Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rock is dead
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRock is dead

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
Polymorphia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2014 at 11:26
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

Gene Simmons is a joke. So were KISS. They were a manufactured band releasing "product" and not "music". File under "entertainment for slow readers". 

However, he's right. Over the last year, I had 5,700 hits on a Bandcamp profile (I would actually class myself as a musician.) About 1300 downloads. I give everything away to charity. So, the model at the time was, if you can't afford it, no problems. If you can afford it, donate what you can, all profits go to charity.

So, 20% hit ratio, not bad. Guess how much was in the pot after 6 months ? $2. Two lousy rotten dollars for writing an entire album which got international radio play. At this point, I gave up. Finally, I wrote a new album, released it, wooo, $18 in an entire week. 

Even if you GIVE away free downloads, only 1 in 5 people who get a download code actually bother to download the files. They'd rather stream the music. All people do now is use internet radio stations like Spotify to stream audio. I remember reading somewhere that one "pop" musician had 30,000 plays and got enough royalties to buy a t shirt.

Listen up, folks, if you think music has gone down the pan over the last 30 years, wait and see what the next 30 are going to be like. If people don't start actually buying music again, there is absolutely no incentive for anyone to learn to play an instrument for you. Hence rock is dead. Music is dead. It was being killed by commercialism but is now being killed by the listening public. 
The self-release market is pretty over-saturated and it's really hard to be successful in those endeavors. Mostly (with exceptions), the people who will buy music want stamps of authenticity. A good label, physical formats, nice packaging for those formats, presence on popular download and streaming sites (iTunes, Spotify, etc.), a live show, good reviews, etc. Mostly, the people who buy music are music magazine Top 40 listeners who will take risks in purchases but only if the odds of quality seem good. It's hard to get that as a musician, though.
Back to Top
Usandthem View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: February 07 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2014 at 13:06
I don't think that a type of music can die.
Back to Top
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2014 at 15:56
Originally posted by CPicard CPicard wrote:


Oh, and, by the way, I think Throbbing Gristle or Einstürzende Neubauten had more influence than the Swans (at least, in Europe). Stern Smile


Einstürzende Neubauten definitely, what with Blixa Bargeld playing with Nick Cave, but I'm pretty sure I'm on a police watch list for admitting in public to listening to Throbbing Gristle.


"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Back to Top
Polymorphia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2014 at 16:18
So, for those of you who'd say rock is dead or simply not the prevailing genre anymore (I might say the latter), what is the prevailing genre today?
Back to Top
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2014 at 16:39
Electronic pop I'd wager, with certain hiphop and R&B subgenres close.
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Back to Top
Archeus View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: June 17 2014
Location: The Dreamlands
Status: Offline
Points: 49
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2014 at 17:10
Originally posted by Toaster Mantis Toaster Mantis wrote:

Electronic pop I'd wager, with certain hiphop and R&B subgenres close.

Sad but true Cry


Edited by Archeus - September 13 2014 at 17:11
What about dogs? What about cats? What about chickens?
Back to Top
StaaViinsZ View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 05 2014
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 101
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 16 2014 at 20:37
Well, in order for a genre of music to be "dead", in my opinion, one of two things must be true:

A: No one is making Rock music any longer (lol)

or

B: People only come to make rock music briefly, then don't care anymore and leave a few months (or a couple years/albums) later

Since neither of those sound even fairly accurate, I would wager to say ROCK IS NOT DEAD.

With everything from Lady Gaga to Yes sometimes thrown into that huge conglomerate generic mess that is the "genre of Rock", it's pretty clear that Rock isn't dead, as least in some definition.

Then again, how does Gene Simmons define "Dead"?

If he's trying to say Hair Bands are dead, then I wouldn't totally agree, Being that some still exist, (Reckless Love, Steel Panther) and that I happen to like the old ones from the 80s, (along with several from the 80s still making music today [Stryper, Ratt, BloodGood, Europe]) but they are much less popular, yes.

If he's trying to say all this music that people make now isn't real Rock, then that's just his opinion.

Every time you turn around you see another old, or middle-aged person going "Music just isn't the same today. Back when I was a kid, music was GOOD".

And another kid going "I love Demi Lovato & Katy Perry".

Perhaps Gene Simmons has fallen into the age closed-minded-ness against today's music?


If anyone's ever heard of Black Veil Brides, you must realize the similarities they bear to KISS, in a modern way.
From the make-up to the general style of music, (Hard Rock, or Metal, although BVB's style has gone through several significant changes over the course of a few albums) to their affectionately named fan base, (Black Veil Brides ARMY...) they're like KISS for teenagers (I happen to be a bit of a fan myself XD).

I believe Black Veil Brides happens to be a fairly successful band, and if Gene Simmons isn't close-minded, surely he would be able to see that, at least in comparison to KISS, they qualify as "Rock", and they are certainly not "Dead".

To say that online distribution killed Rock music is dumb. It's just a new way of distributing new music; again, it depends on your definition of "Rock", and "Dead". If severely damaging the record and physical media industry is what you speak of, sure, I would say it may have done that, but killed any genre of music? No, lol.

If anyone wants a more specific answer, they would need to define "Rock" and define "Dead".

That's pretty much all I can say.
Smile


Edited by StaaViinsZ - September 16 2014 at 20:39
"Let us scream like Tom Mallicoat, and whisper like Geoff Tate, for the difference between the two is nigh."
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.168 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.