Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
mithrandir
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 25 2006
Location: New Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 933
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 09 2008 at 19:27 |
tardis wrote:
I, Robot - 9/10
I really enjoyed this movie, despite hearing only average reviews by the critics. I've never read the book, so I can't compare the film, and anyways books are always better, but I really had fun with this film. Yes, fun is the key word! It was a nice combination of detective story, mystery, and philosophical debates (on artificial intelligence rights, and Asimov writes great AI sci-fi). I liked Will Smith's character, even if it took me a bit to warm up to at first. There is more I could say about the film, but I'll let you judge it for yourself...check it out!
|
hmm, thats quite a high rating...I assumed it just wasn't even worth the effort, I knew the movie wasn't going to follow the book because its basically a series of short stories that follow the evolution of the Robot while testing their merits against the Three Laws of Robotics, so Im assuming it takes more from the subsequent books in the Robot Series like Caves of Steel, maybe I'll give it a chance....I can't imagine it being any worse than some of the movies I saw over the weekend,
|
 |
Fight Club
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 21 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 572
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 09 2008 at 16:45 |
tardis wrote:
Fight Club wrote:
[QUOTE=mithrandir]
Sunshine - I loved the first hour or so of this movie, great
hard-Scifi with an awesome and believable ship, crew interactions and
problem scenarios, great special FX too... this is what CGI was made
for! the only minor factual flaw was there's no reason why they
couldn't have remained in contact with Earth from that short of
distance - but I guess that was something they added to raise the
tension, Now my annoyance with this movie was what played out towards
the end, (all of a sudden it turns into a stalker/slasher in space movie ugh)
...so it lost some points with me on that one, a shame they had to
break the mood with that tripe, I'll still give it a respectful - 7/10
- just because there was so much I liked about the beginning,
|
I pretty much agree with you here on this review, and 7 is quite generous. I loved the first part of the movie, great suspense and tension, beautiful ship design etc. .... but couldn't quite feel disappointed at the sudden "slasher-flick" type ending (won't give anything away here)...still, definitely worth seeing...had a lot of potential as a sci-fi flick, we need more of 'em out there because the good ones are few and far between!
Movies I've recently watched:
Iron Man - 5/10
Mixed feelings on this one. Had some fun scenes and action, but felt disappointingly short-lived if that makes any sense. I felt left wanting for more, and that the ending battle sequence was only subpar (also I have a lot of respect for Jeff Bridges, but couldn't quite get into his character...in fact a lot of the characters felt a bit contrived, but if you can look past the cliched stereotypical archetypes, the movie still has it's fun moments).
I, Robot - 9/10
I really enjoyed this movie, despite hearing only average reviews by the critics. I've never read the book, so I can't compare the film, and anyways books are always better, but I really had fun with this film. Yes, fun is the key word! It was a nice combination of detective story, mystery, and philosophical debates (on artificial intelligence rights, and Asimov writes great AI sci-fi). I liked Will Smith's character, even if it took me a bit to warm up to at first. There is more I could say about the film, but I'll let you judge it for yourself...check it out!
There Will Be Blood - 5.5/10
Very mixed feelings about this effort. I would have given it a much higher rating if the ending hadn't left me feeling so cheated. Sure, maybe it was intentional and all, but I like to see movies that give me at least a partial sense of satisfaction, and all I felt after seeing this movie was disappointment, depression, and a sick feeling in my stomach.
Don't get me wrong, there was some fine acting performances, but the main character was so hopelessly bleak and bitter, with no hope of redemption, I was left feeling like I'd just watched a funeral march. Maybe some like these kind of anti-feel good movies, but I prefer movies with redemptive themes. All I took away from this movie was that I hope to God never to end up like Daniel's character 
Still, I tried to be generous with my rating, movie was captivating and certainly kept me watching, if the ending hadn't left me feeling so jilted, I'd have given a much higher rating. Definitely recommend watching it though, and would love to hear what others think of it...there's no right review for a movie, it's all personal preference 
I will never look at drinking a milkshake the same way again though....
|
Originally posted by BroSpence
Originally posted by Fight Club
Originally posted by Chicapah
Finally
saw "There will be blood" and it was an amazing acting performance by
DDL. He's in every scene and I'll spend the rest of my life dissecting
his character's dark psyche. |
Even
though I believe that his performance may in fact be the best I have
ever seen in a motion picture (yes is really is that profound) I think
it's a crime that the movie gets so much attention for the performance
instead of its entire execution in general. The sheer magnitude of
DDL's performance initially seems to pull people's eyes away from the
true genius of the film. Every little detail in that movie is worked
out to perfection - every. There isn't a single aspect placed within it
that doesn't serve a purpose towards conveying the character of Daniel
Plainview and his conflict with Eli Sunday.
Really everyone,
if you haven't seen this movie yet, I urge you to. If you have seen the
movie and didn't quite get it yet, watch it again, and with a closer
view to aesthetic detail. It truly is a modern day masterpiece and will
be remembered for years to come!
|
WOO
YES! I too was taken away by TWBB. It was brilliant. the acting, the
cinematography, the story, the music. The entire film had everything
you could need. I was upset that a brilliant work of art like TWBB was
reduced to one man's performance (a great one though). The best
picture oscar should have gone to TWBB instead of No Country For Old
Men. While that film was good, it didn't match the glory of TWBB. I
mean the Coen brothers had already made films like No Country before.
TWBB took movies back to the days when epic films were so very well
done like Lawrence of Arabia. The big screen especially magnified the
brilliance of the film too.
Even just the opening shot was perfect. I loved it. easily a 10/10 film for me.
|
Ah
yes, the intro to that movie is just plain brilliant. There's no
dialogue for the first 15 minutes, and it really puts meaning to the
phrase "actions speak louder than words." In this first 15 minutes you
get an idea of exactly what kind of man Daniel Plainview is, and it
sets up the audience for the rest of the film. I too agree
TBWW was a better movie than No Country for Old Men, though No Country
was also brilliant. The Coens have had a long and prestigious career
though and they deserved that Oscar. TBWW was just brilliant
though... I know I'm repeating myself haha, but honestly, the more I
think about that movie the more I realize how great it is. It's such a
successful example of character study that it should be taught in
literature classes. In all honesty, that movie was more poetic than
most of the crap I was forced to read in high school haha. EVERYTHING
has either a literal or metaphorical purpose. I especially love how Eli bleeds black at the end, just like everything else Daniel touches. He is quite literally an oil man.
|
Geez, you rated I Robot higher (much higher) than There Will Be Blood. That's disappointing... You're DEFINITELY going to have to watch it a few more times. I also suggest going out and renting a bunch of David Lynch movies, once you understand those, you'll watch movies in an entirely different manner
|
|
 |
crimhead
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 09 2008 at 02:59 |
So is anyone interested in seeing the new Adam Sadler movie? Mike Myers?
|
 |
KoS
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 09 2008 at 01:09 |
Fight Club wrote:
And I've been wanting to see Sunshine for a while. I enjoyed Danny Boyle's previous works (Trainspotting, 28 Days Later) although Millions really pissed me off. My film teacher told me it was one of his favorite movies of all time so I went out and saw it and thought he was joking. But anyway, I've heard some positive and some negative things about Sunshine, so I'll just have to see for myself.
|
I just saw Sunshine last night and well, same problem as I had with 28 Days, the last part did not fit. I was enjoying the moral dilemmas presented in the film, but then it had to go all action film on me. Overall good film 8/10.
Edited by KoS - June 09 2008 at 01:10
|
 |
tardis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: Victoria, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 14378
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 09 2008 at 01:00 |
Fight Club wrote:
[QUOTE=mithrandir]
Sunshine - I loved the first hour or so of this movie, great
hard-Scifi with an awesome and believable ship, crew interactions and
problem scenarios, great special FX too... this is what CGI was made
for! the only minor factual flaw was there's no reason why they
couldn't have remained in contact with Earth from that short of
distance - but I guess that was something they added to raise the
tension, Now my annoyance with this movie was what played out towards
the end, (all of a sudden it turns into a stalker/slasher in space movie ugh)
...so it lost some points with me on that one, a shame they had to
break the mood with that tripe, I'll still give it a respectful - 7/10
- just because there was so much I liked about the beginning,
|
I pretty much agree with you here on this review, and 7 is quite generous. I loved the first part of the movie, great suspense and tension, beautiful ship design etc. .... but couldn't quite feel disappointed at the sudden "slasher-flick" type ending (won't give anything away here)...still, definitely worth seeing...had a lot of potential as a sci-fi flick, we need more of 'em out there because the good ones are few and far between! Movies I've recently watched: Iron Man - 5/10 Mixed feelings on this one. Had some fun scenes and action, but felt disappointingly short-lived if that makes any sense. I felt left wanting for more, and that the ending battle sequence was only subpar (also I have a lot of respect for Jeff Bridges, but couldn't quite get into his character...in fact a lot of the characters felt a bit contrived, but if you can look past the cliched stereotypical archetypes, the movie still has it's fun moments). I, Robot - 9/10 I really enjoyed this movie, despite hearing only average reviews by the critics. I've never read the book, so I can't compare the film, and anyways books are always better, but I really had fun with this film. Yes, fun is the key word! It was a nice combination of detective story, mystery, and philosophical debates (on artificial intelligence rights, and Asimov writes great AI sci-fi). I liked Will Smith's character, even if it took me a bit to warm up to at first. There is more I could say about the film, but I'll let you judge it for yourself...check it out! There Will Be Blood - 5.5/10 Very mixed feelings about this effort. I would have given it a much higher rating if the ending hadn't left me feeling so cheated. Sure, maybe it was intentional and all, but I like to see movies that give me at least a partial sense of satisfaction, and all I felt after seeing this movie was disappointment, depression, and a sick feeling in my stomach. Don't get me wrong, there was some fine acting performances, but the main character was so hopelessly bleak and bitter, with no hope of redemption, I was left feeling like I'd just watched a funeral march. Maybe some like these kind of anti-feel good movies, but I prefer movies with redemptive themes. All I took away from this movie was that I hope to God never to end up like Daniel's character  Still, I tried to be generous with my rating, movie was captivating and certainly kept me watching, if the ending hadn't left me feeling so jilted, I'd have given a much higher rating. Definitely recommend watching it though, and would love to hear what others think of it...there's no right review for a movie, it's all personal preference  I will never look at drinking a milkshake the same way again though....
|
 |
mithrandir
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 25 2006
Location: New Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 933
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 09 2008 at 00:38 |
|
 |
Fight Club
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 21 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 572
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 08 2008 at 18:23 |
mithrandir wrote:
Gridlock'd - a movie staring Tim Roth and Tupac
Shakur as a couple of junkies set on an adventure of sorts to try to
get into a detox program, not sure why my GF put this in netflix, but
whatever we watched it, mildly amusing view - 3/10
Sunshine - I loved the first hour or so of this movie, great
hard-Scifi with an awesome and believable ship, crew interactions and
problem scenarios, great special FX too... this is what CGI was made
for! the only minor factual flaw was there's no reason why they
couldn't have remained in contact with Earth from that short of
distance - but I guess that was something they added to raise the
tension, Now my annoyance with this movie was what played out towards
the end, (all of a sudden it turns into a stalker/slasher in space movie ugh)
...so it lost some points with me on that one, a shame they had to
break the mood with that tripe, I'll still give it a respectful - 7/10
- just because there was so much I liked about the beginning,
Diary of the Dead - well I had to see it, but really why did Romero
feel he had to make this one? any of the he wanted
to convey have all been done in his previous Zombie epics, so nothing
new there...the hand-held camera view point really didn't bring
anything new either in fact it all seemed a little to sterile if you
ask me, like it should have been grainier looking or something, if
anything there are 3 things that might have actually improved this
movie a bit #1 - should have been a little more raw and dirty looking,
the splicing in the stock footage of disaster and violence made the the
actual filmed footage seem all the more phony, #2 - better acting, I
love sleaze and B-grade cinema just as much as the next guy but there
is something to be said for trained professionals in the business, #3 -
a tigher script, cut out some of the unnecessary BS, maybe span out
some of the more hopeless and depressive scenes...there was no mood
here, also WAY too many moments where you're saying "that doesn't make
sense" or "that wouldn't happen, cause of this and that" -- maybe Im
asking too much here but sh*t man either put out a halfway decent
product or nothing at all, ugh - 2/10, (and only one of those points is
out of respect and remembrance for Romero's classic films)
|
Geez, a 3/10 and a 2/10! Stop watching such bad movies!  And I've been wanting to see Sunshine for a while. I enjoyed Danny Boyle's previous works (Trainspotting, 28 Days Later) although Millions really pissed me off. My film teacher told me it was one of his favorite movies of all time so I went out and saw it and thought he was joking. But anyway, I've heard some positive and some negative things about Sunshine, so I'll just have to see for myself.
|
|
 |
mithrandir
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 25 2006
Location: New Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 933
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 08 2008 at 12:56 |
Gridlock'd - a movie staring Tim Roth and Tupac
Shakur as a couple of junkies set on an adventure of sorts to try to
get into a detox program, not sure why my GF put this in netflix, but
whatever we watched it, mildly amusing view - 3/10
Sunshine - I loved the first hour or so of this movie, great
hard-Scifi with an awesome and believable ship, crew interactions and
problem scenarios, great special FX too... this is what CGI was made
for! the only minor factual flaw was there's no reason why they
couldn't have remained in contact with Earth from that short of
distance - but I guess that was something they added to raise the
tension, Now my annoyance with this movie was what played out towards
the end, (all of a sudden it turns into a stalker/slasher in space movie ugh)
...so it lost some points with me on that one, a shame they had to
break the mood with that tripe, I'll still give it a respectful - 7/10
- just because there was so much I liked about the beginning,
Diary of the Dead - well I had to see it, but really why did Romero
feel he had to make this one? any of the he wanted
to convey have all been done in his previous Zombie epics, so nothing
new there...the hand-held camera view point really didn't bring
anything new either in fact it all seemed a little to sterile if you
ask me, like it should have been grainier looking or something, if
anything there are 3 things that might have actually improved this
movie a bit #1 - should have been a little more raw and dirty looking,
the splicing in the stock footage of disaster and violence made the the
actual filmed footage seem all the more phony, #2 - better acting, I
love sleaze and B-grade cinema just as much as the next guy but there
is something to be said for trained professionals in the business, #3 -
a tigher script, cut out some of the unnecessary BS, maybe span out
some of the more hopeless and depressive scenes...there was no mood
here, also WAY too many moments where you're saying "that doesn't make
sense" or "that wouldn't happen, cause of this and that" -- maybe Im
asking too much here but sh*t man either put out a halfway decent
product or nothing at all, ugh - 2/10, (and only one of those points is
out of respect and remembrance for Romero's classic films)
|
 |
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 07 2008 at 02:16 |
Fight Club wrote:
I especially love how Eli bleeds black at the end, just like everything else Daniel touches. He is quite literally an oil man.
|
HAHA!
|
 |
Fight Club
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 21 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 572
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 06 2008 at 19:30 |
BroSpence wrote:
Fight Club wrote:
Chicapah wrote:
Finally saw "There will be blood" and it was an amazing acting performance by DDL. He's in every scene and I'll spend the rest of my life dissecting his character's dark psyche. |
Even though I believe that his performance may in fact be the best I have ever seen in a motion picture (yes is really is that profound) I think it's a crime that the movie gets so much attention for the performance instead of its entire execution in general. The sheer magnitude of DDL's performance initially seems to pull people's eyes away from the true genius of the film. Every little detail in that movie is worked out to perfection - every. There isn't a single aspect placed within it that doesn't serve a purpose towards conveying the character of Daniel Plainview and his conflict with Eli Sunday.
Really everyone, if you haven't seen this movie yet, I urge you to. If you have seen the movie and didn't quite get it yet, watch it again, and with a closer view to aesthetic detail. It truly is a modern day masterpiece and will be remembered for years to come!
|
WOO YES! I too was taken away by TWBB. It was brilliant. the acting, the cinematography, the story, the music. The entire film had everything you could need. I was upset that a brilliant work of art like TWBB was reduced to one man's performance (a great one though). The best picture oscar should have gone to TWBB instead of No Country For Old Men. While that film was good, it didn't match the glory of TWBB. I mean the Coen brothers had already made films like No Country before. TWBB took movies back to the days when epic films were so very well done like Lawrence of Arabia. The big screen especially magnified the brilliance of the film too.
Even just the opening shot was perfect. I loved it. easily a 10/10 film for me.
|
Ah yes, the intro to that movie is just plain brilliant. There's no dialogue for the first 15 minutes, and it really puts meaning to the phrase "actions speak louder than words." In this first 15 minutes you get an idea of exactly what kind of man Daniel Plainview is, and it sets up the audience for the rest of the film. I too agree TBWW was a better movie than No Country for Old Men, though No Country was also brilliant. The Coens have had a long and prestigious career though and they deserved that Oscar. TBWW was just brilliant though... I know I'm repeating myself haha, but honestly, the more I think about that movie the more I realize how great it is. It's such a successful example of character study that it should be taught in literature classes. In all honesty, that movie was more poetic than most of the crap I was forced to read in high school haha. EVERYTHING has either a literal or metaphorical purpose. I especially love how Eli bleeds black at the end, just like everything else Daniel touches. He is quite literally an oil man.
|
|
 |
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 06 2008 at 01:58 |
Fight Club wrote:
Chicapah wrote:
Finally saw "There will be blood" and it was an amazing acting performance by DDL. He's in every scene and I'll spend the rest of my life dissecting his character's dark psyche. |
Even though I believe that his performance may in fact be the best I have ever seen in a motion picture (yes is really is that profound) I think it's a crime that the movie gets so much attention for the performance instead of its entire execution in general. The sheer magnitude of DDL's performance initially seems to pull people's eyes away from the true genius of the film. Every little detail in that movie is worked out to perfection - every. There isn't a single aspect placed within it that doesn't serve a purpose towards conveying the character of Daniel Plainview and his conflict with Eli Sunday.
Really everyone, if you haven't seen this movie yet, I urge you to. If you have seen the movie and didn't quite get it yet, watch it again, and with a closer view to aesthetic detail. It truly is a modern day masterpiece and will be remembered for years to come!
|
WOO YES! I too was taken away by TWBB. It was brilliant. the acting, the cinematography, the story, the music. The entire film had everything you could need. I was upset that a brilliant work of art like TWBB was reduced to one man's performance (a great one though). The best picture oscar should have gone to TWBB instead of No Country For Old Men. While that film was good, it didn't match the glory of TWBB. I mean the Coen brothers had already made films like No Country before. TWBB took movies back to the days when epic films were so very well done like Lawrence of Arabia. The big screen especially magnified the brilliance of the film too. Even just the opening shot was perfect. I loved it. easily a 10/10 film for me.
|
 |
avalanchemaster
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 06 2008 at 00:32 |
Eastern Promises- another Cronenberg film in the similar vein as his last, A History of Violence... it was okay. worth seeing once. I did not enjoy this one as much as History of Violence, even though it is an interesting look at the workings of the Russian mafia.....some real gory/violent scenes. 6.5/10
Strange Wilderness- another half-baked comedy that is more for the dopes than anybody else. hardly any laugh out loud moments to be found, lots of slapstick and tasteless comedy.....another supposed feel good movie for the stoners that is pretty damn retarded but entertaining in the end..... 4/10
|
|
 |
Fight Club
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 21 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 572
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 05 2008 at 23:22 |
Toaster Mantis wrote:
Just be warned - Oldboy is pretty much the definition of a cinematic Rorschach test except that the blots are blood rather than ink. |
HAHAHA
|
|
 |
Fight Club
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 21 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 572
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 05 2008 at 23:17 |
Chicapah wrote:
Finally saw "There will be blood" and it was an amazing acting performance by DDL. He's in every scene and I'll spend the rest of my life dissecting his character's dark psyche. |
Even though I believe that his performance may in fact be the best I have ever seen in a motion picture (yes is really is that profound) I think it's a crime that the movie gets so much attention for the performance instead of its entire execution in general. The sheer magnitude of DDL's performance initially seems to pull people's eyes away from the true genius of the film. Every little detail in that movie is worked out to perfection - every. There isn't a single aspect placed within it that doesn't serve a purpose towards conveying the character of Daniel Plainview and his conflict with Eli Sunday. Really everyone, if you haven't seen this movie yet, I urge you to. If you have seen the movie and didn't quite get it yet, watch it again, and with a closer view to aesthetic detail. It truly is a modern day masterpiece and will be remembered for years to come!
|
|
 |
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin & Razor Guru
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 04 2008 at 12:25 |
mithrandir wrote:
Jim Garten re 'The Shipping News' wrote:
& I thought beautifully filmed, . |
yeah, that was probably the only interesting part for me, the nice fiming of the landscape, shores, ocean. hills etc, beautiful country side, not so good movie though |
You must admit though, there're not many movies where the 'hero' is saved from drowning by hanging on to a beer cooler, which just happens to contain a man's head... original if nothing else.
|
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
 |
mithrandir
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 25 2006
Location: New Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 933
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 03 2008 at 14:23 |
Jim Garten wrote:
& I thought beautifully filmed, . |
yeah, that was probably the only interesting part for me, the nice fiming of the landscape, shores, ocean. hills etc, beautiful country side, not so good movie though
|
 |
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 03 2008 at 08:26 |
TGM: Orb wrote:
Saw Blade II yesterday.
Was a fun action movie, even if some of the twists (especially the big one) were extremely obvious. Some of the ambiguity was well-handled, though. Haven't seen the first, mean to watch the third on Wednesday.
6/10
|
I fell asleep 30 minutes into it the first time I saw it  But then again, it was 3am when I began to watch it.
|
|
 |
Chicapah
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8238
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 03 2008 at 08:17 |
Finally saw "There will be blood" and it was an amazing acting performance by DDL. He's in every scene and I'll spend the rest of my life dissecting his character's dark psyche.
|
"Literature is well enough, as a time-passer, and for the improvement and general elevation and purification of mankind, but it has no practical value" - Mark Twain
|
 |
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin & Razor Guru
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 03 2008 at 03:27 |
mithrandir wrote:
The Shipping News - eh, not even worth writing about, Kevin Spacey in an uninteresting roll and uninteresting story, I must be harsh - 2/10 |
Ooh, that is harsh  ; personally, I liked the movie; not the most exciting in the world, sure, but well written, well acted (would you expect anything else from Spacey...?) & I thought beautifully filmed, despite the fact it portrayed Newfoundlanders as ignorant inbreeds & Newfoundland itself as an ugly wasteland; not true  - just goes to show the camera does lie.
|
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
 |
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 01 2008 at 14:39 |
Oh, I don't mind long single-shot takes at all. I just think that script-wise, there was too much stuff on Earth and not enough on the solar station.
|
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
 |