Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Ratings of Bruce Springsteen & Radiohead albums
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Ratings of Bruce Springsteen & Radiohead albums

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567>
Poll Question: For which would you be more likely to give ratings and/or good ratings
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
14 [58.33%]
10 [41.67%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 12753
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2023 at 03:29
Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:


In fact, I compared Pa's ranking with RYM's ranking of the prog. And in the latter ranking, Italian prog is completely absent in the Top 60.

In PA 4 or 5 Italian albums works in the Top 60.

So it is your statement that makes no sense.
So italian prog albums at 64, 72, 76, 77, 79, 81, 85 and 92nd, and not in the top 60 - somehow makes my statement false? Is there another country outside the anglosphere with better representation in the top 100? No. You're behaving like a child.
Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 15384
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lewian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2023 at 03:01
Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:


In his golden age (1972-1988) Springsteen never had a good producer. And he has always conceived his albums around a precise theme. This created a song selection that often had little to do with their music quality. Springsteen's approach, in short, is much more narrative, much more folk than rock, even when he wrote rock songs. Lyrics, in short, are essential to understanding his art. His studio albums have never approached the performance of his live shows (just compare Because the night studio version with live version).
For a prog fan, I think his best albums are The Wild and Born To Run.

PS Nice Polemic? Really?

Well that says I liked to read it, and that it is a polemic.

Anyway, as far as I can tell I'm totally with you that Springsteen on albums is far behind Springsteen live. But then we're talking album charts here. Maybe Springsteen as an artists for his overall work and career deserves a status that none of his albums deserve? But that would be irrelevant when talking about album charts.
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 12753
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2023 at 02:24
Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:


From your point of view it should be devalued.

Yes of course. But I'm very pleased with my point of view, and much prefer it to yours.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 38363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2023 at 21:22
Oh damn. Was typing on my phone while waiting for someone and my browser crashed. I was just on my last words when it happened. Maybe it was saying to me, enough is enough you fatuous smelly windbag. No wonder one must be brave to use the Brave browser. In the future I’ll not use this for posting and use Safari on my phone instead. Sketchy browser as someone said here not long ago but good for blocking ads on my iPhone. On android I love Ublock Origin but I recently got an iPhone.

Thanks for pointing that info out. I actually realized later that I likely had misinterpreted, my fault not the translation program, the message and that that limit of two per artist was just imposed on the contributor. It’s based on curated lists from a limited number of people. A very different process to RYM as those contributors who present lists will be more calculating, whereas the RYM program is the much more calculating one by just using an algorithm to calculate the ranking based on the ratings across the database of huge numbers of users. That’s much more impersonal.

I do prefer the way the Cannes film festival awards work compared to say the US academy awards for best pictures etc. Too many people who vote for things in the academy haven’t even seen the films. I like the shortlist, then Jury chooses between them based on a limited number of films that they all watch and discuss. I have huge issues with best if lists generally, but at least I know that they have all considered that shortlist and seen them. Of course has more prized like audience etc.

As to reviewing, various reviewers prefer to review lesser known, little reviewed albums, and that is what I would do — To bring attention to ones I think others will like and I really like. I don’t really care much about the ranking, you seem to try make more of a science of your ratings than I would, we have have very different ideas and approaches on that, and I’m more interested in albums at PA outside the top 100. I better finish this up before it crashes again.

Anyway, I find interest in the more thought curated lists from limited numbers who contribute and lists that are statistically calculated based on large numbers just rating things.
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 6052
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamesbaldwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2023 at 16:58
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

It's easy to spot the differences in albums covered with your highlights, but I think to highlight much more it is important to understand the differences in how the lists are derived, the contributors and how the sites operate. As you have specifically referenced rateyourmusic having multiple albums and I see thsat Ondarock has a maximum of two, this is a translation of what it says at Ondarock that I found the 70s list page

Originally posted by ondarock ondarock wrote:

Each participating editor or contributor compiles a list of titles related to the topic, representative of his or her perspective. To promote heterogeneity in general we impose only one or two records for each band.

The lists are collected and a score is associated with the first twenty discs mentioned: twenty points for the first in order, nineteen for the next, and so on. If a puck is mentioned by several participants, the points received by each are added up. By ordering the titles starting from the one with the most points, the final classification is obtained.

What you are reading is therefore a representation of the convergences and plurality of views among those who collaborate with Ondarock. It is not a table-built list, there are no Cencelli corrections and manuals. The only agreed element is given by the rules above.

It's a game, and we hope the outcome will intrigue readers as much as it does the participants. For those who want to dig further, the personal rankings of individual editors can be mines of discoveries. Happy exploring!


So they limit the number of albums that can be in the list, whereas rateyourmusic has no such restrictions. RYM's charts are just based on users ratings (average value of rating and number of ratings), and of course if many people like and rate one album by a band, it is likely that they will like and rate more albums by the band, thus multiple albums will be in the charts. I don't know how many contributors there are to Ondarock (how many people that list was derived from) but that is something I would wish to evaluate when making comparisons. It's a different thing being a rater just rating lots of albums you like, then a program computes all that those ratings for the ranking, than it is to be contributor to such lists because that becomes much more considered.

So while there are similarities in the albums, the charts are rather apples and oranges because of the differences in how they are derived.

Greg, an unlimited number of albums by the same artist can appear in the FINAL Ondarock chart (three of Bowie's appear). 

It is in the personal Top 20 that each editor has compiled that a maximum of two albums by a single artist can appear. The main reason why there are more artists in the Ondarock ranking than in the RYM ranking, in my opinion, lies in the fact that the editors of Ondarock are NOT fans of specific artists or a specific genre (they have their own tastes, ok: tastes similar to that of the users of RYM: they are not fond of heartland rock, for example), they tend to have a wide range of albums that they consider good. Also, by putting favourite albums in order from 1 to 20, giving each of them a score from 1 to 20, a hierarchy of value and score is necessarily created and this favours the selection of a few albums for the same author. I say 'favours', because since the FINAL ranking is the sum of the editors' Top 20, it could always happen, for example, that the 5 highest rated Bowie albums (I mean the 5 best rated on RYM) are present with more or less the same score - but it doesn't happen, because, I mean, the "best" are Ziggy and Low (or Heroes? ), which also represent two different periods of his production (undoubtedly there are also other albums that one may like very much: one that seems to me overlooked, perhaps because of the bad production, is Aladdin Sane).
In other words, if you want to rank the albums, you have to develop a coherent technique to do so. If you simply average the ratings from 1 to 5 of all the voters, it is unlikely to come out well. The one from progarchives is very good, and it is a miracle, but as we have already said, it has some adjustments. Any serios ranking, for example, must have the same number of voters, or rather, must have the same voters. It makes no sense to compare the score achieved by David Bowie with that achieved by Springsteen if the voters are completely different people, it is not 'scientific'. 
If you go to a music or film festival, you find a jury. Not two juries. Try to think: at the cannes festival a jury votes half of the films and another jury votes the other half of the films. Then the film with the highest score wins. There would be many disputes, because for example that film might not be liked by the jury that did not evaluate it.
For example, I, as a prog reviewer, am trying to write a review of all the albums in the PA Top 100. I'm almost done with the Top 50, and I'm well on my way to those between 51 and 100. It almost feels like it's my duty to do so, if I want to contribute to the ranking. It doesn't make sense for me to vote only for certain albums and not for others, because my vote has helped to move some albums up a few positions, and to move other albums down a few positions: it is only fair that I do this with all of them.
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 6052
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamesbaldwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2023 at 16:19
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

Radiohead - they're great. Lorenzo has made me appreciate Springsteen's live attitude, and I really like some of his live videos. Also he wrote Because The Night and some of the songs Manfred Mann's Earth Band has done versions of that I really love. Still Springsteen's studio material, as far as I took the time to listen to it, has never convinced me.

Nice polemic by the way by Saperlipopette! I can identify with much of it.


In his golden age (1972-1988) Springsteen never had a good producer. And he has always conceived his albums around a precise theme. This created a song selection that often had little to do with their music quality. Springsteen's approach, in short, is much more narrative, much more folk than rock, even when he wrote rock songs. Lyrics, in short, are essential to understanding his art. His studio albums have never approached the performance of his live shows (just compare Because the night studio version with live version).
For a prog fan, I think his best albums are The Wild and Born To Run.

PS Nice Polemic? Really?
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 6052
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamesbaldwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2023 at 16:09
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:



Btw: comparing RYM's all time chart with PA's progchart, and complaining that there's no italian bands in the former, is... just...not... relevant. Italian prog is cherised both at PA and RYM. You will notice when you compare the latter place' prog chart with PA's chart. Any other comparizon is 100% nonsensical.



In fact, I compared Pa's ranking with RYM's ranking of the prog. And in the latter ranking, Italian prog is completely absent in the Top 60.

In PA 4 or 5 Italian albums works in the Top 60.

So it is your statement that makes no sense.


Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

other famous artists with a big commercial impact on the other hand are almost ignored: Rolling Stones, The Who, Springsteen, Michael Jackson, Dire Straits, U2, REM, Oasis, Coldplay etc.
Not true, but the fact that Bowie, Radiohead and MBL - Loveless is more treasured gives me hope for the future of music.


Instead it is true. I was referring to the ranking of the best albums of all time. In that ranking, all these artists are absent (ignored) in the top 100 (apart from Dylan). Many of them are also absent from the Top 200.

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

Perhaps, if there is a logic, it is to devalue flok-blues-rock artists (Dylan, Springsteen, Rolling Stones, Lou Reed, U2, REM etc.). The popular heartland-folk-roots artists are completely underrated: Springsteen, Seger, Mellencamp, Petty, Hiatt etc.
From a music lover point of view, yes it should be devalued.
-
*the number of RYM users


From your point of view it should be devalued.



Edited by jamesbaldwin - June 02 2023 at 16:11
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 38363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2023 at 09:39
^ Absolutely with Pink Floyd. It has sold huge numbers of albums, been popular in the 70s, the 80s, the 90s, and is still very popular amongst different ages. It is of course popular with albums and individual songs and is a staple of classic rock radio -- I heard Pink Floyd far more on the radio than Springsteen for instance. It's an iconic band. And it's still culturally relevant and gets referenced in different media regularly. When I was staying at a hotel with Waters also there last decade, word got out where he was staying, and there were so many young people outside the entrance of the hotel in their Pink Floyd shirts (not Waters shirts).

Say to the average person who says they like Pink Floyd, "Oh, so you're into Prog!" and I would not be surprised if one got a weird look. Some of those kids with the Dark Side of the Moon shirts of course like the iconic design. I used to like to draw that cover in some classes instead of focusing on the subject, but then I loved the album, and The Wall and Wish You Were Here etc. when I was a teenager.

It's hardly just a Prog phenomenon. I have no idea how many of those who know Pink Floyd think of it as Prog. I didn't even when I become aware of Prog as a thing (I associated Prog with Yes and ELP). It transcends genre. It's popular with the kids who are into psych kinds of music (and psych and related is popular at RateYourMusic), older dudes, to those into art rock and classic rock, and just into music. And it shares a lot of fanbase with Radiohead. They are very similar in various ways, so that's all the more reason why I could see a site which has many Radiohead fans rating their albums also rating Pink Floyd albums.

Good point about the logic of it, I focused on the logic being the input/output process, that if the algorithm sufficiently represents the ratings for the ranking in a sensible and reliable way, then it's logical, but actually the logic goes a lot deeper than that. To understand the logic requires understanding how things work there and knowing something about what music is popular and has been since RYM started amongst the kinds of communities and individuals they have there. As a determinist especially (A causes B causes C etc.). Alien thinking to me. I wonder what Hari Seldon, who "develops psychohistory, an algorithmic science that allows him to predict the future in probabilistic terms" would think? It's important to be aware of one's own biases and particular cultural/ environmental conditioning.

Here is the Season 3 trailer of Westworld:



I hear that music and still gives me a thrills after all these years. By the way, since you mentioned Lou Reed, for the season four Westworld trailer, they used Lou Reed's Just a Perfect Day which is so perfect (preferred that trailer and season to season three). And for one of the most iconic scenes in Westworld's season one they used Paint it Black by the Stones. They used Radiohead multiple times. I'm a Westworld fanboy even if I preferred some seasons to others.

Edited by Logan - June 02 2023 at 09:50
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).
Back to Top
Stressed Cheese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 16 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 540
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stressed Cheese Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2023 at 04:02
Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

3) Pink Floyd are present in Pa's Top 10 with three albums, it is true. But it is a prog music ranking. Whereas on RYM, PF are present with three albums in the Top 10 of all seventies music. There is a big difference.
They were one of the most popular bands in the 70's, and are one of the most popular bands now, so this is a pretty good argument in favor of RYM.
Quote
5) So, the RYM ranking is not just a popularity ranking. Some famous artists such as Pink Floyd, David Bowie, Radiohead are very pumped up, other famous artists with a big commercial impact on the other hand are almost ignored: Rolling Stones, The Who, Springsteen, Michael Jackson, Dire Straits, U2, REM, Oasis, Coldplay etc. In addition, some cult artists enjoy a very high ranking (No. 8: My Bloody Valentine - Loveless!!). That ranking seems to me totally unpredictable and devoid of any logic other than that of being a mirror of fan groups.
Keep in mind that some artists are more known for their singles and are popular radio artists, while other bands are either just more album oriented (PF), or are less likely to attract real devotees. RYM is mostly about albums. That is reflected in RYM's amount of ratings, but the average ratings of, say Michael Jackson's classic albums are still very high. So ultimately, this is a non-issue. Just because the amount of ratings doesn't line up with what you'd expect based on album or ticket sales from when these albums were made, doesn't mean the ratings themselves are invalid, and like Logan pointed out, the artists you call "almost ignored" have very good ratings.

Also, Loveless is highly regarded both on RYM and outside.How is that "devoid of any logic"? Because it doesn't line up with your expectations? Because it's not what Rolling Stone would say? There's a lot of highly regarded and popular hip-hop albums on RYM. I wouldn't have been able to guess what they would be before seeing what they are, because that's not my kind of music. But that doesn't mean they're invalid choices. Before I ever started using RYM I was already aware of Loveless as a highly popular album, so if anything, it would be "devoid of any logic" if RYM didn't reflect that. if it was mostly fan groups pumping up ratings, why didn't they do the same to the other 2 MBV albums? You could say the same about Yes on PA.

RYM has its issues for sure, but the reviews show that most people who rate albums do so because they have an interest in the genre. You wouldn't find enough hip-hop fans who hate prog review-bombing Yes albums, for instance, to make any difference.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 38363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2023 at 00:02
Just out of non-interest probably, I did a series of 23 polls last year covering albums in RYM charts that are also in PA while focusing on one album per artist. On album per artist not throughout the whole series of polls, but at least only one album by an artist in each poll, and these first two polls only had one per artist. This list from the first two polls only includes the ones included in Prog categories at Prog Archives. The numbers on the right indicate what were the rankings at RYM in the general music all-time chart at the time. I had neglected Spiderland before even though I know the album well. I might not have thought that it was in PA at the time. I made a mistake on it being out of PA recently, which was pointed out.

This series was a time-consuming exercise, but I had considerable time on my hands and a lot of insomnia. I had hoped that this might complement David's list as mine was compiled differently which was based on RYM's progressive rock chart instead of the general list -- I know so much in PA from my years here that that was fairly easy even if I missed more than one, or two.... If in doubt I did check PA to see if it was in. Miles Davis' In a Silent Way actually is not the top ranked Miles Davis album there, it is Kind of Blue, but I could not bring myself to include it in the list. The much more appropriate In a Silent Way was the second highest-rated Davis album.

Radiohead - OK Computer (1)
Pink Floyd - Wish You Were Here (3)
King Crimson - In the Court of the Crimson King (4)
Godspeed You Black Emperor! - Lift Yr. Skinny Fists Like Antennas to Heaven! (21)
Slint - Spiderland (28)
Miles Davis - In a Silent Way* (33)
Kate Bush - Hounds of Love (38)
Björk - Vespertine (40)
Yes - Close to the Edge (52)
Swans - Soundtracks for the Blind (66)
Talk Talk - Laughing Stock (72)
Can - Future Days (77)
Sigur Rós - Ágætis byrjun (92)
Death - Symbolic (102)
Frank Zappa - Hot Rats (103)
Eno - Another Green World (131)
Genesis - Selling England by the Pound (166)
Comus - First Utterance (178)
Jethro Tull - Thick as a Brick (187)
Tool - Lateralus (206)
Kraftwerk - Die Mensch-Maschine (218)
Herbie Hancock - Head Hunters (228)
Opeth - Blackwater Park (249)
This Heat - Deceit (268)
black midi - Hellfire (285)
Camel - Mirage (302)
Invisible - El jardín de los presentes (329)
Rush - Moving Pictures (333)
Coil - The Ape of Naples (344)
The Mahavishnu Orchestra with John McLaughlin - The Inner Mounting Flame (386)
Gorguts - Obscura (392)
Nine Inch Nails - The Fragile (403)
Van der Graaf Generator - Pawn Hearts (408)
Robert Wyatt - Rock Bottom (427)
Magma - Rétrospective Vol. 1 & 2 (428)
Neurosis - Through Silver in Blood (431)*
Electric Masada - At the Mountains of Madness (433)
Agalloch - Ashes Against the Grain (437)
Tim Buckley - Dream Letter: Live in London 1968 (441)
Mastodon - Crack the Skye (458)
Soft Machine - Third (464)
Santana - Abraxas (466)
Captain Beefheart & The Magic Band (480)
Mr. Bungle - California (487)
Ulver - Bergtatt: Et eeventyr i 5 capitler (499)
Isis - Panopticon (511)
Caravan - In the Land of Grey and Pink (513)
Boredoms - Vision Creation Newsun (519)
NEU! - NEU! '75 (524)
Weakling - Dead as Dreams (534)
Peter Gabriel - Peter Gabriel 3 (aka "Arrgh, My Face Is Melting!", at least that's how I like to call it) (546)

*whenever I see Coil - The Ape of Naples, I misread it as The Age of Nipples. I wonder what Freud would say about that (I have a feeling I know).

After the first two polls, I made it that I could repeat bands/artists for the series as long as it was no more than one album per act per poll. And I started to include Prog Related and Proto-Prog (I had one nor two polls dedicated to that).

For any Italian comrades who may be reading this... While there is a Prog Related Italian album in the fifth poll, the top ranked Italian album from one of our Prog categories, Museo Rosenbach - Zarathustra (1514) did not come until the 12th poll. Then in Poll 13 we had Premiata Forneria Marconi - Storia di un minuto (1601) and Banco del Mutuo Soccorso - Darwin! (1675). Radiohead also features in that poll with Hail to the Thief (1739). Then in Poll 14 of the series we get PFM again, this time with Per un amico (1602), and we get Franco Battiato with La voce del padrone (1812), additionally we get BdMS again in Poll 14 with the self-titled debut (1813). In poll 23 we had Biglietto per l'Inferno - Biglietto per l'Inferno (3284) and Il Balletto di Bronzo - Ys (3350). I remember wanting to get to Area at RYM, and I did, but I gave up on putting up the polls in PA before then as I then got busy with work and really bored with the exercise. Unfortunately. I did not save the lists behind what I posted here, so gave up on the rather fatuous, perhaps, project even though I might have returned to it otherwise (I should have posted all of it in David's topic for posterity or in my last poll). One not surprising thing was that when a band with multiple lauded albums amongst the Prognoscenti started appearing in the list like with PFM and BdMS, it was common for another album or albums by the same band to appear in the ranking soon. This happened with Gentle Giant and some others.

This happens often because when fans of a band rate one album by a band high, they commonly also rate other "respected" albums by that band highly. So you do get these kinds of clusters and one who rates PFM albums, and rates them highly, is more likely than most to also rate BdSM album highly (shared audiences) and so those often will cluster into the rankings not too far apart.

PFM had an album ranking at 1601 and at 1602 of all album in RYM. BdSM had a fair distance between the rankings of its albums with 1675 and 1814, when dealing with so many albums, and only including the ones included in Prog Archives, that number does not seem very much. It probably seems a much bigger difference in ranking for those types who only focus on the top 100 or so of the general music lists, but I went through significantly more than 5000 albums even though my polls stopped before then.

EDIT: I was looking through my polls again and I did miss it there as it was in poll 16: Area - Arbeit macht frei (2183) I had remembered it doing quite well at RYM. 2183 may seem low a ranking to some, but that's a very good score when looking at the overall numbers and what it is higher than -- when you're talking the kind of numbers of RYM and how little it can take in terms of average rating to significantly change the chart position. I love Area (one of my very favourites), so I had been anticipating that when I went down the charts.   I know, Lorenzo, that is a band you too hold in high regard (of course you being my number one Italian comrade).

Edited by Logan - June 03 2023 at 00:57
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 38363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2023 at 20:58
It's easy to spot the differences in albums covered with your highlights, but I think to highlight much more it is important to understand the differences in how the lists are derived, the contributors and how the sites operate. As you have specifically referenced rateyourmusic having multiple albums and I see thsat Ondarock has a maximum of two, this is a translation of what it says at Ondarock that I found the 70s list page

Originally posted by ondarock ondarock wrote:

Each participating editor or contributor compiles a list of titles related to the topic, representative of his or her perspective. To promote heterogeneity in general we impose only one or two records for each band.

The lists are collected and a score is associated with the first twenty discs mentioned: twenty points for the first in order, nineteen for the next, and so on. If a puck is mentioned by several participants, the points received by each are added up. By ordering the titles starting from the one with the most points, the final classification is obtained.

What you are reading is therefore a representation of the convergences and plurality of views among those who collaborate with Ondarock. It is not a table-built list, there are no Cencelli corrections and manuals. The only agreed element is given by the rules above.

It's a game, and we hope the outcome will intrigue readers as much as it does the participants. For those who want to dig further, the personal rankings of individual editors can be mines of discoveries. Happy exploring!


So they limit the number of albums that can be in the list, whereas rateyourmusic has no such restrictions. RYM's charts are just based on users ratings (average value of rating and number of ratings), and of course if many people like and rate one album by a band, it is likely that they will like and rate more albums by the band, thus multiple albums will be in the charts. I don't know how many contributors there are to Ondarock (how many people that list was derived from) but that is something I would wish to evaluate when making comparisons. It's a different thing being a rater just rating lots of albums you like, then a program computes all that those ratings for the ranking, than it is to be contributor to such lists because that becomes much more considered.

So while there are similarities in the albums, the charts are rather apples and oranges because of the differences in how they are derived.

Edited by Logan - June 01 2023 at 21:07
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 6052
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamesbaldwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2023 at 17:42
Let's take the era of progressive, the Seventies:

RYM top 38

1) PF: Wish
2) PF: Dark
3) Bowie: Ziggy
4) BS: Paranoid
5) KC: Red
6) PF: Animals
7) Drake: Pink
8) S. Wonder: Songs
9) Joy Division: Unknown
10) M. Davis: Bitches

----

11) Bowie: Low
12) Yes: Close
13) Television: Marquee
14) M Gaye : Whats
15) Led Zepp IV
16) BS: Masters
17) Dylan: Blood
18) Bowie: Station
19) Can: Future Days
20) S Wonder: innvervisions
21) Black Sabbath
22) Can: Tago Mago
23) Nascimento: Clube
24) Stooges: Fun
25) Young: After
26) Bowie: Hunk
27) Steve Reich
28) Clash: London Calling
29) F Mac Rumors
30) Young: On The Beach
31) Harrison: All Things
32) A. Coltrane: Journey...
33) J Micthell: Blue
34) Eno: Another
35) KC: Larks
36) Cohen: Songs of...
37) Can: Ege
38) TH: Fear of Music

In black the albums of RYM also present on Ondarock. In green those of RYM absent on Ondarock.

What can we notice?
1) Bowie: 4 albums
2) PF: 3 albums (in the Top 10)! Black Sabbat and Can: 3 albums!!!
4) KC, Wonder, Young, 2 albums.



Ondarock:
1) Bowie: Low
2) Joy Division: Unknown
3) Television: Marquee
4) Bowie: Ziggy
5) Suicide: Suicide
6) KC: Red
7) Wyatt: Rock Bottom
8) PF: Dark
9) Led Zepp IV
10) Kraftwerk - The Man...

---------
11) BS: Paranoid
12) Can: Tago Mago
13) Yes: Close
14) Clash: London Calling
15) M. Davis: Bitches
16) Rolling Stones: Sticky Fingers
17) Pere Ubu: Modern Dance
18)  Young: On The Beach
19) Roxy Music: For Your Pleasure
20) stooges: Fun
21) Reed: Berlin
22) Reed: Transformer
23) Drake: pink Moon
24) Neu
25) Kraftwerk: Trans...
26) Soft Machine 3
27) Genesis: The Lamb
28) Nico: Desert Shore
29) Faust I
30) M. Gaye: Whats...
31) Gang of Four: Entertainment
32) Genesis: Selling
33) Sex Pistols: Never Mind...
34) Young: Harvest
35) PF: Wish You...
36) Bowie: Heroes
37) Van der Graaf: Pawn Hearts
38) Residents: Not Avalaible

In black the albums of Ondarock also present on RYM. In red those of Ondarock absent on RYM.

Discover

- similarities
- differences.


Edited by jamesbaldwin - June 01 2023 at 18:03
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 21548
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nogbad_The_Bad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2023 at 17:03
OK Computer 14
In Rainbows 13
The King Of Limbs 13
Kid A 12

Bruce - I got nothing
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 38363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2023 at 14:36
Originally posted by Jared Jared wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Interesting that Springsteen has more votes. I knew that Radiohead does have many detractors (as one person memorably had put it, music to slit your wrists to).


Yep, I think that was me... Approve


Could well be, it was years ago but it stuck with me. I was no Radiohead fan for many years, but little things started to turn me around. I really liked 2016's A Moon Shaped Pool, and this sequence from Westworld got to me.



Edited by Logan - June 01 2023 at 14:42
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).
Back to Top
Jared View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20709
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jared Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2023 at 14:30
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Interesting that Springsteen has more votes. I knew that Radiohead does have many detractors (as one person memorably had put it, music to slit your wrists to).

Yep, I think that was me... Approve
Back to Top
Jared View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20709
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jared Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2023 at 14:28
A really easy one for me.... Bruce all the way... Asbury Park, Born To Run, Darkness, the starkness of Nebraska, the more commercial rockiness of USA... generally excellent stuff, although like Steve Earle and Jackson Browne, he doesn't get a listen these days....

Simply can't stand Radiohead I'm afraid...
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 38363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2023 at 10:49
Thanks Lorenzo, I have a strange interest in these kinds of statistics and their implications/ what one can infer from them. This conversation has been getting my brain to work a little better, I think. I've been taking meds for a serious case of shingles (a kind of herpes, but not the kind born of any fun). Your top 20 does seem great to me and shows to me how much we value the same music highly (that could mostly be my own list). I will listen to Born to Run by the way, as other than the BS I have heard and liked from you, I just had this bad feeling from the radio hits I grew up with. I did quite like Cheech's Born in East LA.

Edited by Logan - June 01 2023 at 10:50
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 6052
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamesbaldwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2023 at 10:40
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Interesting that Springsteen has more votes. I knew that Radiohead does have many detractors (as one person memorably had put it, music to slit your wrists too).

Originally posted by Pekka Pekka wrote:

...OK Computer is my favorite album from the entire bunch but there's a lot more good stuff to listen to from Bruce. So it's all very even! But if I have to choose I'll go with Springsteen because of the longevity and live work....


Yours is a particularly interesting post to me especially in the context of how this poll came to be based on a conversation in another topic. For those that didn't notice the genesis of this, it was over concerns that Radiohead albums ranked higher at RateYourMusic than various classic artists, and in fact until not that long ago OK Computer was the number one ranked album in the Rate Your Music charts (now number two) with a 4.26 rating, 89,734 ratings and 1,671 reviews. As that is your favourite album of the bunch, were you to rate say on   the right scale then that would get the highest rating for you.

I actually had thought about phrasing this poll as which of these artists has the higher ranked album, or some such thing but the issue raised was not just that OK Computer is ranked over these classic artists at a site for rating albums you know and like, but that Radiohead and others have, I think this is a fair summation, too many in the top 100 or so to take the list seriously, or something.... And the classics which may have 15,000 to going on 25, 000 ratings or so for certain albums (I did the stats earlier) are being ignored by not ranking higher (the ranking being based on the number of ratings as well as the average of the ratings) than they do I have a very different take and angle on this, which is why this has been discussed with a few of us participating over many thousands of words in this thread and others.

Bruce Springsteen's top rated album there, Born to Run has a 3.95 rating, 15,715 ratings by the way. His next most popular, Nebraska, has 11,538 ratings, Born in the USA has 10,045 ratings. Those all would be very high numbers at PA, but RYM of course is much bigger. By comparison, Close to the Edge at PA has 4, 944 ratings. Springsteen has six albums at RYM with considerably higher numbers of ratings than Close to The Edge here, and another that has almost as many ratings. So not ignored, just a smaller number of fan raters than various others at RYM.

I must admit a fact: if I observe the charts for decade, RYM is not so bad. The main problem is the Top albums of all time: in that case some popular artists of the Sixties, Seventies and Eighties find place in the at the back because only a few artists have very high ratings, and so these artists occupy the top positions with many albums.

Tonight I will try to make comparisons per decade between RYM and Italian Ondarock, and you will see the similarities and differences.


Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 38363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2023 at 10:22
Interesting that Springsteen has more votes. I knew that Radiohead does have many detractors (as one person memorably had put it, music to slit your wrists too).

Originally posted by Pekka Pekka wrote:

...OK Computer is my favorite album from the entire bunch but there's a lot more good stuff to listen to from Bruce. So it's all very even! But if I have to choose I'll go with Springsteen because of the longevity and live work....


Yours is a particularly interesting post to me especially in the context of how this poll came to be based on a conversation in another topic. For those that didn't notice the genesis of this, it was over concerns that Radiohead albums ranked higher at RateYourMusic than various classic artists, and in fact until not that long ago OK Computer was the number one ranked album in the Rate Your Music charts (now number two) with a 4.26 rating, 89,734 ratings and 1,671 reviews. As that is your favourite album of the bunch, were you to rate say on   the right scale then that would get the highest rating for you.

I actually had thought about phrasing this poll as which of these artists has the higher ranked album, or some such thing but the issue raised was not just that OK Computer is ranked over these classic artists at a site for rating albums you know and like, but that Radiohead and others have, I think this is a fair summation, too many in the top 100 or so to take the list seriously, or something.... And the classics which may have 15,000 to going on 25, 000 ratings or so for certain albums (I did the stats earlier) are being ignored by not ranking higher (the ranking being based on the number of ratings as well as the average of the ratings) than they do I have a very different take and angle on this, which is why this has been discussed with a few of us participating over many thousands of words in this thread and others.

Bruce Springsteen's top rated album there, Born to Run has a 3.95 rating, 15,715 ratings by the way. His next most popular, Nebraska, has 11,538 ratings, Born in the USA has 10,045 ratings. Those all would be very high numbers at PA, but RYM of course is much bigger. By comparison, Close to the Edge at PA has 4, 944 ratings. Springsteen has six albums at RYM with considerably higher numbers of ratings than Close to The Edge here, and another that has almost as many ratings. So not ignored, just a smaller number of fan raters than various others at RYM.
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).
Back to Top
Pekka View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 03 2006
Location: Espoo, Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 6457
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pekka Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2023 at 07:31
I think (maybe excluding some very latest Bruce albums) I've got pretty much the whole discographies from both on my shelves. Both have some really great albums (OK, Kid, Rainbows / pretty much everything from Born to Run to Born in the USA) and some that I barely ever listen to (Pablo, Bends, Moon / pretty much everything from the 90s onwards). 

OK Computer is my favorite album from the entire bunch but there's a lot more good stuff to listen to from Bruce. So it's all very even! But if I have to choose I'll go with Springsteen because of the longevity and live work.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.180 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.