PFs DVD PULSE
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
Forum Description: Discuss specific prog bands and their members or a specific sub-genre
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=29630
Printed Date: June 22 2025 at 22:34
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: PFs DVD PULSE
Posted By: dima_olkov
Subject: PFs DVD PULSE
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 05:50
|
Hi All! Why don't I see latest Floyd's double DVD PULSE on the archives? It was released quite some time ago... and I even remember that it was added and then deleted... ------------- PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull |
Replies:
Posted By: pero
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 05:54
|
Because it's boring. Not as Wall, but still.
Pompei are the best PF DVD. Maybe because they were young
|
Posted By: dima_olkov
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 05:56
|
:-)
first of all, this is one of the greatest concerts ever recorded (and I just love Pompei too)...
second, this is not a reason for not including it :-) ------------- PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull |
Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:00
| http://www.progarchives.com/Progressive_rock_discography_CD.asp?cd_id=7855 - http://www.progarchives.com/Progressive_rock_discography_CD.asp?cd_id=7855 |
Posted By: dima_olkov
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:01
|
I think this is CRAP. Why did they put two totally different releases under ONE? ------------- PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull |
Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:04
| If the track listings are correct, I wouldn't say they're totally different. |
Posted By: dima_olkov
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:06
Well, DVD has so many bonus material... and sound and picture quality are simply incomparible. So the reviews should be obviously different... shouldn't they? ------------- PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull |
Vompatti wrote:Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:14
| ^They probably should, but isn't it the same thing with Live at Pompeii, which is also listed only once? |
Posted By: dima_olkov
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:14
|
i think they should... ------------- PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull |
Posted By: Froth
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 07:24
| whilst pulse should obviously be in the archives, i'm no fan of it. Its not really floyd is it? More like Gilmore with a billion other musicians trying to make up for the loss of Waters and even then they fall well short of the mark. they make floyd sound like 'classic rock'. Nothing compared to the sheer genius of 'live at Pompeii', probbably the best set list in the bands history |
Posted By: andu
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 07:25
|
if it's a different release, it should be treated as such imo. ------------- "PA's own GI Joe!" 
|
Posted By: eugene
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 08:06
|
I am no fan of Pulse and find it to be very mediocre, I have not watched/listened to latest re-release of it, but I've heard my friend telling about it, and I am pretty sure that it's much better than previous release, it's better to such extent that will invoke much better reviews and consequently should be treated as different album IMO.
------------- carefulwiththataxe |
Posted By: rushaholic
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 09:22
Live at Pompei is no doubt one of the greatest shows ever recorded. But your comments regarding Pulse are way off. This is a fantastic live show. Yea, no Waters. I would have like them to continue with him as well. However, the rest of the band was there and they put on one hell of a show. Can hardly compare the two though. Very different times and circumstances. Both still great. |
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 11:38
|
The site policy is that re-releases are not listed separately. There are many LPs which are re-issued as CDs with bonus tracks of course, and the "Pulse" DVD is essentially the same thing.
Feel free to mention your reviews though, anyhting which differentiates the DVD.
|
Posted By: Man Overboard
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 14:28
|
How can a DVD be the "same" release as a CD? Video adds so much to a show... case in point, I had an audio version of Arena's "Caught In The Act" for a while, but it wasn't until I got the DVD that I appreciated it... my review was completely different ------------- https://soundcloud.com/erin-susan-jennings" rel="nofollow - Bedroom guitarist". Composer, Arranger, Producer. Perfection may not exist, but I may still choose to serve Perfection. Commissions considered. |
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 16:04
|
No, not the same as the CD MO |
, it's a re-release of the version which was on VHS video.
Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: October 09 2006 at 16:11
I believe this Pulse is an edition, done with bonus feature, perhaps improvements etc. As Easy Livin said, policy places such (aproximate or exact) releases under a general view, not under ambiguations, extensions, separations. I support that policy. 
------------- 
|