Print Page | Close Window

David Lee Roth vs. Sammy Hagar

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8991
Printed Date: April 29 2024 at 23:39
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: David Lee Roth vs. Sammy Hagar
Posted By: Drew
Subject: David Lee Roth vs. Sammy Hagar
Date Posted: July 21 2005 at 10:37
Interested in this one............



Replies:
Posted By: spectral
Date Posted: July 21 2005 at 10:39
Are they prog then?

-------------
"...misty halos made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine."


Posted By: GoldenSpiral
Date Posted: July 21 2005 at 10:42
is 'both suck' a choice?

-------------
http://www.myspace.com/altaic" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/altaic
ALTAIC

"Oceans Down You'll Lie"
coming soon


Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: July 21 2005 at 11:11

Both are good singers but I've seen both live and they're the 2 biggest poseurs I've ever seen. Sammy Hagar spent most of the gig having a "guitar battle" with his other guitarist (which he of course won) and Dave Lee Roth did more posing to the (admittedly stunning) women in the front row than singing. Unfortunately neither are prog.

"Montrose" is a great album tho' (get on your Bad Motor Scooter and ride!).



Posted By: Drew
Date Posted: July 21 2005 at 11:49

Sorry- dont know of any other site to post this poll-



Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: July 22 2005 at 05:38

I would say Hagar is the technically better singer, but Roth is alot more 'talented' I like all the Van Halen albums with Roth singing, but there are only a few VH tracks with Hagar at the helm that I can tolerate.

Roth is more humerous and better showman. Van Halens music was also more original and varied with him. It seemed to fall into American rock cliche when Hagar took over. IMO.



-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: Moogtron III
Date Posted: July 22 2005 at 05:49

Roth is so funny, and indeed a great show man. He made some great tunes solo. I voted for him.

Still Hagar is a much better lyricist. I guess when he joined Van Halen, the band lost a showman and won a good singer and a lot of depth.



Posted By: Hammill
Date Posted: July 22 2005 at 09:10
i love van halen , i am huge glam/aor/poser rock fan....david lee roth is one of the greatest frontmen ever...he gets my vote.

-------------


Posted By: King of Loss
Date Posted: July 22 2005 at 11:34

Originally posted by spectral spectral wrote:

Are they prog then?

Yea, ugh I know? Wrong section???



Posted By: TheProgtologist
Date Posted: July 22 2005 at 14:41
Roth.I saw them live when they were touring for their first album and Van Halen II.Roth was a good frontman,great showmanship.I was never a huge Hagar fan and saw them live on the 5150 tour and Hagar just bored me.

-------------




Posted By: kirklott
Date Posted: July 22 2005 at 18:53

This really doesn't belong on this site.

Plus the only person I can imagine picking Hagar is a Bud-drunk, Bush-votin' redneck with a serious head injury.

Roth rules.



-------------
"Progressive rock is the key to the continuance of human evolution." - Charles Darwin


Posted By: Trotsky
Date Posted: July 27 2005 at 05:34
With VH, Roth of course, but his solo career was really lame, even more lame than Hagar's

-------------
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”

"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."


Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: July 31 2005 at 15:05
who in their right f**king mind would vote hagar over roth!

-------------
http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!


Posted By: raindance
Date Posted: July 31 2005 at 20:03

Roth unfortuneatly has one of those voices that I absolutely detest  and 'California Girls'.....? What the f**k was he trying to achieve when he sang that? It's the biggest balls up of a cover song ever!!!!!!!!

Hagar is in a far higher league and Van Halen released their best albums with him in the band!



Posted By: Humanizzimo
Date Posted: August 01 2005 at 13:21
Well...i really think Hagar sings better than Roth, but Roth is ``the face`` of VH...

-------------


Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: August 03 2005 at 11:31

Diamond is a 100% pure conceited asshole (made from concentrated pure dickhead fruits and with added pulp) but he is the Van Halen frontman.

Hagar pales in comparison. That debut album is flawless. an all-time classic: every track is a gem.



-------------
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword


Posted By: Vegetable_Man
Date Posted: August 12 2005 at 17:42
I don't really like Van Halen at all, but Roth is a lot cooler than Sammy Hagar.  God I hate Sammy Hagar.


Posted By: Maike
Date Posted: August 12 2005 at 19:21
Roth is the ultimate rock frontman


Posted By: Anonymous2112
Date Posted: August 13 2005 at 01:26
Both of them eat dieareha as far as i'm concerned. But David Lee Roth's got the edge over Hagar

-------------
And The Meek Shall Inherit The Earth


Posted By: porter
Date Posted: August 13 2005 at 07:57
Roth wins....at least for charisma....

-------------
"my kingdom for a horse!" (W. Shakespeare, "Richard III")


Posted By: daz2112
Date Posted: January 22 2006 at 13:01
rothrothroth

-------------
In the constellation of cygnus,There lurks a mysterious force...The black hole


Posted By: Ben2112
Date Posted: January 22 2006 at 23:20
The Gigolo! I am not a fan of the Hagar-era albums at all. Now, the debut album & especially Fair Warning (the closest to "proggy" they every got by the way )...different story.


Posted By: ClemofNazareth
Date Posted: January 23 2006 at 07:16
Originally posted by kirklott kirklott wrote:

This really doesn't belong on this site.

Plus the only person I can imagine picking Hagar is a Bud-drunk, Bush-votin' redneck with a serious head injury.

Roth rules.

Wow, you just described both of my brothers!  And both of them are the only people I personally know who actually own Sammy Hagar solo albums (and I know they both at least have 5150 too).

Roth in a landslide.  Van Halen really kind of annoys me, but I saw them live back in the 70's and Roth does put on a good show, that's for sure.



-------------
"Peace is the only battle worth waging."

Albert Camus


Posted By: ANDREW
Date Posted: January 23 2006 at 08:29

David Lee Roth.



Posted By: JayDee
Date Posted: January 24 2006 at 08:53

Roth! no contest...Entertainingly great!



-------------



Posted By: Garbs
Date Posted: January 24 2006 at 10:56

Roth.

Hagar has an excellent voice but nowhere near the showmanship of the Roth-era.



-------------
So here I am once more


Posted By: Moatilliatta
Date Posted: January 24 2006 at 13:06

I don't like either of them.



-------------
www.last.fm/user/ThisCenotaph


Posted By: SolariS
Date Posted: January 24 2006 at 13:37

 

i think roth was better with VH. also i really dont like hagar.

 



-------------


Posted By: moonlapse
Date Posted: January 24 2006 at 21:15
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

who in their right f**king mind would vote hagar over roth!


Sammy's mom?

DLR for sure!


Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: January 24 2006 at 23:08

Yay! And the fight is on!Big smile



-------------
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: January 25 2006 at 06:44
CRAP BAND. I CAN'T VOTE IN THIS ONE LOL


Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: January 25 2006 at 15:35
Shouldn't this thread be in the White Trash section of the forums.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk