Print Page | Close Window

Where is Pink Floyd in David Weigel’s history of P

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Music Lounge
Forum Description: General progressive music discussions
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=111652
Printed Date: April 19 2024 at 17:07
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Where is Pink Floyd in David Weigel’s history of P
Posted By: bucka001
Subject: Where is Pink Floyd in David Weigel’s history of P
Date Posted: August 04 2017 at 10:59
The Spectator lambasts the new prog book "The Show That Never Ends." Half of the people on this forum will not be on board with the article author's outrage (as many do not consider Floyd to be "prog" rock) while the other half will agree wholeheartedly ("If Floyd wasn't prog, what was?")

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/08/where-is-pink-floyd-in-david-weigels-history-of-prog-rock/


-------------
jc



Replies:
Posted By: bucka001
Date Posted: August 04 2017 at 11:11
Looks like one isn't allowed to click onto the link (at least I'm not) so here's the article in today's paper:

If Weigel can overlook the most acclaimed of all Prog’s bands, can he be trusted about anything at all?

by  https://www.spectator.co.uk/author/clintonheylin/" rel="nofollow - Clinton Heylin

There is many a book that has been cooked up over a liquid lunch, but rarely has one been so obviously ill-conceived as The Show That Never Ends, which comes complete with hyperbolic blurb from the esteemed novelist Michael Chabon. Yet what David Weigel provides is a masterclass in how not to write non-fiction. To paraphrase The Producers, having picked the wrong writer, the wrong editor, the wrong researcher, where did the publishers go right?

The answer, sadly, is nowhere. I say sadly, because for some time there has been an abiding need for a good history of rock’s most reviled ‘aberration’: Prog (short for Pretentious Rock On a Grand scale).

It is almost impossible to stop oneself being offended by this book, whether one’s a Prog purist, a Prog denier or simply a rock historian. (For the record, I am all three.) It is ironic that the underlying problem with the book is conceptual, given that the concept album and Prog were, for a period in the 1970s, almost synonymous. Yet a potted history of the concept album is as beyond Weigel as is all context.

ELP, Yes and Van der Graaf Generator — all of whom receive disproportionate space here — emerge out of a vacuum. As do Jethro Tull, Genesis and King Crimson, whose body of work could carry the contextual weight.

Despite its subtitle, this book charts neither the rise nor the fall of Prog. Barely mentioning Sgt Pepper and the psychedelic origins of Prog, Weigel’s starting points are ELP’s eponymous 1970 debut and the 1969 formation of Yes, neither of which has any bearing on the birth of Prog two years earlier.

As for the fall — as sudden and abrupt as the demise of the dinosaurs (one EMI single by the Sex Pistols is all it took) — in Weigel’s transatlantic universe, there isn’t one. The story meanders into the 1980s, unlike any original incarnation of Prog’s progenitors.

I must admit, I feared the worst before I dug in. As a fully paid-up member of Rock Critics Anonymous, how could I not take umbrage when I saw the author was a political correspondent for the Washington Post? Who he, Jimmy?

The index set off further alarm bells. It includes copious citations for Styx, Kansas, Rush, Todd Rundgren and The Roches (!) — all of whom stand apart from any credible geographic or chronological reference point for Prog. Omitted entirely are any references to Peter Green’s Fleetwood Mac, Family, Traffic, Spooky Tooth, Can, Faust, Amon Dull, Tangerine Dream or Kraftwerk.

And I can spare any fans of German Prog a trip to Waterstones. Here is the one sentence Weigel devotes to all the many bands from the second home of Prog:

The British press embraced, and unfortunately named, the ‘Krautrock’ movement of German bands that were more experimental and less wedded to old European song structures.

In this tome, Can get canned and Faust can go to the devil.

For those unaware that the Canadian blues-rock band Rush decided to become Prog only as its father form was gasping its last, one quotation Weigel cites does rather give the game away. It comes from Rush singer Geddy Lee:

As our tastes got more obscure, we discovered more progressive rock-based bands like Yes, Van der Graaf Generator and King Crimson… They made us want to make our music more interesting and more complex.

In other words, these colonials’ change of tack comes after the fact. Whatever space a discussion of Rush’s opportunistic latterday reclamation of the name warrants, it should surely not come at the expense of the actual originators of Prog.

If one band is a constant thread in the one true Prog story, it is Pink Floyd. They certainly can’t have been largely overlooked by Weigel because of their obscurity, being the most acclaimed of all Prog bands, then and now. Writing Pink Floyd out of The Show That Never Ends is a bit like writing Jesus out of the New
Testament.

Yet the first — and almost the last — mention of Floyd by Weigel comes on page 117, with the release of The Dark Side of the Moon. Their origins in psychedelia; their struggle to carve an original path after the departure of their founder/leader, the star-crossed Syd Barrett; hell, the release of chart-topping albums such as Atom Heart Mother and Meddle — both more revered than the entire ELP canon — warrant nary a mention.

Yet Weigel spends five pages describing the sessions for In The Wake of Poseidon, King Crimson’s lousy second album, a resounding flop from which it would take Robert Fripp and co. three years to recover. Why does it receive such largesse when Starless and Bible Black and Red — two bona fide classics Fripp, Wetton and Bruford crafted in 1973–74 — are not even accorded footnote status? I suspect because Crim’s second singer, Gordon Haskell, is one of a handful of figures from the Prog era Weigel has actually interviewed for his wafer-thin dissertation.

Most of the time he is content to surf Rock’s Backpages, a one-stop online cuttings service, and call it research. His acknowledgments do not include even a mention for Melody Maker, the English weekly whose decline and fall as the music paper of record almost exactly parallels that of Prog, to which it tied its mast from Genesis to disintegration.

All told, The Show That Never Ends reminds me of the student who spent weeks revising Louis XIV’s religious policies for his finals, only to discover to his horror that the paper was on French foreign policy. Undaunted, he began his essay: ‘In order to fully understand Louis XIV’s foreign policies, one need look at his religious policies…’ Weigel is that student, constantly answering questions no one has asked until we finally arrive at Styx, and a Cruise To The Edge of irrelevance.



-------------
jc


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: August 04 2017 at 11:36
Who is Pink Floyd? heheheheheheh

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: August 04 2017 at 11:50
I agree they should be included and at the very least mentioned. I don't know if I would call it an outrage that they weren't included any more than I would if Rush weren't included but it is true that many don't consider Pink Floyd to be prog. To many people prog has to have a crap load of time changes and be super complex. Long tracks with long instrumental passages and synthesizers and deep lyrics aren't enough for some people I guess. 


Posted By: Kepler62
Date Posted: August 04 2017 at 12:57
well I'm not going to lose any sleep over this book. I'm certainly not interested in reading it. I think that  Macan's Rocking The Classics clearly explains the mystery of progressive rock. Whether or not PF is progressive rock, who cares? I happen to like a few of their albums a lot.The guy who wrote this book just sounds like an outsider who might as well be writing about the history of model railroading  without even having played with  a train set as a child. I wonder if he's ever heard of FRUUP, Camel, Gentle Giant or some of the other lesser bands?


Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: August 04 2017 at 13:10
^ Yep, he could very well be another fair weather prog fan. There has been at least one other book written by someone who is not really a big prog fan. A few years ago there was a book called Yes is the answer with articles by several writers that falls into that category if I remember right. However, I don't think you have to be a big fan to write about prog actually. I think it's sometimes good to hear the opinions from an outsider. The one advantage of being a fan though is you are probably more knowledgeable about the subject than someone who isn't. Then again it's not that hard to do a google search on prog(or whatever)to get your facts straight. 


Posted By: tboyd1802
Date Posted: August 04 2017 at 16:51
I've read Weigel's book, and I think the criticisms leveled by Heylin are right on the mark. I found the book dry and rather pointless. It seemed to me like a retelling of a variety of band/player narratives with no overarching theme or motivation. It is not so much the overarching story of progressive rock as it is a series of random vignettes about some of the bands and personalities that participated in the progressive movement of the 70's.

-------------
He neither drank, smoked, nor rode a bicycle. Living frugally, saving his money, he died early, surrounded by greedy relatives. It was a great lesson to me -- John Barrymore


Posted By: Manuel
Date Posted: August 04 2017 at 21:32
Originally posted by tboyd1802 tboyd1802 wrote:

I've read Weigel's book, and I think the criticisms leveled by Heylin are right on the mark. I found the book dry and rather pointless. It seemed to me like a retelling of a variety of band/player narratives with no overarching theme or motivation. It is not so much the overarching story of progressive rock as it is a series of random vignettes about some of the bands and personalities that participated in the progressive movement of the 70's.
Well said.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk