Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Prog_Traveller
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 29 2005
Location: Bucks county PA
Status: Offline
Points: 1474
|
Posted: September 04 2014 at 12:33 |
Only recently have I begun to appreciate metal and prog metal. My preference still is for regular prog rock though.
|
|
PrognosticMind
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 02 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Status: Offline
Points: 1195
|
Posted: September 04 2014 at 12:48 |
SteveG wrote:
| The orange is Progressive metal!!
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
^Metal is often denser than rock afterall.
No vote in this poll. |
^Win.
|
"A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous. Got me?"
|
|
Claypool90s
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 04 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 8
|
Posted: September 04 2014 at 18:41 |
I always considered Tool to be progressive art rock more than prog metal
|
|
Svetonio
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
|
Posted: September 05 2014 at 06:08 |
djent
|
|
Phaolrym
Forum Groupie
Joined: September 05 2014
Location: Sphere
Status: Offline
Points: 40
|
Posted: September 05 2014 at 11:12 |
I've spent more time with listening to prog metal, yet I love them both. (And recently I can say that I tend to listen prog rock more often.)
|
|
Aragon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 186
|
Posted: September 05 2014 at 14:22 |
Progrock for sure....i hate progmetal and all the DT clones!
|
|
|
geekfreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 21 2013
Location: Musical Garden
Status: Offline
Points: 9872
|
Posted: September 15 2014 at 02:29 |
I`ll be a little so so as I`ve been into DT, Tool but not many others as I`m not a fan of the metal prog like most of you all... but its not that I`m in to the metal side of prog. so I`m saying I`m a fan of both styles... so no vote...
|
Friedrich Nietzsche: "Without music, life would be a mistake."
Music Is Live
Two people are better off than one, for they can help each other succeed.
Keep Calm And Listen To The Music… <
|
|
Jeffro
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 29 2014
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2031
|
Posted: September 15 2014 at 09:10 |
"....It's all Rock n Roll to me"
|
|
PrognosticMind
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 02 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Status: Offline
Points: 1195
|
Posted: September 15 2014 at 09:29 |
I love progressive metal, but I don't particularly care for Dream Theater. I've always fancied the likes of Symphony X.
|
"A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous. Got me?"
|
|
Rednight
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 18 2014
Location: Mar Vista, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 4807
|
Posted: September 15 2014 at 10:03 |
It's progressive rock. Prog metal isn't subtle enough for my tastes. People tell me to initiate a listening with Queensryche (misspelled, I'm sure), and I have a feeling I'll have to dabble in that direction soon enough because I've played all the old stuff to death. It's nice to know that 'ryche is a domestic band, though. Saw its lead singer on an episode of That Metal Show and he came off intelligent, assured, and focused, so I'll be checking them out soon enough.
|
|
Green Shield Stamp
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 17 2009
Location: Telford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 933
|
Posted: September 18 2014 at 15:39 |
I often think that progressive metal is an oxymoron. It is metal with lots of twiddly, noodly bits. So, prog rock for me is vastly superior.
|
Haiku Writing a poem With seventeen syllables Is very diffic....
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: September 18 2014 at 16:10 |
Prog was described exactly like that in the 70s.
|
What?
|
|
PrognosticMind
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 02 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Status: Offline
Points: 1195
|
Posted: September 18 2014 at 16:52 |
Dean wrote:
Prog was described exactly like that in the 70s. |
This is kind of what I was just thinking. Metal is technically a progression from rock itself, but I feel that's a whole separate argument.
|
"A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous. Got me?"
|
|
addictedtoprog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2014
Location: india
Status: Offline
Points: 1422
|
Posted: September 19 2014 at 13:24 |
PrognosticMind wrote:
Dean wrote:
Prog was described exactly like that in the 70s. |
This is kind of what I was just thinking. Metal is technically a progression from rock itself, but I feel that's a whole separate argument. | U feel so cause u love ProgMetal more.. And i too feel quite similar.
Edited by addictedtoprog - September 19 2014 at 13:30
|
|
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
|
Posted: September 20 2014 at 04:25 |
As someone who's into both metal and prog-rock, I find a lot of better
known prog metal's fusion of the two to come across as rather kitschy
perhaps by being very literal in the way it combines the two.
I
suspect the reason is that most prominent progressive metal groups
combine styles from after progressive rock and heavy metal had diverged
even further than they did in the 1970s. Even back then, I gather there
was something of a culture clash between the two: The progressive rock
movement tended to emphasize the interplaying instrumental dynamics and usually had
detailed philosophical or ideological worldviews underlying either the
individual record or entire career project's conceptual ethos; the early
hard rock/heavy metal groups on the other hand tended towards emphasis
on the instrumental prowess of individual musicians in the band, and
they also make a point out of moral or ideological ambiguity in their
artistic ethos. This means that the tropes from the disparate styles
stick out more, when there isn't developed a newer fluid musical grammar
in order to provide a coherent synthesis between the two. That's my
best guess as to why groups like Dream Theater and Opeth
don't do that much for me, their songs' narrative structures don't
strike me as quite as logically consistent as if they had stuck to
either genre's rules as either an ideal to live up to or main target to
subvert.
My favourite prog metal groups are usually just more
ambitious and complex than usual for their respective subgenre (e. g.
early Fates Warning), or they come at both metal and prog from a sort of "sideways perspective". (e. g. Virus, Voivod)
Edited by Toaster Mantis - September 20 2014 at 13:42
|
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
|
PrognosticMind
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 02 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Status: Offline
Points: 1195
|
Posted: September 20 2014 at 09:29 |
Toaster Mantis wrote:
As someone who's into both metal and prog-rock, I find a lot of better
known prog metal's fusion of the two to come across as rather kitschy
perhaps by being very literal in the way it combines the two.
I
suspect the reason is that most prominent progressive metal groups
combine styles from after progressive rock and heavy metal had diverged
even further than they did in the 1970s. Even back then, I gather there
was something of a culture clash between the two: The progressive rock
movement tended to emphasize the dynamic of instrumental and usually had
detailed philosophical or ideological worldviews underlying either the
individual record or entire career project's conceptual ethos; the early
hard rock/heavy metal groups on the other hand tended towards emphasis
on the instrumental prowess of individual musicians in the band, and
they also make a point out of moral or ideological ambiguity in their
artistic ethos. This means that the tropes from the disparate styles
stick out more, when there isn't developed a newer fluid musical grammar
in order to provide a coherent synthesis between the two. That's my
best guess as to why groups like Dream Theater and Opeth
don't do that much for me, their songs' narrative structures don't
strike me as quite as logically consistent as if they had stuck to
either genre's rules as either an ideal to live up to or main target to
subvert.
My favourite prog metal groups are usually just more
ambitious and complex than usual for their respective subgenre (e. g.
early Fates Warning), or they come at both metal and prog from a sort of "sideways perspective". (e. g. Virus, Voivod)
|
A very thorough, graspable analysis Toaster Mantis.
Also, Fates Warning (particularly Awaken The Guardian) and Voivod rules.
|
"A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous. Got me?"
|
|
Friday13th
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 30 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 284
|
Posted: September 20 2014 at 12:01 |
Yeah, I started with progressive metal, but the more I listen the more I like the rock stuff. Even the best prog metal bands don't have fluid range of emotions and textures that make prog rock amazing. I actually prefer straight-up heavy metal like Judas Priest to most prog metal. Of course I love the heavy sound, so "heavy" prog like King Crimson and Rush usually do the trick for me.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: September 21 2014 at 00:40 |
Friday13th wrote:
Yeah, I started with progressive metal, but the more I listen the more I like the rock stuff. Even the best prog metal bands don't have fluid range of emotions and textures that make prog rock amazing. I actually prefer straight-up heavy metal like Judas Priest to most prog metal. Of course I love the heavy sound, so "heavy" prog like King Crimson and Rush usually do the trick for me. |
Ditto, except I had started with prog rock. It's indeed the textures that make the difference to me. The constant heavy textures in prog metal gets a bit oppressive after some time whereas the contrast in prog rock provides a breather. And also that since prog metal artists, at least of the DT era, tend to be heavily influenced by the 80s, they channel 80s pop or hair metal in their soft/ballad singing which I don't like. I too like straight up metal more because I listen to it purely for crushing riffs. In prog metal it gets difficult to focus on the riffs with all the changes.
|
|
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
|
Posted: September 21 2014 at 06:08 |
Had completely forgotten about the role of contrasting or building up
layers of texture in progressive rock songwriting, and how that's
something many progressive metal groups neglect. I wonder if that has to
do with that stylistic divergence between prog/psych-rock and HR/HM in
the mid-1970s that I mentioned earlier, probably one that had been
building on account of the difference in artistic ethos between the two
scenes.
An amusing coincidence is that recently, it's become more
commonplace for the more introverted metal subgenres like the
psychedelic end of doom metal (e. g. Electric Wizard) or the types of black metal (e. g. Drudkh)
that emphasize atmosphere over riffing to go over in the opposite
pitfall: Id est songwriting that focuses entirely on development of
texture at the expense of a clear sense of narrative structure in the
composition. In the case of Electric Wizard it's clear they're a
stylistically metal band who are closer to 1960s/1970s psychedelia in
both ideological outlook as well as visual aesthetic, but what's the
excuse of the Eastern European ultranationalists in Drudkh? A misappropriation of Varg Vikernes' interest in Krautrock?
|
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: September 21 2014 at 06:27 |
I think the trend in doom metal owes more to the development of ambient music than anything to do with prog rock. Ambient music also focuses heavily on texture at the expense of narrative or, basically, momentum. Prog rock at its best in the 70s could attain a sweet spot that balanced both momentum and textural variety and depth.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.