Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13243
Posted: February 23 2012 at 05:28
They want to keep bringing Queen's music to the masses, then? Absolutely s*d all to do with milking the said masses for every single penny they can for a retirement fund?
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Posted: February 23 2012 at 05:31
lazland wrote:
They want to keep bringing Queen's music to the masses, then? Absolutely s*d all to do with milking the said masses for every single penny they can for a retirement fund?
I'm getting terribly cynical as I get older
I don't mind them hiring a new singer as long as they do make a new album with him and involve him in the songwriting. If they are just going to use the hot new kid in town to capture eyeballs, it's pretty sad...but not very surprising.
I always thought George Michael would be the best fit for something like this. And the video someone posted of him singing Someone to Love is a really good example. I really like that version. But that video is pretty old, almost 20 years or more? Does George Michael still have that range?
I don't mind this kid, but he needs to tone down the vibrato. Nothing more annoying than excessive vibrato.
Joined: June 13 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Posted: February 23 2012 at 12:18
When Adam sang in American Idol, he showed, that he could sing Queen songs, nearly as good as Freddy. Very close. Closer than Rodgers. Nearly the same as George Michael.
If I had a band with so many popular songs, but without the lead singer, I would also try a subsitute him, so long as I am able to perform up to par myself. And I think that Roger and Brian does a pretty good job. And Adam would not embarres anyone.
I hope they also come to Denmark to tour. I will be there!!
Joined: March 15 2010
Location: Schnitzelland
Status: Offline
Points: 4675
Posted: February 23 2012 at 15:21
It's not exactly a tour (well not yet anyway). It is supposed to be another Queen + project at the Knebworth Sonisphere festival. However, looking at what the media have been writing these past few days, it's a That-guy-from-American-Idol + back-up band event. If I cared enough I'd probably be very sad.
Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
Posted: February 23 2012 at 17:26
SMSM wrote:
Perhaps trying to entice a younger crowd and it is real PC to have a homosexual in your band now.
Besides anybody who complains about the music, they can always claim it is because of homophobia
This is Queen you know. I don't think they would employ a gay singer because it might be percieved to be 'PC'. They have had plenty of experience of homophobia in the past (Reaction to 'I want to break free' video for example.)
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10837
Posted: February 23 2012 at 17:33
What stroke me wasn't the Adam Lambert stuff.
No, what stroke me is "Queen touring" stuff. Again.
I wonder what disturbs me the most: Yes touring despite its roundabout of singers? Queen touring like nothing changed? Jethro Tull releasing "Thick As A Brick II: the Return of the Son of Monster Magnet"? Black Sabbath nth-reformation? I mean... What next? Iggy Pop touring with what's left of the MC5 and Noël Redding???
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 16148
Posted: February 24 2012 at 13:25
lazland wrote:
They want to keep bringing Queen's music to the masses, then? Absolutely s*d all to do with milking the said masses for every single penny they can for a retirement fund?
I'm getting terribly cynical as I get older
No, actually I don't think you are. I would even say that Mosh fits in the same boat a few times over. At least I know that there are not enough folks that want to see Tangerine Dream again with Chris Franke and Peter Baumann or Klaus Schulze in the days where his concerts were a meditation sitting in a Lotus position ... that even included a prayer!
Personally, it's all water under the bridge, and as much as I love AD2, the last thing in the world I want to see is them live ... after listening to "Live in London" and some of the stuff that has shown up recently ... is ... like listening to Robert Wyatt ... I think I like my grandchildren better!
In the old days we probably would have said something nasty to Adam, but I don't think that the whole thing for one man was about his being gay ... it was about who he was, and that last song of his said it all ... and I sincerely doubt that Adam can even pipe that song and not come off very good at all.
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Adam Lambert may tour with Queen as lead singer
Topic Options
Snow Dog wrote:
