Print Page | Close Window

Elements from Netherlands for NEO PROG

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Suggest New Bands and Artists
Forum Description: Suggest, create polls, and classify new bands you would like included on Prog Archives
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=104147
Printed Date: April 25 2024 at 15:43
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Elements from Netherlands for NEO PROG
Posted By: O666
Subject: Elements from Netherlands for NEO PROG
Date Posted: September 24 2015 at 10:08
Elements is a Neo Prog band from Netherlands. Their music is very similar to Marillion early 80's music with a little Floyd flavour. I'm sure they tried hard to make Neo Prog music and you can see this very clearly but I can't rate their music. Now I give you their official site link. You can find anything that you need about them:
 
http://www.elementsmusic.nl/" rel="nofollow - http://www.elementsmusic.nl/



Replies:
Posted By: yam yam
Date Posted: December 18 2015 at 16:02
Review of the 'Monument' album at DPRP: http://www.dprp.net/reviews/201560.php#elements" rel="nofollow - http://www.dprp.net/reviews/201560.php#elements .

Brief samples of all songs from the 'Monument' album:



(More short tubes on the 'Videos' page of the band's official website as given in o.p.)

Elements on progfreak:  http://progfreak.com/Elements-165199.html" rel="nofollow - http://progfreak.com/Elements-165199.html .

Definitely Neo Prog. Worth an evaluation methinks... Embarrassed


Posted By: puzart
Date Posted: January 04 2017 at 06:29
Why did not the band has not been added?Shocked
Very good neo prog.


01. The Ongoing Circle Of Life 06:57
02. Intimacy 05:48
03. Values 06:34
04. Your Way 04:34
05. I Miss You 07:15
06. Looking Back For Tomorrow 04:48
07. Symphony For The Nerds 05:55
08. Imprisoned Angel 08:48
09. The Edge Of Time 04:39
Line-Up:
Joost Donkersloot - Vocals, Bass
Rene Alblas - Guitars
Kees Van Oosten - Keyboards, Backing Vocals
Sander De Jong - Drums




Posted By: yam yam
Date Posted: January 04 2017 at 07:39
They haven't been added because there has never been an evaluation. Cry My reply (after I started logging into the site again after a 6 month absence just to round up all the missed suggestions that had accumulated during that time) was unfortunately the only response to the suggestion, and it has simply been forgotten again until now. Better luck this time around eh? Embarrassed

Note: Keyboard player Kees van Oosten left the band towards the end of 2015, and was eventually replaced in September of last year by Vincent Kuijvenhoven. Despite this quiet period the band is still active, and there are plans to start performing again in 2017.

There is a facebook page for the band:  https://www.facebook.com/ElementsProgMusic" rel="nofollow - https://www.facebook.com/ElementsProgMusic , but there hasn't been a status update for several months. Maybe that will change once the band begins live performances again. Smile

I guess it's over to you guys in the Neo team now...  Tongue


Posted By: O666
Date Posted: January 04 2017 at 08:02
Hi. 
Honestly I guess Team's members ignore my suggestions. I will not suggest new bands or musicians here. Its not fair and make me so sad. 


Posted By: yam yam
Date Posted: January 04 2017 at 09:18
Nobody ignores you deliberately Omid, I can assure you of that. LOADS of suggestions get missed on here - by all sorts of suggesters - indeed, one or two of my own suggestions still haven't received a response, and others needed several 'bumps' before they eventually got the attention of a collab.

It's all due to a combination of various factors:

1/ So many new acts are cropping up on sites such as bandcamp, who play music which can loosely be described as 'prog'.

2/ More and more new people are discovering these artists, becoming members here, and suggesting them for inclusion in our database. This is good in one respect - it means that prog is well, and very much alive, in the 21st Century! Unfortunately the evaluation teams are still made up of just 3, 4, or 5 (occasionally 6) collabs - all of whom have private lives outside of PA...and some of whom have had outside issues in their 'real World' to deal with just recently which have limited the time they have available to dedicate to PA activities.

3/ We don't have a dedicated New Suggestions Monitor like we did up until late 2013 to check all these new suggestions and pass them on to the appropriate evaluation teams (if considered worthy of inclusion). The last guy quit because he was simply being overwhelmed with work, and the situation is if anything even worse now (even though a couple of infamous serial bandcamp suggesters have been suspended from the site for quite a few months now).

The site as it currently is set up simply can't cope with the volume of new music that is being created, and which is tagged as 'prog'. It either needs an overhaul in its objectives (which are currently to be the most complete and powerful progressive rock resource), or an overhaul in the way it is set up to deal with the ever increasing flood of new suggestions.

Otherwise things will probably just keep getting even worse going forward, but I repeat: Nobody is deliberately ignoring anyone...it's just a case of severe system overload...She cannae take any more, Captain - She's gonna blow! LOL


Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: January 04 2017 at 09:37
Originally posted by yam yam yam yam wrote:

Nobody ignores you deliberately Omid, I can assure you of that. LOADS of suggestions get missed on here - by all sorts of suggesters - indeed, one or two of my own suggestions still haven't received a response, and others needed several 'bumps' before they eventually got the attention of a collab.

It's all due to a combination of various factors:

1/ So many new acts are cropping up on sites such as bandcamp, who play music which can loosely be described as 'prog'.

2/ More and more new people are discovering these artists, becoming members here, and suggesting them for inclusion in our database. This is good in one respect - it means that prog is well, and very much alive, in the 21st Century! Unfortunately the evaluation teams are still made up of just 3, 4, or 5 (occasionally 6) collabs - all of whom have private lives outside of PA...and some of whom have had outside issues in their 'real World' to deal with just recently which have limited the time they have available to dedicate to PA activities.

3/ We don't have a dedicated New Suggestions Monitor like we did up until late 2013 to check all these new suggestions and pass them on to the appropriate evaluation teams (if considered worthy of inclusion). The last guy quit because he was simply being overwhelmed with work, and the situation is if anything even worse now (even though a couple of infamous serial bandcamp suggesters have been suspended from the site for quite a few months now).

The site as it currently is set up simply can't cope with the volume of new music that is being created, and which is tagged as 'prog'. It either needs an overhaul in its objectives (which are currently to be the most complete and powerful progressive rock resource), or an overhaul in the way it is set up to deal with the ever increasing flood of new suggestions.

Otherwise things will probably just keep getting even worse going forward, but I repeat: Nobody is deliberately ignoring anyone...it's just a case of severe system overload...She cannae take any more, Captain - She's gonna blow! LOL


It was, indeed, me who quit as a new suggestions monitor. I simply could not cope with the sheer volume of suggestions being made. In fact, sometimes it was descending into a full time job, and I already have a demanding one of those

I would be happy to go back to doing work of this kind, but it would have to be on the basis that there were a few collaborators undertaking such work, not just one or two. Personally, my preference would be to actually have a large team undertaking not just suggestions for inclusion, but actually having that team undertaking the evaluations themselves, and such recommendations for inclusion being binding. That way, some of the inevitable ping ponging between teams might just be avoided.

As you say, David, prog is in a healthy state right now, and the procedures we use on the site could do with being updated a bit to keep up.

Whilst I am at it, I would also refer site members and collabs to a recent interesting exchange between an artist (I forget who) and collabs on the Errors & Omissions thread, in which the artist asked for an update on an out of date entry. There is an argument, I feel, for evaluation teams to move away from evaluation (as I say, set up a suggestions/evaluation team to do that), and to move towards what I think is a very important task, that is updating bios and album entries for existing acts on the site. Many, and many well known acts, not just obscure ones, are in dire need of updating, and I think the sub genre teams are the best placed to do this.

Getting procedures changed on the site is not an easy thing to do. Rather like the government department I work for, in fact!

However, this exchange is worthy of wider debate, and I will post in the collab zone to see what other collabs think.

-------------
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org


Posted By: Meltdowner
Date Posted: January 04 2017 at 09:45
I just posted this on the Neo Prog team thread.


Posted By: yam yam
Date Posted: January 04 2017 at 10:39
^ and ^^  Thanks both! Approve

Great idea Steve to see if this subject stimulates any discussion down in the caverns below! Thumbs Up

Chris (seventhsojourn) was the New Suggestions Monitor I was thinking about who seemed to be particularly badly affected by his experience of doing the pre-evaluation job. He had a fair amount of (unofficial) assistance from me most of the time, but in the summer of 2014, nine months or so after he retired from the Suggestions Monitor job in October 2013, (after doing it for just under nine months I think), he stopped posting out here in the open entirely (his profile still shows as 4001 posts more than two years later), and I believe he is no longer in the RPI team either, although that is still shown as his main function here on his forum member profile page. He still logs in every now and then though. I've no idea if there were any outside personal issues involved at the time, but he seems to have suffered burn-out on somewhat of a grand scale after his time here in the dual role of New Suggestions Monitor/RPI team member.

I think a lot of the problems we currently have with getting new suggestions dealt with is due to the few evaluation collabs we do currently have in our teams trying to soldier on with the job when they are faced with long-term personal issues outside the site, rather than stepping down immediately so that someone else with more time on their hands can be drafted in to replace them and inject 'new blood', though that in itself can lead to problems with the new guys getting used to the way things work etc etc. It's a difficult one... Ermm


Posted By: DamoXt7942
Date Posted: January 04 2017 at 16:15
Pity we work voluntarily 

We will check them, but let us take time every Neo Team member is too pressed with his/her real life (I'll have an important exam 2 weeks later).


-------------
http://www.facebook.com/damoxt7942" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: O666
Date Posted: January 05 2017 at 09:46
Hi.
A Big thanks to David . You right my friend (as always!). I completely agree with you and lazland . But sometimes bad feelings attack to me and make me sad. Honestly , sometimes I can't control my feelings  . I don't know how to explain it now. 
Thanks again guys for your time and good comments Thumbs Up


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: January 05 2017 at 12:00
You're hardly alone when it comes to that struggle. I appreciate this community, and engaging with people here is one of my support mechanisms. :) At times it can make me feel worse, but ultimately I love having this sense of community.

-------------
Just a fanboy passin' through.


Posted By: DamoXt7942
Date Posted: April 21 2017 at 02:47
Agreed with Omid and Artur. Very good Neo Prog. Shocked

Forgive me but please let us take more time. Thanks for your patience.


-------------
http://www.facebook.com/damoxt7942" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: O666
Date Posted: April 23 2017 at 07:17
Thumbs Up


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: April 23 2017 at 08:57
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Originally posted by yam yam yam yam wrote:

Nobody ignores you deliberately Omid, I can assure you of that. LOADS of suggestions get missed on here - by all sorts of suggesters - indeed, one or two of my own suggestions still haven't received a response, and others needed several 'bumps' before they eventually got the attention of a collab.

It's all due to a combination of various factors:

1/ So many new acts are cropping up on sites such as bandcamp, who play music which can loosely be described as 'prog'.

2/ More and more new people are discovering these artists, becoming members here, and suggesting them for inclusion in our database. This is good in one respect - it means that prog is well, and very much alive, in the 21st Century! Unfortunately the evaluation teams are still made up of just 3, 4, or 5 (occasionally 6) collabs - all of whom have private lives outside of PA...and some of whom have had outside issues in their 'real World' to deal with just recently which have limited the time they have available to dedicate to PA activities.

3/ We don't have a dedicated New Suggestions Monitor like we did up until late 2013 to check all these new suggestions and pass them on to the appropriate evaluation teams (if considered worthy of inclusion). The last guy quit because he was simply being overwhelmed with work, and the situation is if anything even worse now (even though a couple of infamous serial bandcamp suggesters have been suspended from the site for quite a few months now).

The site as it currently is set up simply can't cope with the volume of new music that is being created, and which is tagged as 'prog'. It either needs an overhaul in its objectives (which are currently to be the most complete and powerful progressive rock resource), or an overhaul in the way it is set up to deal with the ever increasing flood of new suggestions.

Otherwise things will probably just keep getting even worse going forward, but I repeat: Nobody is deliberately ignoring anyone...it's just a case of severe system overload...She cannae take any more, Captain - She's gonna blow! LOL


It was, indeed, me who quit as a new suggestions monitor. I simply could not cope with the sheer volume of suggestions being made. In fact, sometimes it was descending into a full time job, and I already have a demanding one of those

I would be happy to go back to doing work of this kind, but it would have to be on the basis that there were a few collaborators undertaking such work, not just one or two. Personally, my preference would be to actually have a large team undertaking not just suggestions for inclusion, but actually having that team undertaking the evaluations themselves, and such recommendations for inclusion being binding. That way, some of the inevitable ping ponging between teams might just be avoided.

As you say, David, prog is in a healthy state right now, and the procedures we use on the site could do with being updated a bit to keep up.

Whilst I am at it, I would also refer site members and collabs to a recent interesting exchange between an artist (I forget who) and collabs on the Errors & Omissions thread, in which the artist asked for an update on an out of date entry. There is an argument, I feel, for evaluation teams to move away from evaluation (as I say, set up a suggestions/evaluation team to do that), and to move towards what I think is a very important task, that is updating bios and album entries for existing acts on the site. Many, and many well known acts, not just obscure ones, are in dire need of updating, and I think the sub genre teams are the best placed to do this.

Getting procedures changed on the site is not an easy thing to do. Rather like the government department I work for, in fact!

However, this exchange is worthy of wider debate, and I will post in the collab zone to see what other collabs think.


very well said...Clap  I dare say a change might just bring a few of us retired back out.  The system worked when we were building the site and had scores of us working and working together... now it is very obsolete.


Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: April 23 2017 at 09:32
There is simply too much music released these days under the "prog" tag, and - let's face it - a lot of it is not very good, which often makes evaluations a chore. Therefore, burnout is always lurking around the corner. I spent the best part of the past 10 years or so writing reviews almost non-stop - with the result that now I can hardly write a couple of sentences about music, and (what is worse) have steadily lost interest in it. Nowadays it's more a matter of going through the motions than something I really take pleasure in.

Based on my own experience, I am not surprised in the least that some people get to the point of disappearing completely. Keeping up with this section of the forum is not for the faint of heart. Personally, I think the whole evaluation process is in need of a overhaul. I would be in favour of allowing single Collabs to add bands, though I understand this is a rather controversial proposal.


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: April 23 2017 at 09:42
only controversial to those who think they know better than everyone else hahah.   I'd definitely be in favor of that... you know what my motto long was...  where there is smoke there is fire and most importantly the site was supposed to be for .. the user.. not the collaborator.  The site did forget that... and we did set up ourselves as God's of dictating what was prog or not.  Perhaps it had a place early on but that time is LONG past and the genre teams were meant more to sort out the mess that was the database circa 2005 not to become what they quickly did...  personal fiefdoms.  Granted it was fun to head severa teams myself but it ultimately was a dead end proposition... very few bands get 100% support... if but 25% think so.. so what... in the early days when (as you well know darling) people got mean and nasty when bands got added they didn't agree with it thankfully matured and people finally got through their heads that not everyone sees prog the same way and the forum became more live and let live... and it did well before we left .. well outside of the collabs themselves hahah

Chance will likely never happen though.. I sense ZERO care (note how Steve's post would have sank into the ether) about the state of the site so yeah.. it will continue on auto pilot.  There really is no drive to improve it.


Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: April 23 2017 at 13:50
Originally posted by Raff Raff wrote:

There is simply too much music released these days under the "prog" tag, and - let's face it - a lot of it is not very good, which often makes evaluations a chore. Therefore, burnout is always lurking around the corner. I spent the best part of the past 10 years or so writing reviews almost non-stop - with the result that now I can hardly write a couple of sentences about music, and (what is worse) have steadily lost interest in it. Nowadays it's more a matter of going through the motions than something I really take pleasure in.

Based on my own experience, I am not surprised in the least that some people get to the point of disappearing completely. Keeping up with this section of the forum is not for the faint of heart. Personally, I think the whole evaluation process is in need of a overhaul. I would be in favour of allowing single Collabs to add bands, though I understand this is a rather controversial proposal.


I am glad this discussion has been restarted, and thanks to Micky for his welcome comments.

Turning to Raff's post quoted above, I, too, used to love reviewing. In fact, I have been on a bit of a spending spree with new music in the last month, or two, and I have a huge backlog of music which I would love to post my thoughts on, but I am finding it extremely difficult to motivate myself to do so, and it is not just the usual (true) excuse of not having a great deal of free time to do so.

Perhaps if I get around shortly to doing the one, and enjoy it again, then the rest will flow.......

-------------
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org


Posted By: O666
Date Posted: April 24 2017 at 08:05
Hi
First I want to say a thanks to Micky . "Ignored by Collaborators" is very "Clear" in PA Forums specially in this section (suggesting....). Raff said "There is simply too much music released these days under the "prog" tag " . Of Course but  you have too many resources about them too. You can find many good information about those bands in 3-5 mins (as I do it everyday) . This is not about opinions or taste. For me , its about honor . 
Team's members can reply to guys like me and inform me about my suggestion . They can say "No" or "Yes" to me. I make a suggestion post base under PA rules but after few days check my post for reply and I faced to nothing! 
Sometimes , On of Team's members reply to my post with this words " Thanks. I add it in the chart " and when you check charts in PF , you see they Rejected it only by 1 no vote! This happened for me about "Encircled" band. 1 yes and 1 no vote and then its rejected! And when I wanted to know why , I faced to Locked post!
After all , These things affected to me hardly. Now I come to PA forums 1 or 2 hours in week. Before these , I came 1-3 hours in a day! I know , You don't care about guys like me. Its not important for you I come to PA forums or not.


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: April 24 2017 at 18:17
hmmm.....heartfelt and honest.. so I'll return the favor.

I do understand the frustration.. back in the day we, especially Raff and I who drafted countless members to join our teams and become collabs, would have zero'd in on you. I appreciate the respect the drive and caring about seeing the bands added.  It was hard work back then, probably harder still today, and you needed people that were dedicated and cared.

don't take it personally... being 'ignored'.... it is not personal and I'm sure you're adult enough to realize it. It takes a special breed to invest the time to monitor, evaluate and add/maintain and those resources you mention.. are in fact rare and precious.. not something commonly found.  We had a lot of them in those days.. highly motivated and knowleagle people...and we built this site and we should be, I know I am, damn proud of it. 

However whatever frustration you might have, you do have to temper it with understanding this site is dead man.. creatively dead. It has been on autopilot for years with a few obvious exceptions of some teams that still are killing it.  The problem is two fold.. not enough volunteers to help with the screening and adding.. and what goes hand in hand with that is the lack of feeling that devoting such time would do anything meaningful. For all the sh*t I give the classic admin team, some of it deserved... some just to be a instigator.. they really supported us well.  When we needed something.. they helped out.  There is nothing like that today...  you have a couple moderators sweeping away spam or moving wayward polls and threads. .but the big problem is there is no leadership here thus the site continues on autopilot. 

My advice...  spam more and worry less.  As I noted above...  the site could get back on track.. but it would need some hard changes to how it has done things.. and without leadership to implement it.. it ain't happening so you can just accept it and be happy when a suggestion is noticed... or not.


Posted By: yam yam
Date Posted: April 24 2017 at 19:53
I wasn't around 'back in the day', so I can't personally confirm or refute the first couple of paragraphs of Micky's post above...but based on what he has said in paragraphs three and four, which is absolutely spot on, I certainly believe every word of it.

I think this sums up the degree to which PA has gone down the toilet in a nutshell. On 17 April 2017 at 18:09, site owner M@X posted in the 'Report bugs here' part of the forum that he'd fixed an annoying forum search error that we'd had for several days whereby only a handful of the search results were actually displayed, with the message 'Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a0005' being returned, plus the details of where in the script the error had occurred.

He hadn't logged into the site for ages before this, and he MUST have seen all the posts dotted around the place about the captchas and access denied problems that we've been having, and doubtless would have had a great pile of personal messages about this farcical situation to wade through too...but has he done anything to fix it? - Has he Hell. Disapprove

When the site owner himself doesn't seem to give two hoots about the maintenance and functionality of the site, is it any surprise that so many other long standing members who played such an important part in getting it up and running back in those early days have lost interest? I don't think so.

There are still a few here who care, thank goodness - and who soldier on regardless - but the number is dwindling all the time, and unless something happens soon to reverse this sad decline...something which has to begin with M@X himself, then yes - the site will eventually be as good as dead.


Posted By: Windhawk
Date Posted: April 24 2017 at 21:50
A lot said here that echoes sentiments I've had for a few years.


-------------
Websites I work with:

http://www.progressor.net
http://www.houseofprog.com

My profile on Mixcloud:
https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 01:42
I dunno. I recognise some of the sentiments and frustrations voiced here but I cannot in all honesty say that I share them or in some cases, even agree with them.

At this moment I sit here wondering whether I have enough resilience to keep fighting the CAPTCHAs for another 18 days just to make it to my tenth anniversary, I have a lot of patience in most circumstances but it's not limitless. Like with so many things about this site, it seems so indiscriminate and arbitrary with no rhyme or reason behind it. One of my first band suggestions here all those years ago was about as Prog as it gets yet got consigned to Prog Related because it sounded too new-agey and the production wasn't very good... and from that moment on I realised that this place isn't quite how I imagined it would be or should be and that view has continued ever since, even during my tenure as a Team Leader and as an Admin. My most recent suggestion was an artist I didn't think was particularly Prog but was being promoted as such by their record label and in the music press, they were added to the site without any further acknowledgement or feedback. My view of this site is not a jaded one, it's merely an acceptance of how things are, despite all the changes that have happened since its inception both in the site itself and how it is managed, operated and used but also in the music industry and the world in general.

[To date, the albums of both those artists have not received a single review, so for a site that is extensively and primarily a review site I do kinda wonder what the point of it all is. Of course it could be argued that I could have written reviews for those albums myself but I'm not a reviewer, I don't like writing reviews and - as strange as this may seem to people who do these things as a matter of course - I struggle to be subjective about anything, least of all about music (read the few reviews I've written - there's barely a subjective opinion in any of them).]

The point I'm attempting to make is: whatever anyone thinks this site is for or about the reality can never meet that expectation. That's not to say the site isn't any of those things that people believe it should be, or that is isn't capable of being used how you would like it to be used - it's just not geared to be that thing specifically, nor can it ever be. And that means whatever your view is or your expectations are then this site can only disappoint.




-------------
What?


Posted By: Guldbamsen
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 02:45
Members want more of PA.
Members want less captchas.
Members wishes post-punk bands included.
Members want to add bands themselves so as to get things done quicker but hate it when they come across artists already here who 'most definitely aren't prog'.
Members want half stars.
Members want a job but don't want to perform it.
Members feel they are being overlooked when their suggestions aren't noticed, so they naturally make more.
Members care about PA until they don't get what they want.
Members do not know who's site they're using.
Collabs do not know who they are working for.
Every PA collab walks around behind the scenes smirking and grinning because he or she loves the majestic power of cutting other people and their music tastes off. We love that sh*t.


Do I still use the site despite of this? Yes. Can I think of some new fancy solution to get folks their 'old days' back? No. The old days were never the way they are portrayed today.


-------------
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams


Posted By: Guldbamsen
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 02:58
Another thing:
Some members tend to live in the new suggestions area. Their overall experience of PA relies on band suggestions. They only visit PA for this. When the band finally gets through the door they forget about them or conversely promote them viciously.
I am not saying that we don't need promoters but how about joining in on other discussions before PA is turned into a promotional vehicle?
What I don't understand though is when long standing members like Omid decide to ditch all the interesting parts of PA in favour of focusing solely on suggesting new bands.
Sorry Omid but I miss your presence in the other threads. You act as if PA has plotted against you and that is about as far from the truth as you can get.


-------------
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams


Posted By: DamoXt7942
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 03:25
Forgive me a volunteer but will try to pick new candidates up asap, and let me have a enough consideration. Handshake

-------------
http://www.facebook.com/damoxt7942" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: O666
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 07:14
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

hmmm.....heartfelt and honest.. so I'll return the favor.

......
don't take it personally... being 'ignored'.... it is not personal and I'm sure you're adult enough to realize it. 
Hi 
Of Course its not personally. I talking about "Guys like me" not only myself.  Thanks Thumbs Up


Posted By: yam yam
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 08:16
Originally posted by Guldbamsen Guldbamsen wrote:

Some members tend to live in the new suggestions area. Their overall experience of PA relies on band suggestions. They only visit PA for this. When the band finally gets through the door they forget about them or conversely promote them viciously.
I am not saying that we don't need promoters but how about joining in on other discussions before PA is turned into a promotional vehicle? 

But isn't the new suggestions area the core of what the site is all about? Ermm It's called progARCHIVES, and its aim is to be "the most complete and powerful progressive rock resource", which to me means trying to make sure that as many of the acts out there as possible that are considered to be 'prog' are evaluated, and subsequently included in the database here if deemed appropriate. Surely everything else that the site offers follows on from that...if a band or artist ain't here in the first place then nobody can review their music, or even read anything about them and the kind of music they play to begin with.

Of course, with so many prog acts springing up over the years since the genre was first recognised, a significant number of these bands and artists will never get a single review or rating after being added here -that's just 'par for the course' - but we do need to have them in the archives to begin with wherever possible, so that at least people can find them here and read about them. As I said in an earlier post, the site as it currently is set up simply can't cope with the volume of new music that is being created, and which is tagged as 'prog'. It either needs an overhaul in its objectives (ie to be the most complete and powerful progressive rock resource), or an overhaul in the way it is set up to deal with the ever increasing flood of new suggestions more satisfactorily than is occurring at present.

Just my twopenn'orth. Embarrassed



Posted By: Guldbamsen
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 10:40
I agree with a lot of what you mention Dave don't worry, I just feel a reality check is in order from time to time. We've been through this so many times before and there is sadly no "easy fix". Whatever kind of scenario folks care to throw at PA, chances are, they've been discussed before. There are no good shortcuts to a new and improved way of adding artists to PA without something magical happening from Max.
In the meantime I would refrain from suggesting new bands before my old suggestions have been picked up - is all.

PA is a lot of different things to different people and I sincerely hope it stays that way. To most I know it's about reviews.


-------------
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 10:44
Honesty, I participate less in the threads, some people are too aggressive.

But I daily check the bands suggested to Symphonic and we try to add or reject them in les than 48 hours.

We can afford this luxury, because we don't have many suggestions lately.

The questions are

- Do I enjoy the forum less?  Yes, much less

- Do I still think after 12 years here that PA is the best Prog site? Yes, with all my heart


-------------
            


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 10:48
Originally posted by Guldbamsen Guldbamsen wrote:

Another thing:
Some members tend to live in the new suggestions area. Their overall experience of PA relies on band suggestions. They only visit PA for this. When the band finally gets through the door they forget about them or conversely promote them viciously.
I am not saying that we don't need promoters but how about joining in on other discussions before PA is turned into a promotional vehicle?
What I don't understand though is when long standing members like Omid decide to ditch all the interesting parts of PA in favour of focusing solely on suggesting new bands.
Sorry Omid but I miss your presence in the other threads. You act as if PA has plotted against you and that is about as far from the truth as you can get.

What I don't understand is people who make life impossible, insisting every day that we should add a determined band.

Sometimes we accept them, and we ask for help with the info...Immediately the guy who insisted vanishes in thin air.

There's a recent case, we've been suggested a band called MELODY with one song sample.

We ask for more and the guy said there's no more.

How can anybody suggest a band based in one song? What's the point to add a band who's album nobody can get? (If several thousand of Prog fans can't get it, nobody can).

People who suggest, should add a bio and at least send a link to their music.


-------------
            


Posted By: yam yam
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 11:17
Originally posted by Guldbamsen Guldbamsen wrote:


PA is a lot of different things to different people and I sincerely hope it stays that way. To most I know it's about reviews.

Agree entirely...and I would love to be able to write reviews myself. However, our personal interpretation of music is such a subjective thing that I find it difficult to put what I hear succinctly into words in such a way that it might provide some objective information which others reading the review might find useful, so I don't do it (this is also out of respect for the artists concerned, who are far more gifted and creative than myself - a person who is unable to string more than a few dozen notes together in the correct order on the piano, and thus has no real right to criticise their work at all lol!)

I'm good at digging out hard to find info on the web, and that's about the limit of my 'talent' - hence I tend to limit my activities to the new suggestions forum. LOL


Posted By: yam yam
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 12:13
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

There's a recent case, we've been suggested a band called MELODY with one song sample.

We ask for more and the guy said there's no more.

How can anybody suggest a band based in one song? What's the point to add a band who's album nobody can get? (If several thousand of Prog fans can't get it, nobody can).

People who suggest, should add a bio and at least send a link to their music.

Are we talking about this 'Melody' Iván?







https://www.discogs.com/Melody-Come-Fly-With-Me/release/1450611" rel="nofollow - https://www.discogs.com/Melody-Come-Fly-With-Me/release/1450611 .

They also did a second album called 'Yesterlife' in 1977: https://%20www.discogs.com/Melody-Yesterlife/release/1303621" rel="nofollow -  https://www.discogs.com/Melody-Yesterlife/release/1303621 .

They were a French 1970's band, with male/female lead vocals sung in English. Their debut LP "Come Fly With Me" was actually recorded as a demo at  http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=2766" rel="nofollow - Philippe Besombes  studio, which won them a contract with Vogue.

Collaborator apps79 reviewed their debut album on RYM, and provides all the info you'll need to add them:  http://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/melody_f1/come_fly_with_me/" rel="nofollow - http://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/melody_f1/come_fly_with_me/ .

Both Melody albums have different versions of some of the same material.

They are on proggnosis as symphonic prog band:  https://www.proggnosis.com/Artist/4386" rel="nofollow - https://www.proggnosis.com/Artist/4386 .

If you want to take it any further I can pm you some more samples.



Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 12:47
Originally posted by yam yam yam yam wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

There's a recent case, we've been suggested a band called MELODY with one song sample.

We ask for more and the guy said there's no more.

How can anybody suggest a band based in one song? What's the point to add a band who's album nobody can get? (If several thousand of Prog fans can't get it, nobody can).

People who suggest, should add a bio and at least send a link to their music.

Are we talking about this 'Melody' Iván?







https://www.discogs.com/Melody-Come-Fly-With-Me/release/1450611" rel="nofollow - https://www.discogs.com/Melody-Come-Fly-With-Me/release/1450611 .

They also did a second album called 'Yesterlife' in 1977: https://%20www.discogs.com/Melody-Yesterlife/release/1303621" rel="nofollow -  https://www.discogs.com/Melody-Yesterlife/release/1303621 .

They were a French 1970's band, with male/female lead vocals sung in English. Their debut LP "Come Fly With Me" was actually recorded as a demo at  http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=2766" rel="nofollow - Philippe Besombes  studio, which won them a contract with Vogue.

Collaborator apps79 reviewed their debut album on RYM, and provides all the info you'll need to add them:  http://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/melody_f1/come_fly_with_me/" rel="nofollow - http://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/melody_f1/come_fly_with_me/ .

Both Melody albums have different versions of some of the same material.

They are on proggnosis as symphonic prog band:  https://www.proggnosis.com/Artist/4386" rel="nofollow - https://www.proggnosis.com/Artist/4386 .

If you want to take it any further I can pm you some more samples.


That's not what Silly Puppy "who suggested them" said on the thread

This is what he said:

Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

How does it work here when there are only two videos to be found? This is a super rare and obscure album. It seems like it has been deemed symphonic prog on other sites. Since it is impossible to hear the entire album, will it simply end up in the reject pile?




Three videos are untitled, there's a lot of Psyche and hard rock

We asked for the whole album and Silly Puppy said it was impossible..That's all, I have asked a friend from the radio for the whole OFFICIAL release, he will answer me when he has time, so unless you have the full album as it was released (Not the misspressed copy with Mahogany on side B), this is on standby.

I used to buy all the albums that couldn't be found, I can't afford that anymore, I don't even buy all the albums I would wish to have.

PS: If the robot capcha keeps deleting my posts edition, I will blow.

Now the damn thing asks me to recognize photos.



SOMEBODY FIX THIS SH*T PLEASE.


-------------
            


Posted By: DamoXt7942
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 17:03
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

SOMEBODY FIX THIS SH*T PLEASE.
I'm afraid even M@X cannot fix nor kick out such a b******t CrAPTCHA. Guess this cRaptcha procedure might be specified all around of Web Wiz Forum main server. 
Ouch

-------------
http://www.facebook.com/damoxt7942" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: DamoXt7942
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 17:04
... Anyway I've purchased their album and shared with all of Neo Team members for eval. Cool

-------------
http://www.facebook.com/damoxt7942" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: yam yam
Date Posted: April 25 2017 at 17:49
Originally posted by DamoXt7942 DamoXt7942 wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

SOMEBODY FIX THIS SH*T PLEASE.
I'm afraid even M@X cannot fix nor kick out such a b******t CrAPTCHA. Guess this cRaptcha procedure might be specified all around of Web Wiz Forum main server. 
Ouch

The CAPTCHA isn't a problem at all...it's the 'Access Denied' error that happens after I've solved the CAPTCHA almost every single time for me that sucks. I have to make anywhere between 6 and 12 attempts with 90% of my posts before it finally goes through. It's a damned nightmare!! Angry Surely M@X can fix these access denial errors that keep getting thrown back at us? It must be a software thing that can be quite easily fixed -  surely all the other Web Wiz Forums on the Internet aren't having to endure this same bullsh*t? Ermm


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: April 26 2017 at 10:17
Originally posted by yam yam yam yam wrote:

Originally posted by DamoXt7942 DamoXt7942 wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

SOMEBODY FIX THIS SH*T PLEASE.
I'm afraid even M@X cannot fix nor kick out such a b******t CrAPTCHA. Guess this cRaptcha procedure might be specified all around of Web Wiz Forum main server. 
Ouch

The CAPTCHA isn't a problem at all...it's the 'Access Denied' error that happens after I've solved the CAPTCHA almost every single time for me that sucks. I have to make anywhere between 6 and 12 attempts with 90% of my posts before it finally goes through. It's a damned nightmare!! Angry Surely M@X can fix these access denial errors that keep getting thrown back at us? It must be a software thing that can be quite easily fixed -  surely all the other Web Wiz Forums on the Internet aren't having to endure this same bullsh*t? Ermm

Sometimes after making me check 2 or 3 sets of photos, the systen freezes on that window and I lose all I wrote.

So I have to copy what I wrote every time

It's simply stupid, this guys  from wen wiz forums are making people hate this forums.

BTW: Just found it's a program that WWF sells, it's not automatic.

https://www.webwiz.net/web-wiz-captcha/

Somebody must be hacking the site


-------------
            


Posted By: DamoXt7942
Date Posted: May 05 2017 at 23:36
All aside, Elements have been added to Neo.
http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=10122" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=10122


-------------
http://www.facebook.com/damoxt7942" rel="nofollow">



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk