Print Page | Close Window

Rick Wakeman VS Dave Greenslade

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics related to progressive music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=18948
Printed Date: June 15 2025 at 15:49
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Rick Wakeman VS Dave Greenslade
Posted By: oracus
Subject: Rick Wakeman VS Dave Greenslade
Date Posted: February 13 2006 at 17:32
I know that most of you dont know the keyboardist Dave Greenslade (Colosseum) or you think that is a ridiculous poll because for you Rick Wakeman is far better.
But for my opinion Greenslade is better (unique,complex,atmospheric).

-------------




Replies:
Posted By: memowakeman
Date Posted: February 13 2006 at 17:55

Greenslade skill is amazing, but... is this poll a joke??

sorry...



-------------

Follow me on twitter @memowakeman


Posted By: Tony Fisher
Date Posted: February 13 2006 at 17:55
Greenslade is a really marvellous player but so is Wakeman. I'm sitting on the fence but I expect the Yes fanboys will make sure Wakeman wins.


Posted By: Tony Fisher
Date Posted: February 13 2006 at 17:58
Originally posted by memowakeman memowakeman wrote:

Greenslade skill is amazing, but... is this poll a joke??

sorry...



No. Greenslade deserves to be in the same league as Wakeman, Emerson, Minnear, Banks, Bardens and the rest of the greats. It's not a joke at all. On balance I'm going for Greenslade after all.


Posted By: ANDREW
Date Posted: February 14 2006 at 08:03

I agree with Tony Fisher; Greenslade deserves to be in the same league as Wakemwn, etc...

I love GREENSLADE albums, he's a great keyboardist, underrated!!!



Posted By: Drachen Theaker
Date Posted: February 14 2006 at 09:37
In terms of technique it's no contest - Wakeman wins by a mile. But Dave Greenslade is a very good technical player and I enjoy his stuff just as much. Wakeman never surpassed the awesome Hammond solo Greenslade did on Colosseum's Valentyne Suite, and I love DG's use of mellotrons on the Greenslade albums.

In short they are both great, but different...

-------------
"It's 1973, almost dinnertime and I'm 'aving 'oops!" - Gene Hunt


Posted By: ghost_of_morphy
Date Posted: July 12 2008 at 04:55
Dave Greenslade is a very, very good keyboardist.  But he can't match Wakeman in skill or technical innovation.  Compositionally, it's hard to compare them as they are very different, but I could understand an argument that Greenslade deserves to be mentioned in the same breath as Wakeman there.


Posted By: TGM: Orb
Date Posted: July 12 2008 at 05:54
Wakeman for me, much as I enjoy lots of Greenslade's playing. Wakeman is a much deeper and more interesting contributor, especially on Fragile.


Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: July 12 2008 at 10:54
Originally posted by ghost_of_morphy ghost_of_morphy wrote:

Dave Greenslade is a very, very good keyboardist. But he can't match Wakeman in skill or technical innovation. Compositionally, it's hard to compare them as they are very different, but I could understand an argument that Greenslade deserves to be mentioned in the same breath as Wakeman there.


I agree.

No vote.


Posted By: tszirmay
Date Posted: July 12 2008 at 11:15
While Rick is the uncontested keyboard ruler, there are quite a few just right behind. Greenslade is among that elite group and frankly speaking is utterly deserving of kudos . Therefore , I have annointed Dave a vote because it may never happen again! Rick has been winning polls since 1971!

-------------
I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.


Posted By: b_olariu
Date Posted: July 12 2008 at 16:41
Dave Greenslade from  for me.


Posted By: Alberto Muñoz
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 19:09
Originally posted by cacho cacho wrote:

[QUOTE=ghost_of_morphy] Dave Greenslade is a very, very good keyboardist. But he can't match Wakeman in skill or technical innovation. Compositionally, it's hard to compare them as they are very different, but I could understand an argument that Greenslade deserves to be mentioned in the same breath as Wakeman there.


Agree with that
I vote Rick


-------------






Posted By: Okocha
Date Posted: September 12 2008 at 12:39
Great Rick



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk