Joined: June 04 2010
Location: Terria
Status: Offline
Points: 13298
Posted: September 29 2012 at 20:34
M27Barney wrote:
I bought OK computer - expecting it to be this brilliant opus - it's just a crock of sh*t!....Prog it aint - not to compare with any of the proper exponents of prog....end of...pop music - yeah - AOR maybe - Emperors new clothes definately!!!
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Posted: September 29 2012 at 20:33
M27Barney wrote:
I bought OK computer - expecting it to be this brilliant opus - it's just a crock of sh*t!....Prog it aint - not to compare with any of the proper exponents of prog....end of...pop music - yeah - AOR maybe - Emperors new clothes definately!!!
What exactly is AOR about Airbag, Climbing the Walls or Paranoid Android? And could you please define "proper exponents of prog"?
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 12862
Posted: September 29 2012 at 15:28
M27Barney wrote:
I bought OK computer - expecting it to be this brilliant opus - it's just a crock of sh*t!....Prog it aint - not to compare with any of the proper exponents of prog....end of...pop music - yeah - AOR maybe - Emperors new clothes definately!!!
Prog or not prog is irrelevant to me but Kid A/Amnesiac is more progressive than every single one of your post classic era favorite albums (according to your ratings). You should all check them out before you feel you have a right to an opinion.
But if prog is a defined genre with rules to follow (which would be absurd) and not progressive rock I guess your list of pompous retro prog/generic prog metal is what's real prog.
I bought OK computer - expecting it to be this brilliant opus - it's just a crock of sh*t!....Prog it aint - not to compare with any of the proper exponents of prog....end of...pop music - yeah - AOR maybe - Emperors new clothes definately!!!
Joined: December 01 2010
Location: London, England
Status: Offline
Points: 195
Posted: September 29 2012 at 04:32
Prog to me is a willingness to experiment, to expand the boundaries, seek the new. Ironically, a lot of music classified as prog because of its execution, is often a style simply copied from other prog bands, not new or experimental at all. It should be a principle, not a style.
Regarding Radiohead, if I have a criticism of the band, it would be that they experiment too much, and keep losing direction and shape. But that does mean that regardless of the quality of the results, it is pure exploration and, in my books, that would clearly classify them as Prog.
Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66757
Posted: September 25 2012 at 12:49
I guess that this is as close to a Radiohead appreciation thread that there is out there. SPIN magazine has an article which includes 10 different artists covering Radiohead's Creep. I thought that someone out there might enjoy this.
Joined: March 08 2011
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1091
Posted: December 17 2011 at 07:48
Radiohead is a fantastic band. I don't really care if they're prog or not.
And yes, I agree they're similar to Floyd in some aspects. And Floyd is my favorite band. I don't think Radiohead has ever come close to something like "Dark Side Of The Moon" or "Echoes" but still they did some amazing albums and songs.
I shook my head and smiled a whisper knowing all about the place
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Posted: December 16 2011 at 13:19
Catalani wrote:
darkshade wrote:
I can call a tree a bear; doesn't mean it is.
Perfect. Explains everything.
--------------
Snow Dog wrote:
Catalani wrote:
People are comparing Pink Floyd to Radiohead? Radiohead work is good, but please, don't compare one of the masters of prog with Radiohead.
-------------------------
About the topic, I don't think that Radiohead is a prog rock band. People who likes neo-prog more than I do may have a different opinion, but I can't understand Radiohead as prog.
There is no connection with Neo Prog and Radiohead. And I will compare them with Pink Floyd. There is some of there stuff with a Floydian sound. Like it or not.
Radiohead similar to Floyd? You're kidding, right?
Joined: December 09 2011
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 17
Posted: December 16 2011 at 13:03
darkshade wrote:
I can call a tree a bear; doesn't mean it is.
Perfect. Explains everything.
--------------
Snow Dog wrote:
Catalani wrote:
People are comparing Pink Floyd to Radiohead? Radiohead work is good, but please, don't compare one of the masters of prog with Radiohead.
-------------------------
About the topic, I don't think that Radiohead is a prog rock band. People who likes neo-prog more than I do may have a different opinion, but I can't understand Radiohead as prog.
There is no connection with Neo Prog and Radiohead. And I will compare them with Pink Floyd. There is some of there stuff with a Floydian sound. Like it or not.
Radiohead similar to Floyd? You're kidding, right?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Why we can call Radiohead a prog rock band imo...
Topic Options
M27Barney wrote:
