| Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
xtopher
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 19 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 391
|
Topic: Yes vs Dream Theater Posted: August 22 2006 at 17:41 |
Originally posted by Sacred 22
Considering
the age demographic at this web site I am curious to how you feel. I
know many young proggers who prefer DT to Yes. I prefer Yes by a long
shot myself but then I am 49. |
You are a sick and sadistic man, Steve
Originally posted by Sacred 22
Originally posted by bruin69
I agree that Dream Theater shouldn't be regarded as young upstarts who haven't paid their dues - they've put a lot of work in and deserve kudos for that. I just can't relate to them; to me they're just too passionless and over-technical. Please note this is a personal opinion. I'm no musical expert; I just likes what I likes... |
I think young people tend to favour metal prog over other types of prog. This is not exclusive but more of a general observation and even knowing myself as a kid, although I tired of it quickly. As a woman once told, "Dream Theater is angry man's music" I think she has a point. Their technical prowess is certainly something to see. Ya, they have talent in spades, but I really do believe that thier composition is a tad weaker than the more polished Yes.
Interesting contrasts though. I would have liked to see them on the same bill as they were for a while touring the States. Yes with Dream Theater. Must have been a interesting show. | To say that DT is angry man's music is quite an overgeneralization. True, they are a metal band. But they are easily the most versatile, far-reaching metal band on the planet—a fact people tend to ignore. 95% of metal is, well, sh*t. I can't even listen to it. I mean, yeah, it's a little fun for about 30 seconds or so, but then it gets tedious. DT is so much more than just a metal band: they are a symphonic band, they are an experimental metal band, they are a kick-ass neo-prog band, they are creators of incredible ambient soundscapes, and and they are everything else in between. Their lyrics and concepts are very carefully-written (even if sometimes the lyrics themselves lack subtlety), and are far more sensical and enticing than the jibberish Jon Anderson comes up with. And they are excellent songwriters, a fact that is widely unrecognized given the breadth of their scope.
|
|
|
 |
Progarchives.com
Advertisement
|
Sponsored links (registered users, log in to remove)
|
|
|
| |
Leningrad
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 15 2006
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7985
|
Posted: August 22 2006 at 17:41 |
Howe>Petrucci
Squire>Myung
Wakeman>Rudess
Bruford>Portnoy
Anderson>LaBrie
YES x1000000!
I'm 14, by the way. I'm very weird.
|
|
|
 |
xtopher
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 19 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 391
|
Posted: August 22 2006 at 17:55 |
|
I'll give my two cents:
Anderson < LaBrie
LaBrie is just a chameleon. He can be powerful, he can be heartwrenching, and he can soar. Anderson's voice is pleasant, but his lyrics are distracting and irritating.
Howe < Petrucci
Technical ability: Howe < Petrucci Creativity: Howe > Petrucci Songwriting: Howe < Petrucci Versatility: Howe < Petrucci
As far as 'emotion' goes, well, even if Petrucci's lack of subtlety in his phrasing may be his biggest weakness, I haven't exactly been impressed with Howe's phrasing either.
Squire = Myung
I love that I can always hear Squire, whereas you can only hear Myung about half the time. This is just the nature of metal; the bass mostly serves to pump up the low-end punch of the guitar. But Myung's growl, when you can hear it, is great.
Wakeman < Rudess
Rudess can play anything. He can shred, he can purrr... and I've become increasingly aware, the more I've listened to his work with Dream Theater, just how tasteful his work is. Just listen to his work in "Blind Faith" or the second verse of "Endless Sacrifice." Just... the correct notes to play.
Bruford > Portnoy
Portnoy might be in the business of showing off his skills more often, but I do prefer Bruford on this one.
|
|
|
 |
Asyte2c00
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 15 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2099
|
Posted: August 22 2006 at 17:57 |
|
|
 |
xtopher
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 19 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 391
|
Posted: August 22 2006 at 18:05 |
Originally posted by WaywardSon
Oh yeah, Virgil Donati is a monster on the drums!! I agree! " src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley32.gif"> |
me too. hope the new planet x work comes soon!
|
|
|
 |
Dr. Evil
Forum Groupie
Joined: April 09 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 95
|
Posted: August 22 2006 at 18:07 |
|
|
 |
Sacred 22
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 24 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1509
|
Posted: August 22 2006 at 18:10 |
Originally posted by xtopher
Originally posted by Sacred 22
Considering the age demographic at this web site I am curious to how you feel. I know many young proggers who prefer DT to Yes. I prefer Yes by a long shot myself but then I am 49.
|
You are a sick and sadistic man, Steve
Ok. first I must appologize to the young people here that understand the vast chasm that separates Dream Theater and Yes. To you, I take a bow.
Now getting to you PINK. You are one of those Metal Heads that are a bit slow to understand........ ........ It's ok, some people just take a wee bit longer to grasp the truth. I have all the faith in the world that you will eventually come around and see the light.
Originally posted by Sacred 22
Originally posted by bruin69
I agree that Dream Theater shouldn't be regarded as young upstarts who haven't paid their dues - they've put a lot of work in and deserve kudos for that. I just can't relate to them; to me they're just too passionless and over-technical. Please note this is a personal opinion. I'm no musical expert; I just likes what I likes... |
I think young people tend to favour metal prog over other types of prog. This is not exclusive but more of a general observation and even knowing myself as a kid, although I tired of it quickly. As a woman once told, "Dream Theater is angry man's music" I think she has a point. Their technical prowess is certainly something to see. Ya, they have talent in spades, but I really do believe that thier composition is a tad weaker than the more polished Yes.
Interesting contrasts though. I would have liked to see them on the same bill as they were for a while touring the States. Yes with Dream Theater. Must have been a interesting show.
| To say that DT is angry man's music is quite an overgeneralization. (calm down Pink....temper temper) True, they are a metal band. But they are easily the most versatile, far-reaching metal band on the planet—a fact people tend to ignore. 95% of metal is, well, sh*t. I can't even listen to it. I mean, yeah, it's a little fun for about 30 seconds or so, but then it gets tedious. DT is so much more than just a metal band: they are a symphonic band, they are an experimental metal band, they are a kick-ass neo-prog band, they are creators of incredible ambient soundscapes, and and they are everything else in between. Their lyrics and concepts are very carefully-written (even if sometimes the lyrics themselves lack subtlety), and are far more sensical and enticing than the jibberish Jon Anderson comes up with. And they are excellent songwriters, a fact that is widely unrecognized given the breadth of their scope.
As far as Metal bands go. I would have to agree with you based on the metal bands that I have heard over the years. They dazzle, they are amazing........wow......ohhhh......ahhhhh......"man can that Petrucci play holy sh*t" and all that neato stuff that impressionable young little buggers like yourself are drawn to.................
I'm teasing you Pink, but I don't think you are going to find too many people that have any musical sense at all that will side with your hero's in Dream Theater.
Who said this was a pointless poll???????  |
|
 |
xtopher
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 19 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 391
|
Posted: August 22 2006 at 18:12 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Sacred 22
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 24 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1509
|
Posted: August 22 2006 at 18:18 |
Amazing and here I thought this poll was long ago dead. Just goes to prove the hunger and passion for DT polls.
|
 |
xtopher
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 19 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 391
|
Posted: August 22 2006 at 18:30 |
Originally posted by Sacred 22
Originally posted by xtopher
Originally posted by Sacred 22
Considering the age demographic at this web site I am curious to how you feel. I know many young proggers who prefer DT to Yes. I prefer Yes by a long shot myself but then I am 49.
|
You are a sick and sadistic man, Steve
Ok. first I must appologize to the young people here that understand the vast chasm that separates Dream Theater and Yes. To you, I take a bow.
Now getting to you PINK. You are one of those Metal Heads that are a bit slow to understand........ ........ It's ok, some people just take a wee bit longer to grasp the truth. I have all the faith in the world that you will eventually come around and see the light.
Originally posted by Sacred 22
Originally posted by bruin69
I agree that Dream Theater shouldn't be regarded as young upstarts who haven't paid their dues - they've put a lot of work in and deserve kudos for that. I just can't relate to them; to me they're just too passionless and over-technical. Please note this is a personal opinion. I'm no musical expert; I just likes what I likes... |
I think young people tend to favour metal prog over other types of prog. This is not exclusive but more of a general observation and even knowing myself as a kid, although I tired of it quickly. As a woman once told, "Dream Theater is angry man's music" I think she has a point. Their technical prowess is certainly something to see. Ya, they have talent in spades, but I really do believe that thier composition is a tad weaker than the more polished Yes.
Interesting contrasts though. I would have liked to see them on the same bill as they were for a while touring the States. Yes with Dream Theater. Must have been a interesting show.
| To say that DT is angry man's music is quite an overgeneralization. (calm down Pink....temper temper) True, they are a metal band. But they are easily the most versatile, far-reaching metal band on the planet—a fact people tend to ignore. 95% of metal is, well, sh*t. I can't even listen to it. I mean, yeah, it's a little fun for about 30 seconds or so, but then it gets tedious. DT is so much more than just a metal band: they are a symphonic band, they are an experimental metal band, they are a kick-ass neo-prog band, they are creators of incredible ambient soundscapes, and and they are everything else in between. Their lyrics and concepts are very carefully-written (even if sometimes the lyrics themselves lack subtlety), and are far more sensical and enticing than the jibberish Jon Anderson comes up with. And they are excellent songwriters, a fact that is widely unrecognized given the breadth of their scope.
As far as Metal bands go. I would have to agree with you based on the metal bands that I have heard over the years. They dazzle, they are amazing........wow......ohhhh......ahhhhh......"man can that Petrucci play holy sh*t" and all that neato stuff that impressionable young little buggers like yourself are drawn to.................
I'm teasing you Pink, but I don't think you are going to find too many people that have any musical sense at all that will side with your hero's in Dream Theater.
Who said this was a pointless poll???????  | |
Hey if you'd be willing to buy me all your favorite classic 70's prog, then I'd listen to it and give it a fair interpretation   But until that day, I guess I won't have "seen the light". From what I've heard so far, Dream Theater takes the complexities and melodies I adore, and gives it the metal intensity I crave. And it all comes wrapped in virtuoso playing—my biggest weakness ( because apparently progheads don't like people who can play their instruments ). But hey, give me a break. My path into prog included Joe Satriani, Steve Vai, and Steve Morse.
|
|
|
 |