Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Streaming!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedStreaming!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
HackettFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2016 at 18:54
Originally posted by Komandant Shamal Komandant Shamal wrote:

Originally posted by Smurph Smurph wrote:

Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:





Hi Smurph, I don't know if that's quite the right interpretation. If we say "No one at all will make any money off music, full stop" - which is becoming the case, with the exception of a tiny, tiny, tiny few people, all of whom are producing commercial music.... that doesn't weed out the losers. It weeds out everyone. 


Supply and demand then kicks in as musicians..... stop bothering. To assume people will keep creating music which coincides with your (and my) particular niche market tastes when there is zero money in it and nothing but continual rip offs..... is pretty much a big assumption. ;-)



Why would a musician stop bothering just because there is no money? Some people have a need to create that goes far beyond what any other human cares about. If everyone on the planet died, I would have to spend a lot more time surviving but I would still create albums.



I would rather not listen to a musician that would give up so easily.
I'm not giving up. I continue to play guitar in my bedroom. Is anyone a fan? Well, of course not. Davesax is not talking about giving up music, he's talking about not continuing to prepare it and release it to a wider audience who do not access to his bedroom or computer desktop.

Edited by HackettFan - January 08 2016 at 18:57
Back to Top
Smurph View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 11 2012
Location: Columbus&NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 3167
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2016 at 12:30
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

No, no, gentlemen, that attitude stinks and it represents what's happening in the music world. People seem to have forgotten it's *a two way relationship*. 

Fans support bands
Bands play for fans

And that's what's wrong with the modern music scene. 

If you expect someone to do something for you *for free and as a favour* then you can't really complain if they don't. A fan, simply put, is someone who supports a band. Not someone who just likes the music.

Compliments are very nice but essentially, try eating them. I'm just as happy to play with like minded musicians in a practice room. 

This attitude might stink to you but all I'm doing is responding to the way the world is. We can't make people think that music has value. My response is to keep making music anyway until I die.

I'd be happy to hand out a free album to anyone that personally asked for it. I'd also give 1$ to anyone that would be willing to sit down and listen to one of my albums with their eyes closed and headphones on, focusing on nothing else. If someone would film video of themselves doing that (make sure I can hear the bleed from the headphones being super loud), then write even a scathing review, and I'd send someone 1 dollar. I value my own art more than ANYONE will ever value it.

I would bet you money that I couldn't pay most people to focus and care about what I do. And I'm fine with that. It sucks, but I've accepted how little value music has anymore.

I'm contributing to the devaluing of music because I'd rather die than stop making albums. I can't seem to understand people that seem to think that they have value. We have no value. Every Tom, Dick, and Jane is an "artist" or "musician" now. Our insignificance is insurmountable. There is nothing we can do.

In fact, most of the music I make is not a favor to anyone. In fact, I would say that its existence is more of a burden on the world than it is a positive thing. But I have to do it or else.

I agree that artists should be paid but how can we change the shifting group think of mass culture?


Edited by Smurph - January 08 2016 at 12:47
Back to Top
Meltdowner View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 25 2013
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 10281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2016 at 11:31

I saw this yesterday, it reminded me of this conversation.


Edited by Meltdowner - January 08 2016 at 11:31
Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2016 at 11:17
No, no, gentlemen, that attitude stinks and it represents what's happening in the music world. People seem to have forgotten it's *a two way relationship*. 

Fans support bands
Bands play for fans

And that's what's wrong with the modern music scene. 

If you expect someone to do something for you *for free and as a favour* then you can't really complain if they don't. A fan, simply put, is someone who supports a band. Not someone who just likes the music.

Compliments are very nice but essentially, try eating them. I'm just as happy to play with like minded musicians in a practice room. 


Edited by Davesax1965 - January 08 2016 at 11:18

Back to Top
Komandant Shamal View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 02 2015
Location: Yugoslavia
Status: Offline
Points: 954
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2016 at 10:18
Originally posted by Smurph Smurph wrote:

Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:



Hi Smurph, I don't know if that's quite the right interpretation. If we say "No one at all will make any money off music, full stop" - which is becoming the case, with the exception of a tiny, tiny, tiny few people, all of whom are producing commercial music.... that doesn't weed out the losers. It weeds out everyone. 

Supply and demand then kicks in as musicians..... stop bothering. To assume people will keep creating music which coincides with your (and my) particular niche market tastes when there is zero money in it and nothing but continual rip offs..... is pretty much a big assumption. ;-)

Why would a musician stop bothering just because there is no money? Some people have a need to create that goes far beyond what any other human cares about. If everyone on the planet died, I would have to spend a lot more time surviving but I would still create albums.

I would rather not listen to a musician that would give up so easily.
[/QUOTE] Clap
Back to Top
Smurph View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 11 2012
Location: Columbus&NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 3167
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2016 at 08:59
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:



Hi Smurph, I don't know if that's quite the right interpretation. If we say "No one at all will make any money off music, full stop" - which is becoming the case, with the exception of a tiny, tiny, tiny few people, all of whom are producing commercial music.... that doesn't weed out the losers. It weeds out everyone. 

Supply and demand then kicks in as musicians..... stop bothering. To assume people will keep creating music which coincides with your (and my) particular niche market tastes when there is zero money in it and nothing but continual rip offs..... is pretty much a big assumption. ;-)
[/QUOTE]

Why would a musician stop bothering just because there is no money? Some people have a need to create that goes far beyond what any other human cares about. If everyone on the planet died, I would have to spend a lot more time surviving but I would still create albums.

I would rather not listen to a musician that would give up so easily.
Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2016 at 07:06
Originally posted by Smurph Smurph wrote:

Most of the music that I own I get off of bandcamp directly from artists for free, but I still spend more on music than most people with paying for engineering/etc.

I understand that music holds little value to the public so I don't expect things like success. I need to make my own favorite albums and nothing else.

It really sucks that no one can make money off of it anymore. Most of my favorite musicians have to work day jobs... I guess in the end that slows down the creativity for the world. But I also think no one making money off of music weeds out the losers.

Hi Smurph, I don't know if that's quite the right interpretation. If we say "No one at all will make any money off music, full stop" - which is becoming the case, with the exception of a tiny, tiny, tiny few people, all of whom are producing commercial music.... that doesn't weed out the losers. It weeds out everyone. 

Supply and demand then kicks in as musicians..... stop bothering. To assume people will keep creating music which coincides with your (and my) particular niche market tastes when there is zero money in it and nothing but continual rip offs..... is pretty much a big assumption. ;-)

Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2016 at 07:02
Originally posted by Angelo Angelo wrote:

Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

Yeah, Progstreaming sounds OK. I'll give it a go.

What do I like about it ? By prog fans for prog fans, no big business, no pretence of paying musicians... why not ? 

But I doubt there'll be cross sell. ;-)

Incidentally, here's some Bandcamp stats for you. Last 12,000 visits, nearly... most visits do not come from Progarchives. In fact, less than 1%. The Muffwiggler site is a site for electronic music fans who build their own synths. Most are from within Bandcamp itself. People don't do click throughs. 

So you have to ask yourself: if a prog rock band advertising on a prog rock forum get less than 1% of people looking them up when they've placed a lot of stuff on here (672 posts) then will the prog rock band on a streaming website have people deliberately looking them up on Bandcamp as a result of hearing them on another website ? 

Not very likely, is it ? ;-)

672 posts on a forum is a lot, by some standards. Question is how many views these posts got. Depending on the forum section they're put in, and the time the are posted, they will be seen by more or fewer of the intended audience. A forum like this is, for a lot of people, not the first place they go looking for new music. That would also explain why Bandcamp itself (Where people do go for that reason) produces more hits on your music. 


Hi Angelo, you may recall that one particular thread we had a discussion on recently had over 2,300 views. I'm in IT sales and marketing as a day job, so take it as read that I know how to shift - well, software, at least. ;-)



Back to Top
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 15:57
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

As far as I am concerned, this is a very good time for this debate. The other night, I reread the exceptional interview that Jim Garten did with Martin Orford on this site. I would,thoroughly recommend that people read it again, because it is absolutely one of the finest I have ever read anywhere.

Nice thread, Ryan, which I hope can be an interesting, useful, and positive debate on the site

I agree with everything you said, Steve!  Happy New Year! Clap
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18497
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 12:56
Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

...
Most progressive rock musicians (except a few, very fortunate ones) live on a financial knife edge and need to sell their music to live. Freeloaders and thieves (which is what illegal downloaders are) ruin that situation and the result is that we lose musicians like Martin.
 
Most musicians I have ever met, live on the edge ... but some that I have also met, have another edge, and while streaming may be a problem for some, it isn't for others! Fer crying out loud ... the likes of Dream Theater, Marillion and many other bands, ended up making their future off a lot of sharing of the music when they needed it.
 
I am not an illegal dl'r and would not advise my friends to steal from our friends and the like, and my whole collection of LP's and CD's is all bought, baby ... all of it! And through out my life, I even lost my job because I said ... "love over gold" ... but in the end, I am proud of having stood up for the right situation, and the other folks ended up in the dumps deservedly so, for lying, cheating and the like.
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Smurph View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 11 2012
Location: Columbus&NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 3167
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 11:37
Most of the music that I own I get off of bandcamp directly from artists for free, but I still spend more on music than most people with paying for engineering/etc.

I understand that music holds little value to the public so I don't expect things like success. I need to make my own favorite albums and nothing else.

It really sucks that no one can make money off of it anymore. Most of my favorite musicians have to work day jobs... I guess in the end that slows down the creativity for the world. But I also think no one making money off of music weeds out the losers.
Back to Top
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 10:54
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

Yeah, Progstreaming sounds OK. I'll give it a go.

What do I like about it ? By prog fans for prog fans, no big business, no pretence of paying musicians... why not ? 

But I doubt there'll be cross sell. ;-)

Incidentally, here's some Bandcamp stats for you. Last 12,000 visits, nearly... most visits do not come from Progarchives. In fact, less than 1%. The Muffwiggler site is a site for electronic music fans who build their own synths. Most are from within Bandcamp itself. People don't do click throughs. 

So you have to ask yourself: if a prog rock band advertising on a prog rock forum get less than 1% of people looking them up when they've placed a lot of stuff on here (672 posts) then will the prog rock band on a streaming website have people deliberately looking them up on Bandcamp as a result of hearing them on another website ? 

Not very likely, is it ? ;-)

672 posts on a forum is a lot, by some standards. Question is how many views these posts got. Depending on the forum section they're put in, and the time the are posted, they will be seen by more or fewer of the intended audience. A forum like this is, for a lot of people, not the first place they go looking for new music. That would also explain why Bandcamp itself (Where people do go for that reason) produces more hits on your music. 
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]
Back to Top
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 10:49
Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

Does anyone know how Progstreaming works?  Do they pay the artists per streams? Do they pay the artist a fixed amount for the right to provide their album for streaming?  Or is it more of a promotional thing where the artist agrees to allow the album to be streamed for free for a month or two with the knowledge that they are receiving publicity for their music?  Or do the artists pay Progstreaming for the right to have their album included there because of the publicity that they receive by doing so?

This seems to me to be the way to go for niche artists.  Rather than being lost in the jungle of Spotify or Pandora, they would seem to have more exposure on a niche site that specializes in their niche.  The number of streams being limited to a number of free streams or only available for a fixed period of time would likely encourage listeners to buy these albums before they disappear.

It's free for the artists, and they're streamed for 2 months. The site and its maintenance are paid for through donations and advertisements.
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]
Back to Top
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 10:47
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

You're right in saying not every musician should be able to make a living off their music, but the opposite argument is true, it should be possible for at least some. Without resorting to mass commerialism. Otherwise that sounds the death knell for anything other than "music by numbers". 



That would be hell.... Dead
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]
Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 10:28
Yeah, Progstreaming sounds OK. I'll give it a go.

What do I like about it ? By prog fans for prog fans, no big business, no pretence of paying musicians... why not ? 

But I doubt there'll be cross sell. ;-)

Incidentally, here's some Bandcamp stats for you. Last 12,000 visits, nearly... most visits do not come from Progarchives. In fact, less than 1%. The Muffwiggler site is a site for electronic music fans who build their own synths. Most are from within Bandcamp itself. People don't do click throughs. 

So you have to ask yourself: if a prog rock band advertising on a prog rock forum get less than 1% of people looking them up when they've placed a lot of stuff on here (672 posts) then will the prog rock band on a streaming website have people deliberately looking them up on Bandcamp as a result of hearing them on another website ? 

Not very likely, is it ? ;-)



Total visits11,668
1.
Direct (bookmarks, instant messages, etc.*)7,321
2.
Facebook668
3.
Google search (search terms not available)442
4.
Bandcamp artist brotherhoodofthemachine363
5.
Bandcamp tag tangerine-dream218
6.
Bandcamp tag progressive-rock175
7.
Bandcamp tag space-rock114
8.
Bandcamp tag berlin-school94









Edited by Davesax1965 - January 07 2016 at 10:30

Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 10:23
Hi O666, I fully sympathise.

But by the same token, that's like saying an artist should just give his music away.

If I dropped the price of an album to $1, would most prog rock fans in Iran buy it ? If they have access to streaming sites, they seem to have been able to afford a computer, so $1 doesn't seem unreasonable. ;-)



Back to Top
zravkapt View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 12 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 6451
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 10:22
Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

Does anyone know how Progstreaming works?  Do they pay the artists per streams? Do they pay the artist a fixed amount for the right to provide their album for streaming?  Or is it more of a promotional thing where the artist agrees to allow the album to be streamed for free for a month or two with the knowledge that they are receiving publicity for their music?  Or do the artists pay Progstreaming for the right to have their album included there because of the publicity that they receive by doing so?

I know that the owner of Progstreaming personally asks the artists and/or label for permission, and sometimes gets turned down. I don't think there is any payment going either way, its all promotion.
Magma America Great Make Again
Back to Top
O666 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2009
Location: TEHRAN-IRAN
Status: Offline
Points: 2619
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 10:12
Hi.
I want to talk about another face of Streaming sites. I am living in IRAN. I know many of music fans (specially Progressive Rock) that don't have access to their fav music easily. POP and Rock and Metal music find in IRAN easier than genres like Progressive Rock. I access to my fav music and I don't talk about myself but I have money and I have family outside Iran and ... but most of Iranian People don't have those things that I have. 
They can use "only" Streaming sites and blogs. And another thing : Many of music Sites and Blogs are filtered in IRAN and fans must find some ways to breaking filter . 
Progressive Rock fans have many troubles to access to their fav music.
Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 10:05
Rushfan - I'd actually sign up for Progstreaming. Why ? "Suitable venue". I don't mind it if it's going to be heard by the right people. 

I very much doubt Progstreaming will be paying me anything anytime soon, either. ;-) No, checked, free either way. 

Actually, I feel happier with that. Tell you what, I'll set my disbeliefs about streaming to one side for a while and upload one album. Let's see if this generates cross sales for the rest of the catalogue. 

Any bets, ladies and gents ? ;-)


Edited by Davesax1965 - January 07 2016 at 10:09

Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2016 at 10:03
Hi Timbo - ummmmm. I think it's more complicated than that. Yep, a few supergroups got incredibly rich. That was quite some time ago. 

The problem is that a concept started up that "music equals fame and money". Everyone uses this idea - to rip "musicians" off. This is why a Gibson will cost you £2,500. Basically, a certain number of musicians buy into a dream. Of course, this dream is 99% impossible. ;-) 

Bad musicians - there are plenty - go on stage and play for MONEY. Or for attention. When they get no money and no attention, they soon give up. This is all the marketing and ad men understand as well, hence the music industry. And Spotify, et al. You are, if you're a member of Joe Public, not really buying money. You're buying "product" disguised as music. 

However, there is a hard core of proper musicians out there who just play for the love of it, mainly. These are the people who you see playing small gigs and holding down day jobs, under no illusions about fame or fortune. Ideally, they'd like to be able to give up the day job and play 24/7. This used to be possible three or so decades ago. The money from a small gig and vinyl sales (if you could scrape the money together to get a pressing together) combined with merchandise sales kept quite a few working bands going. 

Even this is becoming pretty much impossible now, what with "pay to play", PA hire, lighting hire etc going through the roof. If I want to do a vinyl pressing, I have to find £1000- 1500 and spreading the word takes all of my time up. The problem with the general public seeing music as "free" - which is now becoming the accepted idea with sites such as Spotify - is that sales disappear. The hard core proper musicians will keep going, but.... would you buy into this ? ;-)

Yes, times have changed and you can have a whole music studio in a spare bedroom. Instruments are effectively much cheaper than in the 70's, in a lot of cases. I have enough equipment for a moon shot. I didn't 40 years ago, that's for sure, nor could I have afforded it. But. It is becoming totally impossible for even hardcore musicians to make a single penny, as the concept is now that music is "free". 

Not everyone will make it. But if no one makes it, and that becomes obvious, no one will sign up to be a proper musician in the first place. You can only take so much disappointment. ;-)

With me, money is NOT the motivation. I've been playing a long time. Even giving music away for free doesn't work, it generates a lack of respect for it, to be honest. Every single "proper musician" I know is utterly disillusioned and plays because they love the music. If it becomes financially impossible to book small gigs because the pot's dried up..... very bad sign indeed. 

If the trickledown effect of Pandora, Spotify et al is to somehow taint and devalue ALL music, God help us. ;-) I think Angelo is right, things will change. If it's because a few people at the top of the food chain aren't making money one way, they'll think of another one. 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.