Print Page | Close Window

Is Kings X Prog?

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Suggest New Bands and Artists
Forum Description: Suggest, create polls, and classify new bands you would like included on Prog Archives
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=22344
Printed Date: April 24 2024 at 09:58
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Is Kings X Prog?
Posted By: walrus333
Subject: Is Kings X Prog?
Date Posted: April 25 2006 at 19:23
How does everyone feel about wehther this band is prog or not? I only have Ogre Tones and Gretchen Goes To Nebraska.  Judging from those 2 id say they are prog related but not fully prog.

-------------
If anyone knows where I can get a copy of some Flute and Voice (Indo-Prog/Raga Rock) albums please PM me! Many thanks!



Replies:
Posted By: WaywardSon
Date Posted: April 25 2006 at 19:41

Iīm ashamed to say I still havenīt heard any of their music. Ritchie Blackmore is a big fan of Kingīs X though, so obviously I will have to check them out.



Posted By: Don Quito
Date Posted: April 25 2006 at 20:28
I would say that their music is Rush influenced ...

-------------
KEEP THE PROMISE YOU MADE


Posted By: Progdrummer05
Date Posted: April 25 2006 at 22:08
in my opinion they have this groove rock vibe with a bit of prog in them. Some say they are the pioneers of Groove rock and this site even says that they are prog metal combined with grunge but i would say they are a bit more on the groove rock side than prog metal

-------------
Carry On My Wayward Son


Posted By: Mandrakeroot
Date Posted: April 26 2006 at 04:03
Yes. YES!!! without doubt!!!
For always yours, mandrakeroot


Posted By: Mandrakeroot
Date Posted: April 26 2006 at 04:04
Yes. YES!!! without doubt!!!
For always yours, mandrakeroot


Posted By: ANDREW
Date Posted: April 26 2006 at 08:07
Prog Related


Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: April 26 2006 at 08:07
The band: Prog-Related, the early albums (up to Faith-Hope-Love): Art Rock.

-------------
https://awesomeprog.com/users/Mike" rel="nofollow">Recently listened to:


Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 17:10

Gretchen is probably thier only full fledged Art-Rock album other than that at their best they were prog-related and overall they just shouldnt be included



-------------
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "


Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 19:44
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

The band: Prog-Related, the early albums (up to Faith-Hope-Love): Art Rock.


Seconded.  This band is a tough call for me.  Those early albums are quite good.


Posted By: zFrogs
Date Posted: June 09 2006 at 13:07
Prog Related. I have all records.

-------------
https://www.instagram.com/erifrog/


Posted By: Bryan
Date Posted: June 09 2006 at 15:36
I've only got Dogman and wouldn't consider it even remotely related in any way to prog... maybe it's not a great representation of their sound though.


Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: June 09 2006 at 16:26
Originally posted by Bryan Bryan wrote:

I've only got Dogman and wouldn't consider it even remotely related in any way to prog... maybe it's not a great representation of their sound though.


No, not really. Dogman is cool ... but more bluesy and less prog than the early albums. I'd suggest to start with the debut ... awesome album!


-------------
https://awesomeprog.com/users/Mike" rel="nofollow">Recently listened to:


Posted By: Jeff Schu
Date Posted: June 09 2006 at 16:30
I've allways heard them referred to as Progressive Metal. I'm not sure if it's accuarate or not since I've never really listened to them before. But, I thought that was the general assessment of them.

-------------


Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: June 10 2006 at 00:01
Originally posted by Jeff Schu Jeff Schu wrote:

I've allways heard them referred to as Progressive Metal. I'm not sure if it's accuarate or not since I've never really listened to them before. But, I thought that was the general assessment of them.


This made me remember something.  This is from this site's definition of prog metal:

"Two bands that are commonly identified as progressive metal, King's X and Opeth, are at opposite ends of the sonic spectrum to one another. King's X are a group influenced very heavily by softer mainstream rock and grunge, whereas Opeth's growling vocals and ultra heavy guitars usually see them cited as death metal."

I certainly never thought of King's X as metal in any way, progressive or otherwise.  But why are they listed as some sort of prog metal exemplar when they're not even in the archives? Confused

By the way, King's X is pretty sweet, in particular the early stuff.


Posted By: Empathy
Date Posted: June 10 2006 at 01:56
I have many of their albums, and I really enjoy them. I definitely think they belong here, under Prog Related.

On a side note... Ty Tabor is an incredible guitarist, and has one of the most ridiculously awesome tones I've ever heard, IMO.


-------------
Pure Brilliance:


Posted By: johnobvious
Date Posted: June 20 2006 at 14:26
Have all their albums up through Manic Moonlight and would have to say no.  Love them and their sound.  TyTabor is an awesome musician as are the other two and their vocal harmonies are outstanding.  I just don't think of them as prog.

-------------
Biggles was in rehab last Saturday



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk