Print Page | Close Window

Young People Relieved They Don't Have to Own Music

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: General Music Discussions
Forum Description: Discuss and create polls about all types of music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=87702
Printed Date: May 14 2025 at 17:36
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Young People Relieved They Don't Have to Own Music
Posted By: darkshade
Subject: Young People Relieved They Don't Have to Own Music
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 10:16
http://us.cnn.com/2012/06/15/tech/web/music-streaming/index.html?hpt=hp_bn5" rel="nofollow - http://us.cnn.com/2012/06/15/tech/web/music-streaming/index.html?hpt=hp_bn5

Some highlights:

Quote "Ninety percent of my friends stream music. To be honest, I haven't seen someone use iTunes in a really long time."  "streaming will be the norm. It's more practical and more convenient than buying music and uploading it onto something. And the best part is, it's free."



Quote "There is a certain relief with not having to own music. It is a lot of work,"



Quote

DiCola believes that music consumers' transition to a full streaming model will be a lot slower than people think.

"Old media sticks around," he said. "FM radio is still around, and just because tech is new doesn't mean it is better in all dimensions." He cited vehicles as one area where streaming music will be slow to gain a foothold.

"Think of Napster," he said. "When it came out people were saying the record labels would disappear, but they didn't."



-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm




Replies:
Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 10:19
Damn, it is a lot of work.  What have I done with my life?

-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 10:24
I know. Punching in credit card numbers on Amazon and waiting 2 weeks to receive a CD while never getting off my chair is a lot of work. I guess unwrapping the case is a lot of work, especially the sticker at the top.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 10:31
Quote He believes the cloud model is where the state of music is heading, and for many people ownership is not essential.


No no no no no no no...



NO!!




-------------

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012


Posted By: tarkus1980
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 10:37
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

I know. Punching in credit card numbers on Amazon and waiting 2 weeks to receive a CD while never getting off my chair is a lot of work. I guess unwrapping the case is a lot of work, especially the sticker at the top.



You're waiting 2 weeks? Get Amazon Prime already!


-------------
"History of Rock Written by the Losers."


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 10:51
Originally posted by tarkus1980 tarkus1980 wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

I know. Punching in credit card numbers on Amazon and waiting 2 weeks to receive a CD while never getting off my chair is a lot of work. I guess unwrapping the case is a lot of work, especially the sticker at the top.



You're waiting 2 weeks?


No, I just used a general amount of time, but regardless; how long I wait for a physical copy is off-topic.


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 11:14
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:




Quote "There is a certain relief with not having to own music. It is a lot of work,"




God, I lived to buy albums, still II love to go on search safaris, it's relaxing and rewarding, maybe using their index finger to search in a bunch of albums gets them exhausted..This is BS.

The system controls people more and more each day, now they are told what to like.

We are doomed as a civilization.

Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Ambient Hurricanes
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 11:30
I don't see what I should be getting so outraged about.  It's unfortunate, I know, that streaming makes it more difficult for artists to make money.  The comment about it being "a lot of work" to own music is pretty silly, but that doesn't change that it takes a lot of money to buy all of the music you like.  Most young people don't have a whole lot of money, especially college students who have to balance school with a part-time job, and pay for their education at the same time.  They're not doing anything illegal or morally wrong, so why should we be angry with them for streaming music?  We can lament these changes in the music industry all we want but in the end, there's no one to blame, no one to be angry at, and no way to change things, so artists and record companies are just going to have to figure out how to adapt.

-------------
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 11:47
^ No one said you had to get angry or outraged at anything. Just bringing this "issue" to light for discussion. It's just interesting that my generation sees it OK to not have to spend money on music if they don't have to. That attitude will be applied to more than just music if they ever see the opportunity arise.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 11:50
Part of the "work" involved in owning music is boxing it up and moving it.  I know a couple of times I've cursed myself when I had to move to a new house.  CDs and records are heavy in large numbers.

-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 11:56
If you read the full article, you'd see that many people don't even download music from iTunes or Amazon anymore, so it's not even completely about the "hard work" of acquiring CDs, ripping them to a computer, storing them, etc. People are just as satisfied to stream it for free and have zero ownership of the music, whether in physical form or digital form.

I say, more power to them, I'm sure the majority of people doing this are not people like us, or most music fans. It's probably people that listen to mainstream stuff ("whatever's on the radio") that probably makes its money tenfold over the "good" music anyway.


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: TheGazzardian
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 11:57
Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

Part of the "work" involved in owning music is boxing it up and moving it.  I know a couple of times I've cursed myself when I had to move to a new house.  CDs and records are heavy in large numbers.

This is true, when I moved last time, the CDs were the heaviest part ... and then re-shelving them all was a huge PITA, especially because of course if I'm going to reshelve them, may as well reorganised them. I'm not looking forward to moving again, my collection has grown quite significantly since then...

As far as streaming goes, I have no problems with it for the most part, I do it myself, it's nice and convenient, especially for checking out new music. I'm still stuck in my ways and end up trying to buy whatever I can that I end up liking.


Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 12:01
Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

Part of the "work" involved in owning music is boxing it up and moving it.  I know a couple of times I've cursed myself when I had to move to a new house.  CDs and records are heavy in large numbers.

That's why I ultimately ditched all the plastic and put all my CDs into sleeves.  Space is at a premium at my house and the physical CDs in cases were just taking up too much room.  In any case, I have them all ripped, so it's pretty much storage.

On-topic:  whether CDs or a downloaded file, I still actually want a copy resident on my own machines.


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 12:04
Ive said stuff like this before: what if Spotify, Pandora, or cloud storage shut down for whatever reason, never to return (or started charging $499.99 for usage). Now you have no music, and have to buy (or illegallly obtain) music, from scratch.

Many responses are "Those things aren't going to shut down". My response, "You don't know that!"


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 12:20
Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

money, especially college students who have to balance school with a part-time job, and pay for their education at the same time.

We were young and had no money also, but even worst, we didn't have downloads  or samples, we bought the albums almost blindly, for God's sake in my country we didn't even had Prog albums, we had to get them from other countries...But that was what made us appreciate music.

People always wanted music for free, I was watching the Isle Of Wight (The Who) Blue-ray and people broke the barriers to get music for free, there was a guy who shouted that they didn't wanted to feed the artists, that music was for people and had to be free, that he didn't wanted artists who had to be paid.

Of course they were repressed...Today they make free downloading illegal, but give free streaming of full albums...I simply don't get it.

Kids today don't even want to choose what they want to listen, they allow others to decide for them, this seems absurd for me.

Maybe I'm a bitter old fart, but I always believed artists have to eat, and that's their career, they have to be paid, and if you don't enjoy music enough to go to a store and find the album you want...Well, you don't care for music at all.

Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 12:44

Clap Well said Iván Clap



-------------
What?


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 12:46
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

Ive said stuff like this before: what if Spotify, Pandora, or cloud storage shut down for whatever reason, never to return (or started charging $499.99 for usage). Now you have no music, and have to buy (or illegallly obtain) music, from scratch.

Many responses are "Those things aren't going to shut down". My response, "You don't know that!"
Hopefully one day people will wake up to the realisation that "the cloud" is one huge rip-off - doesn't anyone get it that when Microsoft, Apple and Amazon are pushing something as the latest must-have it's going to be the last thing on earth than anyone should have. Welcome to the clod.

-------------
What?


Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 12:50
I don't know what the cloud is.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: smartpatrol
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 12:53
Owning music is hard? What the f**k? If you think owning music is hard, then you're the laziest ass person I've met!

-------------
http://bit.ly/1kqTR8y" rel="nofollow">

The greatest record label of all time!


Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 12:55
It's apparently a generational thing.

I spend 7+ years downloading music and accumulating a library on my hard drive. I recently reformatted and deleted all of it. For 99% of my music, I use Spotify, and I love the model. It certainly beats buying a physical CD.

If they decided to raise the barrier to use it (ie raise price), then all the people who pirate and have stopped (mostly) because of this service, will start again.

The bottom line is the old model is COMPLETELY DEAD. Whatever replaces it, it will be on the internet.


_____________________________


Re: "Generational thing"

I mean this in a broader sense, too. Some older people (my parents/grandparents, Congressman, newspeople, etc.) don't get how much the Internet means to my generation. They think it is just another source of information, or a time waster most often. Nope. It is THE source of news, culture, political ideas, and media. This is why people my age can be defensive as hell about regulation of it. What I see is busybodies in Congress and international bodies trying to regulate a socio-cultural equalizer, and holding onto the past when the future is knocking at the door. Don't like it? Fall by the wayside, IMO. But the resentment that comes from older folks struggling to hold back the rapid progression of technology is tiresome to me, at best.


-------------
http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 13:01
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

I don't know what the cloud is.
Basically it's the Internet. Actually Cloud Computing means using Servers and Service Providers to do storage and processing of data where the medium used is the Internet (hence "The Cloud"). What that means is you no longer hold the data or any software on your PC, and more importantly, you don't own any of it. This gets around all the issues of pirate software, pirate music and video - because now rather than sell you a copy of PhotoShop or Justin Bieber's Greatest Hit you borrow it - at the moment that's appears to be for free because the need to hook-in the concept with the public, especially the young who will be the largest consumer group, but in time they will charge for it, either by subscription or bandwidth surcharges or pay-per-view.

-------------
What?


Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 13:03
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

I don't know what the cloud is.
Basically it's the Internet. Actually Cloud Computing means using Servers and Service Providers to do storage and processing of data where the medium used is the Internet (hence "The Cloud"). What that means is you no longer hold the data or any software on your PC, and more importantly, you don't own any of it. This gets around all the issues of pirate software, pirate music and video - because now rather than sell you a copy of PhotoShop or Justin Bieber's Greatest Hit you borrow it - at the moment that's appears to be for free because the need to hook-in the concept with the public, especially the young who will be the largest consumer group, but in time they will charge for it, either by subscription or bandwidth surcharges or pay-per-view.

So it is the internet, but only in a certain way it is used? I can still call the internet, the internet?


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 13:07
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:


So it is the internet, but only in a certain way it is used? I can still call the internet, the internet?
Until Microsoft, Apple and Amazon hold so much of your data that they essentially "own" the Internet, then you'll have to call it The Cloud, the iCloud or Amazon EC2 Wink

-------------
What?


Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 13:10
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:


So it is the internet, but only in a certain way it is used? I can still call the internet, the internet?
Until Microsoft, Apple and Amazon hold so much of your data that they essentially "own" the Internet, then you'll have to call it The Cloud, the iCloud or Amazon EC2 Wink

I don't know the EULA of all these services, but Apple got so much flak for having a clause about owning works uploaded with their book service, that I don't think companies "owning" original works is currently a thing. Soundcloud doesn't known original works uploaded to it, for instance.


-------------
http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 13:16
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:


So it is the internet, but only in a certain way it is used? I can still call the internet, the internet?
Until Microsoft, Apple and Amazon hold so much of your data that they essentially "own" the Internet, then you'll have to call it The Cloud, the iCloud or Amazon EC2 Wink

I don't know the EULA of all these services, but Apple got so much flak for having a clause about owning works uploaded with their book service, that I don't think companies "owning" original works is currently a thing. Soundcloud doesn't known original works uploaded to it, for instance.
That's the current situation because we currently hold so much of this data locally that "uploading" to the Cloud is the norm - I'm crystal-ball gazing here and looking at the time when uploads will be nonexistant and our local harddrives will be empty - if you cannot download the data (because it's streamed) and you cannot buy hardcopy, then there will be nothing to upload. and EULA's will then be "licence to stream" and nothing else, even for music, images, video and manuscripts you've "made" yourself, because youwould have made them "in the cloud" and not locally on your PC or DAW or whatever.
 


-------------
What?


Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 13:19
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:


So it is the internet, but only in a certain way it is used? I can still call the internet, the internet?
Until Microsoft, Apple and Amazon hold so much of your data that they essentially "own" the Internet, then you'll have to call it The Cloud, the iCloud or Amazon EC2 Wink

I don't know the EULA of all these services, but Apple got so much flak for having a clause about owning works uploaded with their book service, that I don't think companies "owning" original works is currently a thing. Soundcloud doesn't known original works uploaded to it, for instance.
That's the current situation because we currently hold so much of this data locally that "uploading" to the Cloud is the norm - I'm crystal-ball gazing here and looking at the time when uploads will be nonexistant and our local harddrives will be empty - if you cannot download the data (because it's streamed) and you cannot buy hardcopy, then there will be nothing to upload. and EULA's will then be "licence to stream" and nothing else, even for music, images, video and manuscripts you've "made" yourself, because youwould have made them "in the cloud" and not locally on your PC or DAW or whatever.
 

That's some pretty intense crystal-balling. I'm not sure how far off I can even see local hard drives and isolated services not being around. I think for professionals, having secure info only they can see will always be in demand. And If EULAs don't take that into account there will always be other options.


-------------
http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 13:22
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:


So it is the internet, but only in a certain way it is used? I can still call the internet, the internet?
Until Microsoft, Apple and Amazon hold so much of your data that they essentially "own" the Internet, then you'll have to call it The Cloud, the iCloud or Amazon EC2 Wink

I don't know the EULA of all these services, but Apple got so much flak for having a clause about owning works uploaded with their book service, that I don't think companies "owning" original works is currently a thing. Soundcloud doesn't known original works uploaded to it, for instance.
That's the current situation because we currently hold so much of this data locally that "uploading" to the Cloud is the norm - I'm crystal-ball gazing here and looking at the time when uploads will be nonexistant and our local harddrives will be empty - if you cannot download the data (because it's streamed) and you cannot buy hardcopy, then there will be nothing to upload. and EULA's will then be "licence to stream" and nothing else, even for music, images, video and manuscripts you've "made" yourself, because youwould have made them "in the cloud" and not locally on your PC or DAW or whatever.
 

That's some pretty intense crystal-balling. I'm not sure how far off I can even see local hard drives and isolated services not being around. I think for professionals, having secure info only they can see will always be in demand. And If EULAs don't take that into account there will always be other options.
Sure, but it's the masses that will determine the nature of the commerce that will be done in the future, as we are seeing in the examples in the OP and through Facebook etc.., not what a few professionals will be doing. The golden rule will always be: follow the money.

-------------
What?


Posted By: Man With Hat
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 13:47
I like owning music. Does this mean I'm old? Ouch

-------------
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.


Posted By: smartpatrol
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 13:50
Originally posted by Man With Hat Man With Hat wrote:

I like owning music. Does this mean I'm old? Ouch
 
I do too and I'm 12, so no


-------------
http://bit.ly/1kqTR8y" rel="nofollow">

The greatest record label of all time!


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 13:56
I, too, like owning music. I don't HAVE to be online to listen to it.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 13:59
I do too, but I must say that at times I feel silly paying money for something that it seems everyone else gets for "Free".

-------------


Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 14:03
It's a little like the difference between being the curator of a museum and being a daily visitor to the museum.  Either person can look at the dinosaur bones any time they want, but I like to think the curator gets a *little* more out of the experience.

-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: gazagod
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 14:23
after recently seeing some interviews with devin townsend and toby driver, plus chatting with mj from thinking plague... 

I think future revenue for 'underground' to 'well known'  non-mainstream artists will probably rely on 'special editions' and kickstarter-type campaigns... I was recently told that dloads don't equal near what a trad cd sale would, though I was thinking it was the opposite... I guess it depends on the venue... amazon vs bandcamp perhaps(though i dont know what bandcamp takes as a %)... I preferred dloads(for affordability and space), personally, but this has made me rethink my purchases... basically, cutting back(i don't have much to spend anyway-as opposed to 10 years ago) and only buying the cds or lps of artists I really appreciate... not to mention avoiding the 'used' sales, because obviously the artist isn't getting a cent... I was also recently apprised that the streaming services basically pay the artists zilch... not a good deal... for them, anyway... there is so much crap out there.. we need to support the relevant musicians somehow.. even if it's a donation so they can get some software/equipment to record or for whatever other reason.... toby driver's got a kickstarter that i think is still ongoing.. not a big fan of the project, but i funded it anyway, because i've enjoyed the cds i've had from him over the years... same goes for devin townsend... i'll probably save some money to buy his new (live)boxset even though i have all the albums already




-------------
we only know that we do not know


Posted By: AlexDOM
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 14:53
Originally posted by Man With Hat Man With Hat wrote:

I like owning music. Does this mean I'm old? Ouch

I'm 19 and I love owning music and recently I've jumped into the world of vinyl and love it. I'm huge into the physicality which always beats an audio file or streaming song any day. Nothing beats the actual physicality of music. I admit though I have quite a few mp3 albums and songs bought or downloaded from like the band's site or record label.

And yes I want to give my money to artists that's their vocation just like any other job. My favorite artist Neal Morse, I order almost 100% of his stuff direct from his record site so he gets 100% profit. I want the man to keep making amazing music so I support him. This can be applied to any favorite artist.


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:07
In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:09
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.


-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:11
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.


Oh yea, that's pretty bad too, forgot about those.

Wait, aren't you like 4 years older than me?


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:16
That's like a 28 year difference in Dog Years.

-------------


Posted By: gazagod
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:19
Angry
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.

DeadClap

don't those things hurt your ears(not YOU-general ya'll!)  I tried those earplug/bud things one time and my right ear felt sore for a couple of days afterwards... and yes, when i was a kid we had tape and cd 'walkman's... and they were also bad for your longterm hearing.. though, not as bad as a night in a 110 db club... I have comfortably used some dj/quality fullcoverage headphones without too much discomfort(used to play some club musics)... but anything you are sticking in your ear can't be very healthy/longterm, at least


-------------
we only know that we do not know


Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:22
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.


Oh yea, that's pretty bad too, forgot about those.

Wait, aren't you like 4 years older than me?


I'll be 29 in August, but I was never raised to have earbuds in my ears 12 hours a day (including at the supper table) while texting someone and not paying attention to where I am going.  Because of user-friendly technology being updated at the rate it has in the last 30 years, there is a world of difference between people who mostly grew up in the 80s and people who mostly grew up in the 90s.

Know how many text messages I've sent in my life?  Four.


-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:24
I have giant iHome studio style headphones, they're very comfortable, have a lot of bass in their sound, and I can't believe I used to (for a short time) use the iPod ear buds. Not to mention those little things never sat right in my left ear, it always slipped out.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: smartpatrol
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:24
I buy CDs alot (and sometimes Records, Tpes, and MP3s). But I also listen to a ton of music online.

-------------
http://bit.ly/1kqTR8y" rel="nofollow">

The greatest record label of all time!


Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:29
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.


Oh yea, that's pretty bad too, forgot about those.

Wait, aren't you like 4 years older than me?


I'll be 29 in August, but I was never raised to have earbuds in my ears 12 hours a day (including at the supper table) while texting someone and not paying attention to where I am going.  Because of user-friendly technology being updated at the rate it has in the last 30 years, there is a world of difference between people who mostly grew up in the 80s and people who mostly grew up in the 90s.

Know how many text messages I've sent in my life?  Four.
Once your kids start texting you are going to have to start or you will be left out of their lives.  So you probably have until 4th or 5th grade.  Isn't that about the time these days when kids have to have their own cell phones. Confused

-------------


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:31
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.


Oh yea, that's pretty bad too, forgot about those.

Wait, aren't you like 4 years older than me?


I'll be 29 in August, but I was never raised to have earbuds in my ears 12 hours a day (including at the supper table) while texting someone and not paying attention to where I am going.  Because of user-friendly technology being updated at the rate it has in the last 30 years, there is a world of difference between people who mostly grew up in the 80s and people who mostly grew up in the 90s.

Know how many text messages I've sent in my life?  Four.


I'm sorry, but my immediate age group (anyone born around 1986-1988) kind of grew up with all this new technology, which was only truly relevant in the last 10 years. What I'm saying is, I remember the "old-world" way of things, we had a computer in my house by 1997, but I wasn't allowed to use it much back then. mp3 players were still a joke when I was still in high school, the iPod thing happened while I was going into my senior year of high school, which is also the first year I ever got a cell phone (but couldn't text, and I don't think cell phones had internet access yet at that point), and I didn't have my own computer until I was in college. I still take my hat and shoes off at the door, and leave my cellphone and headphones in my room when I eat dinner with my family (though we're guilty of sometimes having the TV on during dinner, but that's a whole 'nother discussion for another thread).

It's my brother and sister's age group (born mid-late 1990s) that do not know a world without cell phones, computers, internet, iPods, and they look at CDs the way I used to look at cassettes when I was in 8th grade. Anyone born between 1990 and 1995 have a sort of mixed view point, they weren't old enough to appreciate the "old ways", and were young enough to latch onto the "new ways" and these are the people that are constantly on facebook on their phones while in social settings, or constantly have ear buds in their ears during job interviews (exaggeration).


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:35
Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.


Oh yea, that's pretty bad too, forgot about those.

Wait, aren't you like 4 years older than me?


I'll be 29 in August, but I was never raised to have earbuds in my ears 12 hours a day (including at the supper table) while texting someone and not paying attention to where I am going.  Because of user-friendly technology being updated at the rate it has in the last 30 years, there is a world of difference between people who mostly grew up in the 80s and people who mostly grew up in the 90s.

Know how many text messages I've sent in my life?  Four.
Once your kids start texting you are going to have to start or you will be left out of their lives.  So you probably have until 4th or 5th grade.  Isn't that about the time these days when kids have to have their own cell phones. Confused


Ah, but you see, I have this ace up my sleeve called "Dad says no."  My kids won't have cell phones until they are teenagers, and even then they can borrow ours (yes, my wife and I share one phone).

And I'll bet that by the time Simon and Abigail and Ephraim are teenagers, science will have given us telepathy.  Geek


-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:39
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.


Oh yea, that's pretty bad too, forgot about those.

Wait, aren't you like 4 years older than me?


I'll be 29 in August, but I was never raised to have earbuds in my ears 12 hours a day (including at the supper table) while texting someone and not paying attention to where I am going.  Because of user-friendly technology being updated at the rate it has in the last 30 years, there is a world of difference between people who mostly grew up in the 80s and people who mostly grew up in the 90s.

Know how many text messages I've sent in my life?  Four.
Once your kids start texting you are going to have to start or you will be left out of their lives.  So you probably have until 4th or 5th grade.  Isn't that about the time these days when kids have to have their own cell phones. Confused


Ah, but you see, I have this ace up my sleeve called "Dad says no."  My kids won't have cell phones until they are teenagers, and even then they can borrow ours (yes, my wife and I share one phone).

And I'll bet that by the time Simon and Abigail and Ephraim are teenagers, science will have given us telepathy.  Geek
No daddy can resist this.  http://www.flickr.com/photos/queenofspain/6998504521/" rel="nofollow - http://www.flickr.com/photos/queenofspain/6998504521/  LOL

-------------


Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:42
but daddy i want it now - iwantitnow

-------------


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:44
^ Totally.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:47
I can resist that, no prob.  I just turn into Robot Dad.

-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 15:48
Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

but daddy i want it now - iwantitnow


http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4j3o8PVZP1r0r51z.jpg



-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 16:00


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 16:01
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.
That and this.
 
http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3pkb52/" rel="nofollow">Socially Awesome Awkward Penguin


-------------


Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 16:13
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:



See, I'm of the generation that doesn't mind being trite if it gets the point across.  Wink


-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 16:18
Well, I just like to joke around a lot.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 16:21
Guys, lets not worry about all this. On December 21, 2012, the sun will send out a massive solar flare towards the Earth that will wipe out all satellites and other means of electronic communication, thus, knocking out the internet, and people will have to resort to **GASP** buying CDs again!

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: TheGazzardian
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 16:24
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.

I know! It drives me nuts. I use earbuds sometimes (when in transit, because they are easy to carry around, and occasionally in bed if I need music to help me sleep, because they are easy to wear while lying down + then my wife doesn't have to deal with my music). But with those, and with headphones, I keep the volume DOWN...but I've known people where if I was sitting next to them, and we were both wearing headphones, I can't hear my music over theirs. And I've expressed my concern to them but they don't do anything to change. I just don't -get- it. If you like music, wouldn't you want to protect your hearing?????????!?


Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 16:30
If we want music fetishists to stick with physical media, we're going to have to come up with something  that has a bigger hole in the middle.  LPs > Cassettes > CDs >> ??

-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 17:09
I read this article last week sometime......I made a comment on another forum I was not surprised by the content. It 100% goes hand-hand with the whole Facebook mentality.
Lets not go to the store and buy a card, sign it and give it to our friend or family member on their birthday......Rather go online and post some common comment for all to see you acknowledged a life event....and don't forget the double colon and right side parenthesis marks, to help make it more original.
 
Laziness is what I call it....owning music is work? Really give me a break.
 
Let those lazy young people do what they want...just stay out of my record stores, you are not worthy.
 
I don't consider myself old, but at 49 I am sure that is the case since I buy physical music media. So if I am old, then you (young people) are lazy.
 
As Ivan states....we are doomed


-------------


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 17:35
It's like, you know, just so, like, haaaaard. Cry

In a way, streaming is just the new radio.  Listening to music you don't own is nothing new.  Some people are just casual listeners and the more serious listeners give a damn about the musicians they like being able to make a living.  I think the serious listener is always going to want to collect at least a few hard copies, particularly if it's a nice package.  Hard copies will never become obsolete, but the increased avenues of accessibility are not a bad thing until the happy fun cloud takes over the world and destroys us all.


-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 17:42
Actually, when you have a music collection like mine (23,000 albums) it is a lot of work. A lot of work. Gathering all that together and organising it and so on takes a lot of time and energy.
 
If I could have simply streamed any of it out of the air without any effort, I would have. Who wouldn't?
 
This thread is just whinging.


Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 17:45
Originally posted by TheGazzardian TheGazzardian wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.

I know! It drives me nuts. I use earbuds sometimes (when in transit, because they are easy to carry around, and occasionally in bed if I need music to help me sleep, because they are easy to wear while lying down + then my wife doesn't have to deal with my music). But with those, and with headphones, I keep the volume DOWN...but I've known people where if I was sitting next to them, and we were both wearing headphones, I can't hear my music over theirs. And I've expressed my concern to them but they don't do anything to change. I just don't -get- it. If you like music, wouldn't you want to protect your hearing?????????!?


For this generation, music isn't something to love- it's a barrier for the outside world and a way to discourage thought. 


-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 17:47
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

Actually, when you have a music collection like mine (23,000 albums) it is a lot of work. A lot of work. Gathering all that together and organising it and so on takes a lot of time and energy.
 
If I could have simply streamed any of it out of the air without any effort, I would have. Who wouldn't?
 
This thread is just whinging.

How in the hell do you even listen to 23,000 albums? LOL  It's about a two year cycle for me to get through my collection which passed the 1500 mark last year.

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 17:49
Slarti: I don't. My collection is an artefact for the ages rather than something for me to listen to.
 
Which upon my death will be promptly mothballed and never noticed by anyone.


Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 17:53
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

Actually, when you have a music collection like mine (23,000 albums) it is a lot of work. A lot of work. Gathering all that together and organising it and so on takes a lot of time and energy.
 
If I could have simply streamed any of it out of the air without any effort, I would have. Who wouldn't?
 
This thread is just whinging.
 
Quoted for truth.
 
Actually reposting because I think this is a key point that needs to be made, but will be lost at the end of the previous page.


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 17:57
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

It's like, you know, just so, like, haaaaard. Cry

In a way, streaming is just the new radio.  Listening to music you don't own is nothing new.  Some people are just casual listeners and the more serious listeners give a damn about the musicians they like being able to make a living.  I think the serious listener is always going to want to collect at least a few hard copies, particularly if it's a nice package.  Hard copies will never become obsolete, but the increased avenues of accessibility are not a bad thing until the happy fun cloud takes over the world and destroys us all.
 
Very true Slarti.....it is the "new" FM radio. The problem is now you can make playlists and have the same music available at a push of a button on your phone. With old fashioned FM radio, your still at the mercy of the digital DJ.....I have a warm feeling in my heart knowing I have paid for my music, at least I have something to show for it.
 
Friends and family like to come over and flip thru vinyl and CD cases.......guess I am old skool and I am fine with that.


-------------


Posted By: AlexDOM
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 20:38
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by TheGazzardian TheGazzardian wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

In regards to most media going digital (books, magazines, CDs, etc...) the thing with music is it's different because when you stream (and download? I don't usually download), the quality is lower than if you bought the physical copy. I also realize many people kind of don't care about the quality of "how" they're listening to their music, such as the kinds of speakers they use and such. 95% of the time I'm with anyone in my generation and music is being played, it's through a cell phone Dead or tiny laptop speakers with awful sound quality Pinch.


Earbuds.  Loud.

Your generation will be hearing impaired in the next decade.

I know! It drives me nuts. I use earbuds sometimes (when in transit, because they are easy to carry around, and occasionally in bed if I need music to help me sleep, because they are easy to wear while lying down + then my wife doesn't have to deal with my music). But with those, and with headphones, I keep the volume DOWN...but I've known people where if I was sitting next to them, and we were both wearing headphones, I can't hear my music over theirs. And I've expressed my concern to them but they don't do anything to change. I just don't -get- it. If you like music, wouldn't you want to protect your hearing?????????!?


For this generation, music isn't something to love- it's a barrier for the outside world and a way to discourage thought. 

I have a confession  to make. I love blaring and blasting music, but an overwhelming portion of it is prog in all its forms. I mean come on Supper's Ready 9/8 time instrumental passage rocks blaring out (or DT's heavy songs) of my car or stereo system. I do however hate earbuds with a passion especially with an ipod playing horrendous quality mp3s. My ears want to bleed because it sounds so bad. I have these awesome sound cancelling headphones that has wonderful sound quality combined with my customized equalizer on my sony walkman media player. Yes i do listen to them loudly too, and the spillage is bad sadly so people will hear me. 


Posted By: Ambient Hurricanes
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 20:44
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

money, especially college students who have to balance school with a part-time job, and pay for their education at the same time.

We were young and had no money also, but even worst, we didn't have downloads  or samples, we bought the albums almost blindly, for God's sake in my country we didn't even had Prog albums, we had to get them from other countries...But that was what made us appreciate music.

People always wanted music for free, I was watching the Isle Of Wight (The Who) Blue-ray and people broke the barriers to get music for free, there was a guy who shouted that they didn't wanted to feed the artists, that music was for people and had to be free, that he didn't wanted artists who had to be paid.

Of course they were repressed...Today they make free downloading illegal, but give free streaming of full albums...I simply don't get it.

Kids today don't even want to choose what they want to listen, they allow others to decide for them, this seems absurd for me.

Maybe I'm a bitter old fart, but I always believed artists have to eat, and that's their career, they have to be paid, and if you don't enjoy music enough to go to a store and find the album you want...Well, you don't care for music at all.

Iván

So you wouldn't have taken advantage of streaming music you had it when you were young?  If you don't understand why streaming is legal and free downloads are illegal, that's fine, but it doesn't make it wrong or terrible for people to stream music.  They're not stealing and they're not doing anything illegal.  Sites like Grooveshark even sign agreements with artists and record companies so that they can have the right to offer their services.  Slarti hit on a good point when he said that streaming was the new radio.  You could also think of it as an internet library for music.  Do you feel like you're ripping the authors off when you borrow books from the library instead of buying them?

I stream music quite frequently, and I choose what I listen to myself, and I care deeply about music.  Because I care about it, I'm glad that I can get it more easily and that I can actually afford it.  


-------------
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 21:11
Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:


So you wouldn't have taken advantage of streaming music you had it when you were young?  If you don't understand why streaming is legal and free downloads are illegal, that's fine, but it doesn't make it wrong or terrible for people to stream music.  They're not stealing and they're not doing anything illegal.  Sites like Grooveshark even sign agreements with artists and record companies so that they can have the right to offer their services.  Slarti hit on a good point when he said that streaming was the new radio.  You could also think of it as an internet library for music.  Do you feel like you're ripping the authors off when you borrow books from the library instead of buying them?

I stream music quite frequently, and I choose what I listen to myself, and I care deeply about music.  Because I care about it, I'm glad that I can get it more easily and that I can actually afford it.  

Some of us are a different race of people, I would had used stream to see how the album sounds and then buy it, but the pleasure for me is to get a new LP or CD and open it brand new, that instant alone is worth the money i paid, plus of course years of great music

BTW: We had cassettes, and I preferred to pay for the album  even if i had to sacrifice gas money for weekends or the few luxuries I could afford.

I want Prog to survive, and for one site that pays royalties, 300 steal the full albums and even the complete career of an artist, I love Prog, I want it to survive and for that reason i want it to be profitable, music is not for free, music is property of the artist.

But that's not what I don't understand i don't understand people who say "owning music is a problem" I want my CD's to play at my house, on my trips on the plane, anywhere, I hate MP3, money is still a problem for me (I'm not rich), but music it's part of my life, and my records are my pride and joy.

Iván




-------------
            


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 21:12
There's something about buying an album, especially if you bought it blindly, and it winds up being an awesome album. There is no other way to experience that thrill of emotion.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 21:49
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

There's something about buying an album, especially if you bought it blindly, and it winds up being an awesome album. There is no other way to experience that thrill of emotion.
 
That was 50% of my music buying habit growing up......along with buying based on album cover art.


-------------


Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 22:42
Darkshade: There sure is. It's called downloading blindly. I discovered Animal Collective that way (before they blew up with Merriweather Post Pavilion) also Pinback, a few others.


Posted By: CCVP
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 22:46
Inb4 this ends because the music industry found a new way to gain even more money than ad revenue.

-------------


Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 23:03
CCVP: WHAT THE HELL IS YOUR AVATAR


Posted By: CCVP
Date Posted: June 18 2012 at 23:36
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

CCVP: WHAT THE HELL IS YOUR AVATAR

I though it was pretty well-known that people in Japan wore plastic bags filled with water on their heads in their day-to-day lives.


-------------


Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 04:10
 
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



For this generation, music isn't something to love- it's a barrier for the outside world and a way to discourage thought.
Said the fundamentalist Christian.
OH NO HE DIDN'
Seriously though, let's go back to the 70s when there was no thoughtless music just made for a quick buck or anesthetise people to reality. Back then it was all serious art which- well yes there was Diana Ross... oh OK, there was the Carpenters... OK, Three Dog Night but- OK, The Osmonds, Dawn, Barbara Sreisand, Kool & The Gang, BUT THAT'S IT. Oh and The Captain And Tennile and KC & The Sunshine Band and Andy Gibb and oh, I don't know, DISCO! I could name DOZENS more, possibly hundreds if I really tried.
Music which discourages thought has always been prevalent, unless you think Bing Crosby was some sort of cutting edge revolutionary.
And as for it being a barrier to the outside world, it becomes that through love of it and there have ALWAYS, ALWAYS been people who hide in their room with a record instead of going outside and doing something. Now they can at least travel while listening to it, somehow that is more isolated to you.
It's just senseless nostalgia for an imagined ideal past.


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 07:53
Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

CCVP: WHAT THE HELL IS YOUR AVATAR

I though it was pretty well-known that people in Japan wore plastic bags filled with water on their heads in their day-to-day lives.

I thought it was the a member of the Japanese Aqua Teen Hunger Force. LOL


-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 08:06
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

 
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



For this generation, music isn't something to love- it's a barrier for the outside world and a way to discourage thought.
Said the fundamentalist Christian.
OH NO HE DIDN'



That you would explicitly call me a fundamentalist and implicitly call me thoughtless is baffling. 




-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: Ambient Hurricanes
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 10:38
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

 
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



For this generation, music isn't something to love- it's a barrier for the outside world and a way to discourage thought.
Said the fundamentalist Christian.
OH NO HE DIDN'
Seriously though, let's go back to the 70s when there was no thoughtless music just made for a quick buck or anesthetise people to reality. Back then it was all serious art which- well yes there was Diana Ross... oh OK, there was the Carpenters... OK, Three Dog Night but- OK, The Osmonds, Dawn, Barbara Sreisand, Kool & The Gang, BUT THAT'S IT. Oh and The Captain And Tennile and KC & The Sunshine Band and Andy Gibb and oh, I don't know, DISCO! I could name DOZENS more, possibly hundreds if I really tried.
Music which discourages thought has always been prevalent, unless you think Bing Crosby was some sort of cutting edge revolutionary.
And as for it being a barrier to the outside world, it becomes that through love of it and there have ALWAYS, ALWAYS been people who hide in their room with a record instead of going outside and doing something. Now they can at least travel while listening to it, somehow that is more isolated to you.
It's just senseless nostalgia for an imagined ideal past.
 
I don't recall him saying anything about the 70's, just about this generation.  That doesn't imply that there wasn't any thoughtless music made back then. 
 
And the "fundamentalist Christian" comment was off-topic, rude, and unnessecary, besides being a false assumption.  It's one thing to criticize religion on these forums, another entirely to ridicule someone because of their faith.


-------------
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 11:12
An article on the girl who thinks it's ok to import 11,000 songs to her iTunes that she never paid for, musicians who's lives were ruined due to illegal downloading, and a music professor who explains that some things are exaggerated (record companies don't pay their artists) and some things that are false truths (bands don't really make that much on the road).

http://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/letter-to-emily-white-at-npr-all-songs-considered/" rel="nofollow - http://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/letter-to-emily-white-at-npr-all-songs-considered/


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: CCVP
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 12:15
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

CCVP: WHAT THE HELL IS YOUR AVATAR

I though it was pretty well-known that people in Japan wore plastic bags filled with water on their heads in their day-to-day lives.

I thought it was the a member of the Japanese Aqua Teen Hunger Force. LOL

Don't rule that out just yet, Slarti. LOL


-------------


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 12:40
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

An article on the girl who thinks it's ok to import 11,000 songs to her iTunes that she never paid for, musicians who's lives were ruined due to illegal downloading, and a music professor who explains that some things are exaggerated (record companies don't pay their artists) and some things that are false truths (bands don't really make that much on the road).

http://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/letter-to-emily-white-at-npr-all-songs-considered/" rel="nofollow - http://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/letter-to-emily-white-at-npr-all-songs-considered/
Clap Brilliant article.
 
 
Quote Of the 75,000 albums released in 2010 only 2,000 sold more than 5,000 copies. Only 1,000 sold more than 10,000 copies. Without going into details, 10,000 albums is about the point where independent artists begin to go into the black on professional album production, marketing and promotion.
...that's scary - I knew it was something like that, but not quite that bad.


-------------
What?


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 13:26
^ That is a fantastic article for sure.....WOW!! I agree 100% and am ethically and morally glad that I comply with his 3 points of supporting music
 
1. I have an account at a music site with an active payment process.
2. I enter a password everytime
3. I pay for music on a monthly basis
(3a. I buy CDs and Vinyl on a monthly basis as well as at concerts)
 
I really like how he decribes the "cost" of getting this music and what is happeneing in the background.
 
Clap
 
 


-------------


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 13:33
"It’s not like the money goes into a giant bonfire in the middle of the woods while satanic priests conduct black masses and animal sacrifices"

Actually this is the music industry's dirty little secret. Tongue

"The royalty that is supposed to be paid by law is 9.1 cents a song for every download or copy."  And this is why record companies hate prog, long songs. Wink

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 15:30
Epig: Fundamentalism necessitates a lack of thought.
 
AH: I don't believe it is off-topic. A lot of people would say that religion throws up barriers and discourages thought. It was a "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones" thing.


Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 18:27
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

Epig: Fundamentalism necessitates a lack of thought.
 



Thanks for informing me.  I so wasn't aware of that.

Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:


AH: I don't believe it is off-topic. A lot of people would say that religion throws up barriers and discourages thought. It was a "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones" thing.


A lot of people would say that not accurately reading what someone says while attacking what they did not say discourages thought. 

I would encourage you to stop heralding yourself as a champion of critical thinking.  All the critical thinkers I know have http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=87168&PID=4539721#4539721" rel="nofollow - good reading comprehension skills .


-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 18:35
Also, if you can't read and don't know what we're saying here, send for the government pamphlet "How to Read" (GPO Y9451E).   If you're blind and also can't read, there are government services available in your area to provide you with blind dogs who can read braille with their noses.

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 18:36
They're already working on an ipad with a sensitised screen for blind people to be able to read on it. It should also make pornographic imagery more interesting.
 
What were we talking about?

Oh yeah. Epig, stay out of my beer.


Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 18:39
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:



Oh yeah. Epig, stay out of my beer.


I'm enjoying my own brews with the money I made after spending a year teaching young people how to think.  Big smile


-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 18:43
AND DID YOU SPEND THAT MONEY ON MUSIC? ALL OF IT? BECAUSE IF YOU DIDN"T YOU'RE WORSE THAN HITLER.
DON'T TELL ME ABOUT NEEDING TO FEED YOUR CHILDREN. HITLER NEEDED TO FEED HIS CHILDREN TOO. ARE YOU LIKENING YOURSELF TO HITLER?
I DON'T CARE IF HE DIDN"T HAVE ANY CHILDREN, THE POINT STILL STANDS.
 
CHECKMATE.
 
A KNOCKOUT BLOW
 
WHY DO I OWN BEER, I'M TEETOTAL


Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 18:48
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

AND DID YOU SPEND THAT MONEY ON MUSIC? ALL OF IT? BECAUSE IF YOU DIDN"T YOU'RE WORSE THAN HITLER.
DON'T TELL ME ABOUT NEEDING TO FEED YOUR CHILDREN. HITLER NEEDED TO FEED HIS CHILDREN TOO. ARE YOU LIKENING YOURSELF TO HITLER?
I DON'T CARE IF HE DIDN"T HAVE ANY CHILDREN, THE POINT STILL STANDS.
 
CHECKMATE.
 
A KNOCKOUT BLOW
 
WHY DO I OWN BEER, I'M TEETOTAL


Big smile

(You used a quotation mark for an apostrophe.  Protip- Use the "caps lock" button instead of holding shift).


-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 18:53
BUT WHAT SHOULD I DO WITH MY LEFT HAND PINKIE THEN?

Answers on a postcard to
 
Weekend Activities For The Elderly
c/o Bill O'Reilly
1211 Avenue Of The Americas, yes really
New York
NY10036


Posted By: MillsLayne
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 23:03
I'd still rather have physical copies complete with the album art, liner notes, etc.  Nothing will ever change my mind in that regard.  I'm the same way with e-readers.  Screw 'em, I want an actual book.

-------------
http://gamercards.exophase.com/xbox/user/MillsLayne/" rel="nofollow">

ht


Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 19 2012 at 23:57
I believe that while the death of physical music releases is a done deal as far as the mass market is concerned, limited edition physical releases for collectors and hardcore fans will remain viable for quite some time, perhaps even forever.
 
But I do say perhaps. A lot of us alive now feel the need for physical releases purely because of plastic memory. Future generations will possibly grow up without any concept at all of a sound based product needing to be physically packaged, which could put the nail in the coffin altogether.


Posted By: The Doctor
Date Posted: June 20 2012 at 00:03
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

I believe that while the death of physical music releases is a done deal as far as the mass market is concerned, limited edition physical releases for collectors and hardcore fans will remain viable for quite some time, perhaps even forever.
 
But I do say perhaps. A lot of us alive now feel the need for physical releases purely because of plastic memory. Future generations will possibly grow up without any concept at all of a sound based product needing to be physically packaged, which could put the nail in the coffin altogether.


More and more I wish I still lived in the past.  The 70's would be a nice time again.  Still good things on television, still good music (well, I suppose there is still good prog, but that's it nowadays), no PC (either PC as a matter of fact), and hey as a bonus, there were still jobs here in the US and the rich even paid taxes.  Shocked


-------------
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?


Posted By: smartpatrol
Date Posted: June 20 2012 at 00:04
Originally posted by MillsLayne MillsLayne wrote:

I'd still rather have physical copies complete with the album art, liner notes, etc.  Nothing will ever change my mind in that regard.  I'm the same way with e-readers.  Screw 'em, I want an actual book.


-------------
http://bit.ly/1kqTR8y" rel="nofollow">

The greatest record label of all time!


Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 20 2012 at 00:05
Doctor: Yes because if you read the literature of the 70s, you'll note the constant theme of how satisfied and content everyone was. I believe there's even a book about it called A Decade Without Problems by Alex Haley.


Posted By: The Doctor
Date Posted: June 20 2012 at 00:12
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

Doctor: Yes because if you read the literature of the 70s, you'll note the constant theme of how satisfied and content everyone was. I believe there's even a book about it called A Decade Without Problems by Alex Haley.



LOL  Of course it wasn't perfect, but the late 70's/early 80's were the times that I remember as things being the way they ought to be (from my perspective).  Bringing this back around to the topic at hand, moving to a formless, virtual music form sucks.  And I for one oppose it.  I know, might as well be at odds with the universe, but then I often am.  My god, I'm turning into a grumpy old man.  Embarrassed


-------------
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?


Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 20 2012 at 00:16
"the way they ought to be" presumably means it was a time where your life path still seemed very fluid and full of potential and perhaps before you had less of a grasp on the complexities of the world. While it's completely understandable for you to be fond of or miss that time of excitement, it's completely insane (though also quite normal) to view this as evidence of a certain group of years being superior to other periods of history.


Posted By: The Doctor
Date Posted: June 20 2012 at 00:23
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

"the way they ought to be" presumably means it was a time where your life path still seemed very fluid and full of potential and perhaps before you had less of a grasp on the complexities of the world. While it's completely understandable for you to be fond of or miss that time of excitement, it's completely insane (though also quite normal) to view this as evidence of a certain group of years being superior to other periods of history.


Nostalgia certainly plays a role in that.  But...there are still things that I think make the 70's superior to now.  Three things in particular, the lack of PC (and this time I mean the whole political correctness movement), the fact that there were still jobs here in the US and American labor was respected and still had some strength, and finally the rich still paid taxes.  On top of that, and these may be more nostalgic than something objective to base this on, there was still good music (outside of prog - which is still good), still good television (not this reality .... that has taken over the airwaves and we weren't in danger of losing the physical form of music because these little whippersnappers have become too lazy to actually own music in a physical form. 


-------------
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?


Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 20 2012 at 04:44
PC has done more good than bad. As someone heavily connected to the black community, I can tell you that's a fact. Maybe things were fine in Wonderbread town but think about other places.
 
American labor being respected is similarly code for labour being weak in other countries. America thinks being equal to other countries is a weakness while at the same time going on about how they want everyone to be equal.
 
As for the rich paying taxes... OK I'll give you that one ;)
 
There is still good music outside of prog. Anyone who says there isn't hasn't tried looking.
 
TV was always kind of garbage. In fact if anything there's a strong case for it being better today than in the 70s.
 
Why is it necessary to own a physical representation of a sound? A lot of you prog goes on about how it's about the music and the sound is all that matters etc, image means nothing, and then you come in this thread and insist music be tied to a little paper booklet with some pictures on it.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk