Print Page | Close Window

This Band Choose to be Unsigned

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Unsigned Bands
Forum Discription: For new prog bands with no official releases
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84007
Printed Date: September 23 2014 at 09:20
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.69 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: This Band Choose to be Unsigned
Posted By: powerjuggler
Subject: This Band Choose to be Unsigned
Date Posted: January 06 2012 at 21:25
This band are not interested in being signed, they realise that the music biz is all bollocks and all their future releases are free to download, no pressure, they are not beholding to a record company, a debt, or a self proposed obligation.
http://youtu.be/ZmE86jfqFaI" rel="nofollow -
[TUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZmE86jfqFaI[/TUBE]



Replies:
Posted By: Andy Webb
Date Posted: January 06 2012 at 21:27
But what band is it? Wink

-------------
Formerly Andyman1125
http://ow.ly/8ymqg" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: powerjuggler
Date Posted: January 06 2012 at 21:28
Sorry but how do you post Youtube links?


Posted By: powerjuggler
Date Posted: January 06 2012 at 21:29
I'm trying to figure it out?? But it don't seem to be a working for me


Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: January 06 2012 at 21:36
[ tube ]<insert youtube link>[ /tube ] without spaces between the brackets

-------------


Posted By: Horizons
Date Posted: January 06 2012 at 21:36
add [tube ] and [/tube] on the sides of the link.

such as... 

[tube ]ehrgedhrfgfrg[/tube ] 
make sure its normal text or it doesnt work, atleast for me


-------------


Posted By: powerjuggler
Date Posted: January 06 2012 at 21:40
Finally worked out the youtube configuration needed, you now need to input the long link as opposed to new short link anyway I'll get back to the spin

This band are not interested in being signed, they realise that the music biz is all bollocks and all their future releases are free to download, no pressure, they are not beholding to a record company, a debt, or a self proposed obligation.
Perhaps there should be a section on this forum for bands to promote themselves that don't wish to suck up to record companies?

[TUBE]ZmE86jfqFaI[/TUBE]


free to download at http://www.kingbathmat.com" rel="nofollow - http://www.kingbathmat.com
and on facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kingbathmat/193387497344923" rel="nofollow - http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kingbathmat/193387497344923


Posted By: Andy Webb
Date Posted: January 06 2012 at 21:44
Originally posted by Horizons

add [tube ] and [/tube] on the sides of the link.

such as... 

[tube ]ehrgedhrfgfrg[/tube ] 
make sure its normal text or it doesnt work, atleast for me

The BBCode doesn't understand the hyperlink that Chrome automatically makes urls, that's why. Firefox and IE don't do that, to the best of my knowledge. 


-------------
Formerly Andyman1125
http://ow.ly/8ymqg" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: powerjuggler
Date Posted: January 06 2012 at 22:14
If a band does not wish to be signed by a record company then they cannot be classified as unsigned as they have not attempted to engage a records company interest. This should invalidate them from being inflicted with the category of being an unsigned band. A category which seems to be seen as derogatory as opposed to signed bands.


Posted By: DamoXt7942
Date Posted: January 07 2012 at 00:15
http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=1629" rel="nofollow - This project ?

-------------
http://www.facebook.com/damoxt7942" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: powerjuggler
Date Posted: January 07 2012 at 07:33
Yes this is the same band, never signed to a label, apart from our own, all albums have been self released. But it is not financially viable so until it is all songs will be released as downloads only.


Posted By: Hyperprisms
Date Posted: January 08 2012 at 07:28
Originally posted by powerjuggler

If a band does not wish to be signed by a record company then they cannot be classified as unsigned as they have not attempted to engage a records company interest. This should invalidate them from being inflicted with the category of being an unsigned band. A category which seems to be seen as derogatory as opposed to signed bands.
"Independent" is a better word than unsigned. (but of course then you have to deal with people who think "indy" is a genre)   :)

-------------






Posted By: bensommer
Date Posted: January 08 2012 at 20:44
+1 ditto.

I was ALMOST insulted once, then twice when my albums were reviewed by the guys over at http://beardrock.com/artists/ben-sommer" rel="nofollow - BeardRock.com in the "Stubble" (aka unsigned) category.

Like Geddy says: If you choose not to decide [which label you'll whore yourself to] you still have made a choice! 


-------------
http://bensommermusic.com" rel="nofollow">



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.69 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz - http://www.webwiz.co.uk