Mike Patton v/s Daniel Gildenlow
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics related to progressive music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=40122
Printed Date: July 23 2025 at 10:28 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Mike Patton v/s Daniel Gildenlow
Posted By: Dorsalia
Subject: Mike Patton v/s Daniel Gildenlow
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 04:15
As vocalists. NOT composers.
What do you think?
how I hate vs polls... 
------------- "Es ist übrigens unmöglich, eine Meinung zu haben, ohne dass es unerfreuliche Überschneidungen gibt. Die Grünen sind für den deutschen Wald, die NPD ebenfalls."
|
Replies:
Posted By: Firefly
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 05:17
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:31
If your asking us whos the better vocalist, then its Gildenlow by a country mile.
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: Firefly
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:33
not in my opinon...
|
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:41
As vocalists: Mike Patton without any hesitation. And even not limited to vocals I would vote for him ... he's simply much more versatile and resourceful.
------------- https://awesomeprog.com/release-polls/pa" rel="nofollow - Release Polls
Listened to:
|
Posted By: Bj-1
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:47
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
As vocalists: Mike Patton without any hesitation. And even not limited to vocals I would vote for him ... he's simply much more versatile and resourceful. |
Agree. Although they both have similar voices, I think Patton has the best range and technique!
------------- RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
Posted By: Firefly
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:51
Plus, he can pull it of live too.
|
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:52
Here are some samples to listen to:
http://www.myspace.com/mrbungle - http://www.myspace.com/mrbungle
------------- https://awesomeprog.com/release-polls/pa" rel="nofollow - Release Polls
Listened to:
|
Posted By: Firefly
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:55
Bj-1 wrote:
Agree. Although they both have similar voices, I think Patton has the best range and technique! |
Now I'm confused. These 2 don't sound even remotely alike!
|
Posted By: Philéas
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 07:07
Patton by a million miles.
|
Posted By: Asphalt
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 07:23
I appreciate Patton's talent, but I just prefer Gildenlow. Strikes a chord with me.
|
Posted By: Shakespeare
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 11:18
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
As vocalists: Mike Patton without any hesitation. And even not limited to vocals I would vote for him ... he's simply much more versatile and resourceful.
|
Not to mention he's freaking hilarious.
|
Posted By: Arsillus
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 11:25
Patton is better. He's more diverse in his singing styles.
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 11:28
Dorsalia wrote:
As vocalists. NOT composers.
What do you think?
how I hate vs polls...  |
I think Mike Patton probably wears the nicest shoes. 
However, just for his vocals on Angel Dust alone: Patton.
------------- What?
|
Posted By: ProgBagel
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 11:31
Patton is just a little to wierd and just likes the show his talent a little more.
Daniel.
|
Posted By: el böthy
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 12:41
Patton is good, but he hasnt done anything that had amazed me as much as some stuff by Gildenlöw
------------- "You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
Posted By: Meddler
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 12:52
Patton. I would have said by a mile, but after hearing BE, I hadn't really known how awesome Gildenlow was. Both incredible singers!!!!111
------------- [IMG]http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i165/amorfous/astro-1.jpg">
|
Posted By: Bj-1
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 17:31
Firefly wrote:
Bj-1 wrote:
Agree. Although they both have similar voices, I think Patton has the best range and technique! |
Now I'm confused. These 2 don't sound even remotely alike! |
They are quite similar actually, just listen 
------------- RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
Posted By: King of Loss
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 18:18
This one is a no brainer.
Just listen to Patton live and Gildenlow live....
|
Posted By: chamberry
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 18:26
I like Patton's quirky and weird style, although Gildenlow is an excellent singer.
-------------
|
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 19:19
King of Loss wrote:
This one is a no brainer.
Just listen to Patton live and Gildenlow live.... |
There aren't many Patton live albums available ... I don't think that the various bootlegs are a reliable source of information. I'm sure that both singers had good and bad days ...
------------- https://awesomeprog.com/release-polls/pa" rel="nofollow - Release Polls
Listened to:
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 19:54
Gildenlow.
Patton sucks at everything. 
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: Firefly
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 20:03
Bj-1 wrote:
[QUOTE=Firefly][QUOTE=Bj-1]
They are quite similar actually, just listen  | '
I did. Today, back to back. Like chalk and cheese, really. And just in case I was leading myself upthe garden path (which isn't impossible), I asked people in the sotore, and one of my colleagues. Asked "do these 2 guys sound alike in any way".
Answer was "no".
Maybe it's one of those turquoise things. YOu know how some people argue that turquoise is blue and some argue it's green. They see different things. Maybe you hear a different thing from me.
|
Posted By: Dim
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 22:53
stonebeard wrote:
Gildenlow.
Patton sucks at everything. 
|
A bit blunt doncha think?
-------------
|
Posted By: The Miracle
Date Posted: July 21 2007 at 23:01
Wow, two of my sex gods in the same poll and you expect me to choose?
Gildelow's voice is more beautiful, Patton's in more varied.
Can't vote.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/ocellatedgod" rel="nofollow - last.fm
|
Posted By: Benjamin_Breeg
Date Posted: July 22 2007 at 00:14
oh damn! the both are my favorite vocalists in whole world! Daniel may have learned with Patton, but i think Daniel's voice is little more beautiful than Patton's
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Dream_Thief_/?chartstyle=Geldropdown2">
|
Posted By: Drakk
Date Posted: July 22 2007 at 00:24
Patton by a small margin.
I love Gildenlow's voice, and his range, but Patton's versatility just does so much more for me.
------------- [QUOTE=darkshade] [QUOTE=Sckxyss]
I'm disappointed - neither of these players are avant-garde!
Al di Meola.
[/QUOTE]
haha i know. but the poll itself is avant-garde
[/QUOTE]
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: July 22 2007 at 13:21
If Gildenlow wailed around and made crazy noises and death metal growls at random, this poll would be very different. People make the argument: Patton = versatility, Gildenlow = beauty, or something similar. But just because Gildenlow doesn't do all the crazy stuff that Patton does doesn't mean that he can't, so I think the versatility argument is bunk until proven otherwise. Patton can also sing (semi-)beautifully, but nowhere near the quality of Gildenlow. Because the artists are so completely different, it's hard to even compare, and therefore, I'm basically just going on musical preference. In that area Pain of Salvation kicks the crap out of Mr. Bungle/etc., IMO.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: July 22 2007 at 13:39
stonebeard wrote:
If Gildenlow wailed around and made crazy noises and death metal growls at random, this poll would be very different. People make the argument: Patton = versatility, Gildenlow = beauty, or something similar. But just because Gildenlow doesn't do all the crazy stuff that Patton does doesn't mean that he can't, so I think the versatility argument is bunk until proven otherwise. Patton can also sing (semi-)beautifully, but nowhere near the quality of Gildenlow. Because the artists are so completely different, it's hard to even compare, and therefore, I'm basically just going on musical preference. In that area Pain of Salvation kicks the crap out of Mr. Bungle/etc., IMO.
|
Essentially you're saying: I don't like Avant-Prog.
Patton is an outstanding vocalist who managed to do things with his voice that *nobody* did before. Like it or not, he is truly exceptional ... while Gildenlöw is "just" extremely good.
------------- https://awesomeprog.com/release-polls/pa" rel="nofollow - Release Polls
Listened to:
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: July 22 2007 at 15:10
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
Essentially you're saying: I don't like Avant-Prog.
|
Not necessarily. For example, I like Univers Zero. I'm just not the biggest fan of ADD music like Disco Volante. 
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: Man With Hat
Date Posted: July 23 2007 at 00:07
Patton.
Both are fantastic though.
------------- Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
|
Posted By: MusicForSpeedin
Date Posted: July 23 2007 at 00:13
When I listen to patton I will sometimes laugh because I am so amazed. No other singer has made me do that.
|
Posted By: Proletariat
Date Posted: July 23 2007 at 00:31
stonebeard wrote:
Gildenlow.
Patton sucks at everything. 
|
Gildenlow sucks at evrything.
------------- who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
|
Posted By: StarBreaker
Date Posted: July 23 2007 at 00:35
Gildenlow is the better composer, no doubt about that, but there ain't any other human being who masters so many different singing styles and performs them as well as Patton. So Patton gets my vote.
|
Posted By: moreitsythanyou
Date Posted: July 23 2007 at 00:39
Alas...two of modern prog's most overrated vocalists.
Patton is creative and original. Gildenlow can BE (pun) but I just prefer Patton's body of work.
-------------
<font color=white>butts, lol[/COLOR]
|
Posted By: Firefly
Date Posted: July 23 2007 at 06:40
I think I'd have a tougher time chosing between Patton an Åkerfeldt, even though they sound nothing alike.
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: July 23 2007 at 13:51
Gildenlow as a song writer and composer and musician....and lyricist...
But the poll is about SINGERS.... so, in that respect, patton beats the swede...
PATTON.
-------------
|
Posted By: king_pin
Date Posted: April 15 2008 at 08:20
damn this is tough!
they are both an inspiration for me...
i voted Gildenlow
------------- nou... mag ik het niet nog een keertje overdoen?
|
Posted By: crimhead
Date Posted: April 15 2008 at 12:39
Patton. Incredible live show.
|
Posted By: BroSpence
Date Posted: April 16 2008 at 00:44
Posted By: 1800iareyay
Date Posted: April 16 2008 at 01:01
stonebeard wrote:
Gildenlow.
Patton sucks at everything. 
|
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9147920327049124680&q=faith+no+more+be+aggressive&total=112&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=2 - And swallows
|
Posted By: Avantgardehead
Date Posted: April 16 2008 at 04:34
Mike Patton annoys the hell out of me...
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Avantgardian
|
Posted By: keiser willhelm
Date Posted: April 16 2008 at 04:46
as much as i love daniel gildenlowe, Mike Patton is absolutely incredible. he blows my mind. and the guy is hilarious. gildenlowe kinda takes himself too seriously.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/KeiserWillhelm" rel="nofollow - What im listening to
|
Posted By: karakatoa
Date Posted: May 04 2008 at 09:02
patton for me ,i found POS singer too similar to patton.like a copy
|
|