Progarchives.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Is David Bowie prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum SearchSearch  Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Is David Bowie prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567
Poll Question: Is David Bowie prog?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
14 [35.00%]
26 [65.00%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Message
dr wu23 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3878
Post Options Post Options   Quote dr wu23 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Is David Bowie prog?
    Posted: July 06 2013 at 22:39
Originally posted by Gerinski

I couldn't care less whether he is Prog or not, I just wish there were more Bowie's on this planet.
 
Meh.....never was a big fan of Bowie......now there's an artist who fits into that thread on overrated songs/musicians..
 
Wink
 
 
Et In Arcadia Ego
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Tom Ozric Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2013 at 23:04
Originally posted by Dean

Originally posted by Svetonio

^^ Ok, that was pretty enough for PA admins to add him as prog related act as well, but it doesn't mean that this fashionable pop artist was produced progressive rock enough for Crossover section. You would never forget what Dean pointed out:
Prog RELATED IS NOT PROG.
Your grasp of this concept appears to be limited and/or somewhat selective.
The question needs to be asked :  whilst I am pleased to have many of these 'Prog Related' entries here at P.A. I wonder why they are included here at all if they are 'NOT PROG' ???  If they cross over into Prog territories occasionally then they should be in 'Cross Over'.........
Let's start up the 'Prog Related Archives' and include 'Buggles'............(whom I find more related to Prog than many 'Prog Related' artists........Confused)
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7548
Post Options Post Options   Quote ExittheLemming Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2013 at 00:21
Originally posted by Tom Ozric

Originally posted by Dean

Originally posted by Svetonio

^^ Ok, that was pretty enough for PA admins to add him as prog related act as well, but it doesn't mean that this fashionable pop artist was produced progressive rock enough for Crossover section. You would never forget what Dean pointed out:
Prog RELATED IS NOT PROG.
Your grasp of this concept appears to be limited and/or somewhat selective.
The question needs to be asked :  whilst I am pleased to have many of these 'Prog Related' entries here at P.A. I wonder why they are included here at all if they are 'NOT PROG' ???  If they cross over into Prog territories occasionally then they should be in 'Cross Over'.........
Let's start up the 'Prog Related Archives' and include 'Buggles'............(whom I find more related to Prog than many 'Prog Related' artists........Confused)


They're here because they are:

Influential to or have been influenced by Progressive Rock
Considered to have facilitated the development of Progressive Rock in their locale
Considered to reflect some/many of the stylistic elements and the erstwhile zeitgeist from which Progressive Rock emerged.

These are of course very broad parameters as this isn't an exact science but it's all there in the published definition on PA which I think ain't bad. No-one pretends that any of the artists in Prog Related are Prog. They're not. They're related to Prog.

By way of contrast Crossover Prog artists are deemed 100% Prog but their music contains elements we would ordinarily expect to find in more mainstream pop/rock idioms e.g. shorter more concise song structures, classical, jazz and folk affectations, a greater focus on repeated melodic hooks etc. They don't crossover into Prog, they crossover from Prog. Similarly, a very useful definition is provided on PA which should be of particular value to Prog Reviewers.





Edited by ExittheLemming - July 13 2013 at 00:24
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Tom Ozric Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2013 at 20:24
O.K. - stands to reason.......
Back to Top
charles_ryder View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 15 2014
Location: Russia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 74
Post Options Post Options   Quote charles_ryder Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2014 at 05:32
Bowie is not a prog musician, but his albums are strictly progressive. IMO
Om mani padme hum
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2562
Post Options Post Options   Quote TODDLER Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2014 at 08:57
He was very progressive in his theatrical stage act. That being a desperate craft he strongly developed to be combined with his compositions. I saw him in "The Hunger" and it made me think about the many roles he took on during live performances.. Originally influenced by Syd Barrett' s music , his hair style. the makeup, expanded Bowie' s mind into doing unorthodox things. I can't imagine the suggestions that Bowie and Visconti made to each other during those early , so praised recording sessions. Apart from  Bowie talents, we had Mick Ronson who was a fine and perfectly skilled arranger. Arranging the strings for "Life On Mars" as such proved that his work could easily be compared to the string/horn arrangements of Procol Harums Grand Hotel. Think about it. All those progressive or now defined Proto ..elements existed in Bowie' s music. In 71' he performed at Glastonbury Fayre . ...alone with an acoustic. He was a fine singer songwriter and if you dismiss his harder Rock songs from the early albums and focus mainly on his melancholy pieces, it is evident that he was influenced by a more progressive English writing style which was basically his environment.
Back to Top
Kentucky_Hawkwindage View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 15 2014
Location: Hardinsburg,Ky
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 598
Post Options Post Options   Quote Kentucky_Hawkwindage Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2014 at 16:53
Ground control to Major Tom.....I say negative to Poll question.....but i'm generally on hydrocodone when i post.....
"Nobody's Gonna Change My World That's Something To Unreal"    Profound lyrics that i live my life by-from Black Sabbath's Technical Ecstasy's track You Won't Change Me
Back to Top
tamijo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3844
Post Options Post Options   Quote tamijo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2014 at 07:13
in glimps : Yes
in general : No
As allmost every other artists born from the 70's scene, they was inspired by prog because at the time prog was huge. If you would ask Bowie "do you consider yourself as part of the progressive rock movement", im sure he would laugh himself to death.
 
He fits perfect in prog related.
 
 
Back to Top
tamijo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3844
Post Options Post Options   Quote tamijo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2014 at 07:19
Originally posted by jude111

Originally posted by Dean

Originally posted by jude111

Originally posted by dr wu23

After a month and a half it's 22 to 12 that he's not prog.
 
Wink


And as we know, the minority's usually right LOL
Eh?


Okay, it's not enough to say the minority's usually right. (Clearly that's not the case.) Rather, I'll just say the majority's usually, for want of a better word, 'wrong'. Or, 'off'.

Or to quote Mark Twain: "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect." LOL

Yes  - So i sad down, paused, refelcted, and came up with this thoughtful answer.....NO
Because, if you have a page like this one, you are protecting a minority in music, if you include everything from the 70's, everything slightly fussioned between two or more genres, everyone that has a few tracks of prog, every band or album with someone famous in the prog circles, you will turn PA into a meltingpot, and it will be no more about this small minority in music that is truely prog....so pause..reflect...and tell me, is David Bowie, an ever changing master of Rock, born from Glam Rock years in the early 70's, or is he a full blown representative of 70's prog rock.

Edited by tamijo - May 15 2014 at 07:27
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.69
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.188 seconds.