Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prog/Non Prog Battle: Beatles vs Rolling Stones
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProg/Non Prog Battle: Beatles vs Rolling Stones

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Poll Question: Prog/Non Prog Battle: Beatles vs Rolling Stones
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
53 [86.89%]
8 [13.11%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15926
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2014 at 00:56
I'll give my vote to the Stones. I enjoy more of their output than Beatles'. I'll admit though, that the Beatles were mainly just the 4 of them, Stones best material (67-76 - IMHO) relied on lots of outside help. I still have more Stones LP's than Beatles, and listen to Jagger & his mates, more than Macca and his mates.
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166183
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2014 at 00:28
I see two of the same.

The Beatles.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2014 at 23:52
Never been a Stones fan
Back to Top
uduwudu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2603
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2014 at 22:50
Stones. Plenty of good songs the best were usually the singles. Bit more simple than the Beatles but highly effective. Both are actually quite good C and W bands (first Ringo's lot pre -Rubber Soul, then Keith's outfit around Beggar's Banquet.

Still don't see the relationship between Pepper and Satanic Majesties. A Day In The Life is the best number off both though. Courageous effort though from The Stones and a very accomplished one with a little help from their friend George Martin. Probably prefer Pepper overall but like The Beatles the best efforts were the contemporary but non LP singles (We Love You and Strawberry Fields).

Still around Abbey Road time there was Let It Bleed and both are fine albums. Shame The Beatles couldn't have continued performing - the concert stage return was the stimulus The Stones needed along with a bunch of top albums. Still some of the the solo Beatles records (Imagine, All Things and Band On The Run) give the Strolling Bones a run for their money. But The Stones played, wrote songs, recorded and kept going in a musical world (rock and pop) that does not require progression (change).

That game was all over around 1973 - '74 really.




Back to Top
smartpatrol View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 15 2012
Location: My Bedroom
Status: Offline
Points: 14169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2014 at 22:32
The Beatles, easily; everything they did was gold. The Rolling Stones are beyond overrated; a decent band at their best.
Back to Top
Lynx33 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 28 2008
Location: Hungary
Status: Offline
Points: 500
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2014 at 22:21
Bands listed and not listed in the PA database but often regarded, cross-referenced and linked together. Which one do you prefer?
Mindez elmúlt. Ma már tudom köszönteni a szépséget.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.