Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Transatlantic Virus
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedTransatlantic Virus

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
fuxi View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2459
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2008 at 03:46
If I can add my two cents, it's worth listening to BANTAM TO BEHEMOTH by Birds and Buildings, the latest project of Dan Britton (keyboard virtuoso behind Deluge Grander): ambitious, highly inventive prog, predominantly instrumental and with all the restless fury of "The Gates of Delirium". I mean, let bands like Spock's Beard or Marillion compromise as much as they want to (IF that really is what they're doing), there still are first-rate North American bands out there, taking ideas from classic British prog to new levels!
Back to Top
CCVP View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 15 2007
Location: Vitória, Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 7971
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2008 at 08:33
Originally posted by fuxi fuxi wrote:

If I can add my two cents, it's worth listening to BANTAM TO BEHEMOTH by Birds and Buildings, the latest project of Dan Britton (keyboard virtuoso behind Deluge Grander): ambitious, highly inventive prog, predominantly instrumental and with all the restless fury of "The Gates of Delirium". I mean, let bands like Spock's Beard or Marillion compromise as much as they want to (IF that really is what they're doing), there still are first-rate North American bands out there, taking ideas from classic British prog to new levels!
 
True, and not only north american bands, but also some european bands. However, influence is one thing and repetition / copy is another. any bands nowadays are simply copying the 70's and that really sucks. If i wanted to hear prog that sounds like the 70's i would listen to the actual "old school" prog from the 70's itself or "old school" prog metal from the 90's and late 80's, i preffer listening to Yes / King Crimson / Dream Theater / ELP than to a band that souns like Yes / King Crimson / Dream Theater / ELP.
 
A good example of influence is Neal Morse's music, which is very influenced by thge 70's but its not exactly a copy, and , Pagan's Mind, that is a total Dream Theater copy (hell, even their name is written with the same DT letters).
Back to Top
salmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Content Addition

Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2008 at 11:05
Never had an issue with Spock's Beard's work. I think their recent output is weaker but at least they haven't repeated themselves. Compositionally, though I'll grant you there IS a definite AOR influence, I find them in a completely different league to most in the 'retro prog' field in that the melodies tend to be discernible and not tied up in endless musical derring-do. I liked Transatlantic too, but there's a tendency for greater 'bloat' than Spock's Beard had, with their two albums being almost entirely dominated by massive epics.
 
The Flower Kings are often guilty of that padding I mentioned, with melodies tending to be obscured by tangled music and overlong compositions. TFK are capable of moments of sublime beauty and they probably get closest to the original symphonic sound, but I agree with most of Bob/Easy Livin's reviews of theirs where he says that compositionally, their work does not always really 'flow' as well as the 70s symphonic acts did at their best. I love 'Stardust We Are' and 'Space Revolver' though, which keeps the epics to a minimum.
 
As for Dream Theater? I've never liked any of their albums in their entirety. Again, compositionally I have issues with them, as the solo sections are often too long and occasionally bear little resemblance to the crux of the song. I liked 'Systematic Chaos' when it came out but I can't have played it for months and months. It sure as hell didn't break any new ground, I'll grant you that much, and that's my issue with TFK's latest output too- they are retreading their own steps.
 
Marillion, though, I find to be on a higher plane than any of these acts. I'd argue that as much as I love the Fish-era albums, they have now become a more complex, rich (complex/rich to me doesn't mean twiddly time signatures and long solos) and certainly more diverse beast over the years. Perhaps the Hogarth albums are less consistent than the Fish ones, but more risks are arguably being taken. Fish still has something to say too though- '13th Star' is a brilliant album, sounding contemporary and packing a real emotional punch. I don't really see them as being more 'poppy'- there were always singles on the Fish albums too.
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2008 at 11:39
Nice one Salmacis, well said!
 
Good to see you around, hope things are going well.
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2008 at 12:44
Originally posted by salmacis salmacis wrote:

Never had an issue with Spock's Beard's work. I think their recent output is weaker but at least they haven't repeated themselves. Compositionally, though I'll grant you there IS a definite AOR influence, I find them in a completely different league to most in the 'retro prog' field in that the melodies tend to be discernible and not tied up in endless musical derring-do. I liked Transatlantic too, but there's a tendency for greater 'bloat' than Spock's Beard had, with their two albums being almost entirely dominated by massive epics.
 
The Flower Kings are often guilty of that padding I mentioned, with melodies tending to be obscured by tangled music and overlong compositions. TFK are capable of moments of sublime beauty and they probably get closest to the original symphonic sound, but I agree with most of Bob/Easy Livin's reviews of theirs where he says that compositionally, their work does not always really 'flow' as well as the 70s symphonic acts did at their best. I love 'Stardust We Are' and 'Space Revolver' though, which keeps the epics to a minimum.
 
As for Dream Theater? I've never liked any of their albums in their entirety. Again, compositionally I have issues with them, as the solo sections are often too long and occasionally bear little resemblance to the crux of the song. I liked 'Systematic Chaos' when it came out but I can't have played it for months and months. It sure as hell didn't break any new ground, I'll grant you that much, and that's my issue with TFK's latest output too- they are retreading their own steps.
 
Marillion, though, I find to be on a higher plane than any of these acts. I'd argue that as much as I love the Fish-era albums, they have now become a more complex, rich (complex/rich to me doesn't mean twiddly time signatures and long solos) and certainly more diverse beast over the years. Perhaps the Hogarth albums are less consistent than the Fish ones, but more risks are arguably being taken. Fish still has something to say too though- '13th Star' is a brilliant album, sounding contemporary and packing a real emotional punch. I don't really see them as being more 'poppy'- there were always singles on the Fish albums too.

Once agian I find myslef having to agree almost completely with what salmacis has said (not the bit about Transatlantic though, I think they are two very well balanced, concieved and executed albums).

Good job that man.Clap

With rregards to the bands that stay close to thier influences, I have no problem with them. Symphonic prog is now the oldest genre of prog (I think) and subsequently has been explored to a very large degree, so its very hard for a modern band to brake the mold, besides how many of those classic bands are still recording albums at a high quality? Not many as far as I know , and they do say that veriety is the spice of life, I know I'd get bored with only a specific number of old albums and nothing new in the same style to look forward too after a while. 
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
salmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Content Addition

Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2008 at 14:13
Oh I like the Transatlantic albums, don't get me wrong! Smile Am less enthused about Neal Morse's solo output, though- he's another one that seems to be repeating himself now IMHO.
 
But really, let's face it, even some of the old acts started repeating themselves at some point- Yes' 'Keys To Ascension' albums and the ABWH album springs to mind.
I preferred albums like '90125' and 'Drama' to those backward-looking affairs; at least '90125' and 'Drama' had a contemporary sound, whilst ABWH and KTA show a band desparately trying to match former glories and failing (played 'That That Is' yesterday, it's still a mess!). I heard some samples of Asia's latest opus 'Phoenix' and it looks like they are stuck in a 1982 timewarp. Disappointing, really.
 
I agree with you, sleeper; looking to the 1970s for inspiration is not a bad thing in and of itself. As long as the songwriting is up to scratch I'm fine with it. But too often, I find it isn't. The worst offender for me was Glass Hammer's 'The Inconsolable Secret'- there was just no flow to the big epics on there, hardly any melodic refrains to latch onto. The only pleasure came from picking out where the influences came from and the retro synthesisers/keyboards...which is a pretty hollow pleasure in the end!
Back to Top
E-Dub View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 24 2006
Location: Elkhorn, WI
Status: Offline
Points: 7910
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2008 at 14:30
Originally posted by el böthy el böthy wrote:

Originally posted by DJPuffyLemon DJPuffyLemon wrote:

very innovative neo-prog band

Isnt innovative and neo-prog an oxymoron?Geek


And didn't we just have a fairly big blow-up a month or two ago when somebody made a similar statement from way out in left field that had nothing to do with the thread?

I've seen it time and time again how there's no room for stuff like this, but it obviously goes in one snobbish ear and out the other.

E
Back to Top
E-Dub View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 24 2006
Location: Elkhorn, WI
Status: Offline
Points: 7910
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2008 at 14:45
Transatlantic, though not groundbreaking, produced some of progressive's most memorable music in the past 10 years, in my opinion. What you have is sturdy prog music that stands the test of time. Then again, I'm not one of these over-thinkers who has to find meaning in every guitar chord or tom fill. I simply like what I hear.

The comments about Marillion simply slay me (as many of you could surmise). This band is constantly re-inventing themselves and trying new things to keep their music fresh. There's nothing stagnant or complacent about Marillion. The critique strikes me as being preconceived and ill-informed, but it shouldn't take away from what the band has done to re-establish themselves in the past 8 years.

I think it's abundantly clear that Marbles became one of Marillion's best...including anything from the previous administration. It's music that I haven't heard previously and many consider it a masterpiece. If people didn't "get it", then that's not Marillion's fault.

E
Back to Top
EnglishAssassin View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 83
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2008 at 18:32
Originally posted by E-Dub E-Dub wrote:

Originally posted by el böthy el böthy wrote:

Originally posted by DJPuffyLemon DJPuffyLemon wrote:

very innovative neo-prog band

Isnt innovative and neo-prog an oxymoron?Geek


And didn't we just have a fairly big blow-up a month or two ago when somebody made a similar statement from way out in left field that had nothing to do with the thread?


There is something of a fair point being made here; that Marillion's early career bore a substantial creative debt to Gabriel-era Genesis.

Otherwise, I agree wholeheartedly with E-Dub; they've never been mere copyists, and they've successfully reinvented their sound several times over, Marbles being a case in point.

To try to address the original contention; I have always rather felt that much of the enjoyment to found listening to Transatlantic lay in the fact that they were paying unabashedly affectionate homage to the prog rock bands of the '70s.  Much the same applies, love them both as I do, to the Flower Kings, and, albeit to a lesser extent, Spock's Beard.  That's just something one has to accept when listening to them.  Modern symphonic prog is a somewhat backward-looking genre, but that doesn't, for me anyway, spoil the enjoyment of it.

Dream Theater are, to my mind, something of a different case.  Twenty years ago they staked out their territory, called it prog metal, and have been largely content to play around within those (fairly wide) boundaries since.  I think it would not be unfair to say that, like Marillion, they've still enjoyed more creative growth than most of the bands who influenced them.

A further thought occurs; Marillion have been recording for twenty five years, Dream Theater for nineteen, and have both managed, with, it must be admitted, some ups and downs (This Strange Engine, Falling Into infinity) to remain critically well-regarded.  From a certain point of view, that's a good deal longer than either Genesis, Yes or ELP ever managed.  From a certain point of view...


Edited by EnglishAssassin - April 05 2008 at 18:32
Back to Top
meat puppet View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: March 23 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 12
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 06 2008 at 07:40
This is an interesting thread. It makes sense to me.

A know a classical composer who has listened to various bits of prog.....from ELP,Yes,Crimson,Tool,PF,DT..............he states, "its not proper music, its just an overlong pop song, or a combination of seperate songs bolted together, it doesn't go anywhere, just one big jam". I didn't understand that comment at the time.

That seems to be the essence of it........prog is just a re-hash of other music styles bolted togeter........thats why this thread exists. These bands are not progressive at all !

The real innovation is in the 3 minute pop song, not just the one you hear on the radio, the underground stuff, otherwise only classical music is really is progressive.

Thats not to stop anyone enjoying prog, immerse and enjoy I say and be aware that the lack of true progression is actually the nature of prog..........its actually regressive music. When metal bands happened then progsters welded that modern sound into the musical tapestry and continue to weld more bits as they become popular in the mainstream


Back to Top
DJPuffyLemon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2008
Location: L
Status: Offline
Points: 520
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 06 2008 at 12:24

Meat puppet your comments sound like they came out of the mouth of someone who hates music with any outside influences....so like ALL music!

Of course rock/pop/prog music takes influences from previous sources, but it doesn't mean its regressive. True rock takes its influences from blues and folk, while prog admittedly does look further back to jazz and classical music, but that's only to become more innovative and original.
 
As for classical music, its innovative era seemed to exist around 300 years ago, what new stuff is it coming out with now? As far as I know, its a stagnant genre. While, rock (and in extension prog) is constantly evolving and looking forward...PROGRESSING if you will. :-p


Edited by DJPuffyLemon - April 06 2008 at 12:27
Back to Top
meat puppet View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: March 23 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 12
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 06 2008 at 19:50
You misunderstood my comments.

I can quite happily live with any amount of outside influences in music, its the tag 'progressive' that I think is wrong, it probably always was. There are probably very few truly progressive bands around that take music to another level, most of those would be found in the true (eventualy mainstream) pop culture.....rap, reggae, soul, hiphop, dance etc, metal. Those influences find their way into 'progressive' bands, so you have to wonder what is truly progressive. I would suggest (and interviews with band members back this up) that most 'prog' bands regard themselves as simply 'rock'.

Your assertion that progressive bands borrow from the past can hardly be seen as innovative which is exactly my point........borrowing from the past is regressive. It is why these bands all have similar elements without one strong theme emerging, its the theme that is innovative.

Classicals heyday might be over but the classical music scene is far from dead........and its not my particular interest either. Take a look through the contemporary classic releases over the last few years, the music is pretty challenging !!

Again, remember I listen and love Tool, DT,Riverside, Opeth and cut my teeth in the heyday of prog which I lived and breathed.......ELP, Amon Duul, KC,VDG,PF,Genesis,PFM,Gentle Giant,Pete Sinfield,Yes,Nice,Moody Blues Hawkwind, BackDoor and many others. That was the days when  'progressive' was tabbed and back then it was a springboard from the bands of the day, the sound was different. These days that sound has simply been welded to other genres and though it is interesting its far from new......ie progressive.


Back to Top
ProgRockerJDS View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: March 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 64
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2008 at 17:26
I don't see the problem. Personally, I think that as long as it's good music, a band can do whatever they want, including writing a pop song designed to be a hit single. Pop music isn't bad, it's not prog but as long as it's well written pop, it's still good.

And as far as the outside influences go, a lot of artists copy other artists when they're writing music. It's nothing new.


Edited by ProgRockerJDS - April 12 2008 at 17:38
Back to Top
DJPuffyLemon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2008
Location: L
Status: Offline
Points: 520
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 01:25
Okay, add The Tangent to my list of complaints:
Originally posted by wikipedia wikipedia wrote:

....n 2002 by keyboardists Andy Tillison and Sam Baine of Parallel or 90 Degrees and Flower Kings guitarist Roine Stolt, bassist Jonas Reingold, and drummer Zoltan Csörsz.
Oh god! Roine Stolt ruins music!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.