![]() |
Mountains Come Out of the Sky |
Post Reply
|
Page <123 |
| Author | |||
AtomicCrimsonRush
Special Collaborator
Symphonic Team Joined: July 02 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 12754 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Mountains Come Out of the SkyPosted: January 26 2012 at 18:21 |
||
i assume so as there were errors. But it could also include extra chapters. In any case it is still one of the better prog books covering a wide spectrum of the scene. Are there any others this comprehensive and lavishly illustrated? |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
|
Progarchives.com
Advertisement |
Sponsored links (registered users, log in to remove) | ||
|
|
|||
JeanFrame
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 01 2010 Location: London, England Online Status: Offline Posts: 183 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 01 2012 at 09:43 |
||
Probably it was; paying editors like to stick to the main main mainstream and dont let the fiction get in the way of the truth. |
|||
![]() |
|||
NickHall
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 15 2011 Location: Chingford Online Status: Offline Posts: 126 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 06 2012 at 07:02 |
||
|
1-2-3 excised from the record yet again?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
AtomicCrimsonRush
Special Collaborator
Symphonic Team Joined: July 02 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 12754 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November 11 2012 at 06:56 |
||
|
I just loaded quick look at this book if you like to seee more
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
DiamondDog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 15 2011 Location: London Online Status: Offline Posts: 259 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November 14 2012 at 10:44 |
||
|
It's a nice book, well presented, well written. Unfortunately, it panders to the mainstream's idea of what constitutes prog and its history.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
AtomicCrimsonRush
Special Collaborator
Symphonic Team Joined: July 02 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 12754 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 06 2013 at 16:07 |
||
|
Something went wrong with my clip above
I will try loading again |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
MACB
Forum Newbie
Joined: March 12 2013 Location: Midlands Online Status: Offline Posts: 19 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 19 2013 at 17:18 |
||
|
Blimey, I got a copy today and was shocked when flicking through to page 230 to see a line up Pink Floyd albums instead of Porcupine Tree. I hope this is the only mistake. Otherwise looks like a good read.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
DiamondDog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 15 2011 Location: London Online Status: Offline Posts: 259 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 21 2013 at 12:36 |
||
|
Yes, it's quite good for general populist stuff about Prog. It misses out important bands like Vander Graf, and crucial influences like 1-2-3/Clouds, but it's all very well set out with great photos etc.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Stool Man
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 30 2007 Location: Anti-Cool (anag Online Status: Offline Posts: 1140 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 21 2013 at 12:43 |
||
|
The author has already explained the absence of VDGG, and mentioned 1-2-3 Clouds:
Edited by Stool Man - March 21 2013 at 12:45 |
|||
![]() |
|||
DiamondDog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 15 2011 Location: London Online Status: Offline Posts: 259 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 21 2013 at 15:34 |
||
|
I know, I did see that explanation previously, but an explanation doesn't make it a satisfactory situation. Then again, I've already praised the good things about the book.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011 Location: Sparks, NV, USA Online Status: Offline Posts: 7292 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 21 2013 at 15:38 |
||
|
^ You are saying you can't put up with the author's intent for the book?
|
|||
|
"Composing itself, in a way, is a simplifying process, just trying to pick some (strands?) out [of] the clamour in the head." - Robert Wyatt.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
DiamondDog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 15 2011 Location: London Online Status: Offline Posts: 259 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 21 2013 at 15:43 |
||
|
According to the author himself, his intent was not fulfilled, due in part to forces beyond his control. I enjoyed the book, but that doesn't mean I can't criticise somewhat glaring omissions. No-one is perfect!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Stool Man
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 30 2007 Location: Anti-Cool (anag Online Status: Offline Posts: 1140 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 22 2013 at 07:20 |
||
|
I'd like to see him publish the entire content of all those 300 interviews - that'd be a terrific book on its own
|
|||
![]() |
|||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4460 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 23 2013 at 14:02 |
||
|
Hi,
I'm probably going to get this eventually, but again ... the main issue with the discussion of this subject, is that, AGAIN, the emphasys is all on the English groups, and if you check out the lyrics, this was not an English-exclusive scene, and it was spread out all over the world, which is STILL not accepted, understood, or discussed in most of these "progressive" books, which makes the whole thing sound accidental, and something that all bands copied the London concepts ... and that is not true, never was, and never will be! But we can not get over the fact that the media was stronger in America and England that helped these things get so big, that everyone now considers them the god-given rightful heroes of some progressive ideals ... never mind the lyrics, because they are not progressive ... they are stupid, idiotic, and opinionated, but the music is progressive and the lyrics are not! Look ... how would you like to live in a different country and be totally ignored and you did just as good work as any of those bands in London? And some of those bands in London were over rated, loud, and had as much weight in their work as a pound of nothing! In fact, some of them being considered "progressive" is an insult to the term! ... but them ... definition is not important and skewed to the left or right! Please stop the ethnocentricity of this "progressive" music. We have lists here, that are around the world, like crazy, and London is not as big as the world! And the art world didn't die just because London was alive. So, for your predilection, Tokyo sucked, Paris sucked, Germany sucked, NY sucked, Buenos Aires sucked, Havana sucked, Rome sucked .... want me to go on? Those people never existed or played music? Are you insane? And above all, film and theater and literature was way more progressive in many other places, than London ... though London had the best theaters in the world and the loudest advertising on the arts! I suppose you could say that helped the music ... a whole lot ... but those folks discussing "progressive" were not intelligent enough to have seen, admired, appreciated, other facets of life and living and the arts, to have any idea ... what "progressive" even meant!
Edited by moshkito - March 23 2013 at 14:19 |
|||
|
Some old holy curmudgeon said from his holy trinity of a chapala ... none of the hits, none of the time ... is always better sex for your and your lover!
www.pedrosena.com |
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page <123 |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |