Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
apps79
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 15 2007
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 1551
|
Topic: Prog survival Posted: May 15 2008 at 12:47 |
I'm really curious about your answers...
|
|
Queen By-Tor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
|
Posted: May 15 2008 at 12:57 |
(This is all imo! And all is hindsight, I wasn't around at the time)
Some consider Prog a fad of the 70s, but fads come and go but fans stay forever really. Prog is great music and it's got a nice big ol' following in the underground scene. Prog heads may be hard to find in every day life, but those you find are completely dedicated to the genre. Sure, the critics started to destroy the genre and the bands started to shift going into the 80s, but I think the fans who later became the neo and metal bands are what kept the genre going.
Prog will never die yo'!
|
|
Dr. Prog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 306
|
Posted: May 15 2008 at 13:09 |
the idea that prog 'disappeared' or was killed off by punk or some other such rubbish is just that----rubbish. It simply went underground and was less in the mainstream because of changing tastes and market manipulation. Some styles fell more out of favor than others. This idea that prog was killed off and slayed by the big bad monster of punk is hilarious, and has been foisted on us by prog hating media, led by Rolling Stone magazine, and film clips of Johnny Rotten wearing I hate Pink Floyd shirts. Rotten years later confessed he actually liked Pink Floyd and it was all a marketing gimmick for the Sex Pistols. Many of the writers who started working for the big music periodicals in the late 70s and early 80s were younger and came from a punk background, and absolutely hated prog rock with a passion. Those kinds of writers kept writing for those kinds of magazines, and writers who liked prog did not, which exacerbated the anti-prog sentiment in the press. Don't believe everything you read.
|
|
Norbert
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 20 2005
Location: Hungary
Status: Offline
Points: 2506
|
Posted: May 15 2008 at 13:45 |
Rather just went underground.
There is a life beyond mainstream media.
|
|
MovingPictures07
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
|
Posted: May 15 2008 at 13:46 |
Dr. Prog wrote:
the idea that prog 'disappeared' or was killed off by punk or some other such rubbish is just that----rubbish. It simply went underground and was less in the mainstream because of changing tastes and market manipulation. Some styles fell more out of favor than others. This idea that prog was killed off and slayed by the big bad monster of punk is hilarious, and has been foisted on us by prog hating media, led by Rolling Stone magazine, and film clips of Johnny Rotten wearing I hate Pink Floyd shirts. Rotten years later confessed he actually liked Pink Floyd and it was all a marketing gimmick for the Sex Pistols. Many of the writers who started working for the big music periodicals in the late 70s and early 80s were younger and came from a punk background, and absolutely hated prog rock with a passion. Those kinds of writers kept writing for those kinds of magazines, and writers who liked prog did not, which exacerbated the anti-prog sentiment in the press. Don't believe everything you read. |
Great post. I don't really have anything to add to that.
|
|
|
horsewithteeth11
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598
|
Posted: May 15 2008 at 13:52 |
|
|
|
Dr. Prog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 306
|
Posted: May 15 2008 at 13:53 |
just an added thought, if anything, it was disco that did more damage to prog than punk, at least here in the US. Punk here in the US stayed more in the background or underground in the late 70s. I was in high school at the hieght of the disco madness, and my buddies and I would go to these parties which had turned into disco parties seemingly overnight, and we would put on Yes's Close to the Edge or ELPs Brain Salad Surgery in place of the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack or KC and the Sunshine Band on the turntable, just to piss off the neatly coiffered open shirt chain wearing types who thought they were John Travolta. Needless to say, that made it harder for us to pick up girls at the parties too........
Edited by Dr. Prog - May 15 2008 at 14:28
|
|
Queen By-Tor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
|
Posted: May 15 2008 at 13:58 |
It's funny, I completely forgot about the whole disco thing. I know I'd like to do that exact same thing to some of the house parties I've seen around. "Screw Fergie! You guys need to hear some of THIS" and then put on some BSS or hell, Of Natural History! But hey, who needs to get laid when you can listen to prog?
|
|
MovingPictures07
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
|
Posted: May 15 2008 at 14:43 |
Dr. Prog wrote:
just an added thought, if anything, it was disco that did more damage to prog than punk, at least here in the US. Punk here in the US stayed more in the background or underground in the late 70s. I was in high school at the hieght of the disco madness, and my buddies and I would go to these parties which had turned into disco parties seemingly overnight, and we would put on Yes's Close to the Edge or ELPs Brain Salad Surgery in place of the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack or KC and the Sunshine Band on the turntable, just to piss off the neatly coiffered open shirt chain wearing types who thought they were John Travolta. Needless to say, that made it harder for us to pick up girls at the parties too........ |
Yeah, I never lived through the 1970s, but that sounds perfectly
logical to me and I always did believe that over here disco had more of
an epochal impact than punk did (though in my generation it would be
vice versa, so it seems).
CTTE would be hilarious enough to see, but I think putting Brain Salad
Surgery on there would be hard to top in terms of responses. Sounds
great.
|
|
|
KoS
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
|
Posted: May 15 2008 at 14:50 |
King By-Tor wrote:
It's funny, I completely forgot about the whole disco thing. I know I'd like to do that exact same thing to some of the house parties I've seen around. "Screw Fergie! You guys need to hear some of THIS" and then put on some BSS or hell, Of Natural History!
But hey, who needs to get laid when you can listen to prog?
|
Yeah, refer to the "Prog or Sex" poll. funny stuff.
Edited by king of Siam - May 15 2008 at 14:58
|
|
MovingPictures07
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
|
Posted: May 15 2008 at 14:51 |
King By-Tor wrote:
It's funny, I completely forgot about the whole disco thing. I know I'd like to do that exact same thing to some of the house parties I've seen around. "Screw Fergie! You guys need to hear some of THIS" and then put on some BSS or hell, Of Natural History!
But hey, who needs to get laid when you can listen to prog?
|
This reminds me... I went to an extremely small private high school, and when you reached senior year (if you did... my school had the reputation of being notoriously really tough academically) they initially allowed you the privilege of a little room (which we called the Senior Lounge... but this could be taken away obviously with stupidity). Everyone pitched in and got a stereo for it so that we could listen to music during lunch, study halls, and after school. And one day, after school the lounge was completely empty as it was during Senior Play time and I wasn't working in the play (I'm not much for that), and so I dug out none other than "Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence" by Dream Theater. When everyone returned about 10 minutes later, I had just skipped to "The Great Debate". Needless to say, it was shut off nearly immediately. Though, on this topic, I did occasionally get some opportunities to express my taste. I always came in to school early every morning, so one morning I dared to put on Kansas's "Leftoverture" (since the first song everyone knew), and nearly the ENTIRE album actually got played once, despite the fact that a couple of classmates listened to Carry On like 3 times. I still found it amazing that they finally shut it off halfway through "Magnum Opus". Most of the time though... it was crap, crap, and HORRIBLE crap. Not even just your normal pop music, but really awful stuff like "Fergie" and stuff like that. I didn't bother bringing in my music most of the time in the fear that my CD would get lost or who knows what. Oh, wait, what was the topic?
Edited by MovingPictures07 - May 15 2008 at 14:53
|
|
|
ghost_of_morphy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
|
Posted: May 16 2008 at 03:27 |
Prog survived because there was a significant minority of listeners who really liked it. Prog "died" because prog bands were chasing after the market share that they had had back in prog's heyday (along with a dearth of new ideas to satisfy prog heads.) When market forces or artistic considerations brought them back to prog or inspired new artists to fill the niche, prog was reborn. This is close to your neo prog idea, but not so close that I can vote for it. I'll vote other.
Let me add this, because of the number of votes that you have for the idea that prog never "died." Of course prog never died out completely. But anybody who wants to argue that it didn't virtually disappear from the musical landscape in the '80's is welcome to indulge in that fantasy. I think we can all agree that prog went on lifesupport, for the most part. Claiming that there was never a problem is blinding oneself.
Let me also say that, while progmetal is the single most important evolution of prog in the last twenty years, prog would have enjoyed a resurgence without it, due to the reason I gave in the first paragraph.
Edited by ghost_of_morphy - May 16 2008 at 03:34
|
|
Draconis
Forum Groupie
Joined: February 19 2008
Location: Clovis
Status: Offline
Points: 88
|
Posted: May 16 2008 at 18:19 |
The response getting the most answers - "Prog never really disappeared" - merely restates the premise of the question ("why did it survive?"). So I'm discounting it on that basis. I chose the last option, specifically that Prog carved out a unique niche for itself that nothing else in the rock supergenre could fill - a marriage of classical sensibilities, virtuosic instrumentation and an experimental bent.
|
|
laplace
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 06 2005
Location: popupControl();
Status: Offline
Points: 7606
|
Posted: May 16 2008 at 18:21 |
other - because post-punk let it hitch a ride ;P I think the batch of symphonic rock bands we have now are something other than progressive rock
|
|
Dr. Prog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 306
|
Posted: May 16 2008 at 18:51 |
laplace wrote:
other - because post-punk let it hitch a ride ;P I think the batch of symphonic rock bands we have now are something other than progressive rock |
What you are probably referring to as "post punk" wasn't called that back then---we simply called it progressive rock. It was just a different kind of progressive rock as it evolved. People put labels on stuff long after it happens and like to label things because it makes them more comfortable, kind of like a crutch. As its happening, you really aren't thinking, am I listening to progressive, or "post punk" or math rock etc.
Back in the 70s and early 80s, we just called it good music and we listened to it.
What symphonic rock bands are you sl*gging on now that are not 'progressive"?
|
|
The Pessimist
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
|
Posted: May 16 2008 at 18:56 |
Other - because prog is f**king awesome ...anyone for pimms?
Edited by kibble_alex - May 16 2008 at 18:57
|
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value." Arnold Schoenberg
|
|
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: May 16 2008 at 18:56 |
Norbert wrote:
Rather just went underground.
There is a life beyond mainstream media. | Exactly!
|
|
laplace
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 06 2005
Location: popupControl();
Status: Offline
Points: 7606
|
Posted: May 16 2008 at 19:03 |
Dr. Prog wrote:
People put labels on stuff long after it happens and like to label things because it makes them more comfortable, kind of like a crutch. | GREAT INSIGHT you've solved humanity if post-punk was considered part of prog rock at the time why isn't it on the archives, a fairly inclusive site?
|
|
tszirmay
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: August 17 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 6673
|
Posted: May 16 2008 at 19:22 |
cacho wrote:
Norbert wrote:
Rather just went underground.
There is a life beyond mainstream media. |
Exactly! |
Yes, Prog went underground because it had lost its lofty media spotlight throne leading the “rock” world and being a pet darling but in 1977, certain “powerful” journalists (Lester Bangs), the NME, Melody Maker, Rock & Folk, Creem, Trouser Press etc…. decided that a little crucifixion was long overdue and unleashed an unreal series of slurs (“ Jethro Dull, the Muddy Blues, UnFocused, NO featuring Yawn Anderson (!), Burger King Crimson, Rick Shakeman …..and that’s only the ones I remember!). Frank Zappa was actually referring to the rock journalists as even lousier musicians than the punkers (who at least had some cheeks to pierce). That being said, punk simply usurped the media throne (not too much staying power there before the Durans & Blondie showed up (better musicians, Frank? After all Terry Bozzio was a Missing Person first). The reason prog survived was because many devoted fans (like yours truly) and a few courageous musicians (Marillion, IQ, 12th Night etc…) decided to keep the flame alight in the relative obscurity of the underground. The CD helped all genres but especially prog as fans went for higher fidelity (and space) but its really the children who were curious and asked “Dad, what’s Close to the Edge like?” Many have overlooked the silly “fresh is better” argument and got hooked on the sweeping emotions that only prog can provide to those who are receptive to its charms. Taste is after all a question of personal acceptance. I feel blessed that it did survive and in fact , even flourishes in silence…far from the maddening crowd.
|
I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.
|
|
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: May 16 2008 at 19:27 |
tszirmay wrote:
cacho wrote:
Norbert wrote:
Rather just went underground.
There is a life beyond mainstream media. | Exactly! |
<P =Msonormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"> <FONT face="Times New Roman">Yes, Prog went underground because it had lost its lofty media spotlight throne leading the “rock” world and being a pet darling but in 1977, certain “powerful” journalists (Lester Bangs), the NME, Melody Maker, Rock & Folk, Creem, Trouser Press etc…. decided that a little crucifixion was long overdue and unleashed an unreal series of slurs (“ Jethro Dull, the Muddy Blues, UnFocused, NO featuring Yawn Anderson (!), Burger King Crimson, Rick Shakeman …..and that’s only the ones I remember!). Frank Zappa was actually referring to the rock journalists as even lousier musicians than the punkers (who at least had some cheeks to pierce). That being said, punk simply usurped the media throne (not too much staying power there before the Durans & Blondie showed up (better musicians, Frank? After all Terry Bozzio was a Missing Person first). The reason prog survived was because many devoted fans (like yours truly) and a few courageous musicians (Marillion, IQ, 12th Night etc…) decided to keep the flame alight in the relative obscurity of the underground. The CD helped all genres but especially prog as fans went for higher fidelity (and space) but its really the children who were curious and asked “Dad, what’s Close to the Edge like?” Many have overlooked the silly “fresh is better” argument and got hooked on the sweeping emotions that only prog can provide to those who are receptive to its charms. Taste is after all a question of personal acceptance. I feel blessed that it did survive and in fact , even flourishes in silence…far from the maddening crowd. <SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN> | Wow!! Nice words my friend, didn't know all of that. Great to know it now. Amazing is the history of rock, specially prog Better delete your last post..
|
|