Mekong Delta deserve inclusion over the poor choices of Nightwish and Rhapsody. All due respect to the site's moderators and creators, of course. 

Other examples are some of the bands you mentioned. Watchtower, Sieges Even and almost all the others could anytime replace Nightwish. Although I consider Anathema and In the woods atmospheric metal bands.

Back to Top
Mnemosyne View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 26 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 272
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 10:55
Anyway, what is Rhapsody doing in the Archives?? Some other bands will need that space... some really prog ones... 
I'm a Man-Owl-Fish.
Creator-Observer-Muse.
Back to Top
fairyliar View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 21 2005
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 107
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 11:07
Yeah I agree Rhapsody is power metal and not really prog. That's a clear point.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20615
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 11:10

Originally posted by PeeWee PeeWee wrote:

The same arguments can be made about a band like Kraftwerk. If Kraftwerk is included, why are not artists like the Human League, Japan, Gary Numan and Ultravox included?

I was not warm on Talk Talk's inclusion , because they were pop an d close to new wave. But on the basis of their later albums (late 80's - early 90's) they got included , and they have a case!

As for Kraftwerk , this was also a major discussion! They are in IMHO , mostly due to their first three albums (the debut - Red Cone cover  does not even have one synth on it if you can believe it!) and the fact that they were Krautrock pionneers. They started in 71 and they sounded New Wave six years before all the others!

As for all the new wave bands mentioned here , I hated them all back then , because I suffered to hear radio-waves filled with those hateful digital beatbox symths when you could get a load of so much better tunes a few years before!

I prefer Punk and post-punk over new wave!

let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 11:15
Originally posted by Frasse Frasse wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by PeeWee PeeWee wrote:

The same arguments can be made about a band like Kraftwerk. If Kraftwerk is included, why are not artists like the Human League, Japan, Gary Numan and Ultravox included?

If Talk Talk are listed in the archives and I assume they still are, then Ultravox and Japan should also be there.

BTW..I like all the aforementioned bands..

Isn't Japan there? At least David Sylvain is. 

Japan made some crap pop, but albums like Tin Drum are very strange and very progressive IMO..

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 11:19
Originally posted by fandango fandango wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by PeeWee PeeWee wrote:

The same arguments can be made about a band like Kraftwerk. If Kraftwerk is included, why are not artists like the Human League, Japan, Gary Numan and Ultravox included?

If Talk Talk are listed in the archives and I assume they still are, then Ultravox and Japan should also be there.

BTW..I like all the aforementioned bands..

gosh,I'm glad I'm not the only one around here who had a soft spot for Ultravox...

They're not a band I listen to these days, but I certainly had time for them years ago, even as a metal head! I occassionally dig out my compilation and give tracks like 'Hymn' or 'The Voice' a spin. They were great songs; very powerful.

What was that live mini album they had out? Was it 'Monument' or something? I had that on vinyl and used to play it so loud the house shook!

There was some good music in the 80's. Some of the 'pop' was pretty good. I like Tears for Fears too

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Crimsoner View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: July 20 2005
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 57
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 11:22

Yeah, I definetly agree. Nightwish and Rhapsody are not prog... they are simply Power Metal. It's clear they have "some" elements that can be appeared as progressive... but that doesn't make them progressive IMO...

Just BE!
Back to Top
Jared View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20749
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 11:23

^^^Yep, I had 'Monument' when I was about 14; IMHO, The Voice was the best track they ever wrote, seconded by 'Mine For Life' off Quartet....

...I think T4F is where we part company though...

Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.207 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.