Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Smarter Than The Average Bear
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSmarter Than The Average Bear

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Smarter Than The Average Bear
    Posted: May 01 2012 at 18:51
The phrase "smarter than the average bear" has been around at least as long as I have and I have always taken it to mean "highly intelligent". But last night at the Comedy Festival, local (and recommended) comedian Nick Gibb did this bit:

"Yogi Bear is smarter than the average bear. So what? So are half of all bears. I guess "smarter than the upper quartile of bears" doesn't have the same ring to it."

Besides being funny, this joke began to haunt me. I consider myself fairly intelligent (which most people here do if they're honest about I'm sure) and yet I had never realised what that phrase actually said despite my many encounters with it. This misreading of the phrase must be commonplace or Gibb wouldn't be doing the joke and people wouldn't be laughing at it.
 
It made me think, and worry, about how we are quite capable of staring something in the face that is (obviously in hindsight) wrong or doesn't make sense without even faintly suspecting it. I wonder what other obvious errors or absurdities are in our lives that we don't see through?


Edited by Textbook - May 01 2012 at 18:51
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 19:19
Half of all bears could not be smarter than the average bear.  That's quantitatively impossible, because it would require an odd number of bears.
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 19:24
Well there is no average bear, it's just a point which is the average of all gathered numbers. The bears must be evenly distributed on either side of this average.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 19:32
Bears are probably pretty smart. Most animals are, well they are as smart as they need to be.
Humans are the dumb ones.
They keep building more houses in the heavily forested, mountainous areas of North Jersey with a large bear population and people wonder durrrr why are there bears all over the place?
edit: double kudos for "gee all these bears seem to have gotten a taste for people food so they increasingly come by the house and eat from our garbage cans"


A bear knows what it knows, humans have the ability to think about that decision and still go with it.
Who's really the dumb one?!



Edited by JJLehto - May 01 2012 at 19:33
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 19:33
Interesting that my wondering if there were anything else around me that was obviously absurd yet I didn't notice, immediately resulted in my making a post that was obviously absurd without me realising whilst writing it.
(I'm referring to my speaking very seriously about the even distribution of imaginary bears.)


Edited by Textbook - May 01 2012 at 19:38
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 19:33
The Panda Bear is the cutest bear but it's not smarter than the average bear even though it's quite a minority in the bear world, and it's been said that it's not even a bear even though some include it in the bear family. 
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 66013
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 19:36
I don't think 'Smarter than the average bear' was ever meant to mean highly intelligent, it was just Yogi Bear's catch phrase; I wouldn't attach any symbolism or importance to it.

Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 19:37
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

Well there is no average bear, it's just a point which is the average of all gathered numbers. The bears must be evenly distributed on either side of this average.


Imagine six bears of the following intelligence:

5+5+5+5+5+6

The average intelligence here is
5.166667.  That means only one bear is smarter than the average bear, and the other five fall short.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 19:39
I think using any logic or seriousness in this thread is in itself a logical fallacy.

So therefore:
ALL bears are smarter than the average bear


Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 19:41
What's happening here is the casual use of average by people who aren't mathematicians to variously mean mean, mode and median. So lets start using those words.
 
Now Yogi clearly means median because he says "bear"- you can't attach a specific individual bear unit to mean and mode.
 
So he's saying he's smarter than the median bear, but so are half of all bears.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 19:43
I'm sure Yogi is not a smart bear. I've seen them smarter than that. 
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 19:49
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

What's happening here is the casual use of average by people who aren't mathematicians to variously mean mean, mode and median. So lets start using those words.
 
Now Yogi clearly means median because he says "bear"- you can't attach a specific individual bear unit to mean and mode.
 
So he's saying he's smarter than the median bear, but so are half of all bears.


Someone I knew (not here) made a similar joke (not about Yogi), and I had him arguing because I made the argument in my first post (obviously pointing out the median instead of the mode).  Good fun. 

But Yogi said "average" not "median," so the comedian's joke doesn't work.  A comedian doesn't get to tell us what Yogi meant.  Yogi could very well be smarter than the average bear, as I demonstrated.
Back to Top
HolyMoly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: April 01 2009
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 26138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 20:22
I've interpreted the phrase "smarter than the average bear" to be a joking bit of false modesty, in a way.  Yogi's saying he's smart, and we know he means he thinks he's one of the smartest around, but "smarter than average" is a nice modest, humble way of getting the message across.  So no, I never took it literally - just a bit of rhetoric with a meaning beyond the literal word.
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2012 at 20:47
What is going on in threads like this? Why do rational people spend their time this way?
 
Are they rational?

Cognitive dissonance, it never ends.
Back to Top
Gamemako View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 31 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1184
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2012 at 01:10
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Half of all bears could not be smarter than the average bear.  That's quantitatively impossible, because it would require an odd number of bears.


With an infinite number of bears and a Gaussian distribution of intelligences, exactly half are smarter than average. Remember that 0.9999... (repeating) is in fact equal to 1. 'Tis the nature of infinity. Of course, that assumes a symmetrical distribution; for any skewed distribution, the mean and median are obviously not going to be equal.

Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

Well there is no average bear, it's just a point which is the average of all gathered numbers. The bears must be evenly distributed on either side of this average.


The phrase is imprecise on many levels. It could be "more intelligent than the average intelligence of all bears," or it could be "more intelligent than the bear that is most representative of the average of a group of bears." Ultimately, it is rather meaningless as we have no accurate means of quantifying bear intelligence (or better still, we don't even have a good operational definition of "intelligence" at all).

//EDIT:

Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

Are they rational?


Yes, Virginia, people are rational. LOL


Edited by Gamemako - May 02 2012 at 01:14
Hail Eris!
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2012 at 01:46
Bears were invented by the CIA to prevent the infiltration of red spies in local YMCA youth groups, but following budget cutbacks after the financial troubles of 2008, many bears now find themselves gainfully employed by national park services that want their parks to appear more "bear-y".
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2012 at 09:11
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:


"Yogi Bear is smarter than the average bear. So what? So are half of all bears. I guess "smarter than the upper quartile of bears" doesn't have the same ring to it."?


Since people usually mean the mean when the say average, this joke just makes no sense (funny though).

It makes unfounded assumptions about the distribution of the intelligence of bears. He seems content with accepting that a symmetric distribution of intelligence exists so that mean (average) = median (middle). For any sort of skewed distribution, we can't say that half of all bears are smarter than the average.

As an example. take a bear class room of 10 students where you have the following grades: 100,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 ,0 ,0.

The mean would be 10. There would be only one bear smarter than the average. So the statement smarter than the average bear would refer to the top 10% of bears, quite the lofty compliment.

I actually find this to be very plausible. Since bears can't talk, write, or critically think, and since they tend to maul human beings when placed in closed quarters with them, the vast majority would probably receive a zero for their schoolwork. However, given a freak mutation which produces a bear able to talk and empathize with humans, I would expect that bear to do very well in school.

I hereby conclude that "smarter than the average bear" means the top 10% of intelligence.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2012 at 09:26
So this the bear thread then?LOL

I can't think of similar instances at the moment. I will get back when I can


Edited by Snow Dog - May 02 2012 at 09:27
Back to Top
Smurph View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 11 2012
Location: Columbus&NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 3167
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2012 at 09:38
I say we put the lesser than average bears in labor camps. This will raise the average for normal bears and cause fewer bears to be considered truly intelligent.
Also let's keep all the bears that have less money in camps too. Poor bears are more likely to steal 'pickynic' baskets.
Back to Top
Smurph View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 11 2012
Location: Columbus&NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 3167
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2012 at 09:40
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:


"Yogi Bear is smarter than the average bear. So what? So are half of all bears. I guess "smarter than the upper quartile of bears" doesn't have the same ring to it."?


Since people usually mean the mean when the say average, this joke just makes no sense (funny though).

It makes unfounded assumptions about the distribution of the intelligence of bears. He seems content with accepting that a symmetric distribution of intelligence exists so that mean (average) = median (middle). For any sort of skewed distribution, we can't say that half of all bears are smarter than the average.

As an example. take a bear class room of 10 students where you have the following grades: 100,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 ,0 ,0.

The mean would be 10. There would be only one bear smarter than the average. So the statement smarter than the average bear would refer to the top 10% of bears, quite the lofty compliment.

I actually find this to be very plausible. Since bears can't talk, write, or critically think, and since they tend to maul human beings when placed in closed quarters with them, the vast majority would probably receive a zero for their schoolwork. However, given a freak mutation which produces a bear able to talk and empathize with humans, I would expect that bear to do very well in school.

I hereby conclude that "smarter than the average bear" means the top 10% of intelligence.
 
But what is 4 out of the ten bears are mutated? It's still not considered 'average' to be mutated, but then 40% of bears would be considered smarter than average.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.855 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.