Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Interviews
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Clouds
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedClouds

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
Message
toroddfuglesteg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
Retired

Joined: March 04 2008
Location: Retirement Home
Status: Offline
Points: 3658
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Clouds
    Posted: January 04 2011 at 14:30


Starting life in Edinburgh, Scotland, as The Premiers, then, following a few personnel changes, enjoying some critical acclaim as innovative organ-led rock trio 1-2-3, The Clouds were at the epicenter of the thriving progressive rock scene from its inception in the mid-late 1960s. They remained there until 1971 but never really hit the big time and remain one of Prog's great unsung.

A 2 CD compilation of their three albums + a gig was released at the end of last year which caused renewed interest in Clouds.

I got in touch with the band through their website and this is their story.

#############################################


When, where and by whom was Clouds started ? Did any of you, past and present Clouds members, play in any other bands before joining up in Clouds ? Why did you choose that name ?
In 1964, Ian (Ellis) and Harry (Hughes) were playing together in a group called ‘The Premiers’. The line-up of the band was two guitars, bass, drums (Harry), and vocalist (Ian). The band decided to recruit an organist, and Billy (Ritchie) joined (1965). Billy had been playing in a band called ‘The Satelites’. The organ was so obviously the leading instrument, it changed the dynamic of the band, the lead guitarist left, the band fragmented, leaving just Ian, Billy, and Harry, and we decided to start a new band together. We wanted to do something different, and as there were only three of us, we decided to call the band 1-2-3, it seemed a hip name, and something different, like the band itself. It was only much later (the winter of 1967) that we became Clouds. The name was chosen by our new manager, Terry Ellis. He felt we needed a fresh start and a new name. We never liked the name, we preferred 1-2-3.
How was the music scene in Edinburgh when you started ?
It was vibrant, lots of bands, but mainly all playing the same sort of music, Tamla Motown, including us (The Premiers). The club scene in Edinburgh was really good, the best club was called ‘The Place’, which used to have several groups on at the same time, bands like Nazareth, Lulu and the Lovers, The Stoics, The Dream Police, The Boston Dexters, all the Scottish scene from Edinburgh and Glasgow. The Premiers were one of the middle-order bands, not first-ranking in people’s minds.
Not many people know this, but Clouds was one of the first bands who combined rock and classic music. If not the first band, that is. Other bands like The Nice, Genesis, Procol Harum, Yes and ELP followed suit. How did you get this idea and how did this idea really take off in Clouds ?
1-2-3 was the earliest band to play that form of music. It was only later that this style became part of what would be called progressive rock. We were certainly the only band around the Marquee and London scene playing that form of music, though experimentation was beginning to take place in other ways, Cream, and Pink Floyd, are the other names that spring to mind, though all three of us were trying new music from different directions. It just so happens that our music seemed to find a branch of its own in progressive channels. The basic idea was rewritten versions of pop music songs, and it all sprang from Billy, who had a very radical approach to the arrangements. He took the view that anything was possible, and there were no barriers. The blueprint he used was the exact model that Yes used a year or so later.
It is said you directly influenced Keith Emerson to take up the same idea and the rest is music history (and our website ProgArchives). Please tell us more about how much you influenced him or the background for this claim (which does not originates from Clouds).  
People like Keith Emerson, David Bowie, Jon Anderson, Ian Anderson, Robert Fripp, were in the Marquee audience many times when we played there in early 1967. The influence was in the concept of the music rather than the playing, though the playing was certainly adventurous too. 1-2-3 was the first rock group to use organ as a lead instrument with no lead guitar. That encouraged Keith Emerson to follow that concept. Also, Billy was standing, not sitting down as was normal for a keyboard player in those days. As far as the music itself was concerned, in several of the songs 1-2-3 played, Billy had inserted Classical pieces (in Bowie’s song ‘I Dig Everything’ for instance, where he played the Bach fugue in C minor, and Simon & Garfunkel’s ‘America’ where he inserted a piece of Mozart). I think this encouraged The Nice to take that route. The band that followed our ideas most closely was ‘Yes’. The whole idea of that band was born out of hearing 1-2-3, though of course, none of these people directly admit it even now. The clues are in their own music, and if you look at the press and publicity comments for the time, from the Marquee club, David Bowie, Brian Hogg etc, you’ll find the proof all right. It was two years ahead of anyone else.

Over to your albums. Your debut album was Scrapbook from 1968. Please tell us more about this album.
Terry Ellis decided the format and title of the album, choosing the songs from our demos. The problem we had right from the beginning of our recordings was that Billy was the main song-writer, and he had lots of songs, but they didn’t necessarily suit the band. Ian also wrote songs that were easier for the band to do, and had the advantage of Billy’s arrangements but there just wasn’t enough of them. It was more difficult for Billy to rearrange his own songs, having already written them, and his songs were from the song-writing tradition, whereas the band was basically a unit that sought to play with great invention and improvisation. That gave us a problem. The Clouds Scrapbook (the proper title of the album) solved that by containing both elements separately in the same album. It makes for a very eclectic mix, the pop songs sitting alongside the progressive elements that we’d been playing on stage, and which were a portent of the change to come in rock styles. Really, the 1-2-3 concept worked so well because it was other people’s songs, not our own. We struggled with using original material, even though there were hundreds of songs to use. It was ironic to say the least. Yes began like 1-2-3, but seemed to slip into their own material much easier than we did.

Your second album was Up Above Our Heads from 1969. Please tell us more about this album.
We were uneasy with the first album, as we didn’t feel it had reflected enough of our playing ability and live stage show, so we tried to address that in the second album, but I think it swung too far away from song-writing quality at times. There are a couple of new good songs on there, including some that were also on the Scrapbook album, but a lot of the album is about showing off musical technique. The solos seem too long now, but that was a feature of the times, especially on stage.

Your third album was Watercolour Days from 1971. Please tell us more about this album.
We realised that the first two albums swung one way then the other, so we thought it would be good to combine the two styles in the songs. Some of it worked quite well, and some of it didn’t. It was Billy’s first real attempt to write songs for the band rather than for himself, and Ian and Billy collaborated a lot more writing-wise on this album than the others, though Billy still had fully-composed songs too, such as the title song, which worked fantastically well, and the last song on there, ‘I Am The Melody’. Ian also directly contributed songs like ‘Cold Sweat’(with a bridge by Billy) and ‘Lighthouse’, but Billy was annoyed that Terry wouldn’t let him put some of his other songs on the album. Terry said they were too gloomy or too esoteric. You can hear some of them now on the new CD.
Clouds broke up after that album. Please tell us why, when, where and what the band members has been up to since the break up.
We recorded the album in 1970, but it didn’t come out till early 1971, by which time we had parted company from Chrysalis, mainly because Terry was spending all his time with Jethro Tull instead of us. We were still on the road, but the UK reviews of the album weren’t great, and it all seemed a struggle, we couldn’t see where we were going, so we decided to call it a day. What we didn’t know was that the USA reviews were glowing, or we might have persevered a bit longer.
Ian Ellis is still on the road, and has played and recorded with many front-line bands, including Savoy Brown; Steamhammer; Alex Harvey Band; Jack Green; Steve Hackett Band; Mick Clarke; Paul Samson; The Breakers (including Ric Lee of Ten Years After); he’s also toured with Pete Townshend and worked with our old friend Bev Bevan (ELO).
Harry (Hughes) formed a band called Mahatma, who were managed by the Marquee club. After that, he formed a band called Caledonia and recorded an album with them. He subsequently left the music business and became a successful Occupational Hygienist, though he has recently taken up playing drums again.
Billy (Ritchie) was so disillusioned with music, he left the business after the Clouds era, and became a successful Property Management Investor for a while. He does still play, albeit he doesn’t consider any of that ‘real’ playing. He hasn’t found anything to replace music in his life. He did help his friend Jona Lewie record ‘Rearranging the Deckchairs on the Titanic’, the follow-up single to ‘Kitchen at Parties’, which Billy had suggested to Jona as his first hit single release.

A retrospective Clouds homepage has now been launched and a compilation CD called Up Above Our Heads [Clouds 1966-71] with your three albums has been released (available from Amazon etc etc). Please tell us more about this double CD album and the new website.
The website has actually been around for at least 15 years, since the big Mojo article of 1994 and the CD release in 1996. The new double CD is a chance to hear the albums re-mastered and the sound quality dramatically improved, especially ‘Up Above Our Heads’, the second Clouds album, which has never been on CD before. One of the important things for us is the bonus tracks, which contain a lot of missing pieces of the music that have never seen light of day before, especially the 1-2-3 tape from the Marquee, and a couple of demos of Billy’s which are obviously ages before their time, like most things he does. Even now, those tracks sound revolutionary, like 1-2-3 truly was itself.
I guess there are no plans for any Clouds reunion. But is there any plans for the website and other Clouds related activities ?
The new CD seems to be the end of it, unless there was some kind of demand for more out-takes. There are more demos still around which could be used, but we’ll just have to see if there’s any further interest. The main thing about the internet, the website, the new records, is that it reveals the important history of the band, the influence the band had. It’s heartening to see the history being rewritten to accommodate all that, especially in important music business publications like ‘The Encyclopaedia of Popular Music’ and ‘All Music Guide’. It doesn’t make up for what we lost or didn’t get in the first place, but it is at least some consolation for the contribution we made to rock music.
To wrap up this interview, is there anything you want to add to this interview ?
We’d just like to say that we’re glad to see it acknowledged that we had a crucial influence on progressive music and bands, and it’s a shame that many of the bands themselves who took from us are reluctant to publicly admit where the ideas came from, but we would be the first to say that bands like Yes, The Nice/ELP, King Crimson, still deserve all the accolades going for what they made of that influence. We probably couldn’t have taken it where they did, it’s unlikely we would ever have been commercially popular enough. Our band line-up was original for the time, but ultimately limited, though it’s good to know that people are beginning to understand what our contribution was.
Thank you to Clouds for this interview
Also a big thank you to James Alexander for making this interview possible 
Their PA profile is here and homepage's here
(and I am really looking forward to receiving Up Above Our Heads [Clouds 1966-71] from Amazon


Edited by toroddfuglesteg - January 04 2011 at 14:42
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2011 at 14:50
Wow, this looks impressive! I'll read it asap. Good going Torodd!
Back to Top
zravkapt View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 12 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 6446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2011 at 17:28
Thanks for the interview. The origins of progressive rock are complex and don't revolve around a single album.
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2011 at 02:17
Great read Clap
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2011 at 03:21
Superb interview Torodd, very interesting. "The Clouds scrapbook" is an old favourite here.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2011 at 03:28
AWESOME!!!
 
I had contact with the band a while back - through James Alexander. 
 
It's great to see they've finally released the product they were talking about back then.
 
If that compilation contains the cover they did of Simon and Garfunkel's "America" at the Marquee, that'll be a wake-up call to Yes fans!


Edited by Certif1ed - January 05 2011 at 03:34
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2011 at 12:07
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

AWESOME!!!
 
I had contact with the band a while back - through James Alexander. 
 
It's great to see they've finally released the product they were talking about back then.
 
If that compilation contains the cover they did of Simon and Garfunkel's "America" at the Marquee, that'll be a wake-up call to Yes fans!
It does Mark, track 17 on disc 2: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Above-Our-Heads-Clouds-66-71/dp/tracks/B0045DO99Q/ref=dp_tracks_all_2#disc_2 
What?
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 9939
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2011 at 13:24
Clouds are brilliant! Great energy and great fun! The organ is the lead instrument I guess, but the drums are killer! A band that deserved much better.

Any vinyl re-release?

Back to Top
Malraux View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: November 27 2008
Location: West Coast
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 24 2011 at 11:49
Thanks for the interview. The origins of progressive rock are complex and don't revolve around a single album.
I am not sure where you get the impression that what you wrote above is being claimed in the interview.
 
It is the work that went on before any records were recorded, especially when the band were known as 1-2-3 in their pre Clouds days, that indicated that an iconoclastic musical form was emerging.
 
I believe that only one track, hastily recorded on a tape machine by an audience member even exists of 1-2-3 in action. They did not record and even when they later recorded as 'Clouds', they were best known as a live band.
 
I saw a few performances of the band in their 1-2-3 and later Clouds identities, and believe me that the audiences who were musically quite well informed in those days were split in their opinions. Some were amazed, while others puzzled. It was indeed a new and emerging form of music.
 
Of course, it is ridiculous to suggest that any one band 'invented' progressive rock music, and again I am not sure that this is what is being claimed. The music of 1-2-3 was unique in style at the time, but there were other Hammond players, like Mike Ratledge for example who were taking the sound of the instrument beyond the Jimmy Smith thing, albeit in a different direction. What 1-2-3 introduced was an organ fronted blend of musical styles which was just not being played anywhere else by anyone else.
 
What helped was the superb musicianship of this trio. Harry Hughes for example who has to be one of the most acomplished drummers in the genre and is one of the few drummers I have seen who can do the 'Buddy Rich' one hand drum roll.
 
My six cents worth.
 
M.
 
 
 
Back to Top
JeanFrame View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 01 2010
Location: London, England
Status: Offline
Points: 195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2011 at 06:28
Originally posted by Malraux Malraux wrote:

Thanks for the interview. The origins of progressive rock are complex and don't revolve around a single album.
I am not sure where you get the impression that what you wrote above is being claimed in the interview.
 
It is the work that went on before any records were recorded, especially when the band were known as 1-2-3 in their pre Clouds days, that indicated that an iconoclastic musical form was emerging.
 
I believe that only one track, hastily recorded on a tape machine by an audience member even exists of 1-2-3 in action. They did not record and even when they later recorded as 'Clouds', they were best known as a live band.
 
I saw a few performances of the band in their 1-2-3 and later Clouds identities, and believe me that the audiences who were musically quite well informed in those days were split in their opinions. Some were amazed, while others puzzled. It was indeed a new and emerging form of music.
 
Of course, it is ridiculous to suggest that any one band 'invented' progressive rock music, and again I am not sure that this is what is being claimed. The music of 1-2-3 was unique in style at the time, but there were other Hammond players, like Mike Ratledge for example who were taking the sound of the instrument beyond the Jimmy Smith thing, albeit in a different direction. What 1-2-3 introduced was an organ fronted blend of musical styles which was just not being played anywhere else by anyone else.
 
What helped was the superb musicianship of this trio. Harry Hughes for example who has to be one of the most acomplished drummers in the genre and is one of the few drummers I have seen who can do the 'Buddy Rich' one hand drum roll.
 
My six cents worth.
 
M.

Sounds worth a lot more than six cents to me, more like gold dust. Well said. We must have been in those same early Marquee and Fillmore audiences. If 1-2-3 had made records, there would be no argument about the precedents. And great to see Harry Hughes being justifiably mentioned. Amazing that Bruford and Palmer, who know all about Harry Hughes, haven't even mentioned his name. Even becoming big stars doesn't seem to lessen the paranoia of performers. And I thought drummers were a special union, above all that rivallry?
 
 
 
Back to Top
toroddfuglesteg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
Retired

Joined: March 04 2008
Location: Retirement Home
Status: Offline
Points: 3658
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2011 at 09:54
Originally posted by Malraux Malraux wrote:

 
I am not sure where you get the impression that what you wrote above is being claimed in the interview.
 

My six cents worth.
 
M.
 
 
 

What's written in the intro and in the questions is the interviewer's opinions and his/her opinions alone (the interviewer in this case is me, but you will also find interviews by other members of ProgArchives. Hence I am using 3rd person here). That's why I have a #, @, ~, _ or - type of line + use bold letters to differenciate between the interviewer's opinions, in this case myself, and the band's opinion. ProgArchives never ever manipulate or falsify the views of the interviewed bands/artists. 

Let me also add that I learn something new about this music every single day and I am liable to be red-faced when I read what I once wrote. I am by no means perfect and I surely have views which is purely wrong and utter nonsense. Let's leave it like that. Wink   

Six cents ? You are selling yourself way short. Keep up your good work. 




Edited by toroddfuglesteg - February 10 2011 at 09:56
Back to Top
resurrection View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 08 2010
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 254
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 01:49
Originally posted by Malraux Malraux wrote:

Thanks for the interview. The origins of progressive rock are complex and don't revolve around a single album.
I am not sure where you get the impression that what you wrote above is being claimed in the interview.
 
It is the work that went on before any records were recorded, especially when the band were known as 1-2-3 in their pre Clouds days, that indicated that an iconoclastic musical form was emerging.
 
I believe that only one track, hastily recorded on a tape machine by an audience member even exists of 1-2-3 in action. They did not record and even when they later recorded as 'Clouds', they were best known as a live band.
 
I saw a few performances of the band in their 1-2-3 and later Clouds identities, and believe me that the audiences who were musically quite well informed in those days were split in their opinions. Some were amazed, while others puzzled. It was indeed a new and emerging form of music.
 
Of course, it is ridiculous to suggest that any one band 'invented' progressive rock music, and again I am not sure that this is what is being claimed. The music of 1-2-3 was unique in style at the time, but there were other Hammond players, like Mike Ratledge for example who were taking the sound of the instrument beyond the Jimmy Smith thing, albeit in a different direction. What 1-2-3 introduced was an organ fronted blend of musical styles which was just not being played anywhere else by anyone else.
 
What helped was the superb musicianship of this trio. Harry Hughes for example who has to be one of the most acomplished drummers in the genre and is one of the few drummers I have seen who can do the 'Buddy Rich' one hand drum roll.
 
My six cents worth.
 
M.
 
 
 
Fascinating post
Back to Top
giselle View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 18 2011
Location: Hertford
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2011 at 04:15
I'm not sure Clouds could be considered genuine prog, more proto-prog to me, but definitely important forerunners of the genre. Enjoyed the interview.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 22 2011 at 03:09
Definitely genuine prog - no question!
 
I just found a nice cover of a Clouds' song on YouTube - check it;
 
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
giselle View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 18 2011
Location: Hertford
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 25 2011 at 18:41
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Definitely genuine prog - no question!
 
I just found a nice cover of a Clouds' song on YouTube - check it;
 
Hey thanks, that's really good! Pity it's only a bit of it. If Clouds is gen prog, why is it listed as prog related?
Back to Top
Harry Hood View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1305
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 25 2011 at 23:56
I still fondly remember 1-2-3-Cloudsgate. The main songwriter tried to present a live recording of theirs as taking place earlier than it actually did to prove that he invented prog or something. (I think he may have even tried to identify himself as a "fan" of the band rather than the main guy to increase the authenticty of his website). Someone on here did their research and called him out on it. It was pretty epic from what I remember. 

This was a long time ago and I probably couldn't find the thread at this point, but I remember.
Back to Top
giselle View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 18 2011
Location: Hertford
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 26 2011 at 04:22
yeah i saw that. the guy gave an honest opinion which is fair enough. But if you do your research you'll find that 1-2-3 WERE two years ahead of anyone else and the website is run by a journalist who writes for major mags etc. Then again it would silly for him or anyone else to say that any one person 'invented' prog (though I dont think he says that anyway). it happened for all kind of reasons as Im sure you know better than most.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 26 2011 at 08:46

There is a little controversy around Clouds - their music has an openly melodic appeal that sounds quite MOR pop - it's under the hood that the music is genuinely progressive.

There was also an mp3 of the 1-2-3 version of Simon and Garfunkel's "America" - which I believe is the same version that's included on the recent CD package - which clearly has overdubbed audience reactions. The sound of the crowd is a completely different sound at the start to that at the end - it's a different crowd. 
 
The quality is also rather good for a late 1960s live recording - and the fact that The Marquee (1-2-3's regular haunt) opened a recording studio back then makes me think that the band could have recorded it in there then dubbed crowd. Again, not a problem - this is very common.
 
There's no shame in it, it's just that this was denied by people close to the band, which arose suspicion as to its authenticity.
 
As far as I know, this is the only period recording of 1-2-3 - and its authenticity has not been 100% verified. So we only have the words of those close to the band - if true, then 1-2-3 were indeed months, if not years ahead of the game, as period recordings of The Nice demonstrate.
 
Scrapbook is still a superb light progressive album, and, given it was released in 1969, I have no doubts as to the bands progressive credentials.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
resurrection View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 08 2010
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 254
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 02:46
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

There is a little controversy around Clouds - their music has an openly melodic appeal that sounds quite MOR pop - it's under the hood that the music is genuinely progressive.

There was also an mp3 of the 1-2-3 version of Simon and Garfunkel's "America" - which I believe is the same version that's included on the recent CD package - which clearly has overdubbed audience reactions. The sound of the crowd is a completely different sound at the start to that at the end - it's a different crowd. 
 
The quality is also rather good for a late 1960s live recording - and the fact that The Marquee (1-2-3's regular haunt) opened a recording studio back then makes me think that the band could have recorded it in there then dubbed crowd. Again, not a problem - this is very common.
 
There's no shame in it, it's just that this was denied by people close to the band, which arose suspicion as to its authenticity.
 
As far as I know, this is the only period recording of 1-2-3 - and its authenticity has not been 100% verified. So we only have the words of those close to the band - if true, then 1-2-3 were indeed months, if not years ahead of the game, as period recordings of The Nice demonstrate.
 
Scrapbook is still a superb light progressive album, and, given it was released in 1969, I have no doubts as to the bands progressive credentials.
A thoughtful post at least. But it's not true to say it was only the word of the band. Plenty of witnesses (including David Bowie and many important independent authors) attest to 1-2-3 playing drastically rewritten versions of songs like America in 1966-67. There may be questions re the recording, but not the content.
Back to Top
resurrection View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 08 2010
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 254
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:11
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

There is a little controversy around Clouds - their music has an openly melodic appeal that sounds quite MOR pop - it's under the hood that the music is genuinely progressive.

There was also an mp3 of the 1-2-3 version of Simon and Garfunkel's "America" - which I believe is the same version that's included on the recent CD package - which clearly has overdubbed audience reactions. The sound of the crowd is a completely different sound at the start to that at the end - it's a different crowd. 
 
The quality is also rather good for a late 1960s live recording - and the fact that The Marquee (1-2-3's regular haunt) opened a recording studio back then makes me think that the band could have recorded it in there then dubbed crowd. Again, not a problem - this is very common.
 
There's no shame in it, it's just that this was denied by people close to the band, which arose suspicion as to its authenticity.
 
As far as I know, this is the only period recording of 1-2-3 - and its authenticity has not been 100% verified. So we only have the words of those close to the band - if true, then 1-2-3 were indeed months, if not years ahead of the game, as period recordings of The Nice demonstrate.
 
Scrapbook is still a superb light progressive album, and, given it was released in 1969, I have no doubts as to the bands progressive credentials.
PS - it also has to be said that it was the fine contribution by yourself that has brought this band to the forefront of Prog Archives. Without that vital input there wouldn't even be an argument.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.648 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.