Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - "Hippie" no thank you.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closed"Hippie" no thank you.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Guy Guden View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 07 2014
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 2617
Direct Link To This Post Topic: "Hippie" no thank you.
    Posted: October 14 2016 at 17:25
The Beats were turned into Beatniks by San Francisco columnist Herb Caen, in an attempt to minimalize their counterculture philosophies and attitudes.  By placing a "nik" on the end of "beat," the intention was to diminish its members by aligning the group to Communist Russia and to minimize the demoralizing effect on the United States created by the successful launch of the Sputnik.
 
Likewise to be "Hip," a Beat word, was group herded into the dismissive term hippie; an all encompassing description to describe
many lifestyles, but usually used to evoke a group of poverty embracing individuals, often living communally with long hair, beards and bare feet.  Both groups tend to embrace a freeform, liberal attitude (but their are exceptions)
 
To be a Freak can connotate a wide variety of odd, mutant personalities.  Zappa said he was Freak, not a Hippie/Hippy.  His politics were conservative; he was a tough task master, with a perpetual chip on his shoulder, who looked odd with his long hair, facial hair and quirky clothing, art choices and musical direction.
The only thing "hippie" about him was his open marriage, free love lifestyle and a taste for the kink.  If we use the term "freak" it can be applied from the hippie ("The Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers") to the dangerous (Manson and his outlaw tribe of killers) to the power hungry (a "Control Freak").  And since the '60s, hippie has deviated into yuppie or the pro/con label "hipster".
 
Dada, Nouvelle Vague, being Avant-Garde or an Iconoclast.  Take your pick.
 
Class over for today.  Don't forget to get those term papers done by Tuesday:  "What is the definition of the
word 'Dig' and where does 'Jive' come in?"  See you Monday and enjoy your weekend.   Smile
Back to Top
CapnBearbossa View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: May 11 2016
Location: Baltimore
Status: Offline
Points: 59
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 14 2016 at 15:03
My final word on this, I guess ... don't really know from hippie or freak, and those words mean different things in different countries, apparently. But I was brought into this world about halfway through that turbulent decade of the 1960s...
So, I usually let those who were experiencing their formative or young-adult years in that decade speak for the times.
In this case, the 60's and its counterculture is probably best summarized by a spokesperson like Suze Rotolo (Bob Dylan's girlfriend from 1961-64; Italian-American artist, civil rights activist, and veteran of Greenwich Village culture of the time):
"The sixties were an era that spoke a language of inquiry and curiosity and rebelliousness against the stifling and repressive political and social culture of the decade that preceded it. The new generation causing all the fuss was not driven by the market: we had something to say, not something to sell."



Edited by CapnBearbossa - October 14 2016 at 15:04
Will higher mighty force redeem
the one who dropped the moral compass,
failed to fulfill the dream?
-Ian Anderson
Back to Top
Devoncir View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2016
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 89
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2016 at 20:34
Helter Skelter (kill Sharon Tate) Helter Skelter (kill Sharon Tate) I´ve got blisters on my fingers (kill seven people)

Edited by Devoncir - October 11 2016 at 21:01
Back to Top
Devoncir View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2016
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 89
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2016 at 20:24
Originally posted by Rednight Rednight wrote:

Originally posted by Devoncir Devoncir wrote:

He was a murderer who posed as a hippie.
Wrong again, Mandrake. It was the followers Manson sent to Cielo and Waverly drives who did the murderin'. No evidence has ever come forward that he murdered anyone.

Wrong is the wikipedia KHAAANNNN,  sorry, REEDNIGHTTT
.
Charles Milles Manson (born Charles Milles Maddox, November 12, 1934)[2]:136–7 is an American criminal who led what became known as the Manson Family, a quasi-commune that arose in California in the late 1960s. Manson and his followers committed a series of nine murders at four locations over a period of five weeks in the summer of 1969. In 1971 he was found guilty of conspiracy to commit the murders of seven people – most notably of the actress Sharon Tate – all of which were carried out by members of the group at his instruction. He is currently serving nine concurrent life sentences at Corcoran State Prison in Corcoran, California.
Back to Top
mechanicalflattery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 08 2016
Location: Seattle
Status: Offline
Points: 1056
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2016 at 19:33
Old people are weird... 
Back to Top
EddieRUKiddingVarese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2016
Location: Aust
Status: Offline
Points: 1802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2016 at 19:21
My Kinda Hippies



"Everyone is born with genius, but most people only keep it a few minutes"
and I need the knits, the double knits!
Back to Top
Rednight View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 18 2014
Location: Mar Vista, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 4812
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2016 at 18:59
Originally posted by Devoncir Devoncir wrote:

He was a murderer who posed as a hippie.
Wrong again, Mandrake. It was the followers Manson sent to Cielo and Waverly drives who did the murderin'. No evidence has ever come forward that he murdered anyone.
"It just has none of the qualities of your work that I find interesting. Abandon [?] it." - Eno
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65844
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2016 at 17:34
Originally posted by Rednight Rednight wrote:

^Don't know anything about Charles "Mason" but do know about one Charles Manson who was no poser; he was the real deal when it came to directing a flock of supposed flower children towards murderous infamy, to say the least. He can still be found at Corcoran State Pen., Calif. for that reason.

No doubt.   I know people who remember him hanging out on Haight Street picking up followers.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
EddieRUKiddingVarese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2016
Location: Aust
Status: Offline
Points: 1802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2016 at 16:47
Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

Originally posted by Devoncir Devoncir wrote:

And at woodstock many people were posing as hippies, all about posing

So, please tell me, in the crowd of four hundred thousand gathered around the stage at Woodstock, which were the hippies and which were the poseurs? Were some of them yippies and not hippies or poseurs? There were yippies at Woodstock and there were hippies. I would suggest that after three days of mud and rain, hippies, yippies and poseurs were indistinguishable.

Yeah and which ones took the Brown Acid...................

But wasn't every one at Woodstock?
"Everyone is born with genius, but most people only keep it a few minutes"
and I need the knits, the double knits!
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13388
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2016 at 16:41
Originally posted by Devoncir Devoncir wrote:

And at woodstock many people were posing as hippies, all about posing

So, please tell me, in the crowd of four hundred thousand gathered around the stage at Woodstock, which were the hippies and which were the poseurs? Were some of them yippies and not hippies or poseurs? There were yippies at Woodstock and there were hippies. I would suggest that after three days of mud and rain, hippies, yippies and poseurs were indistinguishable.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Devoncir View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2016
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 89
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2016 at 16:32
He was a murderer who posed as a hippie. And gathered many people who posed as hippies. And at woodstock many people were posing as hippies, all about posing
Back to Top
Rednight View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 18 2014
Location: Mar Vista, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 4812
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2016 at 12:47
^Don't know anything about Charles "Mason" but do know about one Charles Manson who was no poser; he was the real deal when it came to directing a flock of supposed flower children towards murderous infamy, to say the least. He can still be found at Corcoran State Pen., Calif. for that reason.
"It just has none of the qualities of your work that I find interesting. Abandon [?] it." - Eno
Back to Top
Devoncir View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2016
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 89
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2016 at 12:21
I was interested in hippies once. Thought they had some superior view of wisdom, fraternity, love, equality, etc (HAIR), but then I found out that most of it was about drug abuse (GRATEUFUL DEAD), and posing (CHARLES MASON). So hippie is this: posing and drugs, ERIC CARTMAN is right again, But I do like Hawkwind and Blind Melon.

Edited by Devoncir - October 11 2016 at 12:28
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65844
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2016 at 00:25
^ Still, as derogatory names go, 'hippie' is far from the worst.  Almost a term of affection compared to things so bad I won't give examples.
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Progosopher View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 12 2009
Location: Coolwood
Status: Offline
Points: 6484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2016 at 00:14
The "hippies" of San Francisco's Haight Ashbury scene in the 60s also referred to themselves as "freaks," disliking the term hippy so much some of them held a funeral for the hippy in 1968.  Jimi Hendrix once sang that he just wanted to let his freak flag fly.
 
I have been called a hippy myself due to my long hair, casual demeanor, nonconformity, and liberal views.  I have no problem with that (but then I do live in the U.S. and believe me, it also has many negative connotation here - it depends on who you are talking to).  Oddly enough, many of my friends are very conservative.  Any such term or designation can be treated as a compliment or as derogatory.  Few of us totally fit into preconceived roles or stereotypes.  More often than not, I use them as convenient designations.  The trick is to see past preconceptions and to demonstrate that one is not merely a stereotype.
The world of sound is certainly capable of infinite variety and, were our sense developed, of infinite extensions. -- George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty"
Back to Top
Terrapin Station View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 23 2016
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2016 at 09:24
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

Thanks for the replies, folks - sorry !! I wasn't trying to light a fire, here. ;-)

One observation. I'm of course writing from a UK perspective. The US "Hippie" experience may differ. ;-)

If you pop over to the UK Hippy forum, and I strongly advise you not to, you'll see that the UK scene is somewhat different from the US scene. Over here, a number of subgroups sprung up - New Age Travellers, Crusties, etc. All are broadly the same, and tend to fall under the "hippy" banner. I expect most of the posters there are under thirty and wouldn't mind being labelled - generically - a "hippy".

Too right, at 51, I am too young to have experienced the original "hippie" movement of the sixties. Actually, I doubt there are many people who actually did. If you take, for example, Woodstock, the crowd is not solely composed of people who identify solely with hippie views - most were there for the drugs and music, or to dress up in the fashions of the day. It's a crowd of hangers on and wannabe's. Most will have gone back home to safe office jobs, conventional views and lifestyles after dipping their toes in the hippy water. 

Why I don't like being called a hippie. Well. I just don't identify with many of the views, and I also find a lot of hippies so monolithic and set in their views that it's like having a conversation with a religious nut case. I'm sure that there are hippies out there who are more normal, less reactionary and more open to debate, but they seem, alas to be an exception. 

I'll stick with being a freak, thanks. I did have a think about being a Trekker, but I've got too much middle age spread to be able to pull off a Starfleet tunic. Yes, I know William Shatner spent a career doing it. But. ;-)
Well, I'm not very normal and I'm pretty set in my views . . . which isn't to say that I'm not easygoing typically, but nevertheless, I'm pretty set in my views.

I'm a bit too young to have experienced hippiedom fully in real time, too, although on the other hand, my first concert was Jimi Hendrix--but I was only 6 when I saw Hendrix.
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18649
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2016 at 08:50
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

...
This lot however, were hippie-freaks:

At a Renaissance Faire ... no doubt. Gilly loved those btw, and even said that dressing up was the best part!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
EddieRUKiddingVarese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2016
Location: Aust
Status: Offline
Points: 1802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2016 at 03:19
The original Freak on the California scene was Carl Franzoni or Captain F**k as he was called.





"Everyone is born with genius, but most people only keep it a few minutes"
and I need the knits, the double knits!
Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2016 at 03:05
Thanks for the replies, folks - sorry !! I wasn't trying to light a fire, here. ;-)

One observation. I'm of course writing from a UK perspective. The US "Hippie" experience may differ. ;-)

If you pop over to the UK Hippy forum, and I strongly advise you not to, you'll see that the UK scene is somewhat different from the US scene. Over here, a number of subgroups sprung up - New Age Travellers, Crusties, etc. All are broadly the same, and tend to fall under the "hippy" banner. I expect most of the posters there are under thirty and wouldn't mind being labelled - generically - a "hippy".

Too right, at 51, I am too young to have experienced the original "hippie" movement of the sixties. Actually, I doubt there are many people who actually did. If you take, for example, Woodstock, the crowd is not solely composed of people who identify solely with hippie views - most were there for the drugs and music, or to dress up in the fashions of the day. It's a crowd of hangers on and wannabe's. Most will have gone back home to safe office jobs, conventional views and lifestyles after dipping their toes in the hippy water. 

Why I don't like being called a hippie. Well. I just don't identify with many of the views, and I also find a lot of hippies so monolithic and set in their views that it's like having a conversation with a religious nut case. I'm sure that there are hippies out there who are more normal, less reactionary and more open to debate, but they seem, alas to be an exception. 

I'll stick with being a freak, thanks. I did have a think about being a Trekker, but I've got too much middle age spread to be able to pull off a Starfleet tunic. Yes, I know William Shatner spent a career doing it. But. ;-)

Back to Top
hellogoodbye View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP member

Joined: August 29 2011
Location: Troy
Status: Offline
Points: 7251
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2016 at 17:36
Afficher limage dorigine
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.391 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.