Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Michael Romeo vs. John Petrucci
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMichael Romeo vs. John Petrucci
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Ytse Jam View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 02 2005
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 41 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: Michael Romeo vs. John Petrucci
    Posted: February 19 2006 at 16:22
I think Michael Romeo is a very good guitar player, but i prefer Petrucci.
What I listen? ----> http://www.last.fm/user/Junges/



Back to Top
Rising Force View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 09 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 439 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 16:19
Originally posted by W.Chuck W.Chuck wrote:



And I hate the arguments, that guitarists are bad because they play fast. What would you do if you could play really fast and play metal? Maybe you would think "Oh, why should I have fun, I should better play 0,3 notes per second, it's not very demanding for me, but I should do it beceause some people's restricted minds..."



 
Back to Top
W.Chuck View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 606 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 16:11
Originally posted by el böthy el böthy wrote:

Im not a big shreder fan...so Petrucci and Romeo aren´t my favorite. Yet I must say I prefer Petrucci, because he does or trys to do different thinks in each song, where as Romeo always goes as fast as humanly possible...I never heard a Romeo solo that wasn´t "not" fast...I think that´s something he can not do, play slow...Im pretty sure he can´t help it to go a 100 km/h...


Slow solos: Shades of Grey, Candlelight Fantasia, Sonata, Lady of the Snow, Egypt, The Odyssey, Dawn of a Million Souls and several songs with the band "Phantom's Opera"!

And his speed is different... His fastest stuff are e.g. the solo in "King of Terrors". There are many fast solos of him that are only half as fast as this one...

And I hate the arguments, that guitarists are bad because they play fast. What would you do if you could play really fast and play metal? Maybe you would think "Oh, why should I have fun, I should better play 0,3 notes per second, it's not very demanding for me, but I should do it beceause some people's restricted minds..."

Back to Top
Sweet Prog View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: January 27 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 23 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 14:50
Dude two of my absolute favorites

This is like asking me which parent will live and which won't.

I simply can not choose.

I knew about and loved Petrucci for far longer than I have Romeo though.  I always listened to DT but never even knew about the fact that they were "Progressive"  I didn't have much knowledge about the genre at all and just thought there was Rock and Metal, and nothing diff.

Upon discovering Progressive I also discovered Prog Metal and thusly Symphony X and adore Michael Romeo's playing.   I just can't choose, although if we're talkin' about long-time liking here then Petrucci simply because I knew he exsisted longer hehe.
Back to Top
AtLossForWords View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 11 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 6699 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 14:39
Definately Petrucci, he has much more variation and clarity in his tone and his playing.  Petrucci's done everything from Fusion Jazz Metal with LTE to classical shread with JP and JR.  His tone clear, and the listener can hear every note.  His style is one that's built around clean playing.  Romeo is a decent player, but he's very sloppy especially with his solos.  I'll give the edge to Petrucci for his clean playing.

"Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls."
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 14:34
I like Petrucci's style much more. Romeo is pretty good, but SymX doesn't move me nearly as much as DT.
last.fm
Back to Top
HeirToRuin View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 30 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 454 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 14:24
I'd have to go with Petrucci simply because his playing is more diverse....at least comparing Symphony X albums to Dream Theater albums.

Now, within the context of METAL only...I'd give that to Romeo (especially compared to the recent DT material).  However, I've not heard Romeo do anything except SymX so I don't what else he can pull off.
ARTEMIA -http://www.reverbnation.com/artemiamusic
L.i.E. - http://www.reverbnati
Back to Top
el böthy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 27 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 6336 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 13:44
Im not a big shreder fan...so Petrucci and Romeo aren´t my favorite. Yet I must say I prefer Petrucci, because he does or trys to do different thinks in each song, where as Romeo always goes as fast as humanly possible...I never heard a Romeo solo that wasn´t "not" fast...I think that´s something he can not do, play slow...Im pretty sure he can´t help it to go a 100 km/h...
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 13:35

This topic will turn into a bunch of arguing.A similar poll did.

Personally,I prefer Petrucci.

But Romeo is no slouch either.


Back to Top
jesperz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 12 2006
Location: Singapore
Status: Offline
Points: 233 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 12:23
Wow.. This is sure a subjective question...

Well, I am more of a petrucci fanz, of course i'll give it to Petrucci...

But comparing musicians is alittle difficult..

Its more of a style really.. There is no better or worse in music in my opinion. It will be better if you put this question as who's style is more popular among ppl.. Petrucci or Micheal?

Cheers mate!
Z'
<<Dark side of Z' Drummination>>
Back to Top
Bartvarium View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: December 26 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 52 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 11:34
I think they are great musicians,but I like a little more Petrucci!!!!!
Raise your sword mighty warrior
Back to Top
W.Chuck View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 606 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 11:23
Michael Romeo for me!
Both are very good in technique, MJR maybe even a bit more, but John Petrucci also he is really fast and has some cool licks and riffs, has never been something really special for me.



And thanks for the links Blind Camel,
this one is quite cool as well : http://youtube.com/watch?v=LJ7Xfk6r2tU&search=michael%20%20r omeo

Edited by W.Chuck

Back to Top
Ed_The_Dead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 29 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4928 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 09:54
Petrucci of course, though Romeo is still awesome...
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 09:12
I don`t believe there is a best in this debate , both are as great as each other  (though I prefer Romeo by a whisker)
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 09:01
There both fantastic musicians but I find considerably more variaty in Patrucci's playing than I do in MJR's. Sym X have far to many songs that sound very similar (think all there 5 minute songs) and he does dominate the sound of the band. 

Edited by sleeper
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
Blind Camel View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: February 06 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 19 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 05:24
they are both very good...

i'd give the edge to romeo, but thats just my preference. he plays a lot of neoclassical stuff ala yngwie, but he is better in the sense that he has good rhythym parts, and can use phrasing and tastefulness alot better than yngwie. the whole band are top notch, they do get a little cheesy at times, but overall its good stuff. the odyssey is incredible.

no doubt petrucci is a master also, he is definitely right up there.

here are some michael romeo demonstrations:

sea of lies: http://youtube.com/watch?v=QzW5UK0yhws&search=michael%20 romeo

out of the ashes: http://youtube.com/watch?v=hH_tWncJvHQ&search=michael%20 romeo
Back to Top
martinprog77 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 31 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2511 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 05:07
TWO GREAT GUITAR PLAYERS.WHO IS THE BEST...THIS IS A HARD ONE.
Back to Top
acheron View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 12 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 148 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2006 at 04:39

i've been a DT fan for a while now, and i just recently got into Symphony X

Ive been comparing John' and Michael's guitar styles lately and i'm wondering your guys opinions on these two outstanding guitarists.  a few weeks ago i would have preferd John over Mike, but i think ive switched to prefer Mike recently.  John's playing seems to always circulate around a few chromatic shredding runs, his technical mastery over the instrument is out of this world, but his tone and his machine like approach to playing gets a little irritating.  Michael on the other hand has suprisingly tasteful solo's and great tone.  no doubt he can play as fast as anyone in the world, but he seems to always have a good amount of improvisation in his solos.  his playing in general is incredible tight yet loose and fluid at the same time. (think evolution (the grand design)) 

 

 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.119 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.