Dream Theater wins March Metal Madness Tournament |
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Author | ||
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 03 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 17995 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 07:52 | |
I'm going to be honest, 20x weighting is necessary on MMA because we don't have enough regular reviewers to counteract the occasional manipulators.
/offtopic |
||
Biff Tannen
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 13 2010 Location: St. Louis, USA Status: Offline Points: 159 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 09:18 | |
Okay, but you are going to have collaborators manipulate the ratings, too, if they decide they do not like a particular band and decide to review all of their albums just to give them a low rating for each one. I won't mention names, but there are certain collaborators who all but admit in certain reviews that they do not like a band and only listened to a CD once so they could trash it. In fact, in one, a collaborator even said, "have I gotten to 100 words yet?" The obvious implication there being they reviewed it just to give it 1 star and hurt its rating because they have an axe to grind. So, manipulating the ratings can come from anyone, and giving more weight to the ratings of collaborators makes it easier for them to do so.
|
||
"What are you looking at, butthead?"
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 09:27 | |
Easier yes, more likely no. You can name and shame, this is far more preferable to wild accusations - I love watching reviewers squirm as they justify their ratings, collaborators doubly so.
|
||
What?
|
||
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 09:40 | |
I remember that phrase in a review. Might have been Hugues but I wouldn't swear to it.
|
||
Biff Tannen
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 13 2010 Location: St. Louis, USA Status: Offline Points: 159 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 09:45 | |
Naming and shaming won't work, since the reviewers would first deny it, and then insist that fans of said bands are just being crybabies because someone gave them bad reviews, ignoring the fact that the content of their reviews were a sham. It's like a newspaper critic doing a review of a live show in the paper and saying in it they do not like the band in the first place...it's like, you know the review is gonna be bad cause it is more of a reflection of their hate for the band rather than of the actual quality, so what is the point?
|
||
"What are you looking at, butthead?"
|
||
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 09:46 | |
Yes but where did that quote come from?
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 13:01 | |
memory is such a fickle thing,
I have searched the database and there are many reviews that make such a claim, however all of them from non-Collabs and none from collabs or official Prog Reviewers - try some of smartpatrol's reviews - Andy makes a point of doing it, probably following after that arch reviewer Torodd Fuglestegg who also used to make specific mention of the word count in his reviews just so he could stretch them out by just a few more words. Bah, but there you go – I’ve named and shamed them both in exactly one hundred words. Edited by Dean - April 11 2013 at 13:02 |
||
What?
|
||
Biff Tannen
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 13 2010 Location: St. Louis, USA Status: Offline Points: 159 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 13:05 | |
Okay, here is one: Sean Trane's review for The Flower Kings' Space Revolver:
Read my other F K critics as I don't like to repeat myself. But I will have to find something to write if my opinion (which nobody cares for anyway ;-) is to be seen - are we at fifty words yet?
Again , with this album TFK repeats their musical props without changing much of their previous formula. There is of course a solid dose of hard work that going into such an album , (which are finely crafted too and have many positive qualities to their works) >> but I am afraid it is all lost on me. Every single note appears to have been heard in different albums scattered through the prog giants of the 70's. All kidding aside and not wanting to hurt anybody's feelings but my opinion is: spend your hard earned cash on other Swedish groups that are more worthy of your support. Okay, he said 50, not 100. That's even worse. LOL But really, that is an embarrassing review from a supposed collaborator. Edited by Biff Tannen - April 11 2013 at 13:06 |
||
"What are you looking at, butthead?"
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 13:15 | |
^ I'll give you that one - he managed to write three times that 50, but it was hardly worth that much effort for the little he managed to say. I've never been a fan of Hugues' reviews - too terse, too hurried and too many of them.
Edited by Dean - April 11 2013 at 13:16 |
||
What?
|
||
dtguitarfan
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 15:05 | |
Let me repeat this just so it's clear - I am not even pushing to get reviewer status anymore, since I seem to have lost the bug. The other site I used to write for that actually gave me free music has been begging me to write for them again, and I just can't bring myself to do it any more - mostly because it comes with the responsibility to review albums I just don't like, and it's really hard to write a review for an album that you aren't either thrilled with or despise. So here's my point: the biggest problem I had with being denied reviewer status is that I was told that I was clearly an expert on Prog Metal, but they only want people who have a more balances profile of reviews spanning all or most of the sub-genres. But here's the problem with that - you're not getting a balanced perspective that way. On MMA, if someone is an expert on one sub-genre and one sub-genre only - GREAT! They want everyone there! Here, you've got this elitist approach where you only want to represent a certain type of perspective, and that's the biggest problem I have with this site. You're not willing to represent someone who's "clearly an expert" (not my words - that's a quote) on one sub-genre. And that's crap, plain and simple. |
||
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 03 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 17995 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 15:36 | |
I was going to say "incoherent" but that works too.
Geoff - I think being "an expert" on something by necessity includes a certain degree of knowledge on related things. Otherwise there is no frame of reference for comparisons etc Edited by Triceratopsoil - April 11 2013 at 15:38 |
||
dtguitarfan
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 15:42 | |
You don't think I qualify for "expert" status on the subject of Prog Metal? Take a look at my credentials: http://rateyourmusic.com/~dtguitarfan |
||
Biff Tannen
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 13 2010 Location: St. Louis, USA Status: Offline Points: 159 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 15:53 | |
The one problem I see with being an "expert' in one subgenre, such as prog metal, is it can cause one to overrate bands/albums in that area, while underrating bands/albums in other areas, like a prog metal fan not liking prog rock stuff as much strictly because he prefers metal and he feels the rock stuff isn't ballsy enough for him. Granted, we all have preferences and likings and whatnot, so that is gonna come across with pretty much all of us, but I guess I can see wanting collaborators who are more well-rounded, as they are able to have a bit more perspective across subgenres. In other words, loving 5 albums in four different subgenres is more impressive than loving 20 albums in a single one. Diversity is the spice of life!
|
||
"What are you looking at, butthead?"
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 16:01 | |
whatever made you think it was something that a) I didn't get the first time or that b) I was remotely interested?
|
||
What?
|
||
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 03 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 17995 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 16:24 | |
With all due respect, I feel that your scope is far too limited. An expert on "Dream Theater -school of Vanilla prog metal," perhaps, but there is a lot more to metal that is progressive than that. Not to mention influence, origins,
Edited by Triceratopsoil - April 11 2013 at 18:39 |
||
Nogbad_The_Bad
Forum & Site Admin Group RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team Joined: March 16 2007 Location: Boston Status: Online Points: 20204 |
Posted: April 11 2013 at 16:40 | |
Personally I'd go for Sabbath & Motorhead ahead of pretty much anyone else in a metal poll but I'm a more casual fan of the genre and don't have a broad knowledge. |
||
Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/ |
||
dtguitarfan
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
Posted: April 12 2013 at 06:50 | |
Let's say one of the sub-genres on this site was something that really no one listens to any more - like german beer pub songs. By only allowing in people who represent sub-genres like this, you bring this sub-genre more into the forefront than it should be - over representing it. I'm talking about this site representing other perspectives. Represent the people who are experts in this sub, and that one, and ones who like these two subs but not others, and just that one, and then you have a more balances approach. But by insisting "you can't be part of this club unless you meet MY requirements" you are misrepresenting how things actually are, and the 20x weighting adds to that problem. That's what I'm talking about - anyone who has an interest in being a reviewer or collab should be able to get in as long as they prove they aren't some bot, prove they are making an effort to write decent reviews, and as long as they remain civil. If someone starts posting things that are rude in their reviews then you remove their reviewer status. But there shouldn't be this requirement that a person represent a certain array of genres - you're skewing things that way. You're insisting that other people be like the people who are already in power. Like I said - if the only people who vote for congress members are congress members, the Republican party, which has gone crazy, would eventually be 100% of Congress. |
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: April 12 2013 at 07:22 | |
What If games are dumb. It would also appear that letting people down gently to avoid hurting their feelings is also dumb.
|
||
What?
|
||
Gerinski
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 10 2010 Location: Barcelona Spain Status: Offline Points: 5093 |
Posted: April 12 2013 at 07:45 | |
Geoff, with all due respect:
Having been granted the Prog Reviewer status without ever having asked for it and hearing your laments I can only feel a bit of pity for you. I do have the Reviewer status and I use it so little that I wonder if I really deserve it, you on the other hand are (or was) hungry to get it and you did not. It might seem like a very unfair situation from your point of view. I will never say that I deserved getting the Reviewer status but OK, they offered it, I initially hesitated and I told PA that I thought I was not worthy of it and that I was not the kind of person that would write lots of reviews. They answered me, 'we don't expect you to write any particular number of reviews per x time, you review if you want to and you don't review if you don't want to'. After a couple of exchanged messages assuring me that I was not incurring into any obligations I accepted. It's not by asking and whining that you get something, often it's all the opposite. PA is just an entertainment hobby for us but this is a message applicable to much more important things in life. Ambition is not a bad thing per se, but all too often if you act in an openly ambitious or arrogant way ('hey look at my credentials and tell me if I'm not a top Prog Metal expert') the others will not like it. Being determined but always humble, and simply showing your strengths by facts instead of claiming them by your own words tends to work much better. As for the ratings weighting system, I don't get your approach, it's what it is, the owner and Admins of the site decide it, you may criticise it in a civilised and polite way, but don't mix it with your ranting for not having been granted the Reviewer status.
|
||
Jbird
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2011 Status: Offline Points: 338 |
Posted: April 12 2013 at 07:48 | |
Hmm, German beer pub prog.
Guitars, bass, keys, drums, & accordions? Back to the Metal Madness tournament, Images & Words was my favorite album of all the ones they had, and I love MoP and RIP. The best album won, imo.
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |