Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - LGBTA Thread
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedLGBTA Thread

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 17>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 21:11
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

But (to narrow the ordinance to its LGBT implications) we are not talking about men using women's toilets. We are talking about transgender women (men who now are women) using them. Shouldn't that be OK? 

As I said, I have a problem with that. No matter how much such a transgender person feels like a woman, bodily this person still is a man. I understand her feelings, but I want mine to be understood as well.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 21652
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 21:08
Originally posted by garfunkel garfunkel wrote:

An "anti-discrimination" ordinance is so silly. I don't understand liberals.

You're not against discrimination?
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 21:07
But (to narrow the ordinance to its LGBT implications) we are not talking about men using women's toilets. We are talking about transgender women (men who now are women) using them. Shouldn't that be OK? 
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 21:01
Well, to be honest, I would not want to use the same bathroom as men. First of all there would be urinals in front of the cubicles then, and some men would probably use the occasion to display their pecker to ladies present then. Also there a some lady things we do in these ante-room to the cubicle at which I would not want to have men present either.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:56
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Well, I must say I see no need why suddenly men and women should use the same toilets. And the article does not quite make it clear if that was included in the ordinance or not. It just says some people used it as an argument in debate.

Well bills like that aren't about men and women using the same toilets, they are about making gender identity a protected class. It's just that the opposition to such bills almost always goes straight to women's bathrooms, particularly the use of them by trans women.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:56
Fear of transgender people as sexual predators of children used to defeat something that would not allow discrimination of any type to occur. That's what it is. Now it is (or continues to be) to discriminate in Houston (as in many cities and states) based on race, religion, and yes, sexual orientation. 
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:49
Well, I must say I see no need why suddenly men and women should use the same toilets. And the article does not quite make it clear if that was included in the ordinance or not. It just says some people used it as an argument in debate.


Edited by BaldFriede - November 05 2015 at 20:50


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
garfunkel View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2015
Location: NC
Status: Offline
Points: 209
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:40
An "anti-discrimination" ordinance is so silly. I don't understand liberals.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:37
A toilet. Where you urinate or empty your bowels. Read the link I posted to better understand. 
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:36
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

I failed to mention that they used transgender people using bathrooms as a way to scare voters into voting against this ordinance. 

What exactly do you mean by "bathroom"? A toilet or the kind of facility where several people take a shower in the same room at the same time?


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:32
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by A Person A Person wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

How about the gloriously imbecile state of Texas (well, Houston really) voting against a no-discrimination ordinance? And if you had seen some of the anti-ordinance ads, instilling fear on parents with images of men walking on little girls' bathrooms, you would be quite upset. 

Again, it's Texas. 

Sadly it's not the only place that boogeyman is used. Pretty recently I saw an article aobut fearmongering ads concerning "boys being able to look at your daughter in the bathroom" or something to that effect being used in a place I can't remember off the top of my head.

Excuse me? What exactly are you propagating?

I am propagating the idea that perverted men will abuse non-discrimination ordinances to sexually harass or abuse women is a frequently used scare tactic.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:23
I failed to mention that they used transgender people using bathrooms as a way to scare voters into voting against this ordinance. 
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:21
Originally posted by A Person A Person wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

How about the gloriously imbecile state of Texas (well, Houston really) voting against a no-discrimination ordinance? And if you had seen some of the anti-ordinance ads, instilling fear on parents with images of men walking on little girls' bathrooms, you would be quite upset. 

Again, it's Texas. 

Sadly it's not the only place that boogeyman is used. Pretty recently I saw an article aobut fearmongering ads concerning "boys being able to look at your daughter in the bathroom" or something to that effect being used in a place I can't remember off the top of my head.

Excuse me? What exactly are you propagating?


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:18
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

How about the gloriously imbecile state of Texas (well, Houston really) voting against a no-discrimination ordinance? And if you had seen some of the anti-ordinance ads, instilling fear on parents with images of men walking on little girls' bathrooms, you would be quite upset. 

Again, it's Texas. 

Sadly it's not the only place that boogeyman is used. Pretty recently I saw an article aobut fearmongering ads concerning "boys being able to look at your daughter in the bathroom" or something to that effect being used in a place I can't remember off the top of my head.


Edited by A Person - November 05 2015 at 20:18
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:14
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

No. Even more open. Just no-discrimination for anything in Houston. Based on religion, gender, orientation, race, etc. But the Republicans used this fear I mentioned to have people vote against it. Unbelievable.

I would draw the line there somewhere. I would not want a man showering with me in the same room st the same time, and I think a lot of women would feel the same.

Interestingly I have no problem with being on a nude beach with men present. But a shower room feels more intimate for me.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:11
Behold TX idiocy BaldFriede : http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/04/us/houston-voters-repeal-anti-bias-measure.html
Back to Top
GKR View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 22 2013
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 1376
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:06
Yeah, but I'am talking about public toiletes, Bald... no one is going to look you naked in a bathroom.
- From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:05
No. Even more open. Just no-discrimination for anything in Houston. Based on religion, gender, orientation, race, etc. But the Republicans used this fear I mentioned to have people vote against it. Unbelievable.
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 20:01
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

How about the gloriously imbecile state of Texas (well, Houston really) voting against a no-discrimination ordinance? And if you had seen some of the anti-ordinance ads, instilling fear on parents with images of men walking on little girls' bathrooms, you would be quite upset. 

Again, it's Texas. 

I don't quite get it. Non-discrimination in what regard? All people using the same facilities, regardless of gender?


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2015 at 19:56
How about the gloriously imbecile state of Texas (well, Houston really) voting against a no-discrimination ordinance? And if you had seen some of the anti-ordinance ads, instilling fear on parents with images of men walking on little girls' bathrooms, you would be quite upset. 

Again, it's Texas. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 17>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.277 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.