Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Study: People stop listening to new music at 33
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedStudy: People stop listening to new music at 33

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Study: People stop listening to new music at 33
    Posted: May 01 2015 at 02:24
Saw this article linked in my Facebook feed, and I guess it's relevant to many of the discussions we've had on this forum regarding progressive rock's history and future. In my experience, generation gaps in popular music seem to occur on a 25-to-30 year basis so it's not that far off, though I think it's more focused on specific genres and artists than on new records and songs as such depending on which people.

Then again it's probably different regarding obsessive record collector type music nerds like me and most people who post on forums like this one, not to mention that I make a concerted effort to constantly expand my horizons outside of my comfort zone. It does happen at a slower pace than I remembering it doing 5-10 years ago, though, but that's more because I now prefer to familiarize myself with specific artists' career trajectories and biographies as well as their genre/scene's historical context. Basically, I now care more about how music (and art in general) fits into a larger cultural continuity when I appreciate it than I used to... but I wager I do that to a higher degree than the average person.
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Back to Top
paganinio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 07 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1327
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2015 at 08:13
I don't get "Dubstep", which is a genre that became popular in my 20s. And every new genre after that also failed to interest me. I'd rather hear a new Iron Maiden album in 2012, than a new band with a new style in 2012.  Must be the generation gap.
Back to Top
defectinggrey View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 14 2015
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 104
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2015 at 09:22
I'm 62 now and although I don't listen to as much music as I used to, I've gone out of my way to listen to new types of music. Thus in the past decade I've got into New Flamenco (Ojos de Brujo, Lenacay, Calima etc) as well as bands like Rammstein and Hollywood Undead as well as keeping in touch with all of my favourites from the 60s and 70s onwards.
Back to Top
thebeastmustdie View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 30 2015
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 90
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2015 at 13:22
37 here and still searching out new stuff all the time... well, still searching out stuff that is new to me. half the time it'll turn out to be older music I never heard before. I still like to discover new artists as well though.
 
 
the cliche of 'music was better back then' is slowly becoming more apparent to me though. I really do think music post 2000 seems very shakey in terms of overall quality compared to 60s through to the 90s. Although every era has its share of complete crap obviously.
 
when the day comes that I no longer get that indescribable rush of hearing a new track/album/artist that truly blows my mind, then I'll give up on looking for new music


Edited by thebeastmustdie - May 01 2015 at 13:24
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24391
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2015 at 13:49
Not true in the least in my case. I'm well past that age, and am looking for new stuff all the time. I would get terribly bored if I only listened to the same old things. I do have a lot of time for the classics, of course, but there is a lot of great music around nowadays - especially with the advent of streaming sites like Bandcamp.
Back to Top
twalsh View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 26 2014
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 328
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2015 at 14:28
I'm sure that this is statistically true but that PA would have a much greater percentages of exceptions.  I've heard the hypothesis before that musical taste tends to ossify by one's early 30s.  The study cited has good points on the surface (other interests and a 'maturing' of tastes beyond what is merely popular). 
I feel that a period of rigidity happened  to me and remember having a conversation with one of my best friends back in 2006-07, saying that I didn't know any new music.  I calculated and realized I had purchased almost no new music in seven years!  This awareness bothered me and I spent the next several years on again off again seeking out new music, mostly indie rock, blues  and conventional prog metal.  I found PA when I was getting fed up with the limited palette of my searching.

The study has a significant bias of course, relying on Spotify data.  It is a convenient, if not representative, sample.
More heavy prog, please!
Back to Top
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2015 at 10:39
It would be interesting if they distinguished between "new" as in "current" or as in "unfamiliar". 
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Back to Top
zappaholic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Location: flyover country
Status: Offline
Points: 2822
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2015 at 15:49
"I was 'with it' once! And then they changed what 'it' was! And now what I'm 'with' isn't 'it',
and what's 'it' seems weird and scary to me.  IT'LL HAPPEN TO YOU!"
                                                                                                          -- Abe 'Grampa' Simpson
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." -- H.L. Mencken
Back to Top
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 02:26
I posted that exact quote in the "future of progressive rock" thread elsewhere not so long ago. I do think the forum's population is probably not a good representation of how people's tastes in music at large evolve or stagnate over time, since a website like this appeals mostly to people curious about finding less well known artists and records often in styles somewhat outside the mainstream.

Even then, I think most people have a "comfort zone" in a select handful of genres they stay to and there's an important distinction between exploring new styles or music working to different "paradigms" (which often takes some time to adjust to) on one hand, or between being open to new music within the same comfort zone.
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15916
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 04:23
I gotta say here. "Screw the statistics, this statement is a load of rubbish". I DO NOT believe this case at all.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 05:32
Of course it is generally true and it is something that we've known for a very long time now. Just because "it doesn't apply to me" doesn't mean it isn't true for the majority of people. The exception that proves the rule means what it says - if something does not agree with the general idea then it is an exception. As Simon has said (more than once) - we are not representative of the whole population, we are (in the main) exceptional in our tastes in music compared to other people of our own generation - the vast majority of my friends and acquaintances who are of my age are "stuck in the 70s" and do not seek out new music, but there are exceptions.
What?
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 05:59
For those who enjoy the 70's Symph Prog of Crimson, Yes, ELP and Genesis, the likes of the so called 'new Prog' of Big Big Train, Transatlantic, Porcupine Tree, Wobbler, Black Bonzo, Corvus Stone et al  is hardly a wide stretch to make.
Perhaps a wider stretch would for those same folks to start enjoying VDGG, Gentle Giant and say Magma as the latter trio are something of an acquired taste that often proves to be a portal to yet more new discoveries a million miles away from Symphonic Prog.
An even wider stretch would be for the first group to start exploring music without looking necessarily for any Prog quotient or angle e.g. Post Punk, Jazz, Classical, Electronica, Ambient, Folk (the list goes on)
Some of the responses to date remind me of those people who state 'I enjoy socialising' but can't remember the last time they attempted to befriend someone they didn't know already. I've long suspected that our enduring friendships and relationships are forged in the first 35 years of our existence (like our tastes?Shocked)

Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15916
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 06:04
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Of course it is generally true and it is something that we've known for a very long time now. Just because "it doesn't apply to me" doesn't mean it isn't true for the majority of people. The exception that proves the rule means what it says - if something does not agree with the general idea then it is an exception. As Simon has said (more than once) - we are not representative of the whole population, we are (in the main) exceptional in our tastes in music compared to other people of our own generation - the vast majority of my friends and acquaintances who are of my age are "stuck in the 70s" and do not seek out new music, but there are exceptions.
Even if we are of a minority, this statement is just a brash, generalisation that holds little weight in the bigger picture. Generalisations generally suck. Generalisations are superficial and shallow in their analysis. There is no use-by-date for discovering new things, whatever they are......
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 26108
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 06:21
You forge your taste at quite a young age so although you may listen to new stuff its more difficult for it to take hold. I take the point about Gentle Giant and VDGG raised above . I never listened to those bands until about 10 -15 years ago (I'm 52) and even now its a bit of struggle. However I know that many here hold these bands in high esteem so I want to appreciate them as well. As regards new music I tend to think there is nothing new under the sun. The heavy weight seventies prog bands were perhaps not that original they just mixed up what was known already and came up with a new musical cocktail. So its begs the question - what is 'new'? I suspect that 'new' means different things to different people!
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 06:22
Originally posted by Tom Ozric Tom Ozric wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Of course it is generally true and it is something that we've known for a very long time now. Just because "it doesn't apply to me" doesn't mean it isn't true for the majority of people. The exception that proves the rule means what it says - if something does not agree with the general idea then it is an exception. As Simon has said (more than once) - we are not representative of the whole population, we are (in the main) exceptional in our tastes in music compared to other people of our own generation - the vast majority of my friends and acquaintances who are of my age are "stuck in the 70s" and do not seek out new music, but there are exceptions.
Even if we are of a minority, this statement is just a brash, generalisation that holds little weight in the bigger picture. Generalisations generally suck. Generalisations are superficial and shallow in their analysis. There is no use-by-date for discovering new things, whatever they are......
What do you mean "even if we are a minority"? ... we are a minority.
 
It is a statistical average. That does not make it a brash generalisation, or even a generalisation when read in context with the linked article - it is the bigger picture, of which "we" form a small part -  there are also minorities who never got into music at all (strange but true - such people exist). Statistical surveys cannot be superficial and shallow in themselves, it is how they are poorly interpreted and used that makes them suck. I could go on, but I have to go out into the real world now.


What?
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 06:23
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

You forge your taste at quite a young age so although you may listen to new stuff its more difficult for it to take hold. I take the point about Gentle Giant and VDGG raised above . I never listened to those bands until about 10 -15 years ago (I'm 52) and even now its a bit of struggle. However I know that many here hold these bands in high esteem so I want to appreciate them as well. As regards new music I tend to think there is nothing new under the sun. The heavy weight seventies prog bands were perhaps not that original they just mixed up what was known already and came up with a new musical cocktail. So its begs the question - what is 'new'? I suspect that 'new' means different things to different people!


Originally posted by Toaster Mantis Toaster Mantis wrote:

It would be interesting if they distinguished between "new" as in "current" or as in "unfamiliar". 


Fair comment but I think the above is key here
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15916
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 07:39
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Tom Ozric Tom Ozric wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Of course it is generally true and it is something that we've known for a very long time now. Just because "it doesn't apply to me" doesn't mean it isn't true for the majority of people. The exception that proves the rule means what it says - if something does not agree with the general idea then it is an exception. As Simon has said (more than once) - we are not representative of the whole population, we are (in the main) exceptional in our tastes in music compared to other people of our own generation - the vast majority of my friends and acquaintances who are of my age are "stuck in the 70s" and do not seek out new music, but there are exceptions.
Even if we are of a minority, this statement is just a brash, generalisation that holds little weight in the bigger picture. Generalisations generally suck. Generalisations are superficial and shallow in their analysis. There is no use-by-date for discovering new things, whatever they are......
What do you mean "even if we are a minority"? ... we are a minority.
 
<span style="line-height: 1.4;">It is a statistical average. That does not make it a brash generalisation, or even a generalisation when read in context with the linked article - it is the bigger picture, of which "we" form a small part -  there are also minorities who never got into music at all (strange but true - such people exist). Statistical surveys cannot be superficial and shallow in themselves, it is how they are poorly interpreted and used that makes them suck. I could go on, but I have to go out into the real world now.</span>


Yes, Master Dean. We ARE a minority.
What I'm trying to convey here (from the vacuum of my coccoon of existential fantasy....... ) is that it IS a generalisation. How can such a statement NOT be ?? It's like watching those dumb-ass cooking shows on the idiot-box - the chefs say " Everybody loves Pavlova " or " Everybody loves eggs "...... I hate both of those. I'm currently 42, and the amount of 'new' things I've taken on board in the last 9 years is immense. I'm just defiantly against this 'stop listening at 33' assumption. I bet you're older than me, and have discovered lots of 'new' things since you were 33. So, why would some superficial statistic offer a 'solid confirmation that 'people stop listening to new music at 33'. Only applies to bunch of joe-publics where music doesn't have much, if any, bearing on their lives.
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 07:58
If I understand the article correctly (probably not), all the data was sourced from internet streaming activity so isn't it skewed towards an internet savvy (and possibly more impressionable/fashionable youthful demographic anyway?) How many of those whose listening activity was collected were > 33 years old? For such a conclusion to be credible about when listening habits change over time they would have to collect data from say, age 16 to age 36 i.e. at least 20 years (and there was only a fraction of the music available then for streaming that there is now) If it was an even distribution across a broad age spectrum then the results would certainly be interesting but aren't there potentially millions of people > 33 who don't listen to streamed audio but still seek out unfamiliar music and are NOT included in the data?


Edited by ExittheLemming - May 03 2015 at 08:20
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Online
Points: 12660
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 10:12
Considering that all the best music was created before I was 33, I am not sure why this is even a question.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2015 at 11:25
Whatever...

I turned 33 in 1988 after 10 years of being intensely prog crazy.  Artists I have discovered and enjoyed since then in order, more or less - Tori Amos, Angelo Badalamenti, Toni Childs, NIN, Pere Ubu, Sarah McLachlan, Dave Stewart/Barbara Gaskin (though discovered Dave originally with Bruford), Yothu Yindi, Bela Fleck & the Flecktones, Alanis Moriessette, The Irresponsibles, Robert Wyatt, Nirvana, Stereolab, Pierre Bensusan, Afro Celt Sound System, The High Llamas, Electromagnets.

Got on sort a new burst of discoveries around the time I turned 40 - Steve Roach, Dark Matter, Gunn, The Trey Band, Paul Dunmall,  Les Claypool Frog Brigade, Primus, Porcupine Tree, Ozric Tentacles, Locomotive, Buckethead, Grey Star Morning, David Sylvian, Monade, Europa String Choir, Gitbox, The Muffins, Djam Karet, Praxis, Peter Blegvad, Radiohead, Divination, Explosions In The Sky, Pure Reason Revolution, Eluvium. Mr. Bungle, Maserati, The Pineapple Thief, Parallel Mind, Talisma, No Sound, Gongzilla, The Observatory, Phideaux, The Reasoning, Clara Ponty, Crimson Jazz Trio, Umphrey's McGee, Discipline, Paul Cusick, Knifeworld, Black Mountain, Big Big Train, Bubu, Flood, The Gorishankar, Happy Rhodes, Univers Zero, Mono, John Zorn, The Samuel Jackson Five, Stereokimono, Nadav Remez, The Tea Club, The Thieve's Kitchen, The Staves, Cardiacs.

Starting just last year - Perfect Beings, Dream The Electric Sleep, Anubis, Swans, Pymlico, Electric Orange, Fractile Mirror.

But then I am not most people.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.227 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.