Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 28772
Topic: Magma vs. Cardiacs Posted: September 02 2010 at 19:16
Syzygy wrote:
Magma. I can understand why people love the Cardiacs so much, but they've never done it for me (even though Guapo axeman Kavus Torabi is in the current touring line up).
Not true, he's stated in an interview that the Cardiacs are never touring again (due to Tim's health, I assume).
Joined: December 16 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 7003
Posted: September 02 2010 at 16:56
Magma. I can understand why people love the Cardiacs so much, but they've never done it for me (even though Guapo axeman Kavus Torabi is in the current touring line up).
'Like so many of you I've got my doubts about how much to contribute to the already rich among us...'
Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Posted: September 02 2010 at 08:35
AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:
Thats just creepy and stupidly chaotic - Not for me if thats any indication....
It's a good indication of their early stuff but their later albums (including the much lauded Sing to God) is a very VERY different kettle of fish. This video is a perfect example of their more sober, less frenetic side:
I adore both of these bands and couldn't imagine living without either, but My Loyalty Demands. Cardiacs it is.
Edited by Trouserpress - September 02 2010 at 08:35
Joined: December 30 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7037
Posted: August 31 2010 at 17:47
Sckxyss wrote:
Cardiacs are a band I feel like I should like, but for some reason don't. Their sound (re: his voice) really grates on me after a couple songs.
Magma on the other hand...
I tend to agree with this sentiment, the vocals are a huge turn off for me, I dislike them greatly. I really don't find the music interesting enough to endure those vocals either. The Cardiacs are not a terrible band by any means, but they're not one that I reach for very often at all.
Edited by Evolutionary Sleeper - August 31 2010 at 17:48
"when routine bites hard and ambitions are low, and resentment rides high but emotions won´t grow And we´re changing our ways, taking different roads.. Then love, love will tear us apart again.."
Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 28772
Posted: August 31 2010 at 15:14
Yeah, it wasn't even reading the review that got me to listen to it again, but I saw the album art and felt like listening to it. As I was listening the other day, I did read the review though, and enjoyed it.
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: @ wicker man
Status: Offline
Points: 32668
Posted: August 31 2010 at 15:11
SaltyJon wrote:
Logan wrote:
I'm glad you did, because of it I'm revisiting Cardiacs' music, and will be delving deeper into the band's music. Aside from discovering new-to-me music, one thing I love about such topics is that they can prompt me to re-listen to music I haven't heard in quite a while.
Well I suppose we can indirectly thank both Trouserpress and Rune2000 as well then, because Rune2000's review of Sing to God was what got me to listen to them again recently, when I really fell in love with that album, and TP recommended me an order in which to check out the rest of their material (which I've done thanks to iTunes) which really made the music grab me even tighter.
I knew Cardiacs' music before joining PA, but Trouserpress' abundant enthusiasm got me into exploring it more after I joined PA. I don't often look at PA reviews , but I have noted that Rune has written good reviews of much music I really like. I had read Alexander's (Rune2000) review of Sing to God before because there was a topic where someone was, as I recall, slamming Cardiacs and I was looking up the reviews of the albums (perhaps there was a reported review for Sing to God? A few years ago I would have remembered such things easily, but my memory loss is another topic. Maybe I was just looking into some rater's ratings since a low rating of something piqued my interest).
Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 28772
Posted: August 31 2010 at 14:48
DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:
Gotta say, I really dig both. I think I may prefer the first slightly more.
Then either would probably be a good starting point. If you're going for cost-effectiveness (in case you don't like the band or something) I'd say A Little Man and a House and the Whole World Window since it's only one disc and therefore only $9.99 on iTunes instead of StG's two discs and 2x $9.99.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.464 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.