| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Bartvarium 
Forum Groupie
Joined: December 26 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 52
|
 Topic: Special effects
Posted: December 30 2005 at 11:55 |
|
I think that in "te war of the worlds"there are a lot of amazing effects,but the lord of the rings is something realy special!!
|
|
Raise your sword mighty warrior
|
 |
Octamarium
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 24 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 132
|
Posted: December 30 2005 at 12:05 |
I think that Rocco and his brothers has great special effects........but this poll is just for crap minds 
|
|
Look in the mirror...my friend!
|
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: January 02 2006 at 12:22 |
Out of your list,TLOTR.
You should have included the Star Wars prequel trilogy,though.
|
|
|
|
Drew
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 12600
|
Posted: January 02 2006 at 12:39 |
Other- Green Day Videos
no....LOTR I guess
|
|
Jared
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 17529
|
Posted: January 02 2006 at 13:22 |
I'm not bothered to be honest; I've never been drawn to watching a film because of the special effects...in 80% of the cases, Hollywood tends to try and use them to cover up a script that is devoid of ideas, and dialogue which varies from mundane to banal....
...I'll stick with Polanski, Kubrick, Hitchcock & Woody Allen (among many others), ta very much...
|
|
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
|
|
Bartvarium
Forum Groupie
Joined: December 26 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 52
|
Posted: January 02 2006 at 14:30 |
 fandango wrote:
I'm not bothered to be honest; I've never been drawn to watching a film because of the special effects...in 80% of the cases, Hollywood tends to try and use them to cover up a script that is devoid of ideas, and dialogue which varies from mundane to banal....
...I'll stick with Polanski, Kubrick, Hitchcock & Woody Allen (among many others), ta very much...
|
Yes I agree!It is better a cultural and interessant film whit normal effects than a stupid and full of effects one!(but if we can have a film whit an important messages and amazing ffects...whi not? )
P.s.:sorry for forgetting Star wars!!!!!
Edited by Bartvarium
|
|
Raise your sword mighty warrior
|
|
Gentle Tull
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 13 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 518
|
Posted: January 02 2006 at 14:34 |
The best movie ever of course.....
LORD OF THE RINGS.
|
|
|
|
Jared
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 17529
|
Posted: January 03 2006 at 14:52 |
Bartvarium wrote:
fandango wrote:
I'm not bothered to be honest; I've never been drawn to watching a film because of the special effects...in 80% of the cases, Hollywood tends to try and use them to cover up a script that is devoid of ideas, and dialogue which varies from mundane to banal....
...I'll stick with Polanski, Kubrick, Hitchcock & Woody Allen (among many others), ta very much...
|
Yes I agree!It is better a cultural and interessant film whit normal effects than a stupid and full of effects one!(but if we can have a film whit an important messages and amazing ffects...whi not?)
P.s.:sorry for forgetting Star wars!!!!!
|
fair enough...you'll have to forgive me; I'm both a bit of a film snob and a grumpy old sod...
|
|
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
|
|
AtLossForWords
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 11 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 6699
|
Posted: January 03 2006 at 22:03 |
I'd have to go for Lord of the Rings. In that movie, the producer made the CGI look as close to reality as they possibly could have. I didn't think King Kong had the authenticity that Lord of the Rings did as far as effects.
About Star Wars, i love the films, but I'm sorry the CGI is a little overdone. I would have liked them to have built some sets. I don't care too much for movies filmed in front of a green screen. I still enjoy the Star Wars Movies though.
|
  "Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls."
|
|
GoldenSpiral
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3839
|
Posted: January 04 2006 at 08:20 |
out of that list... LOTR was great, but i prefer the effects in the Matrix. they were more groundbreaking at the time i guess. plus, in the 2nd one when the 2 trucks collide head on... damn. that owns.
P.S. star wars = sh*te. (IMHO )
|
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Special effects
