Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Hammar
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 132
|
Posted: April 21 2004 at 09:38 |
Scotto'connor wrote:
Genesis- Selling England By The Pound
Peter Gabriel- Gabriel 3
|
Two great albums, but I do not consider them as instrumental..
..and welcome to the forum!!
Edited by Hammar
|
 |
Scotto'connor
Forum Newbie
Joined: March 03 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 20
|
Posted: April 21 2004 at 11:06 |
[/QUOTE]
HAMMAR- Two great albums, but I do not consider them as instrumental.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah hi Hammar, good point about the albums not being instrumental. Technically all albums are instrumental, but I suppose you mean instruments playing the dominant role in a song. I think in 'Selling England' the instuments a big role in songs like 'Firth of Fifth' and 'Cinema Show'. With 'Gabriel 3' their not as dominant in the album but the instruments are just as important as the lyrics in creating his dark, eerie atmosphere.
That's why I chose those two albums, but in many aspects your right.
Edited by Scotto'connor
|
 |
maani
Special Collaborator
Founding Moderator
Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
|
Posted: April 22 2004 at 14:42 |
All:
I agree that neither MHO or Brand X are truly "prog-rock." However, since they are included on the site, I would have to say that anything by either of them is among the best instrumental prog around (though some MHO has minimal vocals). Also, Wakeman's "Six Wives" is definitely among the best instrumental prog albums ever. I would also nominate the first two albums in Eno's 'Ambient" series, which are especially good. And although others have brought up other groups (Soft Machine et al), it would seem that there is not a great deal of really good instrumental prog around.
Anyone feel up to listing prog bands that are entirely, or at least primarily, instrumental?
Peace.
|
 |
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
|
Posted: April 22 2004 at 18:59 |
How about that Anglagard -- Epilog, Maani?
As I recall, you didn't despise it, and I quite like it. 100% instrumental.
Focus were mainly instrumental, too.
Then there's Tangerine Dream! 98.6% instrumental! 
Edited by Peter Rideout
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
|
 |
moonchild
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 15 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 146
|
Posted: May 16 2004 at 19:50 |
danbo wrote:
I love Snow Goose from Camel.
|
YES.
|
In the Wake of Poseidon
|
 |
moonchild
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 15 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 146
|
Posted: May 16 2004 at 19:52 |
Peter Rideout wrote:
Anglagard -- Epilog
|
I love it.
|
In the Wake of Poseidon
|
 |
semismart
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 05 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 139
|
Posted: May 16 2004 at 20:34 |
If you haven't heard Nostradamus by Solaris, check it out
|
<i>Sports cars</i>, helping ugly men get sex since 1954.
|
 |
The Owl
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 19 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 363
|
Posted: May 17 2004 at 12:12 |
Finch - Beyond Expression
In Spe - Concerto for Typewriter in D
Anglagard - Hybris and Epilog
Finnforest
Djam Karet - Reflections From The Firepool
Trace - Trace, Birds
National Health - Playtime
Gryphon - Red Queen to Gryphon 3
SFF - Symphonic Pictures, Sunburst
|
People are puzzled why I don't dig the Stones, well, I listened to the Stones, I tried, and I tried, and I tried, and--I Can't Get No Satisfaction!
www.myspace.com/theowlsmusic
|
 |
Dan Bobrowski
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
|
Posted: May 17 2004 at 12:29 |
The Owl wrote:
Djam Karet - Reflections From The Firepool
|
Owl, what did you think about DK's A Night for Baku? It's my first DK and I'm impressed, though the production, especially the drums, is a bit garage sounding.
|
 |
Marcelo
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 15 2004
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 310
|
Posted: May 17 2004 at 13:43 |
Wurtemberg's "Rock Fantasy 9" is another forgotten and excellent instrumental album.
|
 |
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
|
Posted: May 17 2004 at 15:14 |
Peter Rideout wrote:
How about that Anglagard -- Epilog, Maani?
As I recall, you didn't despise it, and I quite like it. 100% instrumental.
Focus were mainly instrumental, too.
Then there's Tangerine Dream! 98.6% instrumental!  |
98.6 Peter I thought I was a mathematician! Could you explain how you made this calculation.
|
 |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: May 17 2004 at 16:35 |
Andrew Lloyd Webber's Variations on a Theme of Paganini. (Oh yes it is!)
Twelfth Night - Live At the Target (what a classic!!!).
|
 |
Dick Heath
Special Collaborator
Jazz-Rock Specialist
Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12818
|
Posted: May 17 2004 at 17:01 |
Gaston wrote:
I still don't consider Mahavishnu or even really
Brand X to be prog. They should be classified as Jazz fusion. That
being said, usually the big difference between prog and fusion is that
there is indeed no vocals or such on the fusion albums (except Visions
of the Emerald beyond) and that is a highly distinguishing factor of
the differences between the two. Most prog features vocals, most fusion
doesn't. I could pretty much list off every Weather Report or
Mahavishnu album as the best prog instrumental album. It doesn't work.
I vote for Six Wives (although, is it classical?...jk) |
But I'm sorry to say your opinion is based on set of ideas
generated in hindsight. Mahavishnu And Brand X from the early and
middle 70's respectively, were both categorised prog and jazz rock ( jazz fusion seems to be a later term).
Not all prog has been centred around vocals, the
instrumental work tended to be dominant - perhaps somebody would
like to calculate the percentage time the lead vocalist is in action on
any early Genesis, Yes, King Crimson etc. album. I saw Yes two weeks
after "The Yes Album" was released, and virtually every track
played was rearranged for different combinations of
instrumentation than heard on the albums - a couple of tunes had Squire
and Howe both playing bass. I'm one of those who were originally
attracted to prog because of the high quality of musicianship shown,
vocals being secondary (some lyrics could be just plain daft) - and the
same logic applied to the early jazz rock masters, MO, Machine (but at
least Mr Wyatt wuld do some sort of sonic effect with his mouth),
RTF. The rock djs on BBC Radio One, didn't see/hear any
distinction originally - I heard the full "Pharoah's
Dance" from Bitches Brew
on Pete Drummond's BBC Rock Request Show and Kid Jansen played
Lifetime's "Turn It Over" on his Radio Luxenburg rock show in 1970.
|
 |
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
|
Posted: May 17 2004 at 17:13 |
Interesting that "The Snowgoose" and "Hamburger Concerto" are considered instrumental albums, even though both do actually have vocals. (I do agree by the way).
I guess though the important point is that they don't have lyrics as such, just sounds. In that case, given that Yes' lyrics are written very much with the sound of the words in mind, not the lyrical content, I'll nominate "Close to the edge"!
|
 |
Gaston
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 26 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 401
|
Posted: May 17 2004 at 17:49 |
Dick Heath wrote:
Gaston wrote:
I still don't consider Mahavishnu or even really Brand X to be prog. They should be classified as Jazz fusion. That being said, usually the big difference between prog and fusion is that there is indeed no vocals or such on the fusion albums (except Visions of the Emerald beyond) and that is a highly distinguishing factor of the differences between the two. Most prog features vocals, most fusion doesn't. I could pretty much list off every Weather Report or Mahavishnu album as the best prog instrumental album. It doesn't work.
I vote for Six Wives (although, is it classical?...jk)
|
But I'm sorry to say your opinion is based on set of ideas generated in hindsight. Mahavishnu And Brand X from the early and middle 70's respectively, were both categorised prog and jazz rock (jazz fusion seems to be a later term).
Not all prog has been centred around vocals, the instrumental work tended to be dominant - perhaps somebody would like to calculate the percentage time the lead vocalist is in action on any early Genesis, Yes, King Crimson etc. album. I saw Yes two weeks after "The Yes Album" was released, and virtually every track played was rearranged for different combinations of instrumentation than heard on the albums - a couple of tunes had Squire and Howe both playing bass. I'm one of those who were originally attracted to prog because of the high quality of musicianship shown, vocals being secondary (some lyrics could be just plain daft) - and the same logic applied to the early jazz rock masters, MO, Machine (but at least Mr Wyatt wuld do some sort of sonic effect with his mouth), RTF. The rock djs on BBC Radio One, didn't see/hear any distinction originally - I heard the full "Pharoah's Dance" from Bitches Brew on Pete Drummond's BBC Rock Request Show and Kid Jansen played Lifetime's "Turn It Over" on his Radio Luxenburg rock show in 1970.
|
?
It was an accurate description. I wasn't talking about what some people thought the music should've been called back then, I'm taking modern day reality into account. You find progressive rock in the Rock section and you find Jazz fusion in the Jazz section. You don't find Mahavishnu Orchestra in ANY rock section anywhere except this site, so I don't know why the confrontation.
And anyways Heath, you want to proclaim that the idea is in hindsight, than the term PROGRESSIVE ROCK must be taken in the same light. You don't just call early Floyd and KC "real" prog, it extends to a wide category, but it stays within the rock boundaries, totally. It doesn't, however, cross into a Jazz category.
However, to concede a little, imo, Prog and Jazz fusion actually run into each other on the continuous list of how music meshes and melds into each genre.
|

It's the same guy. Great minds think alike.
|
 |
Dick Heath
Special Collaborator
Jazz-Rock Specialist
Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12818
|
Posted: May 18 2004 at 07:11 |
Gaston
Alas you has to contend with old foogies like me, who come from a less cluttered and less organised period, and regret that modern society loves its pigeonholes (for example, how many variants of electronic dance and rap are there???). There was simplicity of ideas in the mid to late 60's - progressive because there was a perceptable change by hybridising with two or more musical genre, rock because it had rock rhythms, instrumentation, amplification. Hence jazz, folk, world, classical/serious were hydridised in a variety of ways. Anything that gave a new edge to rock and/or pop.
Nice liked their jazz (roots back to Dave Brubeck Quartet's Time Out); check out King Crimson Collectors Club issues, especially the Mel Collins/Wallace/Burrell period to hear them covering of Pharoah Saunder (Denver Radio recording??)!!! Where is the cut off point between Soft Machine the prog band and Soft Machine the jazz rock band? Bill Bruford has alway said he was trying to play jazz drums with Yes - and Jamie Muir was a avante jazz percussionist, who helped push Krimson further into the free rock/jazz area; Keith Tippett plays free jazz piano for Krimson. There are late 70's Genesis tunes which wouldn't seem out of place in the Brand X repertoise for obvious reasons - and why employ specificially a jazz rock drummer and jazz rock guitarist for live gigs? Have you heard Darryl Stuermer and Holdsworth together on Enigmatic Oceans? Caravan experimented with jazz ideas in their second album, before largely abandoning that area to their friends and fellow Canterbury men (i.e Machine). John McLaughlin does his Hendrix inspired rock album with Devotion. ETC ETC.
Plenty more evidence to go but as you state:
However, to concede a little, imo, Prog and Jazz fusion actually run into each other on the continuous list of how music meshes and melds into each genre.
No real problem with this concept. As ever, you have your opinion which I respect, although I will try to change this through (I hope) good examples to support my arguement. However, I still don't accept that what we understood in the 60's should unnecessarily be altered by what pundits concoct in the 80's. The same applies to the post-punk/anti-prog writers who have long managed to skew the history of rock against prog (see my recent letter on Paul Connolly writings in the London Times' art sections).
Edited by Dick Heath
|
 |
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
|
Posted: May 18 2004 at 08:23 |
Just getting back to the subject of the thread for a moment, how about Banco's '...di Terra'?
|
 |
Bjørn Are
Forum Newbie
Joined: April 24 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 16
|
Posted: May 18 2004 at 12:29 |
What about the best instrumental piece?
To move beyond those great albums mentioned above I would suggest few tunes would beat ELP's Barbarian, Toccata and Hoedown, even if they didn't make the orignals themselves. Or if that should count one could as easily put in Tank, Abbadon's Bolero and Karn Evil 9, 2nd Impression.
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.