Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17566
Posted: May 17 2013 at 20:39
Young denies the Reagan-love thing in his new book....it sprung from an interview where some hipper than thou reporters were jazzed about getting some great anti-Reagan quotes from Neil, and they started to lead him. Being used to such childish bullsh*t he smelled what they were up to and got angrier as the interview proceeded. So, being Neil, instead he took the high road and mentioned some of the good qualities he saw in Reagan. Didn't agree with lots of his policies, but admired some of his personal traits. Scandalous! And from that point the story grew its own legs. That's how he explains the whole Reagan thing, check out his new book, it's wonderful.
Joined: October 20 2009
Location: Not Here
Status: Offline
Points: 1754
Posted: May 17 2013 at 20:42
Finnforest wrote:
Young denies the Reagan-love thing in his new book....it sprung from an interview where some hipper than thou reporters were jazzed about getting some great anti-Reagan quotes from Neil, and they started to lead him. Being used to such childish bullsh*t he smelled what they were up to and got angrier as the interview proceeded. So, being Neil, instead he took the high road and mentioned some of the good qualities he saw in Reagan. Didn't agree with lots of his policies, but admired some of his personal traits. Scandalous! And from that point the story grew its own legs. That's how he explains the whole Reagan thing, check out his new book, it's wonderful.
I know that's what he says now. But I remember some interviews at the time. He was going on about the Soviet Union, that the US had to build up its offensive capabilities, build more nukes; he was going on about having to defend the US from communists just itching to destroy it. He went on and on about how he wants to defend his family and would shoot anyone who came into his house. It was all really right-wing stuff. No one was putting words in his mouth.
Too bad those old interviews from the 80s aren't online. Now he can make the claim that his words were twisted, and unless one has the original hard copies, most are none the wiser.
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17566
Posted: May 17 2013 at 20:59
jude111 wrote:
Finnforest wrote:
Young denies the Reagan-love thing in his new book....it sprung from an interview where some hipper than thou reporters were jazzed about getting some great anti-Reagan quotes from Neil, and they started to lead him. Being used to such childish bullsh*t he smelled what they were up to and got angrier as the interview proceeded. So, being Neil, instead he took the high road and mentioned some of the good qualities he saw in Reagan. Didn't agree with lots of his policies, but admired some of his personal traits. Scandalous! And from that point the story grew its own legs. That's how he explains the whole Reagan thing, check out his new book, it's wonderful.
I know that's what he says now. But I remember some interviews at the time. He was going on about the Soviet Union, that the US had to build up its offensive capabilities, build more nukes; he was going on about having to defend the US from communists just itching to destroy it. He went on and on about how he wants to defend his family and would shoot anyone who came into his house. It was all really right-wing stuff. No one was putting words in his mouth.
Too bad those old interviews from the 80s aren't online. Now he can make the claim that his words were twisted, and unless one has the original hard copies, most are none the wiser.
Doesn't sound too bad. A lot of people felt that way about the Soviets during the cold war, and a lot of people would defend their children in a home invasion. I don't think that's "really right wing" stuff. Maybe to you it is. Fair enough.
Joined: October 20 2009
Location: Not Here
Status: Offline
Points: 1754
Posted: May 17 2013 at 21:06
Anyway, I don't mean to make this into political discussions In Neil Young's case, I think he was just being "Neil Young." I don't mean to equate his statements with those of Clapton above or Cat Stevens, or the action of Cantat. I'm just trying to express that I do have problems with certain stances and/or actions of some musicians (or actors, directors, etc.).
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17566
Posted: May 17 2013 at 21:10
Sound good Jude.
Did you ever hear if Clapton has renounced those words? I can only assume so as his career was huge in the 80s. I think in the mid 70s the guy was pretty messed up....I'm assuming he walked back those words since?
Joined: October 20 2009
Location: Not Here
Status: Offline
Points: 1754
Posted: May 17 2013 at 21:17
Finnforest wrote:
Sound good Jude.
Did you ever hear if Clapton has renounced those words? I can only assume so as his career was huge in the 80s. I think in the mid 70s the guy was pretty messed up....I'm assuming he walked back those words since?
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17566
Posted: May 17 2013 at 22:42
OK, did a bunch of reading on the Clapton thing, here's a bit that seems a consensus of much of it.
Enoch Powell had been a member of Edward Heath's Shadow
Cabinet in 1968 when he made his doom-laden speech about immigration,
foretelling a loss of British national identity. It outraged the
political establishment and Heath sacked him immediately from his
position as Shadow Defence Secretary. Powell stood by his speech until
his death in 1998, always claiming he was not a racist or a
"racialist" as he liked to put it but concerned the country could not
cope with high levels of immigration.
Like Enoch Powell, Clapton
has never taken back his comments or compromised his position. As
recently as December 2007 he appeared on the South Bank Show and told Melvyn Bragg
that he wasn't a racist but still believed Powell's comments were
relevant. Unlike Powell, however, Eric Clapton's career has enjoyed a
resurgence - he was given a CBE in 2004, reunited with Cream in 2005 and will be headlining this year's Hard Rock Calling in Hyde Park. Like David Bowie,
who once told an interviewer that Britain would benefit from a Fascist
dictator, "Slowhand" Clapton has managed to emerge from the allegations
of racism seemingly unharmed. ˇ
-theweek.co.uk
He says he was pissed drunk that night in '76 and mostly being provocative/joking, but he's never formally apologized....ouch Eric. Hard to believe he hasn't had more fallout professionally.
Oh, regarding the part about Bowie, he has apologized for his crazy behaviour which he also blamed on being high and enjoying being outrageous.
Elvis Costello has apologized for some nasty comments. So how about Keith Moon's nazi fetish? Harmless fun from the loon? Or unforgivable?
Joined: October 20 2009
Location: Not Here
Status: Offline
Points: 1754
Posted: May 17 2013 at 23:24
Finnforest wrote:
Oh, regarding the part about Bowie, he has apologized for his crazy behaviour which he also blamed on being high and enjoying being outrageous.
Elvis Costello has apologized for some nasty comments. So how about Keith Moon's nazi fetish? Harmless fun from the loon? Or unforgivable?
I didn't know that about Keith Moon. How about Rush's Neil Peart's interest in Ayn Rand? I wasn't so happy when I found that out well over a decade a go...
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17566
Posted: May 18 2013 at 12:34
jude111 wrote:
Finnforest wrote:
Oh, regarding the part about Bowie, he has apologized for his crazy behaviour which he also blamed on being high and enjoying being outrageous.
Elvis Costello has apologized for some nasty comments. So how about Keith Moon's nazi fetish? Harmless fun from the loon? Or unforgivable?
I didn't know that about Keith Moon. How about Rush's Neil Peart's interest in Ayn Rand? I wasn't so happy when I found that out well over a decade a go...
No problem with it. I think an interest in Rand is completely different than some of the other outrageous external behaviours discussed. He was exploring different worldviews/writings and is certainly not a fierce proponent of her harder core views. As with Neil Young/Ronnie, Neil P would probably say that he agrees with some things she wrote but disagrees with quite a lot as well. I think that's gist of what I've heard him say in some recent interviews.
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20702
Posted: May 18 2013 at 16:31
NotAProghead wrote:
dr wu23 wrote:
I don't pay attention to personal bios of most of the musicians I listen to.
Why?
I don't really take the time to seek them out and read them....if I run across one in an lp/cd insert etc or while reading a magazine then that's fine but it just doesn't interest me that much.
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Posted: May 18 2013 at 17:29
Finnforest wrote:
jude111 wrote:
Finnforest wrote:
Oh, regarding the part about Bowie, he has apologized for his crazy behaviour which he also blamed on being high and enjoying being outrageous.
Elvis Costello has apologized for some nasty comments. So how about Keith Moon's nazi fetish? Harmless fun from the loon? Or unforgivable?
I didn't know that about Keith Moon. How about Rush's Neil Peart's interest in Ayn Rand? I wasn't so happy when I found that out well over a decade a go...
No problem with it. I think an interest in Rand is completely different than some of the other outrageous external behaviours discussed. He was exploring different worldviews/writings and is certainly not a fierce proponent of her harder core views. As with Neil Young/Ronnie, Neil P would probably say that he agrees with some things she wrote but disagrees with quite a lot as well. I think that's gist of what I've heard him say in some recent interviews.
He was definitely more into her philosophy in his younger days (Anthem is a particularly blatant example) but just based upon his lyrics, he seems to have departed quite a bit from those views. He's definitely no objectivist, and I'm not even sure he's a libertarian anymore (he described himself as a "bleeding heart libertarian" in an interview and said that he recognized libertarianism as an "ideal," didn't go into any detail on whether he thought it practical or not).
In any case, his views have matured a lot (though I wish he was still a staunch libertarian, though ) and I far prefer listening to his lyrics about interpersonal relationships to his lyrics about how selfishness is a good thing. Wish he'd stop his stupid anti-religion songs though.
Edited by Ambient Hurricanes - May 18 2013 at 17:31
Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
Posted: May 19 2013 at 23:53
Yep. And why not? The music is not isolated from a person's experiences. Knowing the experiences behind the music can give one new appreciation, or perhaps detract from it, and rightfully so. That person's craft is translating experience or ideas into music, and if they do that poorly or choose poor concepts on which to base their product, then that should detract, though not necessarily define. I don't stop listening to an artist because they disagree with me or did something I don't condone, but experiences and ideas do give color to the music, good or bad.
Joined: May 19 2013
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Status: Offline
Points: 554
Posted: May 20 2013 at 15:16
Not a musician but Roman Polanski's actions make it harder for me to enjoy his movies. He is definitely a talented filmmaker, I think "The Pianist" is one of the best movies I've seen, but it's hard for me to forget what Polanski did.
Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 8061
Posted: May 20 2013 at 16:43
Polymorphia wrote:
The music is not isolated from a person's experiences. Knowing the experiences behind the music can give one new appreciation, or perhaps detract from it...
Exactly so.
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Posted: May 21 2013 at 08:04
King Only wrote:
Not a musician but Roman Polanski's actions make it harder for me to enjoy his movies. He is definitely a talented filmmaker, I think "The Pianist" is one of the best movies I've seen, but it's hard for me to forget what Polanski did.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.375 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.