2008 US Presidential election has officaly begun!
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=33589
Printed Date: May 08 2024 at 07:41
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: 2008 US Presidential election has officaly begun!
Posted By: JJLehto
Subject: 2008 US Presidential election has officaly begun!
Date Posted: January 23 2007 at 23:51
|
Feel free to discuss. Who you like, how you think candidates will fare, etc. Personally, I have a tough time sorting through who I like, and who I'd support. Right now, the only candidate I like, is Dennis Kucinich. So until something changes, I throw my support behind Kucinich. That is until, of course, Tiki becomes 35. Then it's him all the way. |
Replies:
Posted By: MadcapLaughs84
Date Posted: January 23 2007 at 23:52
|
Anyone but Bush ------------- 
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 00:11
|
I can't vote yet..... I'm no citizen....
But I'd vote Democrat. And then, I'd go for Gore. As he won't run, I'd go with Richardson or Edwards. As they won't win, I'd go with Clinton. Second choice: Obama. Third choice: The T. ------------- 
|
Posted By: Drew
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 00:22
|
f it- Tiki Barber ------------- |
Posted By: video vertigo
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 00:31
|
Stephen Colbert ------------- "The rock and roll business is pretty absurd, but the world of serious music is much worse." - Zappa |
Posted By: King of Loss
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 07:44
|
I have a serious problem with a lot of the nominees: McCain is a great leader for a Republican anyways, but he is a little bit too old and a little bit Conservative. I hate Hillary, not questions asked. Barack Obama is way too young and way too inexperienced, but still be better than Bush Mitt Romney is a back-stabbing son of a bitch who wanted to become President in the first place, but instead became governor of Massachusetts to "gain experience for the job". What a prick. And of course, the only vote I'm going to vote for is either myself, Daniel Gildenlow (I'm sure he's SICK OF AMERICA AND NOT AMERICAN!) or Ralph Nader. |
Posted By: markosherrera
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 08:57
|
Now I know something about Obama he has a brilliant career ,he is prepared ,intelligent and progressist,he could be a good president for USA and for the USA relation with the rest of the world,I hope that he wins first over Hillary AND AFTER over the republicans .And I BELIEVE that USA is prepared for a woman or for a non wasp candidate. |
Posted By: Passionist
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 09:00
| I think a woman would do good for your country, so Hillary Clinton it is. |
Posted By: bhikkhu
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 10:34
Pat Paulsen.  ------------- a.k.a. H.T. http://riekels.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow - http://riekels.wordpress.com |
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 10:39
Get ready for the worst, guys, once Micky gets wind of that... I can just picture him in his best, full-on firebrand mode! BTW, I'm not an American citizen, but chances are I'll be involved in all the brouhaha in some way or the other... Personally, though I don't know much about the candidates, I'd root for either Hillary or Obama for quite obvious reasons. I don't think the latter has any chances, though. |
Posted By: bhikkhu
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 11:09
Don't forget about John Edwards. I don't know what his chances are, but he's a pretty sharp guy. ------------- a.k.a. H.T. http://riekels.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow - http://riekels.wordpress.com |
Ghost Rider wrote:Posted By: Man With Hat
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 17:47
|
I dont think America is ready for a black or a woman president. I would like to see Obama get into office, however, and I think he would do a better job for this country then Ms. Clinton. (Though of the two, I think Hilary has the better shot).
Although if Rudi ran, I would most likely vote for him.
It will be an interesting election for sure. ------------- Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
Posted By: moreitsythanyou
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 17:51
 In a more serious note, this will be my first election and am looking forward to it. I need to find out a bit more about the particular candidates, but it'll be most likely a democrat or an independant who will get my vote -------------  <font color=white>butts, lol[/COLOR] |
Posted By: Witchwoodhermit
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 19:17
|
Vote choice "me". Do you mean "you" or "me"?  ------------- Here I'm shadowed by a dragon fig tree's fan ringed by ants and musing over man. |
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: January 25 2007 at 12:42
|
^ oooooooooooo I meant ME. As in myself, who created this thread. I thought about a "you" option though... SO, whoever voted for the me option...has just given me one vote for the Presidency. Anyway, I personally have wondered who we wil laccept first. A black man, or white woman.....or reject both. Guess we'll finally find out. |
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: January 25 2007 at 13:29
I don't know that 2 years in the Senate qualifies as a "brilliant career", but he certainly appears to be a breath of fresh air. It was surprising to see even some conservatives on political shows singing his praises. The man has charisma, that much is certain. I'm wondering if he'll turn out to be the JFK of my generation or will just fizzle out. Depends on how he survives the Clinton "machine". |
Posted By: Scapler
Date Posted: January 25 2007 at 16:33
I will be four months off from being able to vote this presidental election Sadly, there are no good Republican candidates, so it will just be a fight amongst Democrats, with no real competition afterwards. ------------- Bassists are deadly 
|
Posted By: markosherrera
Date Posted: January 25 2007 at 17:11
|
Posted By: progismylife
Date Posted: January 25 2007 at 17:15
I will be old enough to vote, but I live in the wrong country and can't register to vote. Damn US citizenship that comes to nothing!! |
Posted By: blaughida
Date Posted: January 26 2007 at 00:03
Check out this website: http://www.fvap.gov/ I'm not sure about the details, but you if you used to live in the U.S. you may be able to register in that state, and if you've never lived in the U.S. but one of your parents used to, you may be able to register in that state where they last resided. |
Posted By: video vertigo
Date Posted: January 26 2007 at 00:36
|
I'd love to see a woman president but I don't think Hilary is the one to do it. Elizabeth Dole on the other hand would have made an excellent candidate, but as we know Bush got the Republican nomination and not Dole in 2000. ------------- "The rock and roll business is pretty absurd, but the world of serious music is much worse." - Zappa |
Posted By: dwill123
Date Posted: January 26 2007 at 08:14
How about Rudy Giuliani? Yeah, that's him for real. 
|
Posted By: markosherrera
Date Posted: January 26 2007 at 16:36
|
Posted By: Jeams Pfirp
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 21:25
-------------  
|
Posted By: Jeams Pfirp
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 21:26
|
I don't want Hillary Clinton to become president. There's already been enough presidents with the last name of Clinton. -------------
|
Posted By: Jeams Pfirp
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 21:30
|
I'll vote for other. How come the democrat side of tyhe race is getting a crapload of coverage and the republican side isn't. If it keeps being like this, people are going to be biased when they are voting. I think I'lol put my vote in as other. If a democrat should be president, though, the person would have to be Barack Obama.
Also, in case you're wondering, yes, I am a Republican.
Aw, crap! I didn't see the Rudi Giuliani option when I was voting.. -------------
|
Posted By: Zepology101
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 21:35
|
ME ------------- 
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 21:39
|
This poll is an accurate sample of why democrats haven't won lately: in raw numbers, they ARE winning, if we add all the democratic candidates' votes together... but as votes for a single candidate, Giuliani is winning. republicans are so much better at sticking with their horse till the end. But I hope that chenges with Giuliani and McCain, and I hope Obama does the decent thing after he loses the primary (it's going to happen) and gives Hillary his support.... otherwise, four more years of G.O.P. -------------
|
Posted By: rushaholic
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 21:44
| Newt!!! |
Posted By: moreitsythanyou
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 21:46
If only 3rd parties had support  ------------- <font color=white>butts, lol[/COLOR] |
Posted By: Chris H
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 21:49
|
Nader! Nader! Nader!
I cant even vote! ------------- Beauty will save the world. 
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 21:50
man, marty feldman's spirit surely has got into you...
  -------------
|
Posted By: rushaholic
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 21:52
Come on now, I think Newt would do a great job. Marty would vote for him.... "Could be worse, could be raining." |
Posted By: moreitsythanyou
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 21:54
That's the spirit
 But unlike you I will be voting by '08 ------------- <font color=white>butts, lol[/COLOR] |
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: January 30 2007 at 22:00
in that we agree... Marty would be voting for him....
I don't know about Gene, or Dom, or even less, Mel.
-------------
|
Posted By: AtLossForWords
Date Posted: February 01 2007 at 00:21
|
I vote Daniel Gildenlow for Premier. He won't try to us us, he won't try to sell us fear, and he won't try to sell us bullsh*t. -------------   "Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls." |
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: February 01 2007 at 14:51
Whoa, this thing is picking up hits.
I don't know if you meant in general, or on this poll. I already had so many, so I just put Nader since he was the main one that came to mind. |
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: February 01 2007 at 16:36
|
I'll most likely be voting for Mitt Romeny. However, if Pat Buchanan
were running I'd gladly vote for him despite what you all will all
undeniably say about third party candidates.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. " |
Posted By: moreitsythanyou
Date Posted: February 01 2007 at 20:04
------------- <font color=white>butts, lol[/COLOR] |
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: February 01 2007 at 22:59
A third party wouldn't hurt things that much... but believe me, you don't want a multi partidist system like in my country (and most third world) where we have more than 20 political parties, most of them without agendas, ideologies, just there for the candidate of the moment. -------------
|
Posted By: rileydog22
Date Posted: February 01 2007 at 23:09
|
Guliani, mostly because he's the least-partisan major-party candidate. The entire party system is stupid, but we can't elect a guy who isn't a part of it. A guy like Guliani is the closest we'll come to a solution; he isn't so different as to not be able to run with a major party, but he also isn't yet another moron making descisions just because his party says so.
-------------   |
Posted By: rileydog22
Date Posted: February 01 2007 at 23:13
I dunno. Tiki is abandoning the us (Giants fans) right now, what makes you think he wouldn't abandon the country? ------------- |
Posted By: imoeng
Date Posted: February 02 2007 at 20:20
|
Hey Tlossy what's that girl name on your pic, again?
------------- http://img360.imageshack.us/my.php?image=spmiw7.jpg">  
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: February 03 2007 at 23:41
......Tiki's retiring still strikes a nerve with me...... I will become his personal/campaign manager, so I can guarantee you he won't decide to step down from the Presidency after like, 6 years  Not to get off the topic off real politics: I retract my first endorsement. Kucinich reflects my ideals, but I don't know if idealism is meant for the Presidency. Guess I'd probably say Hillary. |
Posted By: giantenemycrab
Date Posted: February 05 2007 at 20:08
Hillary, for some reason, scares me.. I won't vote for anyone that scares me...  |
Posted By: Jeams Pfirp
Date Posted: February 05 2007 at 21:01
Word! -------------
|
Posted By: Forgotten Son
Date Posted: February 07 2007 at 06:57
|
1. Ralph Nader 2. Barack Obama 3. John McCain Not really much of my business but there's my tuppence worth. -------------  
|
Posted By: Meddler
Date Posted: February 09 2007 at 09:37
------------- [IMG]http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i165/amorfous/astro-1.jpg"> |
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: February 09 2007 at 11:35
That guy has built such a personality cult. He honestly could do it I think....
Or at least a few million votes from alienated teens.
|
Posted By: Jeams Pfirp
Date Posted: February 09 2007 at 19:35
-------------
|
Posted By: Flokk
Date Posted: February 10 2007 at 16:50
|
Clinton for President! In the first place because of her political view (she's a democrat  ), and of course it would be funny if she becomes it, then she and Bill would become the first couple that became both President of the USA -------------  
|
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 10 2007 at 16:57
|
hahahhah.. love the Guliani votes... seen the latest polls on him. As many people think he is pro-life as pro choice.
He'll NEVER be nominated by extremists on the right once the american
public actually reads the paper and see's that he is a ...wow.. liberal
republican. Don't see them much anymore.
------------- The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip |
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: February 10 2007 at 20:42
Oh yea, I like him, alot but I knew from the start there was no chance in hell he'd make it through.
|
Posted By: SolariS
Date Posted: February 11 2007 at 12:48
I'm voting independent this year. I realized that it's more important to give my vote to the candidate who I feel has the best political stance regardless of whether or not I think they'll win. It's likely that I'll either vote green or for nader (since he's running without party affiliation this year). Republican or democrat it will be the same old sh*t. Vote for a party that isn't so structurally locked by the legislative branch and by the strict bipartisan lines if you want something to be done about the environment, education and foreign policy. A third party choice is the only way to make issues actually count. http://www.gp.org - www.gp.org -------------  
|