Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - "Selling Out"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closed"Selling Out"

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
Author
Message
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 12:43
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Well, I wouldn't go that far because I still loathe Phil Collins' pop music, but I just find it difficult to conclusively say that he did it for the money. I have trouble believing somebody who was already successful as an artist would feel the need to do that.
You know, going back over this thread I've been trying to figuer out who has said that Phil Collins was a sell out on his solo albums. My inital post was made regarding Genesis, who most certainly did sell out and Banks has all but admited as much (and it was Banks and Rutherford who wrote most of the songs,a s we should all know by now).
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 13:25
Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

How did he compromise his artistic integrity exactly? 


I guess you could start with the fondant and formulaic piano fuelled ballads used in 'Romantic Comedies', the stiffer than a 90 year old kitten Motown covers, the warm and cosy nostalgic big band jazz atrocities, the assimilation of cyclic beatbox funk that makes pale Russian bank clerks seem positively urban etc (the list goes on)

Assuming you've heard any of Collins solo output (and I think you have) the question is at best disingenuous.

REO Speedwagon for "Progressive Electronic' anyone ?



So what you meant is that progressive music has more merit than pop music.

I was challenging that assumption. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
TheGazzardian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2009
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 14:38
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

How did he compromise his artistic integrity exactly? 


I guess you could start with the fondant and formulaic piano fuelled ballads used in 'Romantic Comedies', the stiffer than a 90 year old kitten Motown covers, the warm and cosy nostalgic big band jazz atrocities, the assimilation of cyclic beatbox funk that makes pale Russian bank clerks seem positively urban etc (the list goes on)

Assuming you've heard any of Collins solo output (and I think you have) the question is at best disingenuous.

REO Speedwagon for "Progressive Electronic' anyone ?



So what you meant is that progressive music has more merit than pop music.

I was challenging that assumption. 

Progressive rock has different merit than pop music. But more personal merit for 99% of the people here. :D
Back to Top
PurpleWolfhound View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 16 2009
Location: Philadelphia PA
Status: Offline
Points: 615
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 15:22
Originally posted by sleeper sleeper wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Well, I wouldn't go that far because I still loathe Phil Collins' pop music, but I just find it difficult to conclusively say that he did it for the money. I have trouble believing somebody who was already successful as an artist would feel the need to do that.
You know, going back over this thread I've been trying to figuer out who has said that Phil Collins was a sell out on his solo albums. My inital post was made regarding Genesis, who most certainly did sell out and Banks has all but admited as much (and it was Banks and Rutherford who wrote most of the songs,a s we should all know by now).
 
I agree completely, but I still hold that Duke contained a lot more prog than what was on the radio at the time. Misunderstanding is pretty much straight up AOR, but Turn It On Again and Behind The Lines contain odd time signatures and altered song structures. Duke's Travels/Duke's End is a fairly complex instrumental bit.
 
I don't deny that this was part of the transition to complete AOR pop/rock, but I tend to draw the line post-Duke rather than post-Wind and Wuthering. I clearly recall the crestfallen sensation when I first dropped the needle on Abacab.
 
Ahh, needles. Good times...  
Back to Top
Evolver View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover & JR/F/Canterbury Teams

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: The Idiocracy
Status: Offline
Points: 5484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 17:40
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Why would renouncing prog make him be selling out? Wouldn't that make it more likely that he didn't sell out?
Maybe not. But he made a career, and his name playing with a number of progressive groups and artists.  He would not have a chance to play his uninteresting pop without that history.  Renouncing all that makes him an ungrateful t**t.  A sell-out?  Perhaps that's more for fans of Genesis to determine. 
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 17:59
If an artist stops making the music he loves and starts doing something he hates just for the money, maybe he's selling out.. (or maybe he wants to make a decent living, as most people here probably want, even the most "prog-only" ones...)
 
In any case, I really don't believe selling out exists outside of that scenario. Because even if an artist changes his style just to get filthy rich... well, to WHOM is he selling out? To the US dollar? That's legitimate, many people - including many of you - already persue it like the holy grail; in most cases, artists "sell out" for their own benefit. I don't call it selling out.
 
For christ's sake, it's just music! If were taking about something with more of a moral obligation  I would understand condemnation of that who wants to make more money. But it's just music.
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 18:48
Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Why would renouncing prog make him be selling out? Wouldn't that make it more likely that he didn't sell out?
Maybe not. But he made a career, and his name playing with a number of progressive groups and artists.  He would not have a chance to play his uninteresting pop without that history.  Renouncing all that makes him an ungrateful t**t.  A sell-out?  Perhaps that's more for fans of Genesis to determine. 
So Phil Collins has an obligation to you to keep making progressive music for you because he made it in the past?
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
jplanet View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 30 2006
Location: NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 799
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 19:00
Realize that the goal of Genesis when they started out was to be a popular band - they had heavily artistic leanings, of course, but they did not want to be obscure and only play music to a small sub-set of rock fans. During the early 70's, prog was very much in fashion -- in fact, ELP was the highest-grossing live act in the world for a while.

So, I do believe that their taste was versatile enough to include a desire to write well-crafted pop songs, so why stay with the old formula when many of your fans have moved on to something else?

Selling out will occur to a degree with any artist - who knows if Porcupine Tree would have become more metal-sounding had it not been for the fact that prog-metal is far more popular than non-metal prog? You can write a page-long list of prog metal acts that tour internationally, see how many non-metal prog acts will be leaving their home continent this year...But I bet that Steve Wilson and his bandmates genuinely enjoy the heavier sound they've been moving towards - I'm sure they also enjoy no longer needing to work day jobs to support it!
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 20:26
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

How did he compromise his artistic integrity exactly? 


I guess you could start with the fondant and formulaic piano fuelled ballads used in 'Romantic Comedies', the stiffer than a 90 year old kitten Motown covers, the warm and cosy nostalgic big band jazz atrocities, the assimilation of cyclic beatbox funk that makes pale Russian bank clerks seem positively urban etc (the list goes on)

Assuming you've heard any of Collins solo output (and I think you have) the question is at best disingenuous.

REO Speedwagon for "Progressive Electronic' anyone ?



So what you meant is that progressive music has more merit than pop music.

I was challenging that assumption. 


Yes I was aware of that, but with all due respect, you me and everyone else's value judgement is reflected in our wish to join the site. I like to think that any internet resource dedicated to what its members deem to be progressive music has to resemble the defining exclusiveness of PA  e.g. Calling a steakhouse 'the World's Worst Vegetarian Restaurant',  may be pedantically inclusive of all tastes, but you sound like an animal rights activist applying for a job as its chef. (but have no intention of taking up the position if successful Wink)

On a more serious note, I would say that there is shed-loads of music out there that would not be considered either progressive or pop that I prefer to the Progressive Rock celebrated on these pages.
(So perhaps I do agree to a limited extent re your comment on 'merit')
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 20:39
Originally posted by jplanet jplanet wrote:

Realize that the goal of Genesis when they started out was to be a popular band - they had heavily artistic leanings, of course, but they did not want to be obscure and only play music to a small sub-set of rock fans. During the early 70's, prog was very much in fashion -- in fact, ELP was the highest-grossing live act in the world for a while.

So, I do believe that their taste was versatile enough to include a desire to write well-crafted pop songs, so why stay with the old formula when many of your fans have moved on to something else?

Selling out will occur to a degree with any artist - who knows if Porcupine Tree would have become more metal-sounding had it not been for the fact that prog-metal is far more popular than non-metal prog? You can write a page-long list of prog metal acts that tour internationally, see how many non-metal prog acts will be leaving their home continent this year...But I bet that Steve Wilson and his bandmates genuinely enjoy the heavier sound they've been moving towards - I'm sure they also enjoy no longer needing to work day jobs to support it!
I'm fairly sure that PTs heavier sound was a direct consequence of SWilson meeting Mikael Åkerfeldt and Opeth and that any increase in popularity as a result was simply coincidental.
 
Lightbulb sun (2000) -> Blackwater Park (2001) -> In Absential (2002)
What?
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 21:10
For those who do not have compassion for sell outs, remember that many musicians (especially during their youth), are starstruck during that record label signing or the prospects of the outcome from touring. Many who don't realize their social surroundings and even those who do, will give in to the record company decisions. The unfortunate reality for many musicians is that they are working for criminals. The record executives have their private meetings in which they will decide which bands will be chosen for the highest promotion. Many bands will go to the back burner. A business that is ruled by true evil doings. Various musicians I knew who were tossed out of the band before getting signed. All because they refused to give sexual favours. Record scouts are notorious for that act. It's a very tough business because of the sexual over-indulgence from the higher ups. Drugs are of superb quality when handed down from a record company. All these pressures from the dark side of the music business should be taken into account as well. It's relates to the selling out process. Many musicians can't bare the criminal activity and they just bail out. It's a bit like visiting Hell. Dante's Inferno would be a far better comparision. All the different circles in Hell with each circle representing a specific group of criminals. These people should have a circle of their own.   
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 21:16
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

For christ's sake, it's just music!


This should appear on the top of the page every time anyone wants to post on this site.
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2009 at 21:18
I knew this would get good, where is that popcorn smiley...
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Losendos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 571
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2009 at 00:36
maybe bands tire of prog and want to do something else . Only the band can know it's real motivations
How wonderful to be so profound
Back to Top
Ellegon View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: December 30 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 15
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2009 at 01:36
Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

Becoming popular isn't selling out.  Compromising musical values in order to become popular is selling out.

See Love Beach, Giant For A Day, anything Genesis did after And Then There Were Three, for examples.  Rush never were completely prog.  What they have done over the years has been completely consistant with their musical vision all along.


You should have said anything after Wind and Wuthering when talking about Genesis!!! That is the point where Genesis became Genesin't


Edited by Ellegon - December 29 2009 at 01:37
Back to Top
ghost_of_morphy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2009 at 03:06
When I think of selling out, fortunately it isn't a prog album that comes to mind.
 
Selling out will forever for me bring to mind U2's The Joshua Tree.
Back to Top
Evolver View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover & JR/F/Canterbury Teams

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: The Idiocracy
Status: Offline
Points: 5484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2009 at 06:42
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Why would renouncing prog make him be selling out? Wouldn't that make it more likely that he didn't sell out?
Maybe not. But he made a career, and his name playing with a number of progressive groups and artists.  He would not have a chance to play his uninteresting pop without that history.  Renouncing all that makes him an ungrateful t**t.  A sell-out?  Perhaps that's more for fans of Genesis to determine. 
So Phil Collins has an obligation to you to keep making progressive music for you because he made it in the past?
He has an obligation to not brush off the fans who liked him because of what he was, not what he became.   Without the popularity he gained in Genesis, he would not have become Britney.
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
Back to Top
doKCtor Diamond View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: December 17 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 5
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2009 at 13:22
I think there is a major difference between an artist having popular success, and "selling out". It becomes "selling out" when bands and performers make artistic and musical decisions to conform to the commercial musical styles of the day or the marketplace. For the most part this is not true of Progressive bands today nor was it in Prog's first wave of popularity as in the late 60's & early 70's.
Back to Top
rpraborn View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 25 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2009 at 13:39

Maybe the guy had kids. DT for him and miley for the kids. I remember cds i got for my daughter when she was only 5. I started her on Todd Rundgren. Commercial music always has and always will be the main, at least they create jobs for the musicians. Still amazed at how the average listener goes to a Yes concert or Genesis, etc etc. Thank God they do..

rick
rick
Back to Top
Kashmir75 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2009 at 02:44
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by jplanet jplanet wrote:

 who knows if Porcupine Tree would have become more metal-sounding had it not been for the fact that prog-metal is far more popular than non-metal prog? You can write a page-long list of prog metal acts that tour internationally, see how many non-metal prog acts will be leaving their home continent this year...But I bet that Steve Wilson and his bandmates genuinely enjoy the heavier sound they've been moving towards - I'm sure they also enjoy no longer needing to work day jobs to support it!
I'm fairly sure that PTs heavier sound was a direct consequence of SWilson meeting Mikael Åkerfeldt and Opeth and that any increase in popularity as a result was simply coincidental.
 
Lightbulb sun (2000) -> Blackwater Park (2001) -> In Absential (2002)

Not quite true. Wilson was already getting back into heavy music before he met Akerfeldt. He claims he wrote most of In Absentia before he produced Blackwater Park. The heavy edge was there arguably since Stupid Dream (the hints of the heaviness that was to come on Even Less and Tinto Brass, for example). Lightbulb Sun contains some of the heaviest stuff they've done pre- Absentia as well (Russia on Ice). 

Maybe even as far back as Signify. The heavy side of PT was probably inevitable. It just took them six or so albums till they arrived at at.
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.322 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.