Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Music Lounge
Forum Description: General progressive music discussions
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=132613 Printed Date: July 19 2025 at 19:17 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Is Prog really a genre?Posted By: Hrychu
Subject: Is Prog really a genre?
Date Posted: February 20 2024 at 22:34
You can't technically determine if something is prog or not. You gotta feel that. As for Genesis/Rush similarities, they mostly lie in the feel. The rhythms have a certain angularity to them - lots of syncopation, frequent use of 7/8 and other odd meters. Both Genesis and Rush use analog synths, and incorporate the so called "bass pedals" into their arrangements. The thing about prog is that it's a very broad genre that has this sorta continuum. If you take two extreme ends, you won't find much similarities, but the path between those spots is very clearly marked.
If you're familiar enough with a lot, and I mean A LOT of prog rock acts, you're gonna be able to tell what makes progressive rock the genre it is. The human mind has the ability to analyze common concepts between different objects and the more information you process, the more precise and logical your categorizations become. You will eventually start to notice patterns. Just, explore the genre and develop your taste.
-------------
Replies: Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: February 20 2024 at 23:58
Basically, no-- "Prog" is a word given to the penchant for rock musicians in the 1970s to be too ambitious for their own good and make some of the most pompous music on the planet. Great times.
------------- "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 00:57
"Prog" is not a genre, obviously. Why would you think it is? But "Rock" is, and obviously both Rush, Genesis and many other bands fit into it.
Philibert, you need to up your trolling game.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 01:47
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
Philibert, you need to up your trolling game.
Don't encourage him.
(Svetty, is that you?)
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 01:53
^ To paraphrase your question: How can bands A and B be in the same genre when there are differences between them? The answer is obvious.
Posted By: Deadwing
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 02:35
Yeah, but genres are more defined by a cultural thing that happened during a time period than anything really related to the sound itself. The "prog" sound was strong as ever in the 80's, but they simply stopped calling it prog lol
Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 02:44
Philibert wrote:
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
^ To paraphrase your question: How can bands A and B be in the same genre when there are differences between them? The answer is obvious.
But isn't the chasm between Trespass and Led Zeppelin III too wide!?
Led Zeppelin are not a prog band.
Posted By: Gerinski
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 02:45
Obviously it depends on your definition of "genre", but if you interpret it as "style of music", then obviously not. Mike Oldfield and Dream Theater and Zappa do not make music of the same style.
Prog is an approach to creating music, and even in bands so different from each other, you can easily identify similarities in their approach to creating their music.
Posted By: Archisorcerus
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 02:58
No. It is actually a genie.
Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 03:48
Philibert wrote:
@chopper
Oh, okey. Then, there is too wide chasm between …Very 'Eavy …Very 'Umble and Trespass.
I would tend to agree. There is a very wide range of musical styles under the prog umbrella, there's more to it than that - it's all in the musicality, the lyrics/themes, even album covers. It's not a definable musical style such as reggae and is often subjective. Hence why there are so many arguments here about "are such and such prog?".
Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 04:00
Note that due to sock puppetry, the posts for the account by.the user who started this topic were all expunged. So the original first post of this topic is gone, as well as others by that user. It’s easier to batch deal with these.
Posted By: Floret
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 04:25
Prog is not a genre in a classic sense. Prog is most close to being a modern folk art. Everything could be found on the folk-art fair, isn't it?
Posted By: Manuel
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 05:58
There's a difference between "Prog" and "Progressive" music. Prog music nowadays refers to music that is quite complex, with long pieces, a lot of instrumental parts, sudden changes of tempo, odd meters, etc. Progressive music on the other hand, is the type of music that is mainly written for listening, is quite challenging to both the artist and the listener, innovative, incorporates influences from other genres, such as classical, folk, world, etc. So we could say that, while prog is mostly a genre, progressive is more an approach to writing music.
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 06:19
Hi,
Depends on how we look at it ... but many folks won't even bother to look at music history ... in a line ... where you can compare the changes and improvements over the years. Inside of this "exercise" I would imagine and believe that "progressive" deserves to be there, although my worry is about the other version called "prog" which I still don't understand much, but it seems to suggest more rock than progressive ideas.
In the 60's of last century there was a major shift in jazz ... the same thing happened in rock music when it started picking itself up and getting a little fame (or otherwise ... ) and was then heard by many and appreciated from many angles. But no one, really, gave that "rock music" much credit for anything, and most classic folks deemed it too simple and boring to be considered major music ... and now the problem starts ... the revenge was that the public saw immense sales take off and the classical music sales and discussions hit the toilet ... sadly, no one has been able to describe, properly, what progressive was, and then prog was ... and some ideas were thrown together with paper and scissors to create a most incredibly unmusical definition for the "public" that folks, TODAY, still believe in it, even though every thing mentioned is found everywhere else in music. That would mean that progressive, or prog, has no redeeming factor whatsoever.
And later, it became a copy the sound kind of thing, and after that folks with databases, decided that numbers were important and now you don't even know if the definition and idea for it all, matters at all ... because the numbers are more important, just like the record companies told us many years ago.
I think the prog/progressive idea has merit, but it needs to get out of the hands of database folks and have a cleaner musical definition that even fits on a "staff" of musical history ... right now those definitions don't belong anywhere since it all had happened before, and after. Thus making a definition ridiculous to say the least. I'm not sure this will ever happen since the folks that decided the prog/progressive ideas were not musical folks at all ... they just figured out something "different" about their favorite bands!
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Posted By: Mormegil
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 06:55
Atavachron wrote:
Basically, no-- "Prog" is a word given to the penchant for rock musicians in the 1970s to be too ambitious for their own good and make some of the most pompous music on the planet. Great times.
Quote of the week
------------- Welcome to the middle of the film.
Posted By: LAM-SGC
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 07:25
In a word, No.
------------- Across the evening sky, all the birds are leaving, But how can they know, it's time for them to go? Before the winter fire, I will still be dreaming, I have no thought of time.
Posted By: wiz_d_kidd
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 08:00
Prog IS a genre.
A genre is nothing more than a collection of music that has a set of similar attributes (however vague or specific those attributes be) that allows one to discriminate and make the decision "Does band X belong to this set?"
If you say prog is not a genre, then you are denying the ability of anyone to say whether a band is prog or not. Hence, Dolly Parton, Brahms, and LL Cool J are all prog.
If you disagree, then there must exist a set of attribute to their music that says they do not belong to the collection of music we call prog.
Similarly, there exist a set of attribute that allow one to say that Yes, Sonar, and Pikapika Teart DO belong to the collection of music we call prog.
Once you establish any means of declaring a band as prog or not, then you have defined prog as a genre.
And the means, or attributes, that allow you to make that decision may be vague or specific, objective or subjective, intuitive or definable, complete or incomplete -- but they exist, and you use them every day when you are faced with the question "Is band X prog or not?"
If someone asks you what kind music you listen to, and you answer "prog", as one might equally well have answered country, classical, jazz, rock, R&B, rap -- then prog is a genre.
In fact, go to sites like Bandcamp, and look at their list of genres. There they include Prog Rock as a sub-genre of Rock.
So if you continue to deny that prog is a genre, then you must instruct all who run this website to admit ALL bands, include Dolly Parton, Brahms, and LL Cool J to their database.
------------- "Instrumental music is an expression that words can never capture." -- Peter Baumann
Posted By: LAM-SGC
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 08:12
wiz_d_kidd wrote:
Prog IS a genre.
A genre is nothing more than a collection of music that has a set of similar attributes (however vague or specific those attributes be) that allows one to discriminate and make the decision "Does band X belong to this set?"
Can of worms opened, to keep on flogging this horse to death. You know what everyone is going to ask, so just list five of those real attributes that apply to all prog bands.
------------- Across the evening sky, all the birds are leaving, But how can they know, it's time for them to go? Before the winter fire, I will still be dreaming, I have no thought of time.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 08:29
LAM-SGC wrote:
wiz_d_kidd wrote:
Prog IS a genre.
A genre is nothing more than a collection of music that has a set of similar attributes (however vague or specific those attributes be) that allows one to discriminate and make the decision "Does band X belong to this set?"
Can of worms opened, to keep on flogging this horse to death. You know what everyone is going to ask, so just list five of those real attributes that apply to all prog bands.
Thread opened by a troll, banned already, pure baiting here. Let's see how long this thread will last.
Posted By: progaardvark
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 08:39
I've got my hummus ready.
------------- ---------- i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag that's a happy bag of lettuce this car smells like cartilage nothing beats a good video about fractions
Posted By: LAM-SGC
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 09:11
Cristi wrote:
Thread opened by a troll, banned already,
Ah right, sorry. I didn't realise.
------------- Across the evening sky, all the birds are leaving, But how can they know, it's time for them to go? Before the winter fire, I will still be dreaming, I have no thought of time.
Posted By: Hercules
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 10:19
Back in the late 60s (yes - I date back that far), the term "progressive" was used to describe music that didn't conform to the classical 3 minute pop song. It could be because the tracks were longer and more complex, showed more musical virtuosity or had a wider range of instruments than the standard drums/bass/rhythm guitar/lead guitar/vocals so prevalent in many bands.
There was never any suggestion that the music actually needed to evolve and change over time, though it did as more bands experimented with different approaches.
------------- A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life.
Posted By: Hercules
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 10:23
chopper wrote:
Philibert wrote:
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
^ To paraphrase your question: How can bands A and B be in the same genre when there are differences between them? The answer is obvious.
But isn't the chasm between Trespass and Led Zeppelin III too wide!?
Led Zeppelin are not a prog band.
I would suggest that some tracks, like Kashmir and Stairway to Heaven, are very definitely progressive, even if all their output is not.
------------- A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life.
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 10:39
Of course it is
Does everyone saying NO to this question really even know what the definition of GENRE is?
gen·re
(zhän′rə)n.
1.
a. A category of artisticcomposition, as in music or literature,marked by a distinctivestyle,form, or content:"hissixStringQuartets...themostimportantworks in thegenresinceBeethoven's"(Time).
b. A realisticstyle of paintingthatdepictsscenesfromeverydaylife.
2. A type or class:"Emaciatedfaminevictims... on televisionfocused a newgenre of attention on thecontinent"
If prog wasn't a genre there would be tag for it, there would be no PA
Perhaps it began as a subgenre of rock but has blossomed into an entire universe of its own making
If prog is not a category of artistic composition then i don't know what is
Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 10:44
To me it is but I understand not everyone agrees and that's ok. Also, since wikipedia says this "Progressive rock (shortened as prog rock or simply prog) is a broad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genre" rel="nofollow - genre of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_music" rel="nofollow - rock music https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_rock#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMartin199871%E2%80%9375-8" rel="nofollow - [8] " that's good enough for me. ;)
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 11:41
Yes. If I say I listen to Prog, that tells most people with a slight interest in music... something. It's vague and can mean a lot of differnt things. Similar to stating: I listen to Jazz or I listen to Metal. Which can be everything from Peter Brötzmann to Al Jarreau - or Cryptopsy to Queensrÿche.
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 12:38
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Of course it is
[COLOR=#990000]Does everyone saying NO to this question really even know what the definition of GENRE is?
The 3-point definition you cited sucks, is incomplete, and doesn't apply to progressive rock music.
Of course if you'd adjust your settings so one could read your post through the mass of words, shapes, symbols and colors, it would help.
------------- "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 12:58
Atavachron wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Of course it is
[COLOR=#990000]Does everyone saying NO to this question really even know what the definition of GENRE is?
The 3-point definition you cited sucks, is incomplete, and doesn't apply to progressive rock music.
Of course if you'd adjust your settings so one could read your post through the mass of words, shapes, symbols and colors, it would help.
Why are you color blind? Are you unable to distinguish words from meaningless code that is generated by a dinosaur website that the owner refuses to upgrade?
Are you unable to comprehend the definition laid out by dictionaries?
It seems your interpretation is what sucks.
And i doubt anybody really cares what you think.
The rest of the English speaking world has defined what a genre is regardless if you choose to accept it or not.
a https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/style" rel="nofollow - style , https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/especially" rel="nofollow - especially in the https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/arts" rel="nofollow - arts , that https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/involve" rel="nofollow - involves a https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/particular" rel="nofollow - particular set of https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/characteristic" rel="nofollow - characteristics :
What genre does the https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/book" rel="nofollow - book https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/fall" rel="nofollow - fall into - https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/comedy" rel="nofollow - comedy or https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/tragedy" rel="nofollow - tragedy ?
a https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/literary" rel="nofollow - literary / https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/musical" rel="nofollow - musical / https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/film" rel="nofollow - film genre
Dictionary.com definition:
genre
[ zhahn-ruh; Frenchzhahn-ruh ]
See synonyms for: https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/genre?adobe_mc=MCORGID%3DAA9D3B6A630E2C2A0A495C40%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1708545634" rel="nofollow - genre https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/genres?adobe_mc=MCORGID%3DAA9D3B6A630E2C2A0A495C40%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1708545634" rel="nofollow - genres on Thesaurus.com
noun,pluralgen·res[zhahn-ruhz; Frenchzhahn-ruh].
a class or category of artistic endeavor having a particular form, content, technique, or the like: the genre of epic poetry; the genre of symphonic music.
Fine Arts.
paintings in which scenes of everyday life form the subject matter.
a realistic style of painting using such subject matter.
A genre is a particular type of literature, painting, music, film, or other art form which
people consider as a class because it has special characteristics.
[formal]
...his love of films and novels in the horror genre.
Britannica Dictionary definition:
genre /ˈʒɑːnrə/noun
pluralgenres
Britannica Dictionary definition of GENRE
[count]
:a particular type or category of literature or art
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 13:49
@siLLy puPPy Dude, the whole topic was opened by a troll whose all forum posts (including the topic starter) were removed. You're basically "yelling at a cloud" a this point. Yeah, I admit, I took the troll's cheap bait. But none of us is forced to continue this discussion. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-------------
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 13:57
Hrychu wrote:
@siLLy puPPy Dude, the whole topic was opened by a troll whose all forum posts (including the topic starter) were removed. You're basically "yelling at a cloud" a this point.
Yeah, I admit, I took the troll's cheap bait. But none of us is forced to continue this discussion. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
No i'm pointing out the obvious to all those who took the bait and are claiming that prog isn't a genre.
Who cares who started the thread. It has no life unless other infuse essence into it.
I'm simply pointing out an obvious point that many seem to overlook.
If the thread was detrimental to the site in any way then it would've been taken down.
It's a legit question. Is prog a real genre?
By the very definition of what a genre is in the English language, i proved beyond a reasonable doubt that prog IS a genre.
So how is that yelling? I call it stating a case with airtight evidence.
Adding an F bomb is just something that is fun to show the ridiculousness of censorship on this site :D
Case closed. The jury has deliberated. Everyone can go home now and take a chill pill. Ahhh
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 14:09
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
^ There's a difference between "is Prog really a genre" and "does genres really exist?" - It's like you're answering questions that nobody's asking.
WTF are you talking about?
If you or anyone can't see such an obvious conclusion i really don't know how to respond
Maybe brush up on your logic skills?
No one needs you copying and pasting
the definition of "genre" from the dictionary. It doesn't answer the
spesific question. Which - trollaccount or not - obviously means to challenge whether Prog is a meaningful term for a genre. I mean my answer is yes too, but we always disagree that prog is or isn't. So I can understand where such a question is coming from.
-Btw: Are you as hot headed in
real life as on PA?
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 14:22
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
[QUOTE=siLLy puPPy]
Of course it is
[COLOR=#990000]Does everyone saying NO to this question really even know what the definition of GENRE is?
The 3-point definition you cited sucks, is incomplete, and doesn't apply to progressive rock music.
Of course if you'd adjust your settings so one could read your post through the mass of words, shapes, symbols and colors, it would help.[/QUOTE[/B
Why are you color blind? Are you unable to distinguish words from meaningless code that is generated by a dinosaur website that the owner refuses to upgrade
So it's someone else's fault, as usual. Of course it is.
Colorblind? No I perceive color quite well, but citing & responding to your post is almost impossible-- I assume this is not by design or an urge to discourage others' from responding to you, but rather unwillingness. Or laziness.
------------- "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Posted By: MicroscopicLad
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 14:23
Genesis, Yes, ELP and Jethro Tull might be in one box called Prog. But people label Tangerine Dream as prog as well. Could Tangerine Dream and, e.g., Jethro Tull be in the same genre? Hmmm.....
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 14:25
Atavachron wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
[QUOTE=siLLy puPPy]
Of course it is
[COLOR=#990000]Does everyone saying NO to this question really even know what the definition of GENRE is?
The 3-point definition you cited sucks, is incomplete, and doesn't apply to progressive rock music.
Of course if you'd adjust your settings so one could read your post through the mass of words, shapes, symbols and colors, it would help.[/QUOTE[/B
Why are you color blind? Are you unable to distinguish words from meaningless code that is generated by a dinosaur website that the owner refuses to upgrade
So it's someone else's fault, as usual. Of course it is.
Colorblind? No I perceive color quite well, but citing & responding to your post is almost impossible-- I assume this is not by design or an urge to discourage others' from responding to you, but rather unwillingness. Or laziness.
I would say that it's incumbent upon you to muster up the creativity to be able to respond to anyone's post. What a ridiculous claim that someone didn't format a post to your liking and that you find it too difficult to respond to. Do you comprehend how ludicrous that sounds? It's f**king hilarious
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 14:29
Saperlipopette! wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
^ There's a difference between "is Prog really a genre" and "does genres really exist?" - It's like you're answering questions that nobody's asking.
WTF are you talking about?
If you or anyone can't see such an obvious conclusion i really don't know how to respond
Maybe brush up on your logic skills?
No one needs you copying and pasting
the definition of "genre" from the dictionary. It doesn't answer the
spesific question. Which - trollaccount or not - obviously means to challenge whether Prog is a meaningful term for a genre. I mean my answer is yes too, but we always disagree that prog is or isn't. So I can understand where such a question is coming from.
-Btw: Are you as hot headed in
real life as on PA?
Not sure why you're spinning your wheels asking questions that have been answered decades ago. Obviously some who responded here needed a basic dictionary definition because some of the comments exemplified the fact they didn't comprehend the definition at a basic level.
Sometimes a simple inference from a basic definition is all you need to solve a mystery, not a multitude of circuitous arguments that never point out the obvious.
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 14:31
siLLy puPPy wrote:
I would say that it's incumbent upon you to muster up the creativity to be able to respond to anyone's post. What a ridiculous claim that someone didn't format a post to your liking and that you find it too difficult to respond to. Do you comprehend how ludicrous that sounds? It's f**king hilarious
------------- "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 14:38
My intuition tells me Tangerine Dream has no common elements with like Yes, ELP, Gentle Giant and so on. But IMHO it's in the PA database mainly because of two reasons: 1. Prog fans love TD (as well Klown Schulze and other Progressive Electronic artists) in general, so they mutually agreed to get it added to the database out of pure admiration 2. It shares some common historical roots with other prog rock acts
-------------
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 15:16
^ Tangerine Dream and progressive electronic acts were included because they developed side by side with Krautrock and were integral to the progressive rock evolution process. You're right that they have little in common but then again they did provide some of the atmospheric embelishments that many prog rock used as secondary musical forces. I wish we would've limited the site to early prog electronic acts that were part of the original scene because by adding anything related we've opened up a can of worms for inclusion. Still though it isn't the worst thing in the world that the site includes a multitude of creative electronic based acts that appeal to the sensibilities of progressive rock fans. The commonality is that both the prog rock and electronic genres indulge in complex soundscapes albeit through different means. Some of the newer PE acts are hard to evaluate and we have a difficult time agreeing on some of them on the PSIKE team.
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 15:20
Hrychu wrote:
My intuition tells me Tangerine Dream has no common elements with like Yes, ELP, Gentle Giant and so on.
Well, we can't all be experts.
Posted By: Jeffro
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 15:37
This thread delivers. I'm not sure what but damn it delivers!
------------- We all dwell in an amber subdomain, amber subdomain, amber subdomain.
My face IS a maserati
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 15:44
^ Brings out the worst in us, but in an entertaining way
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 16:05
. Still though it isn't the worst thing in the world that the site includes a multitude of creative electronic based acts that appeal to the sensibilities of progressive rock fans.
I didn't say it was a bad thing. B) I only tried to explain the reason all these """Progressive""" Electronic acts exist in a Prog Rock database, the very same one that includes Premiata Forneria Marconi, Genesis et al. under its umbrella of blurry criteria.
-------------
Posted By: TenYearsAfter
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 16:12
Interesting, to say the least: https://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=41724&PN=1" rel="nofollow - The Prog Andaluz Aficionado Thread - Progressive Rock Music Forum - Page 1 (progarchives.com)
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 16:26
TenYearsAfter wrote:
Interesting, to say the least: https://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=41724&PN=1" rel="nofollow - The Prog Andaluz Aficionado Thread - Progressive Rock Music Forum - Page 1 (progarchives.com)
I don't have a clue how this relates to Progressive Electronic, but I'm a huge huge fan of many of the formations that would represent the Andalusian "prog" or rock movement. Especially CAL (from Sevilla). Listen to their album, particularly the mini "epic" Colgao. It's on YT.
-------------
Posted By: TenYearsAfter
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 16:31
Hrychu wrote:
TenYearsAfter wrote:
Interesting, to say the least: https://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=41724&PN=1" rel="nofollow - The Prog Andaluz Aficionado Thread - Progressive Rock Music Forum - Page 1 (progarchives.com)
I don't have a clue how this relates to Progressive Electronic, but I'm a huge huge fan of many formations that would represent the Andalusian "prog" or rock movement. Especially CAL (from Sevilla). Listen to their album, particularly the mini "epic" Colgao.
All reasons to call prog really a genre are there to call Rock Andaluz (or Prog Andaluz, my personal variation) really a genre. I have a regular contact with Rock Andaluz artists/bands and they simply don't understand why Prog Archives still not establish Rock Andaluz as a genre, and why there are hardly new Rock Andaluz bands on Prog Archives. I also hardly notice Spanish progheads on PA.
Check out this: https://www.backgroundmagazine.nl/Specials/RockAndaluz.html" rel="nofollow - Rock Andaluz (backgroundmagazine.nl)
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 16:31
Strictly no unless a 'movement' means 'genre'. Back in the day it was considered to be a soft keyboard version of rock music for people that that didn't want the more heavier guitar based stuff. Keith Emerson took it upon himself to create classical based symphonies (Ars Longa Vita Brevis, The Five Bridges, and some would add Tarkus) and apply them to a rock band format. He even created a band specifically to fully achieve this aim (although Mr G Lake sometimes had different ideas!) . Eventually the trend to create longer multi part tracks became a rampant movement and then we have the so called 'progressive rock'. The thing is though it was not about musical progression (as is often mistakenly believed) and if that is what you consider important then it's not a genre at all but rather a moral obligation. Then it stops being a genre because making 'genre music' has to be bad (as a certain Mr S Wilson will likely lecture you on given half a chance). So it's make your mind up time. Either it is or isn't a genre but it may actually be self defeating if it is!
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 16:42
I think the proggier variant of Rock Andaluz is its own genre in a way but it's also a sub genre of Symphonic Prog and/or Prog Folk (picture it as a Ven diagram). Adding an extra category for just a handful of Andalusian bands would be too pedantic IMO. We already have RPI, which IMO shouldn't exist on PA (talked about that issue numerous times on this forum so I ain't gonna repeat myself again). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-------------
Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 16:52
Prog is not a genre; therefore, I suggest Prog Archives closes post-haste so as not to cause the effrontery of existing for the sole purpose of foisting discussion topics ad nauseam regarding a nonexistent medium.
------------- ...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 16:56
The Dark Elf wrote:
Prog is not a genre; therefore, I suggest Prog Archives closes post-haste so as not to cause the effrontery of existing for the sole purpose of foisting discussion topics ad nauseam regarding a nonexistent medium.
In my mind I'm reading your post with a "posh" accent and picturing you as this character:
-------------
Posted By: TenYearsAfter
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 16:57
Hrychu wrote:
I think the proggier variant of Rock Andaluz is its own genre in a way but it's also a sub genre of Symphonic Prog and/or Prog Folk (picture it as a Ven diagram). Adding an extra category for just a handful of Andalusian bands would be too pedantic IMO. We already have RPI, which IMO shouldn't exist on PA (talked about that issue numerous times on this forum so I ain't gonna repeat myself again). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Just a handful of bands? Do you know how many Rock Andaluz bands emerged since the late Sixties, and how many new bands are active under the banner Rock Andaluz? PA established the genre Raga Prog but if I compare Raga Prog to Rock Andaluz the latter is way more widespread and elaborate. If PA accepts Rock Andaluz I know at least 25 new bands to be included, that is more than a handful, apart from the many many Rock Andaluz bands from the past.
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 16:59
From https://progressiverockcentral.com/" rel="nofollow - Progressive Rock Central.com
http://progressiverockcentral.com/resources/progressive-rock-history/" rel="nofollow - Progressive Rock (also known as Prog Rock, or simply Prog) is a
musical genre that was initially developed in the United Kingdom in the
late 1960s and had its golden age in the first half of the 1970s.
The late 1960s and early 1970s was a time of musical exploration.
Young musicians experimented with new musical instruments and
incorporated and combined various musical genres in new, unexpected
ways.
Progressive Rock was a natural outgrowth of the experimental
Psychedelic period. What took Progressive Rock to another level was that
the musicians who got involved had a more developed understanding of
music theory and musical history.
Early progressive rock mixed rock with blues [SBB, Camel], classical
music [Moody Blues, The Nice, ELP], folk [Renaissance, Gentle Giant,
Strawbs], and jazz [Soft Machine, Caravan] elements, sometimes under the
influence of hallucinogenics for psychedelic music. In addition to
these musical influences, progressive rock musicians added other art
forms such as literature, theater [Genesis] and innovative graphic
design.
Progressive rock is known for its use of complex compositions,
including frequent time signature changes. This means that within a
single song, the rhythm and tempo can change multiple times, creating a
dynamic and unpredictable listening experience for the audience. The use
of odd time signatures, such as 5/4, 7/8, and 9/8, is also common in
progressive rock music.
King Crimson, Gentle Giant, Genesis, and Yes, among others, are known for their use of complex time signatures in their music.
In progressive rock, time signature changes are often used to create
tension and release, add complexity and depth to the music, and
highlight the technical skills of the musicians. This approach to
songwriting and composition has influenced many other genres of music,
including jazz, heavy metal, and https://progressiverockcentral.com/2023/02/09/the-phenomenal-world-of-jazz-rock-fusion" rel="nofollow - fusion .
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 17:01
Do you know how many Rock Andaluz bands emerged since the late Sixties, and how many new bands are active under the banner Rock Andaluz?
Whoa! That's super interesting. I guess due to the language/cultural barrier I was unable to estimate that and I was under the erroneous impression it was only Mezquita, Triana, Cai, and a bunch of others. I'm sorry. 😳
-------------
Posted By: TenYearsAfter
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 17:26
Hrychu wrote:
Do you know how many Rock Andaluz bands emerged since the late Sixties, and how many new bands are active under the banner Rock Andaluz?
Whoa! That's super interesting. I guess due to the language/cultural barrier I was unable to estimate that and I was under the erroneous impression it was only Mezquita, Triana, Cai, and a bunch of others. I'm sorry. 😳
Most people underestimate like you but you are never too old to discover, check out my extensive and updated special on The Dutch Progressive Rock Page:
https://www.dprp.net/features/2022/prog-andaluz-1" rel="nofollow - Prog Andaluz #1 • Features • DPRP.net
https://www.dprp.net/features/2022/prog-andaluz-2" rel="nofollow - Prog Andaluz #2 • Features • DPRP.net
https://www.dprp.net/features/2022/prog-andaluz-3" rel="nofollow - Prog Andaluz #3 • Features • DPRP.net
https://www.dprp.net/features/2022/prog-andaluz-4" rel="nofollow - Prog Andaluz #4 • Features • DPRP.net
https://www.dprp.net/features/2022/prog-andaluz-5" rel="nofollow - Prog Andaluz #5 • Features • DPRP.net
Muchas alegrias, saludos.
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 17:27
Forget what websites and books and magazines and any other source of human information officially have to say, including this one. They're useless. Think independently based on the music, albums, and your own honest perceptions.
------------- "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 17:54
Cristi wrote:
(Svetty, is that you?)
Ok that's funny......I peed a little bit laughing
To me "prog" is not a genre, it is an attribute of music. Progressive rock is a genre, so there are bands not considered progressive rock that can have prog attributes.
But is porg a genre??
-------------
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 18:06
Just for the record, i'm not just citing other sources.
I, 100%, whole-heartedly consider prog rock a genre.
Now symphonic prog, neo-prog, Canterbury Scene are sub-genres.
Metal is a form of rock as well and is now considered a genre
Indie rock, Industrial rock, Gothic rock, Country rock etc are ALL genres
When does a genre become a genre as opposed to a subgenre?
That's another question altogether
Prog rock has been around for close to 60 years
It deserves its standing a bonafide genre
I've NEVER heard anyone consider otherwise except on this thread
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 18:08
Catcher10 wrote:
Cristi wrote:
(Svetty, is that you?)
Ok that's funny......I peed a little bit laughing
To me "prog" is not a genre, it is an attribute of music. Progressive rock is a genre, so there are bands not considered progressive rock that can have prog attributes.
But is porg a genre??
That's a great way to state it. It's the same confusion between prog and progressive. Oh well, i guess this will go on for eternity!
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 18:17
"Is Prog really a genre?".
If Prog is short for Progressive Rock, not the way PA uses this term, but it can be defined as a genre, like the way RYM does it.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 21:05
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
Cristi wrote:
(Svetty, is that you?)
Ok that's funny......I peed a little bit laughing
To me "prog" is not a genre, it is an attribute of music. Progressive rock is a genre, so there are bands not considered progressive rock that can have prog attributes.
But is porg a genre??
That's a great way to state it. It's the same confusion between prog and progressive. Oh well, i guess this will go on for eternity!
Till the cows come home.....
-------------
Posted By: Valdez1
Date Posted: February 21 2024 at 22:47
Atavachron wrote:
Basically, no-- "Prog" is a word given to the penchant for rock musicians in the 1970s to be too ambitious for their own good and make some of the most pompous music on the planet. Great times.
I resemble that remark!!!
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 00:50
Hrychu wrote:
I think the proggier variant of Rock Andaluz is its own genre in a way but it's also a sub genre of Symphonic Prog and/or Prog Folk (picture it as a Ven diagram). Adding an extra category for just a handful of Andalusian bands would be too pedantic IMO. We already have RPI, which IMO shouldn't exist on PA (talked about that issue numerous times on this forum so I ain't gonna repeat myself again). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
This is why I created my website:
- Andalusian Rock
- Andalusian Prog Rock
- Andalusian Prog Folk Rock
- Andalusian Folk Rock
- Prog Folk
- Prog Folk Rock
- Prog Rock/Folk
- Folk Rock
- Prog-Adjacent Folk Rock
- ...
These are all possible tag badges at AP. And it's not to shoe-horn releases into little boxes - if you assign "Andalusian Prog Folk Rock" to a release, it will also be listed when people search only for "Prog Rock", "Rock" or even merely "Andalusian".
Posted By: Awesoreno
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 03:21
I mean, define jazz.
Posted By: Hector Enrique
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 04:07
I think that progressive rock is more of a movement that collects elements from more defined genres (something also debatable...) such as jazz, heavy metal, classic rock, folklore, classical music, and endless etc., and adds such particular structures to it, which are usually characterized by changes in rhythm, comings and goings, extensive atmospheric developments, etc. It is a generalization that I make to explain where the point is, because of course there are also very short, linear and simple songs framed in the same concept.
What can Neurosis and Kitaro, or Isis and Marillion, or Tool and Yes have in common?
IMO, progressive rock is like the great container that welcomes with open arms any artist or band that experiments, combines or develops proposals, and that has a standard of elaboration that is not necessarily complex, but with a great sense of musicality.
------------- Héctor Enrique
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 07:02
Hrychu wrote:
...
1. Prog fans love TD (as well Klown Schulze and other Progressive Electronic artists) in general, so they mutually agreed to get it added to the database out of pure admiration ...
Hi,
I would imagine that you did not see Edgar Froese's words in at least one krautrock special, that were exactly on par with everyone else's work. It was thinking and understanding like that which made the difference ... it wasn't about chords and notes and other superfluous ideas.
The feelings that create a "scene" are usually closely aligned. They might not be in America because East, West, Midwest and South are so different, and Nashville is not interested either, and seeing that in America, makes it hard to understand how so many musical scenes have come alive in Europe for such a long time, going back around (at least) 800 years ... and we think that a genre definition is what this is all about ... IT IS NOT.
The main issue with this discussion is that folks are talking about their favorites. Not the actual arts that created the scene, which included FILM and THEATRE and LITERATURE ... and many folks here ignore that fact. If you think there is a difference, between Damo and Klaus Kinsky you have not watched films or seen the specials about Klaus's improvisations ... that created many a stir, but Werner Herzog kept the camera going because he knew you would never again in a lifetime, capture moments that powerful. Damo extended things the same way ... the camera (us) got to see it all the time!
How can it not be a "genre" when it is spread out so strongly in other arts ... only by people that do not believe that the other arts are important, I imagine.
Crazy ... plz stop using "favorites" to define a genre. Define the time and place and the music itself ... not your favorites!
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 07:12
Valdez1 wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
Basically, no-- "Prog" is a word given to the penchant for rock musicians in the 1970s to be too ambitious for their own good and make some of the most pompous music on the planet. Great times.
I resemble that remark!!!
Hi,
That is such a bizarre idea ... it was like it never happened in Film, Literature and Theater, all over the world. It is sad that so many folks leave behind, so many other artists ... that were a part of it all ... it's down right insane!
The pomposity, comes when we think that seeing the opening of 2001 in the Cinerama Dome (there has never been anything else like it!) was not a strong enough element and idea, that helped a lot of rock music get LOUDER and NOISIER, to impress our naive ideas about the arts, and music. Or that HAIR, showcasing many nude performers and lots of music, was not pompous ... well, maybe Oh, Calcutta was pompous, but at least it was funny and a satire. But I'm not sure that progressive folks might know what that means, and then find so much theater at the time as stupid, and high schoolish! Heck, Burroughs, Ginsberg and many writers that worked with many rock folks, look like total idiots and stupid now ... sorry folks ... that does NOT make sense! They used the same idea for improvisations, and specially Ginsberg.
But no ... all that is garbage, not art, and that's what hurts the progressive music ideas even more.
If you think we, the progressive folks, think it is pompous, you never saw that flute idiot that got blown out at the Hollywood Bowl (finally!!!) by a jazz guy. There was/is more pomposity in some classically minded folks that there was in rock music, though the sales change from classical to rock music in the late 60's changed that idea altogether.
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 08:07
^ I prefer to listen to music for what it is. I am listening to what is coming out of the speaker/headphones. Sure, sometimes having more context on the music can increase your appreciation for it. Occasionally it can do the opposite. But exceptionally good music can be appreciated on its own.
Case in point: As a young boy I got a tape copy of Pink Floyd - Wish You Were Here (that was mid 1980s). I loved it, couldn't stop listening to it. Did I know about Syd Barrett back then? No. Did I care much about any of the societal issues of the 70s? Nope. I was totally clueless when it came to what Have a Cigar was about. Only recently I learned about who is doing the vocals on the track and the stories around that. The point being: If the music is exceptionally good, none of that matters. The music stands on its own (and should be evaluated on its own).
Rant over, back to the (futile) attempt to define "prog".
Posted By: Prog-jester
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 08:20
to me prog has always been about interesting songwriting - atypical song structures/length, certain unpredictability to melodies/chord progressions, uncommon time signatures, etc - so bands like My Dying Bride or Lacrimosa are definitely prog in my book (and bands like Soen are NOT, especially if we look at their recent albums).
Only coupla years ago I discovered to my disappointment that many music listeners (including many prog fans themselves) consider prog mainly to be this uber-technical showmanship competition thing Me? I'd prefer the corniest neo-prog band to any djent act any day
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 09:23
In the simplest possible terms, “prog” is a certain kind of sophistication. Just takes some listening practice to figure out the “certain” part, and it depends on the “base genre”.
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 09:24
^^ agree about Soen, but they’re still “prog-adjacent” on those releases IMHO.
Posted By: miamiscot
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 09:53
Prog is an attitude not a genre.
It is also a verb.
As I've always stated to anyone who'll listen:
"Prog Rock is just music - only better."
------------- The Prog Corner
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 12:33
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
In the simplest possible terms, “prog” is a certain kind of sophistication. Just takes some listening practice to figure out the “certain” part, and it depends on the “base genre”.
Hi,
Well ... it's not the same thing happens in other arts, isn't it?
Just bizarre that we think "prog" has some stuff in it that no other art can show ... although, trying to get someone to describe notes/chords with colors might be a bit strange and weird ... oh wait .. Eno has done it! But it has been done with words, and then some ... I guess that we can now say that many experimentalist folks are total weird and off their rockers because the "sophistication" has to be decided by someone that ... well ... you decide!
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 13:07
^ Of course there could be progressive literature, visual art and films ... who said otherwise?
Posted By: progaardvark
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 14:59
I finished the hummus. I guess spinach dip is next.
------------- ---------- i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag that's a happy bag of lettuce this car smells like cartilage nothing beats a good video about fractions
Posted By: Grumpyprogfan
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 15:05
^Enjoy the genre biscuits.
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 15:06
moshkito wrote:
Valdez1 wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
Basically, no-- "Prog" is a word given to the penchant for rock musicians in the 1970s to be too ambitious for their own good and make some of the most pompous music on the planet. Great times.
I resemble that remark!!! [/DIV
Hi,
That is such a bizarre idea ... it was like it never happened in Film, Literature and Theater, all over the world. It is sad that so many folks leave behind, so many other artists ... that were a part of it all ... it's down right insane!
The pomposity, comes when we think that seeing the opening of 2001 in the Cinerama Dome (there has never been anything else like it!) was not a strong enough element and idea, that helped a lot of rock music get LOUDER and NOISIER, to impress our naive ideas about the arts, and music. Or that HAIR, showcasing many nude performers and lots of music, was not pompous ... well, maybe Oh, Calcutta was pompous, but at least it was funny and a satire. But I'm not sure that progressive folks might know what that means, and then find so much theater at the time as stupid, and high schoolish! Heck, Burroughs, Ginsberg and many writers that worked with many rock folks, look like total idiots and stupid now ... sorry folks ... that does NOT make sense! They used the same idea for improvisations, and specially Ginsberg.
But no ... all that is garbage, not art, and that's what hurts the progressive music ideas even more.
If you think we, the progressive folks, think it is pompous, you never saw that flute idiot that got blown out at the Hollywood Bowl (finally!!!) by a jazz guy. There was/is more pomposity in some classically minded folks that there was in rock music, though the sales change from classical to rock music in the late 60's changed that idea altogether[/DIV
I'm so sorry I've hurt your delicate sensibilities.
------------- "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: February 22 2024 at 17:08
Atavachron wrote:
moshkito wrote:
Valdez1 wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
Basically, no-- "Prog" is a word given to the penchant for rock musicians in the 1970s to be too ambitious for their own good and make some of the most pompous music on the planet. Great times.
I resemble that remark!!! [/DIV
Hi,
That is such a bizarre idea ... it was like it never happened in Film, Literature and Theater, all over the world. It is sad that so many folks leave behind, so many other artists ... that were a part of it all ... it's down right insane!
The pomposity, comes when we think that seeing the opening of 2001 in the Cinerama Dome (there has never been anything else like it!) was not a strong enough element and idea, that helped a lot of rock music get LOUDER and NOISIER, to impress our naive ideas about the arts, and music. Or that HAIR, showcasing many nude performers and lots of music, was not pompous ... well, maybe Oh, Calcutta was pompous, but at least it was funny and a satire. But I'm not sure that progressive folks might know what that means, and then find so much theater at the time as stupid, and high schoolish! Heck, Burroughs, Ginsberg and many writers that worked with many rock folks, look like total idiots and stupid now ... sorry folks ... that does NOT make sense! They used the same idea for improvisations, and specially Ginsberg.
But no ... all that is garbage, not art, and that's what hurts the progressive music ideas even more.
If you think we, the progressive folks, think it is pompous, you never saw that flute idiot that got blown out at the Hollywood Bowl (finally!!!) by a jazz guy. There was/is more pomposity in some classically minded folks that there was in rock music, though the sales change from classical to rock music in the late 60's changed that idea altogether[/DIV
I'm so sorry I've hurt your delicate sensibilities.
Don't encourage it. No one wants to hear its inane nancing about regarding the theatre (not t-h-e-a-t-e-r, dah-ling, the spelling lacks the pretension necessary to encompass the arrogance necessary to prattle on about themes that have no bearing on the discussion).
------------- ...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 00:49
Hector Enrique wrote:
I think that progressive rock is more of a movement that collects elements from more defined genres (something also debatable...) such as jazz, heavy metal, classic rock, folklore, classical music, and endless etc., and adds such particular structures to it, which are usually characterized by changes in rhythm, comings and goings, extensive atmospheric developments, etc. It is a generalization that I make to explain where the point is, because of course there are also very short, linear and simple songs framed in the same concept.
What can Neurosis and Kitaro, or Isis and Marillion, or Tool and Yes have in common?
IMO, progressive rock is like the great container that welcomes with open arms any artist or band that experiments, combines or develops proposals, and that has a standard of elaboration that is not necessarily complex, but with a great sense of musicality.
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 03:25
The Dork Elf wrote:
theatre (not t-h-e-a-t-e-r, dah-ling, the spelling lacks the pretension necessary to encompass the arrogance necessary to prattle on about themes that have no bearing on the discussion).
Really, dahling? Tell that to John Petrucci. xD
-------------
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 03:31
Hrychu wrote:
theatre (not t-h-e-a-t-e-r, dah-ling, the spelling lacks the pretension necessary to encompass the arrogance necessary to prattle on about themes that have no bearing on the discussion).
Really, dahling? Tell that to John Petrucci. xD
I don't know how you are doing these quotes, the person's name does not show.
"Theater" is American English for "cinema", as in "movie theater".
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 04:43
Cristi? That's right. Cristi! wrote:
don't know how you are doing these quotes,
I type the quote tags manually cause it's way quicker that way for me! xD Relax. I was only making a joke. Haha. EDIT: Fixed it. Have a nice day. :3
-------------
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 05:07
Cristi wrote:
Hrychu wrote:
theatre (not t-h-e-a-t-e-r, dah-ling, the spelling lacks the pretension necessary to encompass the arrogance necessary to prattle on about themes that have no bearing on the discussion).
Really, dahling? Tell that to John Petrucci. xD
I don't know how you are doing these quotes, the person's name does not show.
"Theater" is American English for "cinema", as in "movie theater".
Theater is the AE spelling of "theatre", and also a synonym for cinema. At least according to the Cambridge dictionary:
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 05:16
^ Your post suggested that "Theater" only means "cinema".
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 05:24
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
^ Your post suggested that "Theater" only means "cinema".
My post was about John Petrucci's Dream Theater and what it means there.
My bad...
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 05:52
^ Understood!
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 10:09
MikeEnFecalia wrote:
Cristi wrote:
Hrychu wrote:
theatre (not t-h-e-a-t-e-r, dah-ling, the spelling lacks the pretension necessary to encompass the arrogance necessary to prattle on about themes that have no bearing on the discussion).
Really, dahling? Tell that to John Petrucci. xD
I don't know how you are doing these quotes, the person's name does not show.
"Theater" is American English for "cinema", as in "movie theater".
Theater is the AE spelling of "theatre", and also a synonym for cinema. At least according to the Cambridge dictionary:
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 11:27
Genres are for people who need them.
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 13:04
^ I use genres to narrow down the range of possibilities when I'm looking for new music. Not always, sometimes I don't pay any attention. But there are times when I'm looking for something specific, or maybe I'm tired of certain styles or genres due to overexposure. Avant is a good example - sometimes I'm drawn to it, sometimes the idea of dissonant madness doesn't seem right and I'm looking for melodic stuff instead.
I think genres can be useful IF you see them as something optional, focus on inclusiveness instead of divisiveness, and not take them too seriously.
Posted By: progaardvark
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 13:53
I thought it was spelled sink garden, with the e before the i and the k after the w.
------------- ---------- i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag that's a happy bag of lettuce this car smells like cartilage nothing beats a good video about fractions
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 15:49
Easy Money wrote:
Genres are for people who need them.
Sounds sarcastic, but actually genres are useful to music historians, musicologists and anybody tasked with dividing music into categories useful to others or themselves.
Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 16:56
Hrychu wrote:
Cristi? That's right. Cristi! wrote:
don't know how you are doing these quotes,
I type the quote tags manually cause it's way quicker that way for me! xD Relax. I was only making a joke. Haha. EDIT: Fixed it. Have a nice day. :3
Hrychu wrote:
The Dork Elf wrote:
theatre (not t-h-e-a-t-e-r, dah-ling, the spelling lacks the pretension necessary to encompass the arrogance necessary to prattle on about themes that have no bearing on the discussion).
Really, dahling? Tell that to John Petrucci. xD
Here's a suggestion: act like you have the mental capacity of someone older than 12. I also suggest you stop manipulating other people's quotes. That way, even if you are a 12 year-old you won't be viewed as a jackass.
------------- ...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 23:24
^ TL;DR: "Suspend my account NOW!"
Edit: was directed at the posts which the guy below then deleted.
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 23 2024 at 23:43
I sometimes like to turn down my "seriousness knob". I don't see anything wrong with that.
-------------
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 24 2024 at 00:37
^ I saw your posts, a****le.
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: February 24 2024 at 02:05
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
^ I saw your posts, a****le.
Never made a mistake in your life, Mike?
-------------
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 24 2024 at 02:07
^ Plenty! I usually don’t sneakily delete my posts, so you can still find them.