Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The priests abuse scandal...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe priests abuse scandal...

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 9>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
seventhsojourn View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 11 2009
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 4006
Direct Link To This Post Topic: The priests abuse scandal...
    Posted: April 27 2010 at 14:55
Seems to me that some people are keen for this thread to be killed... see PA's basic rules!   
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 27 2010 at 13:13
Originally posted by ReaganwillshottyLibs ReaganwillshottyLibs wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.

You think sexual acts with children is worse then murder? lol
From a legal standpoint, no. To answer Marty's profane question, I think it's pretty obvious that it's better to be alive and raped than dead, and I think victims would find such an attitude offensive. But, from the perspective of the Church, if by the act of rape that person caused one person to go to Hell, then it would have been better to have just murdered him.
Originally posted by Tuzvihar Tuzvihar wrote:

BTW, did you know that Vatican has the lowest age of consent in Europe? 12!! Shocked

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe
Yeah, I don't know why they haven't gotten around to changing that...


Edited by Henry Plainview - April 27 2010 at 13:16
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Tuzvihar View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 18 2005
Location: C. Schinesghe
Status: Offline
Points: 13489
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 27 2010 at 13:11
BTW, did you know that Vatican has the lowest age of consent in Europe? 12!! Shocked

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe
"Music is much like f**king, but some composers can't climax and others climax too often, leaving themselves and the listener jaded and spent."

Charles Bukowski
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 27 2010 at 09:49
Originally posted by Marty McFly Marty McFly wrote:

Wow! Marty found a way around the F word Clap!

Someone cynic enough could ask (when deciding if murder is worse than rape) if ...........

living with it is worse than being dead. Obviously you are dead when someone murders you, but when you are raped, you have to live with it.


What's worse ? It's fuc_king hard question to answer, so I'll just raise it, not answer it. I don't dare.

Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 27 2010 at 09:48
We should just nuke the Vatican and then when all the fallout dissapates we could replace it with a progrock shrine and have real religion with Richard Dawkins as our GOD!
Back to Top
seventhsojourn View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 11 2009
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 4006
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 16:36
Ok, I have already posted numerous messages condemning those clerical beasts that are beyond evil. I have also criticised The Church for the attempted cover-ups. So, The Church cannot be defended on the abuse scandal... but the scatter guns are out.
 
Hot on the heels of the Dawkins and Hitchens affair, I just heard on the BBC News that the UK Foreign Office has been forced to apologise to The Vatican. Apparently there were suggestions that during The Pope's forthcoming visit to the UK he could open an abortion clinic, bless a gaye marriage, and launch a brand of ''Benedict'' condoms.
 
Now, there may be members here that think this is all very funny... I have no problem with that. However I do have a problem with the Foreign Office. This is another nice example of the kind of people that are running the UK... these suggestions were seemingly raised at a brainstorming session. I wonder what other comments were made that we're not being told about... this reeks of bigotry.
Back to Top
Marty McFly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3968
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 13:43

Someone cynic enough could ask (when deciding if murder is worse than rape) if ...........

living with it is worse than being dead. Obviously you are dead when someone murders you, but when you are raped, you have to live with it.


What's worse ? It's fuc_king hard question to answer, so I'll just raise it, not answer it. I don't dare.

There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"

   -Andyman1125 on Lulu







Even my
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 11:53
Originally posted by ReaganwillshottyLibs ReaganwillshottyLibs wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.

You think sexual acts with children is worse then murder? lol


You missed the point.

Is murder worse than rape? Yes.

Is murder worse than pedophilia. Maybe.

Is murder worse than conning a child to have sex with you because you can easily prey on his fears that if he strays from you he will be tormented for eternity? Sweet Jesus Hell yes.

You can lament the taking of someone's life, but this act here should make your jaw drop to the f**king floor by how evil it is.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 11:48
Originally posted by Chris S Chris S wrote:

Originally posted by ReaganwillshottyLibs ReaganwillshottyLibs wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.

You think sexual acts with children is worse then murder? lol
Pretty much.....far worse
 
I honestly don't know which is worse, raping is so repulsive for me that I can't imagine something worst.
 
It's so repulsive that even the criminals consider child raping horrendous, when I made my practice of Penal law in a prison, child rapists had to be appart of the rest of the prisoners, because they were raped, harrassed and even murdered on daily bases.
 
But there's a way toi know...Ask a father of a raped child, if he would rather had his son killed....That will tell you what's worst, despite our natural repulsion for pedophilia.
 
Iván.


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 24 2010 at 19:39
            
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 08:28
I have a hard time ranking bad things like that.  When someone is murdered that person doesn't go on killing other people.  The molested do sometimes turn into molesters.  A sick gift that keeps on giving.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
ReaganwillshottyLibs View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: April 23 2010
Location: Da Hood
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 04:42
Originally posted by Chris S Chris S wrote:

Originally posted by ReaganwillshottyLibs ReaganwillshottyLibs wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.

You think sexual acts with children is worse then murder? lol
Pretty much.....far worse

Only by someone whose morally challenged. 
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 04:39
Originally posted by ReaganwillshottyLibs ReaganwillshottyLibs wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.

You think sexual acts with children is worse then murder? lol
Pretty much.....far worse
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
ReaganwillshottyLibs View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: April 23 2010
Location: Da Hood
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 03:44
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.

You think sexual acts with children is worse then murder? lol
Back to Top
UndercoverBoy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 5148
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2010 at 21:58
Originally posted by who-knows-it's-prog who-knows-it's-prog wrote:

Remember this pope was in the Nazi party...so denial should come easily to him.
You had to be a part of Hitler's Youth if you were a boy at that time.  Please don't start this.
Back to Top
who-knows-it's-prog View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: August 13 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 23
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2010 at 20:01
This whole thing has nothing to do with the bible or any other nonsensical religious nonsense, it's all about abusers in the Roman catholic church who should know better, these people are put in a position of trust, and children should be free from paedophiles. Hang them high, and show to the world we will not accept paedophilia or any other abuse.
Remember this pope was in the Nazi party...so denial should come easily to him.


Edited by who-knows-it's-prog - April 30 2010 at 18:06
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 10:10
I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32476
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 08:00
Originally posted by someone_else someone_else wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by someone_else someone_else wrote:

The Scriptures speak of hell as well, and no one in the Scriptures speaks more about hell than Jesus. No matter what tradition makes of it:
 
And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. (Matt. 5:29)
 
Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Matt. 23:33)
 
 
 


Right.  And when Jesus uses that word, did he mean a place of eternal, conscious torture and physical agony?

I submit that he did not.
 
 
 
Apparently not, according to these verses (in English):
 
And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. (Rev. 20:14,15)
 
(In Dutch the word for 'hell' here differs from the word used in the Gospel according to Matthew).


As well it should, because they are two different words in the Greek as well (gehenna in Matthew and hades in Revelation).
Back to Top
npjnpj View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:53
At this point I'll probably go along with Saint Ian's immortal line: 'It always causes a fight, man' and bow out.
Back to Top
someone_else View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 23994
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:42
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by someone_else someone_else wrote:

The Scriptures speak of hell as well, and no one in the Scriptures speaks more about hell than Jesus. No matter what tradition makes of it:
 
And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. (Matt. 5:29)
 
Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Matt. 23:33)
 
 
 


Right.  And when Jesus uses that word, did he mean a place of eternal, conscious torture and physical agony?

I submit that he did not.
 
 
 
Apparently not, according to these verses (in English):
 
And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. (Rev. 20:14,15)
 
(In Dutch the word for 'hell' here differs from the word used in the Gospel according to Matthew).
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32476
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:37
Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

So what is he supposed to mean then?
I find those lines quite clear.
I mean, he probably didn't mean "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell which is quite a comfy place where you'll be given a good talking to and then psychiatrists will evaluate whether you can rejoin society" 


Do you honestly believe the only interpretation is the Westernized traditional one?


Edited by Epignosis - April 22 2010 at 07:38
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 9>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.180 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.