Bin Laden is dead.

 

Gamemako wrote: Speaking of which, did anyone else see that Discovery Channel program about replicating the shot? They came remarkably close.

I'm more surprised that something enlightening was shown on the Discovery Channel. 

 

The T wrote: Explain please. I see groups of people celebrating other groups of people's deaths. In this case, the US is celebrating the death of ONE person apparently responsible for 3000 deaths. In the first case, Palestinians (for example) were celebrating the death of 3000 people (and, most importantly, the big strike to US' pride) apparently (in their eyes) responsible for years and decades of oppression via their next-door allies... I've said I understand the joy this time, but it's still sad and even disgusting to celebrate death.

And yet, those 3000 people had nothing to do with Israel, so perhaps not all viewpoints are equal.   

The T wrote: Henry Plainview wrote: Rolling my eyes @ u T Please don't report me!!!

Get some new material, especially when most people in this thread won't even understand it. 

Henry Plainview wrote: Rolling my eyes @ u T

Henry Plainview wrote:   The T wrote: As I said I understand the joy and celebrations... It's sad because I remember the minutes after 9/11 footage was shown of celebrations in the middle east... Hell some Anti-US people in my country (and all south america) celebrated... Humanity is repulsive I guess.. Yes, these two things are totally equivalent.  I see no difference whatsoever between the death of 3000 people and the death of the person who killed them.

Henry Plainview wrote:   The T wrote: I'm not seeing much insanity there... Was it severe head trauma that caused you to enter Libertopia? Seriously, it's worrying if you're starting to embrace that sort of thing.People that want to control the way everybody behaves like you sweet HP are responsible for the surge in libertopanists...   If the government could fake it at any time, why didn't Dubya do it on '08? Or Obama do it before the midterms? The timing makes no sense as a faked political maneuver (ignoring the obvious conspiracy problems). I agree with the problems. I've never been a conspiracionist (I believe we landed on the moon as 9/11 was an actual attack by muslim terrorists... JFK i'm still unconvinced about Oswald being alone but probably he was). Your savage reaction against any POSSIBLE conspiracy theory (insane or not, you just predict they will al be insane) tells me you have quite embraced the "if the government or the media says it, it is true" thing...  I do agree that it won't really change anything. We agree.

manofmystery wrote: Hawkwise wrote: Osama is not really dead. It was a lookalike. He's living quietly in rural Wisconsin, sharing a flat with Marilyn Monroe. Meanwhile Elvis is flipping burgers in a roadside cafe on route 66. conspiracy theories dream this will be.     Actually, Bin Laden slipped away to Argentina to live with a 122 year old Hitler, whose his new robotic heart has him gearing up for a comeback.

Hawkwise wrote: Osama is not really dead. It was a lookalike. He's living quietly in rural Wisconsin, sharing a flat with Marilyn Monroe. Meanwhile Elvis is flipping burgers in a roadside cafe on route 66. conspiracy theories dream this will be.

 

The T wrote: Conspiracy theories aside, I'm not seeing much insanity there... Anyway, he's most likely dead, and the wars will continue and nothing absolutely nothing will have changed.

About that, we can agree. Nothing will change with his death, as I said previously. People will not suddenly awaken to the insanity of molesting one another under guise of safety.

Still, that article was awful. Really? You expect people not to celebrate the news that the killer of 3000 American citizens, a man who has declared war on the United States, has been killed? Staged my ass. And when we can't even keep account of our nuclear warheads, we're expected to be able to locate a single dialysis machine belonging to a man with possibly tens of thousands of followers? Holy hell. I don't know much about Paul Craig Roberts, but he's clearly off his rocker.

Gamemako wrote: The T wrote: A brief alternative view of the events...  *sigh*. I would debunk, but you really can't argue with a conspiracy theorist: they'll just call you a part of the conspiracy.

The T wrote: A brief alternative view of the events...

*sigh*. I would debunk, but you really can't argue with a conspiracy theorist: they'll just call you a part of the conspiracy.