Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
SgtPepper67
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 17 2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 530
|
Topic: Richard Wright Posted: July 30 2009 at 17:10 |
"Vital, he likely influenced all floyd material"
I always thought the keyboards and Gilmours guitar together defined Pink Floyd sound, I'm surprised he's so underrated. He's not more important than Roger or Dave but his influence was essential in the sound of the band. I know he didn't played in The Final Cut and AMLOR, but although I like those albums it's like there's something missing.
|
In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made...
|
|
suremang
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 30 2009
Location: Ventura, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 8
|
Posted: July 30 2009 at 11:36 |
Genius is not always a flashy solo. Sometimes it's knowing exactly what to play to compliment the songwriter, even if it's just chords. I'm thinking of the keyboard parts in "Wish You Were Here"...simple, but very defining and memorable.
|
Greg Sherman
|
|
A Person
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
|
Posted: July 29 2009 at 19:01 |
ten years after wrote:
ten years after wrote:
Walker wrote:
RoyFairbank wrote:
I think Roger would pick either 1 or 2, Dave would pick between 2 and 3 Nick would pick between 2 and 3 A stereotypical RIck would pick between 1 and 2.
Happy progging!
| I think some of you are misunderstanding this post. He's not saying Roger's contributions would be a 1 or 2, he's saying Roger would choose 1 or 2 to describe Rick's contribution's, etc.
| This is clearly what was intended. I think it is wrong though. Waters is on record as giving very high proace to Wright's contribution - particularly with regard to Dark Side of the Moon. His problem with Wright later on was that he simply stopped contributing and, in particular, showed very little interest in getting the Wall out according to Waters' tight schedule.
| proace = praise. Is it possible to edit posts after they've been posted?
|
I agree with the OP, Wright seemed very humble about his abilities as a musician. I watched a video about the making of Broken China on google video once, and it told about how he was only comfortable doing the vocals at home. IMO, his contribution to the band was considerable, from the early psychedelic experimentation in "Interstellar Overdrive" or "A Saucerful of Secrets" to the more structured sound on "Us and Them". PS if you look at your post their is an option in the top right corner that says Post Options, click that and a list will drop down, the last of which is Edit post
|
|
Chris S
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
|
Posted: July 29 2009 at 18:45 |
There was rumour around the time of his death that he had another solo work almost completed. Wouldn't it be great if DG could help get that to the fans if it were true.
|
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
|
SMSM
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 210
|
Posted: July 29 2009 at 17:58 |
I just look at the Floyd Albums post Waters, they are in my opinion the best Floyd ever did, no doubt in giving Wright more room to contribute.
His solo stuff is terrific
|
|
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12608
|
Posted: July 28 2009 at 22:13 |
I think it depends on the perspective taken. If it is about who wrote which songs, then he didn't participate very much; though some of his contribution are really important for Pink Floyd. But, surely the keyboard arrangements and soundscapes created by him all along Pink Floyd's carrer were essential for the Pink Floyd sound. So, according to the first perspective, I would go for option 3; according to the second perspective, I would go for option 4.
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: July 28 2009 at 16:29 |
Oh, and "Echoes" as well. ;)
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: July 28 2009 at 16:27 |
I would say that option 3 is the best fit. To claim that he influenced all Floyd music is ludicrous, however his contributions were great. Welcome to the Machine, Us and Them, Great Gig in the Sky, would all be considerably different had Rick not been there.
|
|
Callergrim
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 28 2009
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 40
|
Posted: July 28 2009 at 16:11 |
I think Rick Wright was very important for the sound of Pink Floyd. I can't imagine the sound of Pink Floyd's, WYWH, DSOTM, and Animals without him, for example.
Edited by Callergrim - July 28 2009 at 16:14
|
|
himtroy
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1601
|
Posted: July 28 2009 at 14:18 |
His contributions were definitely pretty important. I'd dare say more so than Gilmour, while Gilmous was a sick guitarist, a nice guitar solo really doesn't benefit the song as much as the structure and chords behind the song, which is where Rick wright often shined.
Plus, what the hell would Floyd be without the organs, pianos, and synthesizers?
|
|
Proggy Pogo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 16 2009
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 198
|
Posted: July 28 2009 at 07:49 |
I went for option 4 - I agree with Floydispink that Rick Wright's contribution was especially important in Floyd's early stuff, such as Set The Controls For The Heart of The Sun and the like. Ok he wasn't extravagant like Emerson or Wakeman, but just as valued.
|
|
|
The Sleepwalker
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 03 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 15141
|
Posted: June 25 2009 at 05:40 |
I think he was very important as a member of the band, definitely in their early psychedelic years. I can't imagine songs like A Saucerful Of Secrets, Careful With That Axe or Let There Be More Light without Richard Wright's organs and keys. In the 70's he was a bit less important I think, but Shine On would definitely be a dull piece without Rick's contribution to it.
|
|
martinprog77
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 31 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2511
|
Posted: June 25 2009 at 05:16 |
Considerable, his contributions were genius
|
Nothing can last there are no second chances. Never give a day away. Always live for today.
|
|
tdfloyd
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 06 2008
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 966
|
Posted: June 24 2009 at 22:45 |
Option 4 Vital Definitely. It wasn't Waters words that first got me into Floyd or Gilmours guitars. It was Wrights keyboards. Before Animals, he was all over everything. Tasteful and original. With Animals, his playing was great although Waters wasn't giving too many writing credits at the time to anyone. The Wall he was relegated to the background and word has it that he wouldn't / couldn't contribute. The Final Cut is a piece onto itself and Wright isn't there. A good example of what is missing if he wasn't around is Momentary Lapse. The balance is gone. I like the album but it could have been much better without the Gilmour soloing all over the place. Division Bell restores that balance.
|
|
Alberto Muņoz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: September 18 2008 at 16:18 |
Option 3 also for me, his piano and keys chop is essential floyd, or who else are playing the keyboard player David?, Syd?, Roger???
Let's face it PF are gonna be the same never...
|
|
|
Ayrton
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 10 2006
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 10
|
Posted: September 16 2008 at 01:48 |
R.I.P. genius.
|
|
febus
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: January 23 2007
Location: Orlando-Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 4312
|
Posted: June 07 2008 at 23:02 |
Option #2 for me.......Important contributions at the beginning but influence waning little by little as Roger took control!
|
|
febus
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: January 23 2007
Location: Orlando-Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 4312
|
Posted: June 07 2008 at 22:59 |
R. Wright a genious now ????? it's a little bit stretched to me!
|
|
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: June 07 2008 at 22:14 |
I'll go with the majority this time.. Option 3 for me! Though considering Febus words, right. Taking the word Genius.
Edited by cacho - June 08 2008 at 14:52
|
|
ten years after
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 07 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1008
|
Posted: June 07 2008 at 22:14 |
ten years after wrote:
Walker wrote:
RoyFairbank wrote:
I think Roger would pick either 1 or 2, Dave would pick between 2 and 3 Nick would pick between 2 and 3 A stereotypical RIck would pick between 1 and 2.
Happy progging!
|
I think some of you are misunderstanding this post. He's not saying Roger's contributions would be a 1 or 2, he's saying Roger would choose 1 or 2 to describe Rick's contribution's, etc.
|
This is clearly what was intended. I think it is wrong though. Waters is on record as giving very high proace to Wright's contribution - particularly with regard to Dark Side of the Moon. His problem with Wright later on was that he simply stopped contributing and, in particular, showed very little interest in getting the Wall out according to Waters' tight schedule. |
proace = praise. Is it possible to edit posts after they've been posted?
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.