![]() |
King Crimson vs. Camel |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 8> |
| Author | |||||
jude111
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 20 2009 Location: China Online Status: Online Posts: 894 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: King Crimson vs. CamelPosted: May 23 2012 at 20:34 |
||||
Edited by jude111 - May 24 2012 at 06:49 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Progarchives.com
Advertisement |
Sponsored links (registered users, log in to remove) | ||||
|
|
|||||
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 18 2009 Location: Mexico Online Status: Offline Posts: 3771 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 23 2012 at 19:02 |
||||
|
Just got to know Camel a few months ago, and still am getting some albums (well, as a matter of fact, I still need to get a few King Crimson albums too, but overall I think I have a better idea of their discography). Though I have come to love some things from Camel quiet a bit, I still give the edge to King Crimson.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
clarke2001
Special Collaborator
Eclectic Prog Team Joined: June 14 2006 Location: Croatia Online Status: Offline Posts: 4158 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 23 2012 at 09:25 |
||||
|
I went with a crimson camel.
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
rogerthat
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member Joined: September 03 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4744 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 23 2012 at 09:21 |
||||
No, they look for Hammonds and mellotrons and any other sounds that take them "right back to the 70s". The rest are heretics. |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
spknoevl
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 14 2011 Location: Dallas, TX Online Status: Offline Posts: 296 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 23 2012 at 07:33 |
||||
|
KC too experimental? Isn't that what prog fans look for? Would you rather listen to a band that fits comfortably in the genre, or a band that consistently takes chances?
Oh yeah..............I went with KC.
|
|||||
|
http://martinwebb.bandcamp.com
The notes are just an interesting way to get from one silence to the next - Mick Gooderick |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011 Location: Reno, NV, USA Online Status: Offline Posts: 7530 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 23 2012 at 01:57 |
||||
|
Easily KC. Camel are hard to swallow. KC are much more fun ... and archetypal ... and dirty-visceral ... and they can be pure-visceral. Camel don't seem to be very open about it (to me at least.)
Edited by Dayvenkirq - May 23 2012 at 02:03 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Man With Hat
Collaborator
Jazz-Rock/Fusion Team Joined: March 12 2005 Location: Neurotica Online Status: Offline Posts: 38107 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 23 2012 at 00:18 |
||||
|
KC
|
|||||
|
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
gerdtheater
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 03 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 274 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 22 2012 at 23:40 |
||||
|
I like them both, it's just that I prefer KC during their first years, and Camel since their first album!
|
|||||
|
Playing a three-hour Rush show is like running a marathon while solving equations.
Neil Peart |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
jude111
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 20 2009 Location: China Online Status: Online Posts: 894 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 22 2012 at 19:26 |
||||
|
The critic in me acknowledges that King Crimson should win this poll, but the one I listen to more, like a secret guilty pleasure, is Camel. I feel more of an emotional connection to Camel, and I find the music to be more evocative. Crimson often leaves me cold, although "Starless" is one of my favorite prog songs ever.
Edited by jude111 - May 22 2012 at 20:50 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
stacyj
Forum Groupie
Joined: May 22 2012 Location: Sanford,NC. Online Status: Offline Posts: 75 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 22 2012 at 16:38 |
||||
|
Everyone likes different kinds of music?
These are 2 different types of Music,are they not?
...so i guess were talkin about preference?
...and dont say, DUH! lol
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
The Bearded Bard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 24 2012 Location: The Other Side Online Status: Offline Posts: 5868 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 29 2012 at 17:53 |
||||
|
When I can vote: KC.
|
|||||
![]()
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Thandrus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 05 2007 Location: Georgia Online Status: Offline Posts: 340 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 05 2011 at 19:59 |
||||
|
Two of my very faves. So, EQUALLY..
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
dr prog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 25 2010 Location: Melbourne Online Status: Offline Posts: 633 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 05 2011 at 17:11 |
||||
Slow mellotron songs are limited, once you record a couple they start sounding similar
I much prefer prog bands who compose really good upbeat songs as well as slow songs using their jazz and classical influences. I don't want to hear a song with 5 minutes of wind chime eg. Larks 1. What's so good about it? Waste of album space when something great could have been included but Crimson were capable of upbeat greatness with Wetton and without SInfield imo
Give me Raindances and Moonmadness anyday of the week over Crimson King, Islands, Starless and even Red and Larks
Red and Larks are pretty good, but Moonmadness and Raindances are better Edited by dr prog - October 05 2011 at 17:17 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
juandhaltrich
Forum Groupie
Joined: April 14 2010 Location: Buenos Aires Online Status: Offline Posts: 78 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 05 2011 at 11:14 |
||||
symph prog is limited? compared to ....what? to king crimson maybe! crimson has some symphonic arrangements, but their not a symphnic prog band. they're " super-progressive prog " lol, that's like the very essence of progressive rock what im talking about. but there is this thing on my mind now: you say symph prog is limited......then what is illuminating, if symph is limited?
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
elp
Forum Newbie
Joined: November 30 2010 Location: Sweden Online Status: Offline Posts: 32 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 05 2011 at 06:15 |
||||
|
Improvisation rules
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
dr prog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 25 2010 Location: Melbourne Online Status: Offline Posts: 633 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 05 2011 at 04:21 |
||||
|
I rate camel the better band because they had some great compositions. Quality prog. 70s Crimson were not composers after Sinfield left mainly, just experimenters, but they did write some nice slow tracks. Not sure how experimenting comes close to composing honestly. The best tracks from the Wetton era are Nightwatchman, Book of Saturday and Exiles imo. All slow songs. Starless is cool although I don't think it's half as good as some think. As for upbeat stuff, Crimson didn't have a composing idea really. A cool riff here and there but overall a solid band but many better at that time imo
Edited by dr prog - October 05 2011 at 04:26 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
ColonelClaypool
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Bergen, Norway Online Status: Offline Posts: 634 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 05 2011 at 02:14 |
||||
|
Love both bands equally.
|
|||||
|
With magic, you can turn a frog into a prince.
With science, you can turn a frog into a Ph.D. and you still have the frog you started with. |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
dr prog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 25 2010 Location: Melbourne Online Status: Offline Posts: 633 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 05 2011 at 00:35 |
||||
symph prog is very limited though.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
rogerthat
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member Joined: September 03 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4744 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 05 2011 at 00:08 |
||||
Not even ITCOTCK? Because that is pretty much the basis for a whole lot of symph prog.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
dr prog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 25 2010 Location: Melbourne Online Status: Offline Posts: 633 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 04 2011 at 23:26 |
||||
they don't fit my definition fully. Not the most melodic band going around
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Post Reply
|
Page 123 8> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |