Glueman Im not talking about the fact Co&Ca should be here I did state that in my point what I was trying to say was that we need to destinguish first the differnce between prog and progressive.
I just used Co&Ca as an example of a band who are centeral to this argument, some people on here would say their music is good but they are not proggy whilst other may say they are proggy and good whilst some would say they are sh*t and are just progressive whilst another final group may say they are sh*t but porggy.
I personally feel they are a good proggy band, but someone may not agree with me.
I don't feel this point is about the music or the porggyness of something, I see it being the age old question of prog and progressive, once they have been determined then you can contiune the questioning and get to this point.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
"Proggyness"
Topic Options
Snow Dog wrote:
