A new theory on gravity

My brother, who is an absolute genius,, has come up with a new theory about gravity. It goes totally against the grain, but it is, contrary to the current theory,, totally in accordance with the facts. He has an explanation why there is so much more matter than antimatter (it only appears so, but it is not true) and also for the fact that the universe expands faster than we should expect from the big ban (a fact which was only recently discovered).. He has to slaughter a holy cow of physics for that though: That holy cow is the belief that gravity is only an attracting force (it is a repelling force between matter and antimatter in his theory). The common belief is that there is no repelling gravitational force because if there was we would measure it.. But he proves that the gravitational effect between matter and antimatter can not be measured directly and that we have to rely on circumstantial evidence for it, and all this evidence points to the fact that that force is indeed repelling..

He also shows that general relativity predicts the existence of antimatter., thus combining the theory of relativity and quantum theory. He explained it all to me, and though I don't fully understand it it sounds totally brilliant.

I always presumed anti matter was repelled from matter. Was I wrong?

But there is evidence for it. that's the point. As I already said, he has proven that the gravitational effect between matter and anti-matter can not be measured directly.and that it is a fallacy to think it can be measured. We have to rely on circumstantial evidence. And this circumstantial evidence all points his way.

It wasn't possible to measure the x-ray emissions of Cygnus X-1 2000 years ago, but that doesn't mean it's impossible. What does your point about the difficulties of measuring gravitational attraction between atomic particles show?

In any case, great you're saying he proved something. I haven't seen any of his work nor have you decided to show it.

I proved that P=NP last night. Go ahead tell me I'm wrong. What's your point here? I simply expressed my skepticism.

My proof of P=NP is in accordance with what we observe. Give me my $1,000,000 please. I proved it.

There's plenty of proposed solutions to the issues you have brought up. The reason that we don't have a solution is because we don't have evidence for any of the proposed theories.

It's like talking to a serious Flat Earth Theorist. They can and do posit a slew of physical laws to show how the Earth can be flat in accordance with our expectations. However, the world still isn't flat. Physics isn't a deductive science.

Title made me think of this:



That was my two cents worth.


Edited by The Truth - June 14 2012 at 13:54

Gravity is an illusion planted in your minds by governments all around the globe...

BaldFriede wrote: I phoned my brother about this, and he just said this: "There is not a single observation that points to gravity being an attracting  force between matter and antimatter".. I have no idea if he is right, but perhaps you can say something to that.

As far as I know that is accurate. I'm not sure what that matters though. There is not a single observation that points to gravity being a repelling force between matter and antimatter.

The T wrote: Gravity is an illusion planted in your minds by governments all around the globe...

You said governments as if there's more than one. Everyone knows that the NWO rules the globe.

??? "violating Occam's razor" ???