![]() |
Prog tracks that you feel get too much hate... |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Author | ||
moshkito ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 18558 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 7 hours 46 minutes ago at 12:21 |
|
Hi, We kinda forget that Alan Parsons was already doing "surround" when doing a lot of the classical music work he was a part of. So Alan saying that he preferred surround is kinda funny and weird, and almost suggests that we do not know what surround was being done in the 1960's to get a better sound out of an orchestra, however, the playing equipment at home, was stereo as "surround" could not exactly be done at home, though some German efforts (the Head system) and other things were attempts at spreading the ability of a stereo system, but a stylus, in general could not exactly pick up 4 points on a groove in the LP, I don't think. NOTE: Check out an orchestra recording on a RED SEAL album ... you will be able to tell, on the headset, that this was a different microphone than that and many more examples, since in those days, one did not exactly do as much changing, and was dependent on the quality of the playing more than it is these days, where electronics allow for changes later if one wants to. Wonderful example with Klaus Schulze and Lisa live album on one of the CD specials where they want to change a detail ... that you and I will NEVER find ... to make it better! This brings out how things were recorded all around ... and the orchestra had a lot more details to work on, than a rock band, in general 4 or 5 folks. The design and implementation for an orchestra is far more important for a recording than what was done with rock music, and only rock fans don't seem to know that. You can't record an orchestra with 4 or 5 microphones, in general it's going to take at least 30 or 40 microphones (possibly more!!!), creating a really huge work for the person at the big table which we see in pictures ... with 30 or 40 sets of levels and faders and some addons to each line, or microphone. Early rock music used to combine things on a microphone, and I think that some of the early Beatles and Rolling Stones had this, and when you hear it today, it really does not sound very good. Every time you see a table that big for the engineer, you know that they have done larger groups and orchestras. Since that time, however, a lot of really good engineers and producers, have helped improve the state of the recording of things for rock music, so SW making it look like he is repositioning things and making the whole thing sound better, or livelier, will sound good all around, and when it is cleaned up, it becomes even more interesting and enjoyable. |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
![]() |
||
Grumpyprogfan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: July 09 2019 Location: KC Status: Offline Points: 12804 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The reason I buy any SW remix is because of the surround mixes, and all I've heard are excellent. Even an average budget surround setup will sound excellent. Also, both Alan Parsons and Steven Wilson have both mentioned that they prefer surround to stereo.
|
||
![]() |
||
Disconnect ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 02 2007 Location: Syracuse, NY Status: Offline Points: 346 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I enjoyed SW's mixes of Tarkus and Octopus. To these ears they sound amazing. Full disclosure, though, I have a really high-end turntable and sound system...so to Pedro's point I suppose that does matter a bit.
|
||
"My own response to King Crimson is one of quiet terror." - Robert Fripp
|
||
![]() |
||
moshkito ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 18558 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi, It's not hate. It's simply that what he is doing is not as mind altering, or incredibly artistic development for the music itself. And it goes back at least 75 years when a famous conductor wanted to change the sitting of the orchestra players so different parts of the music would get a better expression in the recording. So, thinking that what SW is doing is far out and exceptional, makes me think that the history of "recording" is being ignored, and not many folks have EVER heard the RED SEAL albums in the late 1960's which were the very special super recordings of a lot of things. TOMITA's "Snowflakes are Dancing" got the treatment, and you want that version, so you can hear what SW is doing ... and this album was done in 1975!!!! I, personally, do not have an issue with the work that SW is doing, although I think that some of it is not helping the work much ... I still see/think that the Gentle Giant stuff is much better and superior on a really good sound system with a good/great turntable and stylus .... however, these days, no one has really heard anything that great to have any idea of what I am saying and know the difference. But, in my book, SW is doing one thing that is valuable, and that is improving the recording on a lot of albums where it was fine at the time, but really not that great. I, for example, doubt that SW can touch an album done by Alan Parsons, for example, specially as he came through the classical folks in England that were doing some outstanding stuff in recording, way before EMI/Abbey Road opened up their doors to "long haired poor musicians" as many were labelled then. It was a part of the list of the worst business decisions ever done, BTW, listed for the 20th century ... specially The Beatles and Rolling Stones. Edited by moshkito - 11 hours 51 minutes ago at 08:16 |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
![]() |
||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21780 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
^ SW mixes are getting a lot of hate
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
moshkito ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 18558 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi, There is no poor/bad seat in that system, which is how I remember it ... and it just makes the whole thing so special ... always loved it, and I laugh when I hear any of SW's mixes, kinda making it look like this instrument is here and that one over there, and then having the sound move around a bit ... it's a really poor version of what PF did live, in large places, at least. I always thought that the logic behind the remix/remaster was not thought out properly, and it tended to focus on cool, not the work itself! I don't even have the heart to listen to SW's remixes of KC. I never needed them as their music had the spaciousness for us to feel it. Edited by moshkito - Yesterday at 15:43 |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
![]() |
||
progaardvark ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams Joined: June 14 2007 Location: Sea of Peas Status: Offline Points: 53554 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Pink Floyd was still using a quadrophonic sound system during their 1994 tour. I saw them in Philadelphia and can vividly remember the sound moving around the stadium. And that's even from sitting on one side of Veterans Stadium in the upper deck (left side of the stage). I imagine it was more pronounced if you sat in the middle of the stadium on the field. |
||
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag that's a happy bag of lettuce this car smells like cartilage nothing beats a good video about fractions |
||
![]() |
||
Saperlipopette! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 12829 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
||
moshkito ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 18558 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi,
Comments on this thread are in the MOSH PIT ... it was too long to post here. It will be up within an hour or two (9AM here PST) |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
![]() |
||
moshkito ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 18558 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi, I think I had something like 8 or 9 bootlegs from the early days, and only one from DSOTM on (the Anaheim triple LP). The bootlegs for DSOTM, were not interesting and that's where you could see that the mechanical style needed to stay with the film and all the stage stuff, might have taken the flow of the band and its previous shows. I think it was the version of EMBRYO that was on a Wyzardo (something like that) bootleg that was way better than most of them, and the version on the Sampler was not that good in my ears. It also sounded like it was doctored in parts ... a criminal offense! It really made me wonder who the fudge made these decisions ... like ignoring the band's ability and how they worked things, and eventually using a version that did not have the nuances that so many of the bootlegs were showing ... I just about have to listen to them all again, though I think all of those bootlegs have long been gone from my collection ... (the LP's were getting too heavy for this old man without a house of his own, and having to move was a problem!) I have to get rid of the books, and CD's too ... though at least I can rip them into MP3's and hope a can fit them all in many hard drives and save them ... since no one else has ever heard the majority of the bootlegs and really has no idea what I am saying, or likely thinking that I am just making stuff up! PF did not make its name from the Syd Barrett days ... they made their name from the concerts with DG at the start, and then blew out the map with DSOTM. But it was the bootlegs that prefaced the fantastic concerts, of which I got to see one at the Hollywood Bowl (either August or September 1972) in their magic sound that was QUADRAPHONIC ... another idea that most people here have no idea and think some of the magic in digital positioning a la SW, was big ... the only bad thing about the QUAD system was that you couldn't take it home with you! The stuff these days, even in the fancy digital crap is still not as good ... for that matter, even the Grateful Dead sound system was the best I have ever saw and heard ... clean too! You never missed a single touch by anyone playing anything, and it was truly a big trip! At the Hollywood Bowl, the opener was "One of These Days" and it going around your venue front, back and side, was pure magic. Still something to love and enjoy ... this was never repeated even after DSOTM ... of with RW who turned a 3D moment into a 2D crap'er in his shows! Roger might know and create a lot of stuff, but he has no feel for its presentation whatsoever! Edited by moshkito - Yesterday at 08:34 |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
![]() |
||
Tapfret ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 12 2007 Location: Bryant, Wa Status: Offline Points: 8633 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Siberian Khatru, which I read folks compare to Stayin' Alive. I am particularly fond of the Yessongs version.
As previously mentioned, The Battle of Epping Forest. |
||
![]() |
||
Themistocles ![]() Forum Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: May 05 2025 Location: Portland, Or Status: Offline Points: 12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That is a shame. An esoteric masterclass of a career. |
||
Sjå, my first album in 25+ years is out now: https://jeffjahn.bandcamp.com/album/sj I am told its quite original
|
||
![]() |
||
Saperlipopette! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 12829 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Mademoiselle Nobs replaced Seamus from the studio recording, in Pompeii. So it's really Steve Marriots Border Collie I'm not willing to fight for:) The studio recording of Embryo ended up on a Harvest Sampler in 1970 (without the band's approval). I know the band never thought they nailed it properliy, but I love it and think it would have been the perfect end to side 1. I'm more than happy with Meddle as it is of course. Just a meaniningless "what if" thought. Nothing more. |
||
![]() |
||
DoobieBrother6 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: February 04 2025 Location: Ontario Status: Offline Points: 232 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I agree that YES "Don't kill the whale" gets short shrift from the forums.
Also "Topographic Oceans" wrongfully gets ascribed bile. |
||
![]() |
||
cstack3 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: July 20 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ USA Status: Offline Points: 7514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
"Owner of a Lonely Heart." I love to watch Howe's face whenever he plays it, he looks like he ate rabbit poo! (Thanks, Lazland, for the brilliant analogy!) It's not a bad song, actually.
|
||
I am not a Robot, I'm a FREE MAN!!
|
||
![]() |
||
TheLionOfPrague ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 08 2011 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 1091 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Jeremy Bender - ELP
More Fool Me - Genesis |
||
I shook my head and smiled a whisper knowing all about the place
|
||
![]() |
||
Enchant X ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: July 31 2014 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 922 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Gnik Nosmirc ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 28 2024 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 307 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Emerson's Piano Concerto n°1, but we've already had this discussion...
|
||
Eclectic/RIO/RPI/Canterbury
|
||
![]() |
||
moshkito ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 18558 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi, Considering how many versions of EMBRYO were on the bootlegs, I would imagine that there was a some thought along the way to include it, though I have a feeling that it didn't fit the ideas, or concepts, that they loosely designed for their albums, which left EMBRYO behind. BTW, shame on you ... Mme Nobs (Knobs??) was very far out! And better looking than Roger! ![]() Edited by moshkito - May 06 2025 at 09:35 |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
![]() |
||
Floydoid ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 02 2007 Location: Planet Prog Status: Offline Points: 2132 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I agree about 'San Tropez' - the light cocktail hour jazzy feel nicely fits in with the overall romantic feel of the album (though not as a stand alone track). Embryo would have been an interesting inclusion, tho the band claimed it was never properly finished (hence the hasty withdrawal of the Harvest label double sampler 'Picnic'). The other nice inclusion, again with a romantic feel, could have been 'Biding My Time' had it not been shoved out on 'Relics' earlier in the year. Yes, 'Seamus' is the definitive throwaway track. Meddle is my favourite album of all time by the way, as it was my entry point into the Floyd (and the start of a lifelong obsession with all things Floydian). Not only that, on a wider scale, 'Meddle', and the live album of Ummagumma proved to be my gateway into prog generally... all back in 1971/2! |
||
"Christ, where would rock & roll be without feedback?" - D. Gimour
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |