Steve Howe Interview: Something strange
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
Forum Description: Discuss specific prog bands and their members or a specific sub-genre
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=93355
Printed Date: April 25 2024 at 07:02
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Steve Howe Interview: Something strange
Posted By: npjnpj
Subject: Steve Howe Interview: Something strange
Date Posted: May 06 2013 at 09:35
|
There was
an interview with Steve Howe posted here a short while back that contained a
passage that I can't really fathom, and I'd like to hear your opinions about
it. |
Replies:
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: May 06 2013 at 09:42
|
It's not a big deal, there are probably a lot of musicians who don't know a thing about sheet music and haven't learned it because they feel they don't need it since they've already got the ins and outs memorised and a well developed ear for what others are playing. I have a friend who's been playing guitar for over 10 years, and he's bloody good these days, who is exactly the same. ------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005  |
Posted By: Adams Bolero
Date Posted: May 06 2013 at 09:47
|
Jimi Hendrix couldn't read music but that didn't stop him being one of the greatest guitarists of all time and neither does it for Steve Howe. ------------- ''Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal.'' - Albert Camus |
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: May 06 2013 at 09:51
|
George Harrison is another famous example of someone who couldn't read sheet music. Once you can play your instrument and are a reasonably successful musician, there's hardly motivation to go learn.
|
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: May 06 2013 at 12:11
| You'll probably find a hell of a lot of rock guitarists that are the same way. |
Posted By: brainstormer
Date Posted: May 06 2013 at 12:11
|
I knew a kid who when my age at the time, around 16, could play as fast as Mahavishnu Orchestra's recordings of John Mclaughlin. He couldn't read, and I imagine these other guys learned to be good at an early age, also. The pain of going back and having to train your brain to do it all from paper, and get it all on paper, is probably not worth the effort. ------------- -- Robert Pearson Regenerative Music http://www.regenerativemusic.net Telical Books http://www.telicalbooks.com ParaMind Brainstorming Software http://www.paramind.net |
Posted By: Roland113
Date Posted: May 06 2013 at 12:20
|
As a practicing musician, I think I'm qualified to partially answer this. Let me clarify one thing first, when a musician says that they can't 'read' sheet music, they're referring to the inability to pick out notes in time with the music. By this I mean just about any musician can sit down and look at a sheet of music and slowly pick out the notes. People that can 'sight read' or 'read' music for short refer to being able to play something brand new, at the proper tempo and rhythm from the sheet music the first time they look at it. It's a great skill and something that is almost required from anyone that plays in an orchestra or a session musician. But not required to be fantastic. Nor is it an indication of laziness. In Mr. Howe's case, I'm assuming it's simply a skill that he never felt was important. There are really two reasons to learn how to read sheet music. Reason one is to learn to play something that someone else has written. Mr. Howe doesn't seem to be the type to go start a cover band so much of the learning someone else's wouldn't be a high priority to him. I certainly don't claim on the same plane as Mr. Howe, but I've managed to play for thirty years with very little sheet music. Honestly, I've sat down and given it a passing attempt from time to time, but quickly stopped caring, especially when I started creating my own stuff which is so much more personally gratifying. Reason two is to learn to write sheet music so that others can play your stuff. In Mr. Howe's case that is easily contracted out. If he doesn't want to leave it for interpretation, then most modern music composition software will write sheet music out for you, I think I saw this feature as early as the late 80's. I would say that laziness is not the case as much as it simply isn't a priority. There are so many other things that you can do with your time, why waste it on something that you don't want or need to do. ed. replaced Hackett with Howe
 ------------- -------someone please tell him to delete this line, he looks like a noob------- I don't have an unnatural obsession with Disney Princesses, I have a fourteen year old daughter and coping mechanisms. |
Posted By: zumacraig
Date Posted: May 06 2013 at 12:28
|
i can fake reading music, but i play by ear. i taught myself piano and guitar and have been playing for 20 years. music education can be quite helpful though...but it also could be an obstacle. there was just no way i would ever have played an instrument if i wasn't able to do it my way. i heard songs i wanted to play and i busted my ass every day to play them. this was not work though...i loved doing it. that being said, i did grow up in a home with two classically trained musician so basic stuff came naturally to me. to me, i could care less if someone is classically trained or not. if it's good, it's good. what's interesting to me these days is the shredders who post on youtube. they learn note by note a petrucci solo via watching his video and then can play it themselves. no musical knowledge at all. at the same time, you cannot teach touch, dynamics etc. most people just don't get 'playing music'. the pound away like idiots. lots of that on youtube too. my friends who teach music are always complaining about windshield wiper guitarists and banging piano player
------------- Stardust we are. -Roine Stolt |
Posted By: brainstormer
Date Posted: May 06 2013 at 18:30
It's like how you say a sentence. You can say it with love and affection, or you can say it like a robot, or somewhere in between! I always liked the idea that music is a lot like other forms of language, although I know some don't like that idea. I think Stravinsky said he didn't. ------------- -- Robert Pearson Regenerative Music http://www.regenerativemusic.net Telical Books http://www.telicalbooks.com ParaMind Brainstorming Software http://www.paramind.net |
zumacraigPosted By: Horizons
Date Posted: May 06 2013 at 18:45
|
Isn't Peart the same way? ------------- Crushed like a rose in the riverflow. |
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 07 2013 at 02:21
|
I'm baffled that you are baffled by this, npjnpj. I played around with sheet music many years ago and still have some books of it. When you can do music in your head it gets in the way more than it helps. The advent of recorded music renders it kind of obsolete... ------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened... 
|
Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: May 07 2013 at 04:08
|
McCartney can't read music and he's written classical pieces including an opera, he just gets someone to write it down for him.
You could argue that when you're a full-time guitarist you have got the time to learn to read/write music but Howe's career doesn't seem to have suffered too much.
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: May 07 2013 at 04:34
|
Do you think Steve Howe would have made a more valid contribution to rock music had he been able to read/write music? ------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy! |
Posted By: M27Barney
Date Posted: May 07 2013 at 06:44
|
Steve Howe composed and played in some of the best symphonic progressive rock that has EVER been produced - The fact that he cannot read sheet music is probably just as irrelevant as the fact he couldn't / wouldn't have wanted to make himself an electric/acoustic guitar......... ------------- Play me my song.....Here it comes again....... |
Posted By: Gerinski
Date Posted: May 07 2013 at 07:16
|
I think Roland113 made the good point. I honestly believe than Howe and most other professional musicians can understand written music, I would find it really surprising if that was not the case. I am not a musician but I can play some instruments at amateur level and even myself understand the logic of music writing and with big effort and patience I can decipher a score, or (again with big effort and patience) I could write the score of something I composed (which indeed, as long as I can play it, software can do for me saving me the effort). A completely different thing is mastering the subject at such a high level that you can be given a score, put it in front of you and start playing it. This requires huge training and for a musician playing mostly his own music it has little if any value. I believe that most musicians work at an 'in between' level, in order to play something from another musician they need to learn the piece first, but unless they really master it by heart, having the score in front of them can help them playing it through.  Incidentally, I have always wondered at Jordan Rudess having the tablet with the score on top of his keyboard for playing his DT material. Is it just to make him look a cooler, more classically trained musician? Does he really not master the material by heart thoroughly enough that he needs the score guidance? Does he really look at it? Does it really help him to play along? Would he make mistakes had he not have it? |
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: May 07 2013 at 08:59
The clue here is ... "to me that's just weird" ... which you yourself stated. Check out some of the music things being taught in the internet about music these days ... by simply using mathematics ... and not music, or the notes themselves. You might not necessarily know the notes, or their names or that blah and blah is blah and blah ... but you can still play it. This is the side of "music" and its "academic" knowledge, and styles, that is difficult to make folks understand ... there is another side of music that has nothing to do with a DAW, composition, and any academic information that you and I know, and Steve Howe is not the only one ... It kinda makes sense to me, as I always thought that his playing was designed sort of like stairs ... you go up and down and sometimes sideways ... and it works ... and as long as he has the freedom to move on it, it's not an issue. If he does NOT have the freedom, I think a lot of folks would have problems playing with Steve Howe. ------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com |
Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: May 07 2013 at 09:16
| I have a friend who can pick out a chord from a song and play it exactly, but if you ask him what the chord is, he probably won't know. |
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: May 08 2013 at 08:50
I have the same issue in writing, and it also happens on stage with actors. There is a point when/where what was written has nothing to do with anything that we think, or understand, and (for example) this was important and very valuable, when discussing "modern theater" since the 1950's because no one could tell ... where it came from ... it wasn't just an idea ... it was something else ... and finding a good enough understanding to work with is the difference between a good performance of "Waiting for Godot" or one that will have you asleep in 15 minutes! This same thing, also happened in film (Godard and Truffaut) and also happened in music a bit later ... which was the tougher "process" to crack, until "popular" music busted the whole thing with the Beatles, Rolling Stones and the like! The saying, often is, you have to "unlearn all you know", in order to find something new. And, of course, this is not something that goes very well with the logic that permeates a database. However, the database volume and information also brings something to the table, and credit must also be given there.
I always have said that the worst part is that if Petrucci was playing a violin, he would get invitations to the Met and the Scala and Beyruth ... but because he has an electric guitar ... he's a thrasher and who cares! It's so bad, that we can not even tell when someone DOES know what they are doing and when they don't ... we continue to support "favoritism" and we never know when musicianship is at play!
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com |
Posted By: Earthmover
Date Posted: May 08 2013 at 12:22
|
I certainly think that knowing music theory has many benefits, but I've also heard tons of artists who know absolutely no theory but are making much better music than the artists who are musically educated. Maybe knowing theory can be somewhat restrictive in some cases. -------------  |
Posted By: infandous
Date Posted: May 09 2013 at 07:29
|
If Wakeman, who can obviously read scores and write his own, had no problem working with Howe then I don't see why he really needs to know that himself. I've played for 20 years, and I did learn to read many years ago, but I've never had any use for it as I have always played with people who play mainly by ear. For myself though, I think I might have been a better song writer had I learned some theory, but I'm happy with what I know and can do. For us hobbyists, it's just really not that important. At the level of someone like Howe, I guess it really depends on what you want to do and who you are working with. He obviously hasn't needed formal training, or even to be able to read and write music. It's hard to argue with success, no matter how it is achieved. I find that highly trained musicians often lack their own "voice", their own unique sound. There are, of course, exceptions (Wakeman, for instance), but for the most part that has been my experience. |
Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: May 09 2013 at 08:25
|
Posted By: infandous
Date Posted: May 10 2013 at 10:35
Possibly, but I doubt Wakeman ever wrote out Yes pieces, even for his own reference. |