Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Kashmir75
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 07:34 |
floydispink wrote:
I really don't think bands like DT, PT and Opeth are selling out just because they hit the charts. There are much more prog (especialy prog metal) fans than many people think.
|
Well said. I only discovered these three bands after they respectively signed to Roadrunner. I then picked up all their past discographies. There's some benefits to gaining wider attention!
|
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 07:40 |
Toaster Mantis wrote:
Dean wrote:
While that may be the situation now, don't think that was how it was 5, 10 or 15 years ago when the people who listened to most (if not all) of those bands were predominately Metal fans and many only they picked up on Prog as a result.
From my own perspective I first listened to them back then it was because they were metal bands.
|
Yeah, but now it looks like a lot of prog fans will get into metal bands that have a strong affinity with progressive rock but don't use it as a launch-pad to metal of a somewhat similar persuasion but without the prog connection. How many Isis fans go anywhere near Eyehategod? How many Opeth fans go on to investigate, say, Asphyx or Autopsy?
|
I guess that really depends on what direction those fans came from in the first place, Opeth attracted fans from Death Metal (European, Scandinavian, Swedish, Gutenberg Melodic etc), some through the labels they were signed to (Candlelight, Peaceville, Century Media, Music For Nations, Misanthropy [indirectly] and of course Roadrunner) and associated metal acts (Katatonia, In The Woods, Anathema, Misanthropy (the band)), some through bands they toured with Cradle Of Filth etc. and some through the pure "prog metal" associations.
Toaster Mantis wrote:
This incidentally goes both ways, in certain circles it's become a running gag how increasingly dissimilar gothic rock and gothic metal become since new gothic metal bands draw inspiration mostly from the original goth metal bands like Paradise Lost and Type O Negative without bothering to listen to the goth-rock bands those were inspired by. It becomes like a game of musical chairs. |
Tell me about it
I managed a Gothic Metal band that at various times covered Type O, Anathema, London After Midnight, Misfits and Radiohead - getting Metal gigs was easy - Goth gigs were always an uphill struggle ("PVC and frilly shirts doth not a goth band make.." was one such rejection  ) , but oddly better received once we managed to get them. Too Goth to be metal, too Metal to be goth. 
Even when Paradise Lost covered the Sister's "Walk Away" few metal or goth fans "got it".
Toaster Mantis wrote:
Also I think there is a stigma against bands coming from the opposite direction, where once the band has been "tainted" with mainstream success they are treated with suspicion when they try and go less commercial. |
Which ones would you mention as examples? Yes' infamous Tales from the Topographic Oceans?
|
I was thinking of bands and artists that were mainstream first and went in Prog directions later (or at least had Prog moments) - the floor of the Prog Related evaluation room is littered with such examples of a mainstream band with a solitary Prog album. Vangelis released at least two (perhaps more) prog albums and is not regarded as a Prog artist. Even Jem Godfrey of Frost* was viewed with some suspicion when he released Milliontown because he had been associated with Atomic Kitten.
Edited by Dean - December 26 2009 at 07:42
|
What?
|
 |
friso
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 24 2007
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 2506
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 07:49 |
I don't think modern prog metal is selling out. Progressive metal just ain't a curse word anymore. The metal scene is opening up for the technical metal bands and death metal bands with as a side-effect progressive metal coming into the charts. Furthermore people who listen to metal buy more cd's then people who listen to pop music.
|
 |
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 08:02 |
Dean wrote:
I guess that really depends on what direction those fans came from in the first place, Opeth attracted fans from Death Metal (European, Scandinavian, Swedish, Gutenberg Melodic etc), some through the labels they were signed to (Candlelight, Peaceville, Century Media, Music For Nations, Misanthropy [indirectly] and of course Roadrunner) and associated metal acts (Katatonia, In The Woods, Anathema, Misanthropy (the band)), some through bands they toured with Cradle Of Filth etc. and some through the pure "prog metal" associations. |
Yeah, maybe Opeth weren't that good an example because they've demonstrated themselves to appeal to both camps something very few prog metal bands do and I have to admit they're successful in that regard even though I don't really like their music. Should probably have focused on Isis instead, I feel it's a pretty sure bet fewer Isis fans are familiar with straight-up sludge metal like Eyehategod or Weedeater than Opeth fans are familiar with "ordinary" death metal.
|
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 08:59 |
Toaster Mantis wrote:
Dean wrote:
I guess that really depends on what direction those fans came from in the first place, Opeth attracted fans from Death Metal (European, Scandinavian, Swedish, Gutenberg Melodic etc), some through the labels they were signed to (Candlelight, Peaceville, Century Media, Music For Nations, Misanthropy [indirectly] and of course Roadrunner) and associated metal acts (Katatonia, In The Woods, Anathema, Misanthropy (the band)), some through bands they toured with Cradle Of Filth etc. and some through the pure "prog metal" associations. |
Yeah, maybe Opeth weren't that good an example because they've demonstrated themselves to appeal to both camps something very few prog metal bands do and I have to admit they're successful in that regard even though I don't really like their music. Should probably have focused on Isis instead, I feel it's a pretty sure bet fewer Isis fans are familiar with straight-up sludge metal like Eyehategod or Weedeater than Opeth fans are familiar with "ordinary" death metal.
|
I think you are correct with Isis - I would imagine that any Isis fans here are more aligned to the Post Metal side than the Sludge side (and possibly discovered them through the Post- route too) ... personally I simply don't like pure sludge metal and Isis & Neurosis are as close as I want to get.
|
What?
|
 |
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 09:50 |
Yeah. I think we can agree that the frequently repeated mantra of progressive metal getting prog fans into metal and metal fans into prog is only a half truth and only likely on occasion for a very simple reason: It's rather few prog metal bands that appeal to both prog fans and metal fans.
|
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
 |
Guitar1Jesse
Forum Groupie
Joined: June 22 2008
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Status: Offline
Points: 44
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 10:23 |
With Dream Theater, their music changed quite a bit. I used to be a die-hard DT fan but around the time of Octavarium I was seeing a change that I didn't like. I became less of a fan and at the same time they became more popular. Marketing can really change a band's perception and Roadrunner gave DT an image I can't stand anymore. I saw them live this year and it wasn't the same band, wasn't the same music. Sold out? I don't know, but certainly the popularity has taken its toll.
|
Take a few minutes and listen to this!
http://www.myspace.com/jlangmusic
|
 |
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 10:27 |
Toaster Mantis wrote:
Yeah. I think we can agree that the frequently repeated mantra of progressive metal getting prog fans into metal and metal fans into prog is only a half truth and only likely on occasion for a very simple reason: It's rather few prog metal bands that appeal to both prog fans and metal fans.
|
Although that is very probably true in general, we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that two prog metal bands in particular may appeal to both camps i.e. Opeth and Dream Theater. Both are massively popular (in and outside of PA it seems) and the latter have covered some of the classic prog 'canon' by way of covers of material by Pink Floyd, UK, ELP, (Rudess solo album I think) Crimson, Kansas, Dixie Dregs etc. Ain't there loads of plain vanilla metal fans out there who like DT ? (or are they viewed with suspicion by metalheads ?) wouldn't some of them be attracted explore further the aforementioned prog materal they have attempted ? BTW For the sake of clarity, I cannot stand Dream Theatre (but that's beside the point)
|
 |
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 10:44 |
ExittheLemming wrote:
Ain't there loads of plain vanilla metal fans out there who like DT ? (or are they viewed with suspicion by metalheads ?) |
The latter is often the case, usually accompanied by a preference for Fates Warning, Queensr˙che or Savatage over Dream Theater. For the record, that includes myself except that I'm not familiar enough with Savatage to have an opinion on them.
|
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
 |
maribor
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 04 2005
Location: Slovenia
Status: Offline
Points: 116
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 12:08 |
I think the reason why progressive bands are charting again has more to do with downloading than with increased popularity.
And for the record, I don't think making pop records like Genesis, Yes and Asia did is selling out either. They were bloody good pop records and to this day these bands admit that they wanted to do this. With Genesis you can see it gradually evolving all the way from WAW, ATTWT to Duke, while Yes changed their direction because they had a new man in the band with a totally different approach to music. If you look at Asia - Wetton and Downes have always been more interested in making melodic rock than progressive rock, just look at Wetton's solo albums - hardly any prog there. So, I don't think these bands were selling out. Selling out would be if a fat cat executive came up to them with a big bag of money and said: "Now, write some hits and this bag's yours." And I don't think that happened.
|
Non mi svegliate
|
 |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 12:33 |
I'm OK with selling out as long as they do it by the pound.  I think the increased popularity of prog has nothing to do with selling out. I think it's due to us old farts still being around yet having a taste for the new stuff and having children that they also infect with the prog bug. And the newest generation of prog fans naturally taking an even bigger interest in the new artists. And maybe even people who don't fit into either of those categories becoming dissatisfied more mainstream artists and the internet being such a great tool, they can find the stuff at places like this site for example. Either that or we are succeeding in our plan to turn the people of the Earth into zombie prog pod people.
Edited by Slartibartfast - December 26 2009 at 12:44
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
 |
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 12:52 |
Newsflash: People enjoy Pop and Prog.
What a world huh?
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
 |
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 14:05 |
Yeah a Lady Ga Ga next to a Gentle Giant CD. Doesn't that just make you want to spew.
|
 |
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 14:50 |
Depending on the era the Lady GaGa cd would be better.
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
 |
bsms810
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 03 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 363
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 16:34 |
i dont mind lady gaga
She writes pretty good pop melodies. Like Jacko did (obv not in the same league). I quite like pop music when it has nice melodies (unlike most of the bland stuff in the charts)
|
'when was the last time you had a girlfriend?'
'I dont look at it as when, I look at it as who...and why' - David Brent
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 16:45 |
Prog Rock is pop music.
|
What?
|
 |
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65844
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 17:10 |
^ well it certainly falls under 'popular music', that is for being so unpopular most of its life
Interesting discussion- I'm listening to a CD just recorded by a local band I used to roadie for in the early 80s (during the Bay Area thrash/progmetal boom).. just now did they get around to producing a proper release on an independant label. The CD is - well, it's not bad considering the material is 27 years old and the remaining members are well into their late 40s - but one also sees why the group was never signed (and probably never will be): they do a mix of very heavy metal with very melodic parts, guitar&synth harmonies and catchy vocals.. it's a very tough mix to achieve well and attract fans, and most people seem to like either melodic/catchy or heavy/proggy. Also I think a certain audience/generation has to mature a bit and catch up to the musicians of their time in order to fully appreciate what they're doing, sometimes this happens and sometimes not.
|
 |
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 17:23 |
Dean wrote:
Prog Rock is pop music. |
Can somebody please explain that to Ivan?
Edited by harmonium.ro - December 26 2009 at 17:25
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 17:28 |
^ as soon as I've mastered the art of uphill waterskiing, learnt how to juggle soot and nailed this jelly to a plate.
|
What?
|
 |
SgtPepper67
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 17 2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 530
|
Posted: December 26 2009 at 17:32 |
maribor wrote:
I think the reason why progressive bands are charting again has more to do with downloading than with increased popularity.
And for the record, I don't think making pop records like Genesis, Yes and Asia did is selling out either. They were bloody good pop records and to this day these bands admit that they wanted to do this. With Genesis you can see it gradually evolving all the way from WAW, ATTWT to Duke, while Yes changed their direction because they had a new man in the band with a totally different approach to music. If you look at Asia - Wetton and Downes have always been more interested in making melodic rock than progressive rock, just look at Wetton's solo albums - hardly any prog there. So, I don't think these bands were selling out. Selling out would be if a fat cat executive came up to them with a big bag of money and said: "Now, write some hits and this bag's yours." And I don't think that happened.
|
I completely agree. I don't think any of those bands, Genesis, Yes, etc. ever sold out.
|
In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made...
|
 |