Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage") |
ERRORS THREAD Report Errors and Omissions Here |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1 305306307308309 490> |
| Author | ||
tempest_77 
Forum Senior Member 
Joined: January 06 2018 Location: Maryland Status: Offline Points: 1662 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: January 16 2021 at 13:57 |
|
http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=165 I.Q. also needs the tag for Collaborators' Top Prog Album of 2019. Also, every Collaborators' AOTY from 2009 lacks the tag on their respective album pages—only the 2005 thru 2008 albums have it on their album pages.
|
||
 |
||
|
yam yam
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 16 2011 Location: Kerberos Status: Offline Points: 5814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 16 2021 at 15:15 |
|
It's best to wait a day or two now for Google's caches to catch up so that the searches don't keep returning albums that you've already fixed. I have a batch of 57 here now which I'll leave you with. Very few came via a Google search - most were found by looking back through a few bandcamp artists' discographies on here. Google search will be a much easier and quicker way of finding the albums once their cache has been made up to date again: http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=13780 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=14433 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=22091 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=24476 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=28556 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=28557 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=28558 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=28559 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=28560 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=28561 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=33236 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=37063 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=37680 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=41132 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=41164 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=44181 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=44471 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=44643 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=45754 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=47429 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=49424 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=49584 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=51663 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=51686 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=52200 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=52201 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=53681 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=53682 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=54738 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=55052 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=56947 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=57083 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=57564 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=57892 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=5889 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=59081 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=59082 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=59397 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=60806 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=63245 These next ones are all from the band Elegant Simplicity. Firstly http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6682 There is a note here saying "The actual instrumentation was not available at this moment" If you look at https://www.elegantsimplicity.com/discography/albums/improper-advances-1992/ you will find the following: ©1992 All music composed, arranged, performed, and produced by Steven M. McCabe. Songs originally recorded between 1990 and 1992 on Tascam Porta One 4 track recorder. Remastered 30th May 2020 and released June 5th, 2020 Proximity Records seems to be a label exclusive to Elegant Simplicity, and all orders either for CDs or digital albums are actually processed via their bandcamp: https://www.discogs.com/label/141171-Proximity-Records-2 Most of the albums don't say "FLAC download - bandcamp.com", but instead have "FLAC Proximity Records" with a reference number followed by (www), but it amounts to the same thing, and I think this should be replaced with "digital album - bandcamp.com" just like all our other bandcamp artists. This one mentions bandcamp by name: http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=54675 The rest say FLAC Proximity Records (or even MP3 Proximity Records on a few album pages): http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=12362 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=54675 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6683 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6684 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6685 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6686 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6687 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6688 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6690 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6691 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6692 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6693 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6694 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6695 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=9035 I won't post any more of these here until Monday now.  - E&O Team. Thanks, done. P.S. Simplicity doesn't seem too elegant after sorting their releases out. Edited by NotAProghead - January 17 2021 at 08:51 |
||
|
||
|
yam yam
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 16 2011 Location: Kerberos Status: Offline Points: 5814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 16 2021 at 16:30 |
|
|
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=65033 - This album has been added under the band Láquesis, but is in fact a solo project by that band's ex-bass player Ariel Martin Loza. It contains an embarrassing typo in any case... Line-up / Musicians - Ariel Martin Loza / Guitars, ass, Keyboards I think that should have read: - Ariel Martin Loza / guitars, assorted keyboards (unless he has a particularly tuneful ass, of course!!) The full info for the release can be found at https://progrockjournal.com/eiemel-eiemel-album-review/, but I really think that Eimel should have been evaluated and added here as a separate standalone artist rather than being simply added to the Láquesis discography.
|
||
|
||
|
projeKct
Special Collaborator 
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: November 03 2013 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 17 2021 at 06:19 |
|
|
^ Interesting, thanks, done.
|
||
|
||
|
projeKct
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: November 03 2013 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 17 2021 at 08:49 |
|
|
Thanks, done by Eugene :
... and done by me:
 |
||
|
||
|
mbzr48
Forum Senior Member
Discography Auditor Joined: February 11 2011 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1993 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 17 2021 at 08:50 |
|
|
http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=9435
Here we go again, there are 5 albums here that are DBA and now a new one is coming (I wanted to add but I'll wait for a decision) and the driving force is not only Downes but Braide too (Equal) not like The Prog Collective that I brought up an issue here on 1/13 and kind of got an explanation that might be OK, DBA are the initials of TWO individuals not one driving force! if I was Chris Braide I wouldn't be happy! there is a website https://downesbraide.co.uk/ and a FB page https://www.facebook.com/downesbraide not under Downs alone!
|
||
|
||
|
nick_h_nz
Collaborator 
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team Joined: March 01 2013 Location: Suffolk, UK Status: Offline Points: 6737 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 17 2021 at 09:00 |
|
Here I am in agreement with you. There are several instances in the PA database where collaborations are unfairly placed under another name, rather than their own. Often, I suspect, for expedience rather than any other reason. While I think it is near impossible to claim The Prog Collective is anything other than Billy Sherwood under another name, DBA is definitely two individuals, and shouldn’t really be under just one. |
||
|
||
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7678 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 17 2021 at 09:09 |
|
|
Mayer, I think you may add new DBA album to Geoff Downes discography,
Long time ago we discussed such albums in the forum with admins and genre teams. There are different cases. Let's take real names for simplicity. 1. One of the artists is on PA, another one isn't - the album goes to PA artist discography (Geoff Downes in our case, because Chris Braide is not included yet). 2. Both artists are on PA - if so, the album goes to the first listed artist discography. For example,
|
||
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
||
|
||
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7678 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 17 2021 at 09:14 |
|
Another case I forgot to mention in my previous post. Yes, it's possible to add DBA as a separate band (entry) on PA. If you'd like to make it real, please contact the genre team first.
|
||
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
||
|
||
|
nick_h_nz
Collaborator
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team Joined: March 01 2013 Location: Suffolk, UK Status: Offline Points: 6737 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 17 2021 at 09:18 |
|
That’s the expediency I assumed was the case. It makes sense, but I think it should perhaps be made more obvious somehow, as it’s the first time I have ever seen it spelt out. Not that I know where you would state that.... 🤪🤷🏻♂️ It’s nice to see it explained though, so thanks! 👍🏻👍🏻 |
||
|
||
|
yam yam
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 16 2011 Location: Kerberos Status: Offline Points: 5814 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 17 2021 at 09:25 |
|
|
The other thing to consider with the Downes Braide Association is that it's debatable whether their music is really prog to begin with. A few proggy keyboard flourishes here and there, but overall it's probably more of an AOR flavour than prog, so I think there's a fair chance they'd be rejected if evaluated for inclusion here as a separate entry. At least the project is included on the site situated where it is now.
- E&O Team: Thanks, if chances for DBA inclusion are pretty low, let's leave their albums in Billy Sherwood's discography. (I write here only to prevent multiple quotes and confusion.) Edited by NotAProghead - January 17 2021 at 14:02 |
||
|
||
|
yam yam
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 16 2011 Location: Kerberos Status: Offline Points: 5814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 17 2021 at 13:27 |
|
|
I said I wouldn't post any more of these here until tomorrow, but just in case either of you are bored tonight...
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=1007 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=1008 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=12660 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=13571 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=13572 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=13573 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=13574 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=13576 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=13578 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=13579 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=13581 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=13582 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=13584 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=14185 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=15187 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=15189 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=15190 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=15193 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=15194 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=15195 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=15198 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=15463 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=15505 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=16673 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=17502 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=17695 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=17698 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=17704 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=17932 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=17933 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=17934 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=17935 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=18853 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=18854 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=20221 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=21865 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=22870 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=24378 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=25023 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=26310 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=26312 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=26904 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=2779 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=29431 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=29444 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=30269 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=30984 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=31407 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=32127 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=33765 50 pages in total again.
|
||
|
||
|
projeKct
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: November 03 2013 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 17 2021 at 20:31 |
|
|
^ Thanks, David. Done!
That's a lot of work, because I correct many details along the way...
So I will take a break on Monday!  |
||
|
||
|
tempest_77
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 06 2018 Location: Maryland Status: Offline Points: 1662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 18 2021 at 03:02 |
|
Don't believe this was done yet. No rush of course, I just want to make sure it doesn't get lost in the thread.
Edited by tempest_77 - January 18 2021 at 03:03 |
||
|
||
|
yam yam
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 16 2011 Location: Kerberos Status: Offline Points: 5814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 18 2021 at 04:26 |
|
Here's the next batch for when you or Eugene is ready to continue the crusade. When these 50 are done, somewhere around 650 of these pages will have been put right since the issue was initially brought to attention last May.  http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=35094 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=36412 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=3701 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=37613 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=37832 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=38580 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=38895 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=38959 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=39784 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=4059 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=41394 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=41741 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=41808 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=41810 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=42437 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=42607 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=42879 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=43264 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=43601 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=43840 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=44774 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=47449 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=47631 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=48003 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=48571 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=48799 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=48869 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=50082 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=5072 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=50897 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=51044 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=51723 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=51763 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=51816 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=52006 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=52292 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=52910 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=52974 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=53072 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=53688 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=56642 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=56809 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=56837 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=570 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=572 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=57263 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=57359 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=57532 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=59073 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=59123 And we still don't really know how many more of them there are...  - E&O Team: Thanks, done.
Edited by NotAProghead - January 19 2021 at 09:28 |
||
|
||
|
Psychedelic Paul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 16 2019 Location: Nottingham, U.K Status: Online Points: 34698 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 19 2021 at 04:11 |
|
|
I noticed there are two recent Rick Wakeman albums missing from ProgArchives:-
Live at Starmus (2017) Christmas Portraits (2019) Thank in advance.
Edited by Psychedelic Paul - January 19 2021 at 04:14 |
||
|
||
|
yam yam
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 16 2011 Location: Kerberos Status: Offline Points: 5814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 19 2021 at 05:15 |
|
|
^ You can add them yourself if you have all the relevant information to hand, but be careful with 'Live at Starmus', since Discogs, Amazon, Proggnosis and several other sites suggest that it was released on 2nd Sept 2016.
|
||
|
||
|
mbzr48
Forum Senior Member
Discography Auditor Joined: February 11 2011 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1993 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 19 2021 at 08:47 |
|
|
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=743
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=61185 Duplication, need to be combined
|
||
|
||
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7678 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 19 2021 at 10:13 |
|
|
^ Thanks, Mayer, but I think both albums should stay as separate entries, because the NOTE in 1981 edition explains:
"NOTE: In 1992 the full album was re-recorded with different line-up and released on CD including 6 bonus tracks".
|
||
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
||
|
||
|
yam yam
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 16 2011 Location: Kerberos Status: Offline Points: 5814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 19 2021 at 10:32 |
|
|
Next batch of 50 albums to fix:
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=10051 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=11460 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=12303 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=14801 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=16316 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=16317 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=16318 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=16320 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=17952 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=18572 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=190 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=18635 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=25751 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=27520 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=32732 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=33191 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=34953 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=37529 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=38278 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=42905 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=44704 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=44916 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=44922 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=46743 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=48410 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=48855 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=51066 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=51946 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=52869 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=53119 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=54107 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=56223 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=56716 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=56719 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=56721 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=56724 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=56833 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=57026 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=57027 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=57662 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=58048 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=59072 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=59175 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=59177 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=59457 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=61561 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=61599 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=61759 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=62178 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=62293 They're still coming thick and fast... - E&O Team: Thanks, done.
Edited by NotAProghead - January 20 2021 at 16:09 |
||
|
||
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 305306307308309 490> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
tempest_77 wrote: