![]() |
Calling all old hippies |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | |||||||||
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Online Status: Offline Posts: 32913 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Calling all old hippiesPosted: May 28 2012 at 05:25 |
||||||||
|
My problem is the use of the word hippy has totally put me off reading anything you post...or being even a little bit interested in your web site.
Actually......I have no interest anyway.
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
Progarchives.com
Advertisement |
Sponsored links (registered users, log in to remove) | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
froggyted
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 22 2009 Location: Bristol, UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 29 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 05:26 |
||||||||
Interesting. I need to look into this further.
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
froggyted
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 22 2009 Location: Bristol, UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 29 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 05:29 |
||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
froggyted
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 22 2009 Location: Bristol, UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 29 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 05:34 |
||||||||
Well yes, i guess that the use of all force is evil. Except when you need to defend your own well-being against those who would threaten it with their own use of force. Imo, WW2 was one war that had to be fought, to stop a dictatorship that threated both the wellbeing and lives of many others. I would also endorse those that are standng up to the regimes in the likes of Syria who are using force against what began as peaceful demostrators trying to exert some democratic right.
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
froggyted
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 22 2009 Location: Bristol, UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 29 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 05:41 |
||||||||
I don't believe that the hippie cause was a completely wasted one: i believe it helped set a precedent for what is happening around the world today. Still, i very much like your view that we need to be in balance with our own conscience, but imo we also need to believe that we really can make the world a better place (in the long term). I don't think the masses are as accepting anymore that the one with the biggest gun decides what is true.....
Edited by froggyted - May 28 2012 at 05:45 |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
ExittheLemming
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 19 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 6019 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 06:49 |
||||||||
|
I have a horrible feeling that a global government would suffer a similar fate to that of the world football governing body FIFA: A small failed Swiss footballer would suggest that racism can be solved with a handshake, women should wear tighter shorts and low cut shirts to combat sexism and that the introduction of goal-line technology is about as likely as any official coming up squeaky clean in an independent and external corruption inquiry.
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
froggyted
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 22 2009 Location: Bristol, UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 29 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 07:55 |
||||||||
I agree that there aren't many encouraging precedents and FIFA certainly isn't one of them! If i was to put my cynical hat on i would suggest that maybe the reason officials at the top have resisted goal-line technology is that the game is actually bent at the highest levels, to the point where maybe some matches are actually fixed by buying match officials. Goal-line technology would certainly cause problems in such a scenario.
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
ExittheLemming
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 19 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 6019 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 08:01 |
||||||||
|
^ Sorry for going off topic but yes, agreed, there's word for what you describe.....Italy
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
aginor
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Flåklypa Online Status: Offline Posts: 18035 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 08:23 |
||||||||
|
im more of a hippo then a hippi
|
|||||||||
|
you know Procol Harum created their own nieche in prog in the 70s like theyr own symph prog sound which they molded to their own IMO, quote Aginor
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
froggyted
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 22 2009 Location: Bristol, UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 29 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 08:44 |
||||||||
Watch out for the mafia, man!
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
froggyted
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 22 2009 Location: Bristol, UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 29 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 08:53 |
||||||||
.....er, maybe that's a start..... BTW, how do you multiquote on this forum, or do you just have to cut and paste?
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
dreadpirateroberts
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2011 Location: AU Online Status: Offline Posts: 947 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 08:59 |
||||||||
|
^ yep, cut and paste is easiest :)
Edited by dreadpirateroberts - May 28 2012 at 09:00 |
|||||||||
|
We are men of action. Lies do not become us.
JazzMusicArchives. |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
froggyted
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 22 2009 Location: Bristol, UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 29 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 09:05 |
||||||||
Thanks. Have just noticed my own forum doesn't have multiquote either. A pity, it makes life much easier.
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Eclectic Prog Team Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Online Status: Offline Posts: 30755 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 09:49 |
||||||||
Taxes are an example of force. ![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
Smurph
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 11 2012 Location: Columbus&NYC Online Status: Offline Posts: 1884 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 14:10 |
||||||||
|
Why the hell do liberal people agree with actual liberals? I think an actual "liberal" would be a person that liberally thinks on their own and detests the government.
At this point I'm fed up with all of it and realize that I have no control over the evils that hold this world together. I'd rather just try to live through it and treat individuals with love and respect.
This might be a dangerous attitude to have, but if you think that you're really going to fix anything, you are mistaken. More freedom means capitalism will take advantage of the weak, but more government intervention means the government will take advantage of their power, the weak, and promote specialized interests.
Nothing will ever be ok. Neither side brings peace and true equality to the table. Everything stinks. Poop. Diahrea.
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
Dean
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Albion Online Status: Offline Posts: 29130 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 14:47 |
||||||||
|
You've obviously given a lot of thought to this subject long before I posted and I haven't, so excuse me if I gloss over some of your points...
That's a measure to reduce server overhead - you will receive one update notification following each visit you make, not for every post made since your last visit - if you do not revisit the thread then your inbox will not fill with a series of redundant emails.
Social changes over the past 150 years have not been hard-fought by the masses, quite the reverse - practically everything achieved has been through the ideology of a select few (Keir Hardy, William Wilberforce,etc) through the support of a slightly broader but still select number of influencial supporters - not really "by the masses". You could argue that capitalism and monetarism follow the same profile and were hard-fought by the masses because they were implemeted by the ruling party as voted for by "the masses". Democracy tends to be like that when almost two thirds of a population voted against the elected ruling party.
I expect it to be too unwieldy to implement because "of the people" means that the people have a direct say in every policy, which either means continuous referendums or pages of pre-prepared questionnaires answered by every person on the planet - this is never going to happen, as always it will be the most motivated that will act, not the most informed or the most affected. As the size of government increases the bureaucracy to support it increases and the detachment from "the people" increases. In a small society with small government the proportion of "for the people" politicians are more representative "of the people" - once the number people to each elected official goes beyond those that personally know the person elected then there is a seperation of interest between the elected official and those they represent.
The truthful answer is we don't know... The traditional "global warming" argument of deforestation has given way to "climate change" and what was considered to be the prime cause (carbon cycle) is now ranked third behind water-cycle and heat-management, the reason behind this is that while trees are good at sequestering carbon and good at releasing oxygen, so is every plant on the planet including all those planted in the cleared forests... What we don't seem to consider is that deforestation on a massive global scale has been going on for the past 25,000 years, both naturally through forest fires and "unnaturally" through the direct action of man. In the past the whole of the UK and Europe was forest - those were cleared by men armed with stone axes and wood was the main construction material for literally thousands of years for shelter, tools, transport and fuel - what we call the stone-age, bronze-age, iron-age and industrial-age were all in reality variants on the wood-age. The one thing forests do not provide is food.
In principle you can (or so the libertarians will argue) as the system should self-regulate. Whether that is true or not (or whether you have the courage to find out because if they are wrong then we're all stuffed), the alternative is even less palitable - how do you police without the threat of retribution?
no answer
o...kay. What you are describing is wholly impractical as it requires every citizen on the planet to be in the upper portions of Maslow's hierarchy of needs and thus have the inclination and time to participate in global government to the degree required... and once we have achieve that for all citizens of planet Earth we won't need a global government.
What I rally against is ineffectual appeasement, and that's what we have at the moment - CFL light bulbs and unplugging phone chargers piss me off greatly - as do so-called "Eco" solutions such as electric and hybrid cars powered by lithium batteries and the stupid supermarket carrier bags nonsense... Do people truly honestly believe that any of that actually achieves anything? It's homoeopathic consumerism - a whopping great green placebo sugar-pill to make you feel better that does absolutely nothing. IF (and that's a stonking great big IF) mankind can affect climate in a positive way by design and action (as opposed to in a negative way by accident and inaction) then to achieve any predictable effect the input stimulus has to be massive - chaos theory and butter-fly wings do not apply - and that is horrendously dangerous and woefully irresponsible. Every well-meaning positive change that the human race has attempted on the environment has been either totally ineffectual or stupendously disastrous.
The policing, regulation and control we need is not just on the those who are doing harm to the environment, but also on the eco-warriors who through ineptitude and ill-conceived idealism think they are doing good.
|
|||||||||
If you cannot be wise, pretend to be someone who is wise and then just behave like they would - Neil Gaiman |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
stacyj
Forum Groupie
Joined: May 22 2012 Location: Sanford,NC. Online Status: Offline Posts: 75 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 14:58 |
||||||||
|
....oh really?
cant we all just get-along?
...as in down the road?
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Online Status: Offline Posts: 3681 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 15:17 |
||||||||
|
This seems like a thread I should be involved in but I'd do feel like catching up on the reading
By the way Epig, when Slarti says this:
I think we all know he's referring to me. Of course, he is an extremely close minded person when it comes to politics and problem solving. Also, I'm a classical liberal so Slarti is the anti-liberal, anyway (just to get into the proper use of terms debate again Edited by manofmystery - May 28 2012 at 15:18 |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
froggyted
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 22 2009 Location: Bristol, UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 29 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2012 at 19:18 |
||||||||
Dean, there's no doubting that you're an excellent and knowledgeable debater, but i get the impression that we're not going to agree, and that everything i propose you're going to shoot down in flames, so, seeing as its late and i've had a crap evening (personal issues) i'm not going to attempt to answer every point that you make, particularly as i need to put a lot of my available time into further imrpoving my website and promoting the forum there. You come across to me as a cynic who seems to think that no change that we (the human race) can bring about is going to fundamentally improve the society we already have, and maybe you're right, but i guess that if we all believe this then we might as well just let the system tick along merrily as it is and consign millions more of the human race to premature death at the hands of uncaring corporate monoliths, despots, lunatics and gun-wielding egotists ( i guess the latter three are more or less the same thing). I will, however, make a few brief points, but forgive me for not directly referencing your comments due to time constraints:
As i say, your a great debater, but you have basically put a wall up against almost every point i've argued and therefore i doubt we're ever going to agree on much. We're on opposite sides of a divide. I guess you could argue that there's not much hope for improving the world given the diversity of opinion that this thread exemplifies, but i live in hope. Thanks very much though, for all the time and trouble you've taken to debate this, and the interest you've taken, i genuinely appreciate it. I hope to have similar in-depth discussions on my own forum in time, but given that i only posted on this forum in the hope of getting a few people genuinely interested in participating in my own website i think that at this point i must say that my energies are best spent elsewhere. I would happily continue such a debate on the Globalfightback forum, but this isn't the place for me. I'm a great fan of prog music, amongst other genres, but don't get much time to debate music anymore; however, i'll probably drop by from time to time on other threads and will look forward to talking music with you. Edited by froggyted - May 28 2012 at 19:20 |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
Slartibartfast
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Online Status: Offline Posts: 26018 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 29 2012 at 08:00 |
||||||||
The big question then: Is love all you need? ![]() (bonus question pre-hippie question: Does she really love you yeah yeah yeah?) ![]() Edited by Slartibartfast - May 29 2012 at 08:15 |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |